These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

[Galatea] First batch of sov capture iterations

First post First post
Author
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#661 - 2015-08-20 11:57:51 UTC
Icycle wrote:
We have adapted over time.


Not from what I can see. Biting ankles and talking unjustified amounts of smack has not changed in any way so as to require adaptation.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Icycle
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#662 - 2015-08-20 12:04:02 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Icycle wrote:
We have adapted over time.


Not from what I can see. Biting ankles and talking unjustified amounts of smack has not changed in any way so as to require adaptation.


I dont see any smack talk here. At least not from my side...It maybe sound like smack to you defenetly not me.
So there is a change to entosis ships among others. Its far from ideal from what it was before but we will adapt. We can still work under these changes. We will adapt. Like to see you try that for a change.
Sgt Ocker
What Corp is it
#663 - 2015-08-20 12:12:30 UTC
Speedkermit Damo wrote:

I'm getting plenty of fights in my alliance thanks. And I'm not the one complaining about a lack of content or fights. I was referring to the posters who are complaining about having no-one to shoot while surrounded by blues.
Damn that must have been one tough solo pvp myrm, 34 of eves best to kill him.
Now that's some pretty awesome content right there.

My opinions are mine.

  If you don't like them or disagree with me that's OK.- - - - - - Just don't bother Hating - I don't care

It really is getting harder and harder to justify $23 a month for each sub.

Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#664 - 2015-08-20 12:14:47 UTC
Orca Platypus wrote:
They had a valid reason to ***** about it, now situation has changed to the better.
From a perspective of dominionfags, situation is terrible indeed - it is so hard to hold all those systems you don't use, don't need, don't live in, but need so much for... what again?
Once again, downsize to what you use, and viola - trollceptor immunity has been achieved.
And MoA doesn't really want to troll - they just want to help you downsize, that's it.
Only in your opinion has it change for the better. Objectively, kill numbers in nullsec are down by 16% compared to last year and 11% compared to last month and the server population is continuing to decline.

And no, it's not hard to hold systems. This is what you fail to understand by not being part of sov. We can hold a large number of systems each with more potential for use by players with an even greater ease, because sov trolling doesn't actually mean sov gets taken. You still need a bigger stick than the other guy to take and hold sov. The new system is even more of a reason to get more blues and sign more non-invasion agreements.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#665 - 2015-08-20 12:19:21 UTC  |  Edited by: Lucas Kell
Icycle wrote:
If you got to be prooven that fact specially when everybody says null is boring....I wont say anymore not to offend...
It's boring now, with the new mechanics. That tells me that the new mechanics are what are killing the game, not that we are blue. Coalitions have existed for a long time and the population has gone up. Now that coalitions are being aggressively attacked though mechanics changes the population is going down. You can't prove that coalitions are bad for the game because they aren't.

Icycle wrote:
Good for you! Dont do anything. Dont reset or redeploy. Stay at home whining about why you cant kill stuff. More targets I have to shoot. See if I care. In the end its your loss not mine. I got more than enough targets to shoot.
We're not whining about why we can't kill stuff. As we always have, we can roam around and find fight just like you do. What we are doing here is pointing out that the mechanics will increase the level of stagnation in null because they are badly thought out. People like you are happy to see the game lose subscribers as long as it benefits you.

FYI: This blog post goes a long way to explaining why people don't just unblue for the sake of it and why mechanics need to change to drive conflict.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Warmeister
Tactical Farmers.
Pandemic Horde
#666 - 2015-08-20 12:40:25 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
Icycle wrote:
If you got to be prooven that fact specially when everybody says null is boring....I wont say anymore not to offend...
It's boring now, with the new mechanics. That tells me that the new mechanics are what are killing the game, not that we are blue.

your coalition policy is creating boredom for it's members and foes. embrace it. that's how your leaders want it to be. no fun allowed.

do the same thing you did when you were forced to grind structures in bombers
Icycle
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#667 - 2015-08-20 12:41:01 UTC  |  Edited by: Icycle
Lucas Kell wrote:
Icycle wrote:
If you got to be prooven that fact specially when everybody says null is boring....I wont say anymore not to offend...
It's boring now, with the new mechanics. That tells me that the new mechanics are what are killing the game, not that we are blue. Coalitions have existed for a long time and the population has gone up. Now that coalitions are being aggressively attacked though mechanics changes the population is going down. You can't prove that coalitions are bad for the game because they aren't.

Icycle wrote:
Good for you! Dont do anything. Dont reset or redeploy. Stay at home whining about why you cant kill stuff. More targets I have to shoot. See if I care. In the end its your loss not mine. I got more than enough targets to shoot.
We're not whining about why we can't kill stuff. As we always have, we can roam around and find fight just like you do. What we are doing here is pointing out that the mechanics will increase the level of stagnation in null because they are badly thought out. People like you are happy to see the game lose subscribers as long as it benefits you.


The new mechanics killing the game? So after DRF seized to exist and a blue blob formed in the north and a series of blue blobs in the south, the game subscription began to take a tomble. There was some events that did not really measured up to their hipe and some disapointments began. There was very few actual good events. Before 2013, eve is full of series of great events.
In 2013 the game so famous chart of user subscription that people keep showing on an on, it shows a steady decrease for ages of pilots. I am a been playing this game forever. So it shows a steadelly decreasing since before Sep 2013. It not this sov. So thats debunked! No more lies plz. This is put to rest!

You cant fight fight cos there is no one to shoot. How many times i got to say this? You got too many blues! Its your fault not CCP! The level of stagnation is defined by level acitivty. If players like you are so bent on staying and set everyone to blue well what do you get? I mean seriously what you expect? Another DRF? Maybe who knows but you still got old DRF members blue or friendly. So i dont see how this is going to happen....Agin your fault, just in case you miss that too!
I am not happy to lose game subscription even thought I was one of the people shooting Jita monument in the riot.
Thats one reason I want people to reset to go back to the old chaotic eve, that was much more fun. These were the days when there was not so much blues.
Arkady Romanov
Whole Squid
#668 - 2015-08-20 12:47:27 UTC
Warmeister wrote:
Lucas Kell wrote:
Icycle wrote:
If you got to be prooven that fact specially when everybody says null is boring....I wont say anymore not to offend...
It's boring now, with the new mechanics. That tells me that the new mechanics are what are killing the game, not that we are blue.

your coalition policy is creating boredom for it's members and foes. embrace it. that's how your leaders want it to be. no fun allowed.

do the same thing you did when you were forced to grind structures in bombers



No, our policy is to create boredom for our enemies. When we talk about no fun allowed, we're talking about you.

Whole Squid: Get Inked.

Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#669 - 2015-08-20 12:55:05 UTC  |  Edited by: Lucas Kell
Warmeister wrote:
your coalition policy is creating boredom for it's members and foes. embrace it. that's how your leaders want it to be. no fun allowed.

do the same thing you did when you were forced to grind structures in bombers
Do you honestly believe this? For it's members, fun is a priority. You think you'd really hold on to this meany members if you couldn't entertain them? As for enemies, that's more propaganda than anything else, but yeah, the most efficient way of winning a battle is making your enemies choose not to fight. The goal of game mechanics is to make sure that fighting is always a good choice. That's called driving conflict. These new mehcanics make that even less important. Honestly I didn't think they could come up with a way to drive less conflict than dominion, but CCP surprises us once again.

Icycle wrote:
The new mechanics killing the game? So after DRF seized to exist and a blue blob formed in the north and a series of blue blobs in the south, the game subscription began to take a tomble. There was some events that did not really measured up to their hipe and some disapointments began. There was very few actual good events. Before 2013, eve is full of series of great events.
In 2013 the game so famous chart of user subscription that people keep showing on an on, it shows a steady decrease for ages of pilots. I am a been playing this game forever. So it shows a steadelly decreasing since before Sep 2013. It not this sov. So thats debunked! No more lies plz. This is put to rest!
They aren't the only reason for the drop in population, but they are certainly a contributing factor to the recent dip. Go ahead and pull out the stats and there's a clear drop at each stage of this sov release.

And if you've been around for a long time, you should know that a major selling point of EVE has always been the massive fleet battles. Those are almost dead now and will be further reduced if these mechanics continue to be rolled out.

Icycle wrote:
You cant fight fight cos there is no one to shoot. How many times i got to say this? You got too many blues! Its your fault not CCP! The level of stagnation is defined by level acitivty. If players like you are so bent on staying and set everyone to blue well what do you get? I mean seriously what you expect? Another DRF? Maybe who knows but you still got old DRF members blue or friendly. So i dont see how this is going to happen....Agin your fault, just in case you miss that too!
I am not happy to lose game subscription even thought I was one of the people shooting Jita monument in the riot.

Thats one reason I want people to reset to go back to the old chaotic eve, that was much more fun. These were the days when there was not so much blues.
Of course there's people to fight! If we want to fight we can easily find one. Everyone hates us remember. Just because we have a lot of allies, it doesn't mean we don't also have a lot of enemies. We simply have not reason to do it.

Us resetting, it will not happen. If CCP aren't putting in reasons for us to fight, we're not going to do it. That's like asking a shopkeeper to stop selling his best selling products just for a challenge. It makes no sense. If null stagnates further it's all on CCP. If they can't design a game that drives conflict then their game will die. It's really that simple.

And obviously you don't care about loss of subs, which is why you are selfishly supporting mechanics that benefit you while harming the core of what makes EVE different from other MMOs.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Querns
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#670 - 2015-08-20 12:58:38 UTC
Aiyshimin wrote:
Querns wrote:
Sentamon wrote:

Nobody will ever take you on, ever ... unless CCP starts giving out free Titans and someone else wants to run a 50k coalition.
A 1v1 with entosis pilots is about the best you can hope for, but you send overwhelming numbers at him too and cant figure out why he runs.

But keep on recruiting and blueing and don't let the door hit you on the ass when you leave.

I love that the idea that the Imperium's invincibility is so assured that even people who hate the coalition are accepting it as gospel.

It's probably our most successful piece of agitprop ever, and it's at its strongest when the barrier to entry for sov warfare is at its lowest.


Being universally despised as an opponent is not exaclty the same as being invincible. Nobody wants to play with you or like you play, we prefer enjoying our lives and computer games.

That's the stuff.

This post was crafted by the wormhole expert of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal, the foremost authority on Eve: Online economics and gameplay.

Speedkermit Damo
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#671 - 2015-08-20 13:00:40 UTC
Sgt Ocker wrote:
Speedkermit Damo wrote:

I'm getting plenty of fights in my alliance thanks. And I'm not the one complaining about a lack of content or fights. I was referring to the posters who are complaining about having no-one to shoot while surrounded by blues.
Damn that must have been one tough solo pvp myrm, 34 of eves best to kill him.
Now that's some pretty awesome content right there.


Your kill board had better be awesome, if you even have one.

Protect me from knowing what I don't need to know. Protect me from even knowing that there are things to know that I don't know. Protect me from knowing that I decided not to know about the things that I decided not to know about. Amen.

Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#672 - 2015-08-20 13:16:07 UTC
Speedkermit Damo wrote:
I'm getting plenty of fights in my alliance thanks. And I'm not the one complaining about a lack of content or fights. I was referring to the posters who are complaining about having no-one to shoot while surrounded by blues.
Just out of curiosity, who is it complaining about having noone to shoot?

For the most part the problem isn't that there's noone to shoot, it's that the mechanics to start conflict over space ownership are boring (mining structures), the ability for solo players to contest sov make it too risky to deploy over a moderate distance and that more people will run when engaged now as their ships aren't fitted for conflict. There's plenty of people to shoot, just nothing driving us to do so. Personally I'm quite happy plodding along with my traders while CCP break null, but it's not really very good for the long term health of the game.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Icycle
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#673 - 2015-08-20 13:22:10 UTC  |  Edited by: Icycle
Lucas Kell wrote:

They aren't the only reason for the drop in population, but they are certainly a contributing factor to the recent dip. Go ahead and pull out the stats and there's a clear drop at each stage of this sov release.

And if you've been around for a long time, you should know that a major selling point of EVE has always been the massive fleet battles. Those are almost dead now and will be further reduced if these mechanics continue to be rolled out.


While there was a significant increase of user during the dominion and DRF invasion, it was followed by a quick downfall.
The battle aint all. ISK drives it too big time. During Dominion it was really easy to make much more isk due to bugs and the trend at that time that everyone wanted to move to null. There was no system that did not have a carrrier. Everyone was ratting like crazy. High sec numbers went really down and high sec war deckers whined and CCP fixed the bugs and then nerfed it. Number began to take a tumble again. Now CCP made it really easy to make even more isk wit hthe buff to systems. There are so many anomolies I cant eevn count them!

The most significant change is without a doubt is that there is not enough action in eve. In the last few years the same sov did jack for numbers even with B-R5RB event. Its not sov. Its people opting out of pvp and unsubscribing alts. If I was in the CFC, I would probably unsubsribe too my alts. There is so much safety in numbers that makes no sence to have alts. Besides you are not getting the fights.

Lucas Kell wrote:

It will not happen. If CCP aren't putting in reasons for us to fight, we're not going to do it. That's like asking a shopkeeper to stop selling his best selling products just for a challenge. It makes no sense. If null stagnates further it's all on CCP. If they can't design a game that drives conflict then their game will die. It's really that simple.


NCDot and DRF did not have a reason to fight besides beef over past eve events. Not CCP, but eve players. B-R5RB was pritty much an accident from a bad decision from N3. They ignored the first rule in eve when capitals. Load grid first or suicide.
War between the russians that just ended, also a beef over events in the past. Goons causing the destruction of BOB, also a beef event. The destruction of Atlas also a beef. The destruction of PL in fountain also over beef. The destruction of Goons by IT Alliance also a beef. The invasion of Goons into Esoteria and subsecuent dispatched of Goons back home was also over a beef in a thread. The first war between Goons and BOB also over a beef.
CCP DOES NOT PUT THE REASON TO FIGHT. PLAYERS DRAMA DOES IT ALL THE TIME!!!!!!
I cant believe your character is so old and you havent noticed this already?
Its players that generate content not CCP! Quit blaiming them for your faults!
bigbillthaboss3
Amok.
Goonswarm Federation
#674 - 2015-08-20 13:29:20 UTC
The issue isn't all of FozzieSov, a majority of us like the concept. It needs work, however.

Zipping around at 4 km/s, in an interceptor, and clicking a button should not in any way give you ownership in null sec sovereignty. Sovereignty should be fought over and influence a push of assets by group A versus current sov citizens group B. If an entity wants to take space, they need to dedicate themselves to it, not send a lone interceptor with the belief "If you don't get it now, just go back and try again in a little bit. They will eventually get tired of responding."

Another issue is there needs to be some form of shooting something, but I believe that will be addressed with the citadels patch.

I am willing to bet once people start entosis'ing things in ships cruiser size and up you will see some fights start developing.



Also please ignore the MoA trolling (and obvious alts), they use to be in CFC and are just mad at us for kicking them from the pack. Try and stay on topic.
Warmeister
Tactical Farmers.
Pandemic Horde
#675 - 2015-08-20 13:38:49 UTC
bigbillthaboss3 wrote:
The issue isn't all of FozzieSov, a majority of us like the concept. It needs work, however.

Zipping around at 4 km/s, in an interceptor, and clicking a button should not in any way give you ownership in null sec sovereignty. Sovereignty should be fought over and influence a push of assets by group A versus current sov citizens group B. If an entity wants to take space, they need to dedicate themselves to it, not send a lone interceptor with the belief "If you don't get it now, just go back and try again in a little bit. They will eventually get tired of responding."
.

you are quite right. it's not zipping around in interceptor that gives the ownership, it's failure of defenders to show up.
if an entity wants to hold space, they need to dedicate themselves to it, and show up for defense. it shouldn't be based on defender sitting docked up protected by gazillions of HP
LujTic
Green Visstick High
#676 - 2015-08-20 13:43:33 UTC
Although I think these changes are positive, I think they are just a band-aid for a new design that failed. This isn't going to fix the problem. I think the new mechanics for Citadels are much better and I hope that this is just a stop-gap measure to keep more players from leaving the game until Citadels are released and those mechanics can be properly tested ingame. There is no good reason to have different mechanics for PoSses, Citadels and sov structures. We just need one mechanic that works.
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#677 - 2015-08-20 13:45:37 UTC
Icycle wrote:
While there was a significant increase of user during the dominion and DRF invasion, it was followed by a quick downfall.
The battle aint all. ISK drives it too big time. During Dominion it was really easy to make much more isk due to bugs and the trend at that time that everyone wanted to move to null. There was no system that did not have a carrrier. Everyone was ratting like crazy. High sec numbers went really down and high sec war deckers whined and CCP fixed the bugs and then nerfed it. Number began to take a tumble again. Now CCP made it really easy to make even more isk wit hthe buff to systems. There are so many anomolies I cant eevn count them!
ISK is always easy to make. Incursions, high sec trading and FW all exist.

Icycle wrote:
The most significant change is without a doubt is that there is not enough action in eve. In the last few years the same sov did jack for numbers even with B-R5RB event. Its not sov. Its people opting out of pvp and unsubscribing alts. If I was in the CFC, I would probably unsubsribe too my alts. There is so much safety in numbers that makes no sence to have alts. Besides you are not getting the fights.
Sov didn't do much, but news articles of epic battles with $300,000 in damages did and those battles occurred because of committed assets in null. Those types of battles will no longer occur under the current system since people no longer need to commit assets to take sov.

Icycle wrote:
NCDot and DRF did not have a reason to fight besides beef over past eve events. Not CCP, but eve players. B-R5RB was pritty much an accident from a bad decision from N3. They ignored the first rule in eve when capitals. Load grid first or suicide.
War between the russians that just ended, also a beef over events in the past. Goons causing the destruction of BOB, also a beef event. The destruction of Atlas also a beef. The destruction of PL in fountain also over beef. The destruction of Goons by IT Alliance also a beef. The invasion of Goons into Esoteria and subsecuent dispatched of Goons back home was also over a beef in a thread. The first war between Goons and BOB also over a beef.
CCP DOES NOT PUT THE REASON TO FIGHT. PLAYERS DRAMA DOES IT ALL THE TIME!!!!!!
I cant believe your character is so old and you havent noticed this already?
Its players that generate content not CCP! Quit blaiming them for your faults!
They may not have had a reason to start the fight, but the mechanics are why the fight escalated. Fights will invariably be because group A can't deal peacefully with group B and often because of resources (see the entire fountain war), but thanks to the new mechanics, when that happens no big battle occurs. We have people now citing 60b in losses as an epic scale battle. That's horrendous to be quite honest.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Icycle
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#678 - 2015-08-20 13:46:10 UTC
bigbillthaboss3 wrote:
The issue isn't all of FozzieSov, a majority of us like the concept. It needs work, however.

Zipping around at 4 km/s, in an interceptor, and clicking a button should not in any way give you ownership in null sec sovereignty. Sovereignty should be fought over and influence a push of assets by group A versus current sov citizens group B. If an entity wants to take space, they need to dedicate themselves to it, not send a lone interceptor with the belief "If you don't get it now, just go back and try again in a little bit. They will eventually get tired of responding."

Another issue is there needs to be some form of shooting something, but I believe that will be addressed with the citadels patch.

I am willing to bet once people start entosis'ing things in ships cruiser size and up you will see some fights start developing.



Also please ignore the MoA trolling (and obvious alts), they use to be in CFC and are just mad at us for kicking them from the pack. Try and stay on topic.


lol, how nice..a personal attack.
What else you are going to call me next?
It makes me feel warm in the inside.

Do you know that we also do cruiser entosis? Or have you missed it?
Frostys Virpio
State War Academy
Caldari State
#679 - 2015-08-20 13:46:23 UTC
Warmeister wrote:
bigbillthaboss3 wrote:
The issue isn't all of FozzieSov, a majority of us like the concept. It needs work, however.

Zipping around at 4 km/s, in an interceptor, and clicking a button should not in any way give you ownership in null sec sovereignty. Sovereignty should be fought over and influence a push of assets by group A versus current sov citizens group B. If an entity wants to take space, they need to dedicate themselves to it, not send a lone interceptor with the belief "If you don't get it now, just go back and try again in a little bit. They will eventually get tired of responding."
.

you are quite right. it's not zipping around in interceptor that gives the ownership, it's failure of defenders to show up.
if an entity wants to hold space, they need to dedicate themselves to it, and show up for defense. it shouldn't be based on defender sitting docked up protected by gazillions of HP


How long would you tolerate a kid playing ding dong ditch at your door?

You can't unplug the door bell (they will just knock instead) but if you decide to ignore them, they get to own a room in your house.
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#680 - 2015-08-20 13:48:49 UTC
Warmeister wrote:
you are quite right. it's not zipping around in interceptor that gives the ownership, it's failure of defenders to show up.
if an entity wants to hold space, they need to dedicate themselves to it, and show up for defense. it shouldn't be based on defender sitting docked up protected by gazillions of HP
Then why not make it so entosis modules can only go on a a BC or above? If the defenders don't show up, then ship type is irrelevant. The only reason people want to use interceptors is so they can run away when defenders do show up. Tell me I'm wrong.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.