These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE Alliance Tournament Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

AT XIII RULING: Together We Solo vs Gone Critical - Team Warp-in

First post
Author
General Vachot
The Vendunari
End of Life
#61 - 2015-08-16 05:59:20 UTC
I agree that a rematch as first match is best way to resolve this. Or at the very least if you don't plan to change the decision in any way then at leats award Gone critical 1 set of the BPC?
Scipio Artelius
Weaponised Vegemite
Flying Dangerous
#62 - 2015-08-16 06:14:27 UTC  |  Edited by: Scipio Artelius
General Vachot wrote:
I agree that a rematch as first match is best way to resolve this. Or at the very least if you don't plan to change the decision in any way then at leats award Gone critical 1 set of the BPC?

The only issue I have with a rematch is that it exposes another one of both teams doctrines and may leave one or both of the teams short when they fight just a couple of hours later, giving them limited choices against any bans that occur in the later fight against us.

That seems overly harsh on Gone Critical, who abided by the rules and don't deserve to be subject to a second fight for round one. If they lose the fight, they will end up right where they are now, but potentially without a doctrine they might otherwise be able to use.

At the end of the day, it's the team's responsibility to abide by the rules of the tournament. Even in the case where a referee misses something, that is only there as a check of everything. It's still up to the teams to play according to the rules. So I think it's a bit harsh on Gone Critical to almost penalise them for doing the right thing, while allowing Together We Solo the opportunity to get away rewarded for their breach of the rules.
Jamir Von Lietuva
Nameless Minions
GaNg BaNg TeAm
#63 - 2015-08-16 06:15:56 UTC  |  Edited by: Jamir Von Lietuva
This is simple, you cheat, you loose or even get kicked from the tourney. If you cheat you do not deserve a replay.

as a competitor tourney is hard as it is, now we have to not only play with the meta we have but question every match if they have crystals or slaves in, maybe halos, what if their cheating flagship does not die and we loose? This puts an unnecessary mental strain on participants and it's super simple to solve.

Cant follow rules - get REKT.

also i want my Flycatcher reimbursed

EDIT: I'm super salty about That Escalated Quickly killing the flagship wreck
Ospie
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#64 - 2015-08-16 06:21:50 UTC
I also would like to see this ruling reversed. The match would have gone very differently had the warp-ins been legal, there shouldn't be any leniency towards breaking the rules - intentional or not. The AT is meant to A) Provide an event for the Eve community, B) Provide an opportunity for groups to put their best forwards to fight under 'fair / equal' conditions to determine the better team in each match, C) Showcase Eve as an MMO with a competitive, innovative player base to attract future players.

This decision insults A & B and shows Eve in a poor light.
Primary This Rifter
Mutual Fund of the Something
#65 - 2015-08-16 06:55:08 UTC
Every year it's more stories like this.

No wonder people are losing interest.
Ole Sukarala
Northern Ghosts
#66 - 2015-08-16 07:09:05 UTC  |  Edited by: Ole Sukarala
You cant possibly be serious about this and let that rule breaking go unpunished. Even if the rule breaking team had lost. a what-if is not needed here - a violation of rules needs to be sanctioned. Referee mistakes can happen but you have to fix it afterwards or nobody will take the rules serious anymore.

really bad start for ATXIII Cry
Buhhdust Princess
Mind Games.
Suddenly Spaceships.
#67 - 2015-08-16 08:15:44 UTC
Ok we are going to bring a triage archon and see if CCP notices.

Make them rematch or take the losers bracket imo. Or have their 2 captains battle it out 1v1 battleships.
Officer Nyota Uhura
#68 - 2015-08-16 08:18:36 UTC  |  Edited by: Officer Nyota Uhura
The level of childishness in this thread makes me all giddy. "Well now you gave PL the permission to drop their super fleet." No they didn't. "Now people can use 6% implants." No they can't. "Now you can drop a triage archon there." No you can't. One referee missed a call, that's that. In what sports a bad referee call leads to changing the rules? That's just dumb talk out of your ass.

I'd like to see a world cup soccer game re-played because the referee did a minor mistake. I'd like to see olympics ice hockey game result declared invalid because referee didn't notice a bad substitution at some point.

But please go on making yourselves look silly; your tears keep the rest of us fueled.
lolcorpholder alt
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#69 - 2015-08-16 08:23:31 UTC
Officer Nyota Uhura wrote:
The level of childishness in this thread makes me all giddy. "Well now you gave PL the permission to drop their super fleet." No they didn't. "Now people can use 6% implants." No they can't. "Now you can drop a triage archon there." No you can't. One referee missed a call, that's that. In what sports a bad referee call leads to changing the rules? That's just dumb talk out of your ass.

I'd like to see a world cup soccer game re-played because the referee did a minor mistake. I'd like to see olympics ice hockey game result declared invalid because referee didn't notice a bad substitution at some point.

But please go on making yourselves look silly; your tears keep the rest of us fueled.



Except that it was two referees so far
ChaeDoc II
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#70 - 2015-08-16 08:25:59 UTC
It's a nonsense ruling but we're not going to get CCP to change their mind, and they shouldn't just because people don't like it.

What should happen now though is that some kind of penalty should still be applied to Together We Solo, like a 10 point penalty for their next match. The referees should have spotted it but them not doesn't mean TWS should get away with it without consequence.
lolcorpholder alt
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#71 - 2015-08-16 08:32:46 UTC
CCP Logibro wrote:
. We now have plans in place to improve the check for this in the tournament referee tools by the second weekend of play at latest.




Can you clarify that there will be no checks in place for this sunday?
Sgt Ocker
What Corp is it
#72 - 2015-08-16 08:34:25 UTC
Scipio Artelius wrote:
General Vachot wrote:
I agree that a rematch as first match is best way to resolve this. Or at the very least if you don't plan to change the decision in any way then at leats award Gone critical 1 set of the BPC?

The only issue I have with a rematch is that it exposes another one of both teams doctrines and may leave one or both of the teams short when they fight just a couple of hours later, giving them limited choices against any bans that occur in the later fight against us.

That seems overly harsh on Gone Critical, who abided by the rules and don't deserve to be subject to a second fight for round one. If they lose the fight, they will end up right where they are now, but potentially without a doctrine they might otherwise be able to use.

At the end of the day, it's the team's responsibility to abide by the rules of the tournament. Even in the case where a referee misses something, that is only there as a check of everything. It's still up to the teams to play according to the rules. So I think it's a bit harsh on Gone Critical to almost penalise them for doing the right thing, while allowing Together We Solo the opportunity to get away rewarded for their breach of the rules.

Simply fixed. The match would be a do-over.
Same ships same team members - Just placed on the field at the right start positions.

In fact if either team are given the option to use another doctrine it could bias the outcome.
If Gone Critical was going to win with the doctrine they chose, they have that same chance in a rematch.

CCP made a bad call here. The tournament has rules, they need to be adhered to or the whole competition becomes a farce.


My opinions are mine.

  If you don't like them or disagree with me that's OK.- - - - - - Just don't bother Hating - I don't care

It really is getting harder and harder to justify $23 a month for each sub.

lolcorpholder alt
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#73 - 2015-08-16 08:38:07 UTC
Sgt Ocker wrote:
Scipio Artelius wrote:
General Vachot wrote:
I agree that a rematch as first match is best way to resolve this. Or at the very least if you don't plan to change the decision in any way then at leats award Gone critical 1 set of the BPC?

The only issue I have with a rematch is that it exposes another one of both teams doctrines and may leave one or both of the teams short when they fight just a couple of hours later, giving them limited choices against any bans that occur in the later fight against us.

That seems overly harsh on Gone Critical, who abided by the rules and don't deserve to be subject to a second fight for round one. If they lose the fight, they will end up right where they are now, but potentially without a doctrine they might otherwise be able to use.

At the end of the day, it's the team's responsibility to abide by the rules of the tournament. Even in the case where a referee misses something, that is only there as a check of everything. It's still up to the teams to play according to the rules. So I think it's a bit harsh on Gone Critical to almost penalise them for doing the right thing, while allowing Together We Solo the opportunity to get away rewarded for their breach of the rules.

Simply fixed. The match would be a do-over.
Same ships same team members - Just placed on the field at the right start positions.

In fact if either team are given the option to use another doctrine it could bias the outcome.
If Gone Critical was going to win with the doctrine they chose, they have that same chance in a rematch.

CCP made a bad call here. The tournament has rules, they need to be adhered to or the whole competition becomes a farce.




Except both teams have probably analyzed their flying in that match and would now be way better prepared for the matchup, calling better primaries etc etc, so basically wouldn't be the same match anymore
Xola Zuni
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#74 - 2015-08-16 08:55:20 UTC  |  Edited by: Xola Zuni
Very bad call. Whether it was on purpose or not, it was a clear breach of rules.

It's not only that Gone Critical lost a match, they also lost 10 skins and their flagship.

At least a rematch (same comps) is due, I actually even think that Together We Solo deserves a forfeit loss as it seems like they did not inform CCP of their "mistake" before the match had started and were taking advantage from it.

With the double elimination system there is already enough room for second chances, as there will always be a losers bracket. So I do not see a single reason to be "nice" to rulebreakes.
Tallardar
Doomheim
#75 - 2015-08-16 08:56:22 UTC  |  Edited by: Tallardar
Primary This Rifter wrote:
Every year it's more stories like this.

No wonder people are losing interest.


The past few years have shown CCP aren't interested in running the AT, and if that's the case why would the players bother if the people running it don't care?
Ackaroth
Plundering Penguins
Solyaris Chtonium
#76 - 2015-08-16 09:08:19 UTC
What?

Poor form. Here's to hoping this decision gets reversed.
Scipio Artelius
Weaponised Vegemite
Flying Dangerous
#77 - 2015-08-16 09:21:25 UTC  |  Edited by: Scipio Artelius
Sgt Ocker wrote:
Simply fixed. The match would be a do-over.
Same ships same team members - Just placed on the field at the right start positions.

If CCP could spawn the ships with the same fittings for any that were killed, then that could work, putting aside the issue of one team breaking the rules and not having any consequence for that (whether it was deliberate or accidental, responsibility rests with the team, not the referees).

Logistics aren't as simple as informing teams just a couple of hours out that a rematch is on. So if CCP have the mechanics available to spawn everything that was killed, ready to go, then this would work.
gascanu
Bearing Srl.
#78 - 2015-08-16 09:37:40 UTC
CCP Logibro wrote:
Hey Guys

In match 14 between Together We Solo and Gone Critical, the Together We Solo team warped onto the field at 100km. The rules state that teams must warp in at a maximum of 50km.

In this case, the breach in the rules was not picked up by the referee, and the match played out with the Together We Solo team winning the match.

After review and discussion by the tournament team, we have decided to let the result of the match stand. We now have plans in place to improve the check for this in the tournament referee tools by the second weekend of play at latest.


...the words fail me...
5pitf1re
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#79 - 2015-08-16 10:18:25 UTC
If I would be fielding an AT team I'd be boycotting the next matches until CCP reacts.
Sgt Ocker
What Corp is it
#80 - 2015-08-16 10:24:36 UTC
Scipio Artelius wrote:
Sgt Ocker wrote:
Simply fixed. The match would be a do-over.
Same ships same team members - Just placed on the field at the right start positions.

If CCP could spawn the ships with the same fittings for any that were killed, then that could work, putting aside the issue of one team breaking the rules and not having any consequence for that (whether it was deliberate or accidental, responsibility rests with the team, not the referees).

Logistics aren't as simple as informing teams just a couple of hours out that a rematch is on. So if CCP have the mechanics available to spawn everything that was killed, ready to go, then this would work.

CCP have the ability to refund a ship that is lost due to server outages or other events out of player control.
Pretty sure they could spawn the ships that were lost during the original fight.

In fact it would be better if CCP spawned all ships involved on grid, so the respective pilot warps to it in his or her pod and boards it.
This removes the chance of someone refitting a ship with knowledge from the previous fight of what they are facing. This is Eve, if you know exactly what you are facing in a coming fight, you fit to counter it.

My opinions are mine.

  If you don't like them or disagree with me that's OK.- - - - - - Just don't bother Hating - I don't care

It really is getting harder and harder to justify $23 a month for each sub.