EVE Information Portal

Alternative names for the Invulnerability Field:

Asylum Field
noun
1.an institution for the maintenance and care of the mentally ill, orphans, or other persons requiring specialized assistance.
2.an inviolable refuge, as formerly for criminals and debtors; sanctuary:
3.International Law:
a refuge granted an alien by a sovereign state on its own territory.
a temporary refuge granted political offenders, especially in a foreign embassy.
4.any secure retreat.

Sanctum Projection Field: an inviolably private place or retreat. (SPF. "Good luck attacking them. They're using SPF 50!)

Elysian Fields http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elysium

That does sound pretty good.

Harmonized Aggression, Vandalizaiton and Encroachment Negator

I'm fairly certain that CCP is slowly and systematically working to phase out dscan entirely. They'll never admit to this I'm sure. But they have in the past alluded to the simple technical performance issues it causes (in the way it violates the efficiently segregated grid boundaries). Not to mention that it is, at its heart, a terrible gameplay mechanic (not the hunting aspect, but the defensive mashing it constantly aspect).

These structures aren't meant for solo players, let alone single player corps. The entire idea of a single player corp is an abomination and I hope CCP never ever does anything to encourage them. You're playing an MMO, the hell are you doing in a single man corp...

Alt Corp? and just because it is a one man corp, it could still be in an alliance.

Call it the Curtain Wall or the Bailey, in keeping with the old scholl naming. Call the tower itself the Keep.

I like what I am reading about this update.

I do hope that capitals and super capitals can be moored/docked even by small groups (so I do hope to see mooring in L-size citadels), so that the game does not require a toon to be exclusively allocated to such ship. This will open up this end-game play to smaller entities that can't afford the luxuries of these specialized cap toons.

I hope that the new mechanics for structures will allow small groups to be able to attack smaller class WH settlements, while limiting the size of what can be built into this space according to the mass size of the WH leading into or out of it.
Will there be size limits on deploying citadels based on a WH's class?

Is there is anything planned regarding capitals being build in low class wormholes, while none can be brought in due to mass limitations? This situation, if allowed to continue unhindered, will transform some of the low-class WHs into fortresses that simply can't be conquered anymore, which is contrary to what Eve stands for.

For the WH citadel defense discussion, I'd prefer if guns were to fire automatically like pos guns do now, but energy drain, E-war, stasis, scramble modules should not be automated, and have to be manned to be useful.

I do hope that citadels will all become beacons. I do not care too much about the d-scanning skills, that will still be necessary to locate ships, but it is important to maintain the covert recon aspect without needing probes to find any of the citadels in a system, regardless of ownership.

Sorry to burst your bubble, but CCP Seagul always take care of mentioning solo players in her appearances (see my sig below). Solo play is very valid, and way more common that you'd like I am sure.
That does not mean they do not contribute to the MMO aspect of the game....

In regard to the replacement of the current starbase structures with the new ones to come, what is happening to the current starbase structures; are we just getting the base isk value back? Is it the same for current faction structures?

So, you now require anyone who wishes to be involved with structures to so arrange their lives such that they can be playing EVE every single day; 365 days per year?