These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

[AEGIS] Fleet Warp Changes - Please see devblog!

First post First post First post
Author
Awkward Pi Duolus
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#1441 - 2015-06-16 21:34:00 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
All you did earlier on is show you have no idea how our fleets work.


I'll leave it to general populace to judge the absurdity of your claim of a 250 man fleet as being a one-man show.
Nanar DeNanardon
Babylon Knights
#1442 - 2015-06-16 21:39:27 UTC
As a multi-accounts Miner I really dislike this change.

To mine in null with a kind of security I never warp directly in belt but always warp squad to a BM at 300km from the belt, then I warp squad to an asteroid. And to be safe I warp to a BM in pos...

This change will suddenly remove me all safety I did learn the latest year I passed in NULL-SEC.

The reply "Warping directly into belt is still possible" is just a joke and create a prefect rendez-vous between the hostile inty and your mining fleet.

Maybe this change will create content on the PVP side, maybe.

But if this change is done for PVP why nerfing PVE ? Why does all changes done in this game are currently just removing feature ?

If this change is done, multi accounts-mining in null sec will just be too risky. If I a can't mine with a kind of safety (I have 10s to warp out from the belt when an inty come) I'll have no interest to keep 5 accounts.

But maybe nerfing bombers have something to do with nerfing miners and WH...

Will we still be able to warp fleet to an asteroid ?...

My 2cents
joecuster
Anime Masters
#1443 - 2015-06-16 21:47:35 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
Awkward Pi Duolus wrote:
baltec1 wrote:
To stop the FC ship from being the scout in a battle.


We covered this red herring already here and here.


All you did earlier on is show you have no idea how our fleets work.

All these bads.... I mean casuals come crawling out of the wood work to run their mouths about things they don't have a very good understanding of.
Awkward Pi Duolus
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#1444 - 2015-06-16 21:54:53 UTC
joecuster wrote:

All these bads.... I mean casuals come crawling out of the wood work to run their mouths about things they don't have a very good understanding of.


Leave baltec alone - he might be a bit off base, but his heart is in the right place, and the man has a doctrine named after him - can't get much more space VIP than that.

Incidentally, since when did VoC have an F1 problem? You of all people should know this change isn't necessary to whip the elites into a pvp frenzy..
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#1445 - 2015-06-16 22:05:18 UTC
joecuster wrote:

All these bads.... I mean casuals come crawling out of the wood work to run their mouths about things they don't have a very good understanding of.


It makes you wonder what their rage is going to be like when the logi nerf lands.
Lan Wang
Princess Aiko Hold My Hand
Safety. Net
#1446 - 2015-06-16 22:06:09 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
joecuster wrote:

All these bads.... I mean casuals come crawling out of the wood work to run their mouths about things they don't have a very good understanding of.


It makes you wonder what their rage is going to be like when the logi nerf lands.


LOGI NERF WTF!

Domination Nephilim - Angel Cartel

Calm down miner. As you pointed out, people think they can get away with stuff they would not in rl... Like for example illegal mining... - Ima Wreckyou*

stoicfaux
#1447 - 2015-06-16 22:18:45 UTC
Lan Wang wrote:
baltec1 wrote:
joecuster wrote:

All these bads.... I mean casuals come crawling out of the wood work to run their mouths about things they don't have a very good understanding of.


It makes you wonder what their rage is going to be like when the logi nerf lands.


LOGI NERF WTF!

Here's the article.

Pon Farr Memorial: once every 7 years, all the carebears in high-sec must PvP or they will be temp-banned.

Lan Wang
Princess Aiko Hold My Hand
Safety. Net
#1448 - 2015-06-16 22:25:19 UTC  |  Edited by: Lan Wang
stoicfaux wrote:
Lan Wang wrote:
baltec1 wrote:
joecuster wrote:

All these bads.... I mean casuals come crawling out of the wood work to run their mouths about things they don't have a very good understanding of.


It makes you wonder what their rage is going to be like when the logi nerf lands.


LOGI NERF WTF!

Here's the article.



damnit foiled again

What i thought

Domination Nephilim - Angel Cartel

Calm down miner. As you pointed out, people think they can get away with stuff they would not in rl... Like for example illegal mining... - Ima Wreckyou*

Miner Hottie
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#1449 - 2015-06-16 22:36:42 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
Executor Ardur wrote:
kyoukoku wrote:
This nice article by Talvorian Dex, on Target Caller's blog, about the change got linked to in /r/eve an hour ago, so I thought it should be linked here for CCP to take notice of.


Good article, to the heart of the problem. These changes are been rushed and virtually no thought has been put of the impact. Its lets do X and screw everyone else. We are going back to 2007 and without taking into concideration other changes in game that has happened since then.


No, its a bad article as it makes wrong assumptions, does not understand what is being targeted and fails to see just how easily this can be adapted to.


A good idea for changing gameplay/game design would allow us to apply multiple solutions aa a new way to play the game. This change does not provide that. It provides only 1 viable solution, having a ship at the warp target if it's not a celestial or similar.

I have yet to see you spout another solution to this conundrum.

It's all about how hot my mining lasers get.

joecuster
Anime Masters
#1450 - 2015-06-16 22:38:38 UTC
Miner Hottie wrote:
baltec1 wrote:
Executor Ardur wrote:
kyoukoku wrote:
This nice article by Talvorian Dex, on Target Caller's blog, about the change got linked to in /r/eve an hour ago, so I thought it should be linked here for CCP to take notice of.


Good article, to the heart of the problem. These changes are been rushed and virtually no thought has been put of the impact. Its lets do X and screw everyone else. We are going back to 2007 and without taking into concideration other changes in game that has happened since then.


No, its a bad article as it makes wrong assumptions, does not understand what is being targeted and fails to see just how easily this can be adapted to.


A good idea for changing gameplay/game design would allow us to apply multiple solutions aa a new way to play the game. This change does not provide that. It provides only 1 viable solution, having a ship at the warp target if it's not a celestial or similar.

I have yet to see you spout another solution to this conundrum.


Heres a solution: gain situational awareness and be able to warp yourself where you need to be instead of relying on an fc to fly your ship for you.
Miner Hottie
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#1451 - 2015-06-16 22:47:47 UTC
joecuster wrote:
Miner Hottie wrote:
baltec1 wrote:
Executor Ardur wrote:
kyoukoku wrote:
This nice article by Talvorian Dex, on Target Caller's blog, about the change got linked to in /r/eve an hour ago, so I thought it should be linked here for CCP to take notice of.


Good article, to the heart of the problem. These changes are been rushed and virtually no thought has been put of the impact. Its lets do X and screw everyone else. We are going back to 2007 and without taking into concideration other changes in game that has happened since then.


No, its a bad article as it makes wrong assumptions, does not understand what is being targeted and fails to see just how easily this can be adapted to.


A good idea for changing gameplay/game design would allow us to apply multiple solutions aa a new way to play the game. This change does not provide that. It provides only 1 viable solution, having a ship at the warp target if it's not a celestial or similar.

I have yet to see you spout another solution to this conundrum.


Heres a solution: gain situational awareness and be able to warp yourself where you need to be instead of relying on an fc to fly your ship for you.


I like flying in fleets mixed between frigates and cruisers all the way to capitals. I also like to arrive on grid with my mates. Not first cause my T3 cruiser landed on grid ahead of my triage. But hey, calculating relative warp speeds is "situational awarness" according to you.

Also, I love nothing more than waiting for bookmarks to sync after we probe something in a hole. But you knew that already.

It's all about how hot my mining lasers get.

baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#1452 - 2015-06-16 22:54:27 UTC
Miner Hottie wrote:

I have yet to see you spout another solution to this conundrum.



What makes you think there should be a way around this? The whole point is to make you use dedicated probers.
Miner Hottie
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#1453 - 2015-06-16 23:08:57 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
Miner Hottie wrote:

I have yet to see you spout another solution to this conundrum.



What makes you think there should be a way around this? The whole point is to make you use dedicated probers.


Who said anything about a way around this? Like its something to be beaten? What happened to gameplay changes that opened up the game and gave us multiple new options and multiple counters?

Despite your repeated attempts at supporting this change nothing about it makes for compelling gameplay (unless yiu count forum trolling as compelling... which may actually be compelling for you).

It's all about how hot my mining lasers get.

joecuster
Anime Masters
#1454 - 2015-06-17 00:09:12 UTC
It compels null bears to work in smaller effective groups. It also forces people to pay attention and actually learn the game.
Arrendis
TK Corp
#1455 - 2015-06-17 00:13:49 UTC  |  Edited by: Arrendis
Awkward Pi Duolus wrote:
baltec1 wrote:
All you did earlier on is show you have no idea how our fleets work.


I'll leave it to general populace to judge the absurdity of your claim of a 250 man fleet as being a one-man show.


Actually, he's right. The current line of FC fittings for our fleets all include the ability to probe.

What's more, most of our FCs are using multiple accounts during every engagement, running their brick-tanked FC ship (which may or may not be a booster) as well as a probing covops. Why? Well, it's really quite simple:

90% of humanity is a bunch of mouth-breathing morons who'd have a hard time finding their heads with both hands if they weren't attached.

This is also why for large organizations, fittings are standardized - we simply don't trust the average salt-of-the-earth nitwit to have the first clue how to fit a ship.

We also tend not to trust the average salt-of-the-earth nitwit to not be shooting his own fleet members during a fight - and experience has proven us right on this one at least once pretty much every fight.

So if you expect the FCs to not be control-freaks who feel like this change means they have to do everything themselves on even more simultaneous logins... you're either incredibly naive, or smoking crack.

And if you think this is unfairly critical of people in general, I encourage you to talk with people who run large organizations outside of EVE. This is not a condition that exists only for explodable internet space pixels. The more points of failure you introduce, the more places failure will occur.

Always.

Edit to add: As for the specific claim about 'a 250 man fleet being a one-man show'... it's usually more like a four-man show. Maybe up to 9 if you want to include the WC's turning their boosts on and off.
Onslaughtor
Phoenix Naval Operations
Phoenix Naval Systems
#1456 - 2015-06-17 00:24:03 UTC
So im just going to bring this back since we are talking about broadcasts now.

Q: CCP, why you do this?
A: We want transfer more responsibility for the success of a fleet from its FC to its members.

CCPs current design goal is to give players more agency in fleets. As many FCs and line members have said, the current proposal does not truly address this and removes semi necessary functionality. Overall a bad game design.


Quote:
So me and a bunch of friends found a possible solution to keeping the main design goal of getting people involved with fleets and a sense of personal agency, while maintaining our current level of fleet ability, AND adding in new ability in the form of sudo fleet formations.

Current fleet warp functions are split into 2 parts.

1
Fleet warps as we know them now become emergency fleet warps. They can only warp to a few permanent objects such as the sun, planets, stations, and gates. This is the "No time to explain we are leaving" option for the fc and keeps that functionality alive while limiting it and allowing game play to form in the chase.

2
The new fleet warp mechanic is a fleet warp broadcast. This broadcast works on anything the current (pre aegis) fleetwarp can. Upon activation, everyone gets a visible broadcast saying the fc is starting a fleet warp. From there each pilot mush click on it and accept the warp at a range they choose. After some number of seconds (ten seems reasonable) the fleetwarp is initiated for everyone who signed on. After that, any fleet member may still warp to the broadcast in the fleet history.


In this way, current functionality is preserved and the design goals are meet, while also adding new functionality. Programing my be required, o dear.

If you agree please quote as these forums seem to bury things really quickly.


combined this with the requested broadcast warp to fleet member and your pretty much all set.
Jenshae Chiroptera
#1457 - 2015-06-17 00:30:24 UTC
Arrendis wrote:
Awkward Pi Duolus wrote:
[quote=baltec1]All you did earlier on is show you have no idea how our fleets work.
... Edit to add: As for the specific claim about 'a 250 man fleet being a one-man show'... it's usually more like a four-man show. Maybe up to 9 if you want to include the WC's turning their boosts on and off.
So, some of our top pilots just get lucky all the time?
No.
You have always had the option to follow the FC blindly or think for yourself within the context of the battle. That won't change.
What will changes is more ships dying for a short time.
Then people will become more risk adverse and put out scouts even further. If they aren't entirely sure they can beat the others they will turn tail and run. If they are sure, then the other side will run.

This is a very short sighted mechanics change.

CCP - Building ant hills and magnifying glasses for fat kids

Not even once

EVE is becoming shallow and puerile; it will satisfy neither the veteran nor the "WoW" type crowd in the transition.

joecuster
Anime Masters
#1458 - 2015-06-17 00:33:30 UTC
Jenshae Chiroptera wrote:
Arrendis wrote:
Awkward Pi Duolus wrote:
[quote=baltec1]All you did earlier on is show you have no idea how our fleets work.
... Edit to add: As for the specific claim about 'a 250 man fleet being a one-man show'... it's usually more like a four-man show. Maybe up to 9 if you want to include the WC's turning their boosts on and off.
So, some of our top pilots just get lucky all the time?
No.
You have always had the option to follow the FC blindly or think for yourself within the context of the battle. That won't change.
What will changes is more ships dying for a short time.
Then people will become more risk adverse and put out scouts even further. If they aren't entirely sure they can beat the others they will turn tail and run. If they are sure, then the other side will run.

This is a very short sighted mechanics change.

They already put scouts far away and run even if 1 neutral pops in local. Your point is null. The only way to get fights is to deceive bads into thinking they can win.
Azarath NazGhoul
Doomheim
#1459 - 2015-06-17 01:28:10 UTC
Seriously I don’t understand how people don’t learn.

This change will ONLY make fleets more annoying, no fleet will EVER engage with “warp yourself” due to how the game works.
Warp yourself worked back in the days of 10 ship fleets but they are long gone. If you try to warp yourself in a fleet fight you will lose that fight if you have anything like even numbers due to how the game is working. You need to land with the full fleet at the same time or big parts of the fleet will be destroyed before you can even fight back.

This means NO fc will use “warp yourself”, we will wait for a cloaked warping or not engage.

So the “more pilot engagement” argument is BS. Left is some conspiracy theories like CCP don’t want fleet fights anymore, they want solo cruiser gameplay (nerf fleet, make cruisers the best ship class for multiple reasons, nerf capitals take away the need of a fleet to take structures.


1nverted
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#1460 - 2015-06-17 02:29:31 UTC
Hi CCP

I'm really pleased with these changes.

I think they will accomplish three things which are all good for the game:

1. Make non slippery pete snipper doctrines viable again as it will take longer for tackle to land on them. In this added time, the sniper fleet can fully align.

2. As noted it will need bombers. Good.

3. It will make pilots making perches and warp ins far more valuable. I performed this role extensively in black legion and it was great fun. I welcome changes that make this role more important.

Stick to your guns!