These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

CCP - End Highsec Incursions

First post First post
Author
Kashadin
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#861 - 2015-05-12 03:47:55 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
baltec1 wrote:
Kashadin wrote:



At least the bomber alt makes you ISK from other players (for the most part) and not just magically makes it appear from concord.


Nah, its from running FW missions.


This.

I don't know what possess people who don't know what they are talking about to post in threads lol. LP doesn't come from players, it comes from the game.



Must be talking about yourself, I explained myself like 2 post after the one you quoted.


And 2 points.

1) In FW, LP can come from players. As long as they are from the opposing militia you get LP for blowing up the persons ships, it's not very good from what I understand because A) people normally fly cheaper ships in FW and B) you don't get consistent fights in FW to make good enough LP to out-do the other sources.

2) LP in and of itself has no value and is not trade able, it is the items that you purchase with it that have value. And that being said the ISK that someone gets from LP is made from selling the items to other players, not a magical source of ISK in the way of bounty/site payout.

With point 2 being made, a large profit is made in incursions from the LP that can be moved to other sources, tho at a decreased rate.
Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#862 - 2015-05-12 03:50:43 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
Mario Putzo wrote:
You seem to really ignore the man hour value.

10 man groups is 150 man hours
40 man groups is 600 man hours.


This is what 113,220(based upon 7,548 pilots and your calculations) man hours looks like.


I'm serious when I say that it's funny as hell to see these people grasping for so many straws that they end up confirming the problem they are trying to deny. The poster you replied to is the prime example, because he claimed that "only a few hundred people do incursions anyway" then went on to link a graph showing incursion rewards are the third largest isk faucet in the game (meaning that if it's only a few hundred people, something is WAY wrong with the activity they are doing because it takes 10s of thousands of players to generate the isk the constitutes the largest isk faucet that's barely 3 times the size of the incursion runners contribution lol).

So now the goal post is moved to "man hours"... when the man hours needed to set up PVE outside of high sec incursions is WAY higher than what incursion communities have to do (hell, I have yet to do an incursion more than 12 jumps from a Trade hub), further demonstrating the imbalance.

I hope I never come across something I need to defend so much that it makes me as irrational as some of these deniers.
Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#863 - 2015-05-12 03:56:39 UTC
Kashadin wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:
baltec1 wrote:
Kashadin wrote:



At least the bomber alt makes you ISK from other players (for the most part) and not just magically makes it appear from concord.


Nah, its from running FW missions.


This.

I don't know what possess people who don't know what they are talking about to post in threads lol. LP doesn't come from players, it comes from the game.



Must be talking about yourself, I explained myself like 2 post after the one you quoted.


And 2 points.

1) In FW, LP can come from players. As long as they are from the opposing militia you get LP for blowing up the persons ships, it's not very good from what I understand because A) people normally fly cheaper ships in FW and B) you don't get consistent fights in FW to make good enough LP to out-do the other sources.

2) LP in and of itself has no value and is not trade able, it is the items that you purchase with it that have value. And that being said the ISK that someone gets from LP is made from selling the items to other players, not a magical source of ISK in the way of bounty/site payout.

With point 2 being made, a large profit is made in incursions from the LP that can be moved to other sources, tho at a decreased rate.


LP never comes from a player, it comes from NPCs. Getting lp for blowing up a player doesn't mean LP came from a player. EVE doesn't take isk out of a dudes wallet to pay you.

All of which is moot. Faction Warfare wealth generation is wholly and completely unbalanced. That'
s why so many of us have FW farming alts (mine is in a corp with FARMING in the name lol). Under no circumstances should someone be able to generate more PVE wealth with a disposable stealth bomber or caracal than they can with a freaking Carrier in low or null sec. The very idea is obscene.

Of course I'm going to keep doing it till CCP gets off their collective Duffs and does a top down review of PVE wealth generation (I will also continue to fly Ishtars till they fix them too), but it's crazy to me how people can be so selfish as to not even be able to admit when something is wrong with something that is so obviously broken by any reasoned and reasonable measure. 200 mil per hour (selling when you hit at least tier 4) stealth bombers are not reasonable.
Kaldi Tsukaya
Deveron Shipyards and Technology
Citizen's Star Republic
#864 - 2015-05-12 04:00:49 UTC
This still going? Roll

It is not about high, low or null.
It is all about lack of risk.

Just add risk. Some drifters, Momma with a Lux, or allow other ppl to do it.
Some random (or targetted) 'splosions.

Keep the community.
Hell, keep the riches.

Just blow some **** up already.
Kashadin
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#865 - 2015-05-12 04:12:24 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
Kashadin wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:
baltec1 wrote:
Kashadin wrote:



At least the bomber alt makes you ISK from other players (for the most part) and not just magically makes it appear from concord.


Nah, its from running FW missions.


This.

I don't know what possess people who don't know what they are talking about to post in threads lol. LP doesn't come from players, it comes from the game.



Must be talking about yourself, I explained myself like 2 post after the one you quoted.


And 2 points.

1) In FW, LP can come from players. As long as they are from the opposing militia you get LP for blowing up the persons ships, it's not very good from what I understand because A) people normally fly cheaper ships in FW and B) you don't get consistent fights in FW to make good enough LP to out-do the other sources.

2) LP in and of itself has no value and is not trade able, it is the items that you purchase with it that have value. And that being said the ISK that someone gets from LP is made from selling the items to other players, not a magical source of ISK in the way of bounty/site payout.

With point 2 being made, a large profit is made in incursions from the LP that can be moved to other sources, tho at a decreased rate.


LP never comes from a player, it comes from NPCs. Getting lp for blowing up a player doesn't mean LP came from a player. EVE doesn't take isk out of a dudes wallet to pay you.

All of which is moot. Faction Warfare wealth generation is wholly and completely unbalanced. That'
s why so many of us have FW farming alts (mine is in a corp with FARMING in the name lol). Under no circumstances should someone be able to generate more PVE wealth with a disposable stealth bomber or caracal than they can with a freaking Carrier in low or null sec. The very idea is obscene.

Of course I'm going to keep doing it till CCP gets off their collective Duffs and does a top down review of PVE wealth generation (I will also continue to fly Ishtars till they fix them too), but it's crazy to me how people can be so selfish as to not even be able to admit when something is wrong with something that is so obviously broken by any reasoned and reasonable measure. 200 mil per hour (selling when you hit at least tier 4) stealth bombers are not reasonable.



1) If you read the entire point, it is obvious that I am going the bare minimum in saying that LP comes from players, in that you get LP for blowing up opposing FW fighters.

2) I don't do the FW or incursion ISK grind because I find them boring and have better stuff I could do with my time, making ISK has never and likely will never be a very important thing to me.

3) I agree that the amount of ISK that someone can make for almost nothing is ridiculous in FW, but that has more to do with the farming nature of the community that sprang up around FW and not really a lot to do with FW itself. I don't think that FW and the associated LP stores were ever intended to be used the way that they are currently. Not that that has anything to do with this thread.
Vennicea
Doomheim
#866 - 2015-05-12 04:26:05 UTC
It is actually quite amusing to see the heat that this topic is creating.

Unfortunately it appears that neither side will budge & this topic will devolve into an endless rant of arguments & counter-arguments which actually solves zip.

Time for me to do something productive.
Scipio Artelius
Weaponised Vegemite
Flying Dangerous
#867 - 2015-05-12 04:30:15 UTC
Vennicea wrote:
... this topic will devolve into an endless rant of arguments & counter-arguments which actually solves zip...

That happened long ago already.
GankYou
9B30FF Labs
#868 - 2015-05-12 04:36:20 UTC  |  Edited by: GankYou
Jenn aSide wrote:
baltec1 wrote:
Kashadin wrote:



At least the bomber alt makes you ISK from other players (for the most part) and not just magically makes it appear from concord.


Nah, its from running FW missions.


This.

I don't know what possess people who don't know what they are talking about to post in threads lol. LP doesn't come from players, it comes from the game.


The LP is then converted into a commodity that has said LP value build into them, the ISK is then traded from players looking to purchase this commodity.

LP store is actually an ISK sink, as some items require you to pay an unrecoverable sum to an NPC Corporation to obtain them, and none items to my knowledge pay you. Smile

In short, Loyalty Points is a resource - just like mining, or salvaging is, though with an added healthy benefit of taking the ISK out of the system and keeping inflation in check.

Here is the graph again - http://i.imgur.com/wybDyAB.png
Neesa Corrinne
Nyx Legion..
Breakpoint.
#869 - 2015-05-12 04:37:41 UTC
The really amusing part is that the OP claims to have been running incursions for several hours a day for several years.

So in other words, he made his billions and wants to slam the door shut on others now that he's moving on.
Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#870 - 2015-05-12 04:45:36 UTC
Kashadin wrote:


3) I agree that the amount of ISK that someone can make for almost nothing is ridiculous in FW, but that has more to do with the farming nature of the community that sprang up around FW and not really a lot to do with FW itself. I don't think that FW and the associated LP stores were ever intended to be used the way that they are currently. Not that that has anything to do with this thread.


I was in FW at it's inception in 2008, and it wasn't like that, in fact no one did FW missions then. CCP WAY over-buffed the FW rewards, in part because many of us short sightedly (myself included) complained that there were no rewards for being in FW. The problem isn't the farming community, it's that CCP stuffed rewards into something that was supposed to mainly be about pvp.

Now there are lots of people who don't give a damn about FW in FW farming, and that's a shame. FW was glorious in the beginning, all we were really asking for was a way to sustain ourselves while being in FW and CCP responded with an unbalanced gold mine that screws everything up.
Kaldi Tsukaya
Deveron Shipyards and Technology
Citizen's Star Republic
#871 - 2015-05-12 04:55:47 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
Kashadin wrote:


3) I agree that the amount of ISK that someone can make for almost nothing is ridiculous in FW, but that has more to do with the farming nature of the community that sprang up around FW and not really a lot to do with FW itself. I don't think that FW and the associated LP stores were ever intended to be used the way that they are currently. Not that that has anything to do with this thread.


I was in FW at it's inception in 2008, and it wasn't like that, in fact no one did FW missions then. CCP WAY over-buffed the FW rewards, in part because many of us short sightedly (myself included) complained that there were no rewards for being in FW. The problem isn't the farming community, it's that CCP stuffed rewards into something that was supposed to mainly be about pvp.

Now there are lots of people who don't give a damn about FW in FW farming, and that's a shame. FW was glorious in the beginning, all we were really asking for was a way to sustain ourselves while being in FW and CCP responded with an unbalanced gold mine that screws everything up.


At least ships explode in lowsec and there are people hunting. That you have to use a cloaky bomber to avoid that is indicative of the risks.
Kashadin
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#872 - 2015-05-12 05:20:20 UTC
Kaldi Tsukaya wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:
Kashadin wrote:


3) I agree that the amount of ISK that someone can make for almost nothing is ridiculous in FW, but that has more to do with the farming nature of the community that sprang up around FW and not really a lot to do with FW itself. I don't think that FW and the associated LP stores were ever intended to be used the way that they are currently. Not that that has anything to do with this thread.


I was in FW at it's inception in 2008, and it wasn't like that, in fact no one did FW missions then. CCP WAY over-buffed the FW rewards, in part because many of us short sightedly (myself included) complained that there were no rewards for being in FW. The problem isn't the farming community, it's that CCP stuffed rewards into something that was supposed to mainly be about pvp.

Now there are lots of people who don't give a damn about FW in FW farming, and that's a shame. FW was glorious in the beginning, all we were really asking for was a way to sustain ourselves while being in FW and CCP responded with an unbalanced gold mine that screws everything up.


At least ships explode in lowsec and there are people hunting. That you have to use a cloaky bomber to avoid that is indicative of the risks.



The bomber has nothing to do with needing to avoid people (tho it helps) and more to do with the BS size weapons on a frig size hull that can sig tank a entire room of a LVL 4 mission while blitzing it. And the fact that you can do this with several missions in a single run in a decent amount of time for a large pay out. At least on the minmitar side, the caldari and galente FW have some problems with this because of the EWAR they go against, and the last time I looked at FW the amarr pay outs weren't worth the effort tho that could have changed.
Kaldi Tsukaya
Deveron Shipyards and Technology
Citizen's Star Republic
#873 - 2015-05-12 05:57:41 UTC
Kashadin wrote:

The bomber has nothing to do with needing to avoid people (tho it helps) and more to do with the BS size weapons on a frig size hull that can sig tank a entire room of a LVL 4 mission while blitzing it. And the fact that you can do this with several missions in a single run in a decent amount of time for a large pay out. At least on the minmitar side, the caldari and galente FW have some problems with this because of the EWAR they go against, and the last time I looked at FW the amarr pay outs weren't worth the effort tho that could have changed.


Could you tank these missions in a blinged out Golem or a navy BS? If so, wouldn't the payouts be faster?
Kashadin
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#874 - 2015-05-12 06:07:25 UTC
Kaldi Tsukaya wrote:
Kashadin wrote:

The bomber has nothing to do with needing to avoid people (tho it helps) and more to do with the BS size weapons on a frig size hull that can sig tank a entire room of a LVL 4 mission while blitzing it. And the fact that you can do this with several missions in a single run in a decent amount of time for a large pay out. At least on the minmitar side, the caldari and galente FW have some problems with this because of the EWAR they go against, and the last time I looked at FW the amarr pay outs weren't worth the effort tho that could have changed.


Could you tank these missions in a blinged out Golem or a navy BS? If so, wouldn't the payouts be faster?



Not really since you have to go 15+jumps to get to the area to do the missions, they are all in LS FW space that is normally controlled by the opposing faction. The up side is that you can go to as many of the LVL4 mission givers for your faction as you feel like before going out to run the missions, combine that with the fact that for many of the missions you only have to destroy a handful of BS or industrial ships it makes the Stealth Bomber the most efficient way to do it.
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#875 - 2015-05-12 10:20:14 UTC
Kaldi Tsukaya wrote:


Could you tank these missions in a blinged out Golem or a navy BS? If so, wouldn't the payouts be faster?


You would need a very specialized fit to match the warp speed and you would encounter a great many fights when moving gates. Plus why spend 2-3 billion on a ship when a 50 mil expendable frigate can do the job.
Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#876 - 2015-05-12 12:19:41 UTC  |  Edited by: Jenn aSide
Kaldi Tsukaya wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:
Kashadin wrote:


3) I agree that the amount of ISK that someone can make for almost nothing is ridiculous in FW, but that has more to do with the farming nature of the community that sprang up around FW and not really a lot to do with FW itself. I don't think that FW and the associated LP stores were ever intended to be used the way that they are currently. Not that that has anything to do with this thread.


I was in FW at it's inception in 2008, and it wasn't like that, in fact no one did FW missions then. CCP WAY over-buffed the FW rewards, in part because many of us short sightedly (myself included) complained that there were no rewards for being in FW. The problem isn't the farming community, it's that CCP stuffed rewards into something that was supposed to mainly be about pvp.

Now there are lots of people who don't give a damn about FW in FW farming, and that's a shame. FW was glorious in the beginning, all we were really asking for was a way to sustain ourselves while being in FW and CCP responded with an unbalanced gold mine that screws everything up.


At least ships explode in lowsec and there are people hunting. That you have to use a cloaky bomber to avoid that is indicative of the risks.


I wouldn't call it risk honestly. Bombers are best but you can do the missions in any number of ships, including Caracals. All you have to do is buy a stack of caracals and enough fittings to fit them out and just spend them like candy. hell, when I jump into an Amarr militia gate camp I don't even try to make it back to the gate, I just let them kill the ship, Pod me back to Hek (I chuckle when i think "these guys are sending me to HEK lol) and simply attack my travel route backwards.

It's insane, we should not be able to make 100-250ish mil per hour with a Caracal or Stealth bomber we don't give 2 filps about if it dies. In defense of incursions , at least you need a BS for that unbalanced monstrosity, but FW missions are the number 1 messed up PVE thing in EVE. CCP could fix FW missions by making them at least not be blitzable (if you have to clear the field of NPCs instead of killing a couple BSs or haulers or a structure, the massive amount of LP rewarded would make more sense).

I'ma keep farming till CCP does something, but it's really dumb how they have it now. There are WHOLE ALLIANCES in FW that play both sides of a conflict and actively manipulate which side is allowed to "win" for isk farming purposes, it's a perversion.
Kaldi Tsukaya
Deveron Shipyards and Technology
Citizen's Star Republic
#877 - 2015-05-12 13:31:34 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:

I wouldn't call it risk honestly. Bombers are best but you can do the missions in any number of ships, including Caracals. All you have to do is buy a stack of caracals and enough fittings to fit them out and just spend them like candy. hell, when I jump into an Amarr militia gate camp I don't even try to make it back to the gate, I just let them kill the ship, Pod me back to Hek (I chuckle when i think "these guys are sending me to HEK lol) and simply attack my travel route backwards.

It's insane, we should not be able to make 100-250ish mil per hour with a Caracal or Stealth bomber we don't give 2 filps about if it dies. In defense of incursions , at least you need a BS for that unbalanced monstrosity, but FW missions are the number 1 messed up PVE thing in EVE. CCP could fix FW missions by making them at least not be blitzable (if you have to clear the field of NPCs instead of killing a couple BSs or haulers or a structure, the massive amount of LP rewarded would make more sense).

I'ma keep farming till CCP does something, but it's really dumb how they have it now. There are WHOLE ALLIANCES in FW that play both sides of a conflict and actively manipulate which side is allowed to "win" for isk farming purposes, it's a perversion.


Gotcha, see how that works now.
The fix isn't so radical for CCP either.
Lena Lazair
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#878 - 2015-05-12 16:46:02 UTC
High-sec incursions should be moved exclusively to high-sec islands.

It introduces all kinds of risk to the overall process to offset the rewards, while still maintaining the integral separation of risk DURING the PvE activity, which is what the average high-sec player actually cares about.
Miami Jones
Virtual Industry Inc.
New Eden Bling Empire
#879 - 2015-05-12 19:58:30 UTC  |  Edited by: Miami Jones
2Sonas1Cup wrote:

Heres what I do as an incursioner in eve:

- log in
- waitlist and grab a beer
- join fleet make 250mil an hour with lp included (each account)
- run for 2 or 3 hours and log out

Wheres the harsh and cold environment in this?


Ummm no you don't. Given 2000 isk per lp (which is double the going rate atm), that's 31.5mil for concord bounties plus 14mil in lp =45.5mil per site.

You state you make 250mil an hour on each account. That's 5.5 sites an hour or 10.9 minutes a site including warp time, x ups etc. The only way to do this is to farm TCRCs over and over and have an endless waiting list of logi to replace those leaving. Obviously you don't know wtf you're talking about because the sites cycle between TCRC NRF and TPPH for HQs. It is impossible to always get TCRCs every site. Also, doesn't your fleet ever do a TPPH to bio?

The OP wayyy overstates income from incursions. Eve is not "broken" because of incursion income. Get your math right before posting.
Frostys Virpio
State War Academy
Caldari State
#880 - 2015-05-12 20:09:03 UTC
Lena Lazair wrote:
High-sec incursions should be moved exclusively to high-sec islands.

It introduces all kinds of risk to the overall process to offset the rewards, while still maintaining the integral separation of risk DURING the PvE activity, which is what the average high-sec player actually cares about.


There aren't that many high-sec highland IIRC so people could potentially leave a boat in most possible places.