Player Features and Ideas Discussion

that reset would be nice and sure would generate content for all.but i think ccp needs to do that with the removal of standings,allow 1 blue alliance,1 red alliance and the rest is nuetral..

Not even a sub-atomic particle of reality comes close to proving you are right on anything you have argued under this thread, and you repeatedly saying that you are right will not change that. :)

But hey, please do keep up with your plan, maybe it will work on the 493125th try.

I don't see anyone proposing "Mordus Angels members need to develop further brain cells" as a solution against the deficiencies of Fozzie Sov, therefore, you will not find many people that take your ridiculous suggestions such as "unblue your allies" or "undock your alts and shoot them with your main" and such seriously.

typical goon nub,im not a moa alt infact

sorry to mess up "your" thread,are you bitter about your loss?

It was said we wont b*tch about it an we will adapt. It says alot more than CFC tears have
I am not sure of the context you are usingf deficiency.
But what CCP said, this will give a bit more advantages to the attacker than the defender which is a step in the right direction I think. So far it does what it says.
I am not going to care if you dont like it cos you dont care that I like it
It is true CCP did not supply in game tools and we have to use external ones. That needs fixing.
The lack of content its not a new thing. It has been happening for years. Several years back you guys reseted temporarelly to create content cos too many blues. Its not the first time it has happened. Again, its YOUR and YOUR Alliance fault, not CCP.
You create content, not CCP!
Why deploy to providence is canceled? That you alliance fault too!

question for all those ppl teaching the rest of us how to catch trollceptors: what happens when a trollceptor orbiting a structure at 24.5 km move let's say 20km away and breaks his locking range? can he warp away or not?

Is there a good reason why not to add a requirement for attacking to be at war with the alliance you are attacking?

concord is already involved with the new sov mechanics, so adding a requirement for people to declare war would make logical sense. and it would force trolls to put in a bit of extra effort before attacking.

thoughts?

Not until entosis cycle completes.


They had a valid reason to ***** about it, now situation has changed to the better.
From a perspective of dominionfags, situation is terrible indeed - it is so hard to hold all those systems you don't use, don't need, don't live in, but need so much for... what again?
Once again, downsize to what you use, and viola - trollceptor immunity has been achieved.
And MoA doesn't really want to troll - they just want to help you downsize, that's it.

Prove that it's killing the game. The only people that believe that are your "grr goons" type who are typically butthurt over being rejected by the larger coalitions. Large groups with large fleets aren't just good for the game, they are what makes EVE stand out from the rest.

An no, we don;t need to reset or redeploy. We can simply continue to sit in our big groups being untouchable by groups like you. The new sov mechanics have made the game more boring, but not more difficult.

if he was entosing, he cant warp away. All it can do is burn away until cycle finishes. The cycles are very long
So all you have to do is have a faster ship. Example I got caught by a ship was doing 7000m/s and by another doing 13000m/s in another day