These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Let's talk about Capitals and Supercapitals

First post First post
Author
Asuka Solo
I N E X T R E M I S
Tactical Narcotics Team
#321 - 2015-04-17 05:29:24 UTC  |  Edited by: Asuka Solo
Rowells wrote:
d0cTeR9 wrote:
Karash Amerius wrote:
d0cTeR9 wrote:
People that do not own supers or regularly use caps, shouldn't have any say in this...



We are having a good discussion here...lets not muck it up with opinions like this.


Actually we are not.

There's a LOT of people who clearly do NOT use caps and/or supers that think they know what they are talking about. That's a problem, because there's a lot more of those people than of players that actually use the damn things.

It's the same thing as the carrier nerfs. Anyone with a bit of knowledge and brains knew how to deal with skynet, which is why you never saw those players complain about it. Just noobs that got their precious t3 cruiser (or faction cruiser) popped when they jumped a gate with a small gate camp defending their SOV/space and they had carrier support...

CCP bends over backward to listen to them, its always been like that, and now the game is a washed down version of what it was before.

Yes caps and supers are strong... that's the point of them (they are far from OP... they used to be 5-6 years ago, not anymore). With the way things are going, a LOT of us are worried mooring will be a death trap to supers (and yes caps).

Personally, i use a POS to log into my super and safe log off. Without that bubble, its a LOT more work simply to log in and out (and logging always require me to log my alt in system first). Without that safety 'mechanism', some (maybe a lot) of us would have to abandon this part of EVE (personally i really like flying supers, i do wish they were more useful though).

You are trying to disregard others' conflicting opinions by claiming they don't own the ships (which is entirely irrelavent). If they don't have knowledge about them or don't know what they are talking about, it will be clear. You don't need to own a super to have a valid opinion on it.

Otherwise we are left with a club of super-owners who refuse to change anything because they have invested in them and want more from it, which is not bad, but definitely a stacking of opinions.


In other words... /Incarna...

Nobody had incarna, but there were a few wanted the change... but the opinions of those who didn't want the change or who felt offended by incarna gate / monicle gate, vented their frustration publicly enough for ccp to halt that direction.....

That being said... the changes wanted by caps and super cap owners who actually fly these ships.... do NOT align with the changes wanted by rifter lovers.... sub cap pilots need to know their place through cold hard roles and ingame inabilities based on hull size.... and its NOT supposed to be at the top of the food chain.

Eve is about Capital ships, WiS, Boobs, PI and Isk!

Rowells
Blackwater USA Inc.
Pandemic Horde
#322 - 2015-04-17 05:57:54 UTC  |  Edited by: Rowells
Asuka Solo wrote:
Rowells wrote:
You are trying to disregard others' conflicting opinions by claiming they don't own the ships (which is entirely irrelavent). If they don't have knowledge about them or don't know what they are talking about, it will be clear. You don't need to own a super to have a valid opinion on it.

Otherwise we are left with a club of super-owners who refuse to change anything because they have invested in them and want more from it, which is not bad, but definitely a stacking of opinions.


In other words... /Incarna...

Nobody had incarna, but there were a few wanted the change... but the opinions of those who didn't want the change or who felt offended by incarna gate / monicle gate, vented their frustration publicly enough for ccp to halt that direction.....

That being said... the changes wanted by caps and super cap owners who actually fly these ships.... do NOT align with the changes wanted by rifter lovers.... sub cap pilots need to know their place through cold hard roles and ingame inabilities based on hull size.... and its NOT supposed to be at the top of the food chain.
Are you hoping, that by painting anyone who disagrees with your opinion as a greedy subcap pilot, is going to make your arguments any stronger? There is no reason to believe that their opinion has no validity based on their cap status. Otherwise, you're going to have the same argument thrown in your face for wanting to protect your prize pony. Who's to say you're not highly biased based on your status, and should therefore be disregarded as not having uninfluenced reasoning?

Something, something, ad hominem.

Also: I wasn't very involved in the community yet when incarna rage was going around. So got nothing to say there.
Asuka Solo
I N E X T R E M I S
Tactical Narcotics Team
#323 - 2015-04-17 07:00:34 UTC
Rowells wrote:
Asuka Solo wrote:
Rowells wrote:
You are trying to disregard others' conflicting opinions by claiming they don't own the ships (which is entirely irrelavent). If they don't have knowledge about them or don't know what they are talking about, it will be clear. You don't need to own a super to have a valid opinion on it.

Otherwise we are left with a club of super-owners who refuse to change anything because they have invested in them and want more from it, which is not bad, but definitely a stacking of opinions.


In other words... /Incarna...

Nobody had incarna, but there were a few wanted the change... but the opinions of those who didn't want the change or who felt offended by incarna gate / monicle gate, vented their frustration publicly enough for ccp to halt that direction.....

That being said... the changes wanted by caps and super cap owners who actually fly these ships.... do NOT align with the changes wanted by rifter lovers.... sub cap pilots need to know their place through cold hard roles and ingame inabilities based on hull size.... and its NOT supposed to be at the top of the food chain.
Are you hoping, that by painting anyone who disagrees with your opinion as a greedy subcap pilot, is going to make your arguments any stronger? There is no reason to believe that their opinion has no validity based on their cap status. Otherwise, you're going to have the same argument thrown in your face for wanting to protect your prize pony. Who's to say you're not highly biased based on your status, and should therefore be disregarded as not having uninfluenced reasoning?

Something, something, ad hominem.

Also: I wasn't very involved in the community yet when incarna rage was going around. So got nothing to say there.


I'm not hoping.

I know. And I am highly biased. Proudly.

If you see some 10 day old character talking politics in CAOD, yet he's never been in a 0.0 alliance in his 10 day career.... then his opinion isn't worth the e-page its written on....

In exactly that way, sub cap pilot opinions should be cast aside when balancing supers.

Eve is about Capital ships, WiS, Boobs, PI and Isk!

Skia Aumer
Planetary Harvesting and Processing LLC
#324 - 2015-04-17 07:33:27 UTC
Rowells wrote:
Rawketsled wrote:
Dreads:
Just give them something meaningful to shoot at in FozzieSov.

Maybe it's time to unleash them upon the battleship hordes?

Battleships fleets struggle to survive even now, and after Fozziesov they would become completely irrelevant. Svipuls or Ishtars will out-maneuver them and capture command-node thingies in other systems of constellation, with significantly lower risk. And if BS fleet chose to use triage - they chose to lose.

Larger ships (which are battleships and capitals) are in advantage when you want to hold the grid. And you never want to hold the grid in Fozziesov. Unless your titan jump instead of bridge.
Rowells
Blackwater USA Inc.
Pandemic Horde
#325 - 2015-04-17 08:02:10 UTC
Asuka Solo wrote:

I'm not hoping.

I know. And I am highly biased. Proudly.

Then how can you honestly say someone else's biased opinion is unworthy, when you yourself admit to having one?

Asuka Solo wrote:
If you see some 10 day old character talking politics in CAOD, yet he's never been in a 0.0 alliance in his 10 day career.... then his opinion isn't worth the e-page its written on....

In exactly that way, sub cap pilot opinions should be cast aside when balancing supers.

If the opinion holds merit under scrutiny then it shouldn't matter if my duck or his grandmother said it. It's usually pretty easy to debunk those kinds of statements if its that obvious how uninformed they are.

I hate to bring up real-life examples but, would you say anyone who doesnt smoke pot shouldn't be allowed to make rules on it? You can't voice opinion on being gay if you are not gay yourself? Or that you shouldn't have any say in politics, because you are not a politician?

Might as well start having to request API checks before posting in any feedback threads, in case anyone who doesnt meet the preferred requirements tries to make an argument.
Gremoxx
Wing Commanders
#326 - 2015-04-17 09:40:55 UTC
Skia Aumer wrote:
Rowells wrote:
Rawketsled wrote:
Dreads:
Just give them something meaningful to shoot at in FozzieSov.

Maybe it's time to unleash them upon the battleship hordes?

Battleships fleets struggle to survive even now, and after Fozziesov they would become completely irrelevant. Svipuls or Ishtars will out-maneuver them and capture command-node thingies in other systems of constellation, with significantly lower risk. And if BS fleet chose to use triage - they chose to lose.

Larger ships (which are battleships and capitals) are in advantage when you want to hold the grid. And you never want to hold the grid in Fozziesov. Unless your titan jump instead of bridge.


I can not guess what CCP is planning.

However, this is an interesting point raised here.

Will there be any reason to use anything bigger than BC for large scale fights after Zero hour of Fozziesov ? New players are less inclined to jump several systems in BS, using JB or being bridged by Titan gives us the "fatigue", and if we intend to defend multiple systems in constellation with limited manpower (small alliances fighting for foothold in 0.0), using BS will slow you down. And capturing structures will now be done by means of "magic" -wand.

What will be the drive to invest in anything bigger than BC ?
Skia Aumer
Planetary Harvesting and Processing LLC
#327 - 2015-04-17 10:12:22 UTC
Gremoxx wrote:
What will be the drive to invest in anything bigger than BC ?

Yes.
For ratting.
Professor Maddoc
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#328 - 2015-04-17 11:57:08 UTC
Just a question, i dont pretend to know anything about this but it interests me none the less. oh an im newb so go easy on me plz lol

Why doesn't CCP just stop players being able to produce these ships and replace them? introduce some sort of new tech, maybe drop from these new Jove battleship with doomsdays, reverse engineer or somein to a whole new tech lvl of battleships ect that replaces the current super training?

I mean if these ships are "broke" why fix them? just replace them much like what is being done with sov, but replace them with ships that ppl who currently fly these ships will be excited to fly.

Im no pretending to know anything as u can tell, just a question :D
Serendipity Lost
Repo Industries
#329 - 2015-04-17 12:33:02 UTC
Professor Maddoc wrote:
Just a question, i dont pretend to know anything about this but it interests me none the less. oh an im newb so go easy on me plz lol

Why doesn't CCP just stop players being able to produce these ships and replace them? introduce some sort of new tech, maybe drop from these new Jove battleship with doomsdays, reverse engineer or somein to a whole new tech lvl of battleships ect that replaces the current super training?

I mean if these ships are "broke" why fix them? just replace them much like what is being done with sov, but replace them with ships that ppl who currently fly these ships will be excited to fly.

Im no pretending to know anything as u can tell, just a question :D



Because super pilots have super tears, super egos, super peens, super entitlement, super.... well everything. Super pilots are just super. How can we not give a child w/ a super toy super special treatment??

Sigh, you newbs just can't understand super entitlement until you own a super. Please train up a super so you can understand the super demands involved in super ownership on a super level.

TL/DR You can't be super until you own a super.
Somerandomkoreanguy
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#330 - 2015-04-17 13:22:45 UTC
while i havent flown many capital ships at all other then a Nidhoggur and the .. well i dont think it counts Orca...

but i have a slight thought train

a capital ship is a HUGE platform i am in favor of the modes idea but with a twist

give capital ships a number of specialist core systems

basic idea would be that you could have 3 systems

Offence Defence Propulsion

you will have to swap the cores to get the new functions and that would require mooring or station docking and a timer before the core goes active in order to prevent in the field coreswap a capital ship is a bit to big to on the fly change its core workings i mean its a LARGE ship which means it could work well with the future changes.


say for instance i mount a Fighter coordination centre core on my nidhoggur (offence) it would allow me to deploy more fighters per skill level or perhaps they do more damage (effectivly i turned the niddy into a Thanatos bonus wise)

i then choose a auxiliary shield augmentor it improves the shield resists as defence core

as propulsion core i choose improved engine controll, it gives the ship more agility, acceleration and warp speed at the expense of more expensive or taxing jumps (this will be a lazy ratters wet dream i know not the brightest idea so help it improve)

it is now a local area support carrier that has resistances and mobility but it lacks the traditional nidhoggur logistics.
(now i dont feel forced to train a another races capital ship skills and getting one and fit. and suddenly the carriers became interesting again in my eye in contrast to it sitting for 3 years in a hangar doing NOTHING)

or it could have a engineer quarters core for logistics (Offence core)
advanced nano coating in defence core
and gravital warp drive as propulsion

now its a Logistics ship with improved armor resists and it cannot warp from a bubble as usual but drag bubbles cant affect it as when it is in warp its shear gravitaional effect ripples the bubble. the drawback is there is no jumpdrive to use anymore and its weight increase basicly means longer aling time too.

if you would break the ship down into cores or subsystems if you will the capitals could become alot more interesting and diffrent from what they are now.

if we would fit cores then the same hull can do alot of things and in a sense bring in more diversity in the capital fleet atleast for the carreris/moms instead of having a driffrent carrier hull for a diffrent purpose, the ships are just too big to be locked down like that in my perspective.

now i just blindly threw out an idea i have had in my head for a while and it may be bad it may be good or it may just provide a diffrent perspective on what a capital ship can be percived to be.


as for titans and dreads i dont really know ive never flown either but maybe you could give them some core systems and capital grade utilities aswell. like the phenix being turned into a immensly powerfull Ewar platform and the Revelation with the same core a monster cap neutralizer i dont know i havent flown them just ideas from a subcap pilot who is vastly dissapointed in capital grade ships.
WarFireV
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#331 - 2015-04-17 13:46:14 UTC
Professor Maddoc wrote:
Just a question, i dont pretend to know anything about this but it interests me none the less. oh an im newb so go easy on me plz lol

Why doesn't CCP just stop players being able to produce these ships and replace them? introduce some sort of new tech, maybe drop from these new Jove battleship with doomsdays, reverse engineer or somein to a whole new tech lvl of battleships ect that replaces the current super training?

I mean if these ships are "broke" why fix them? just replace them much like what is being done with sov, but replace them with ships that ppl who currently fly these ships will be excited to fly.

Im no pretending to know anything as u can tell, just a question :D


Because they are not broken?
MeBiatch
GRR GOONS
#332 - 2015-04-17 14:35:57 UTC
Gremoxx wrote:
Skia Aumer wrote:
Rowells wrote:
Rawketsled wrote:
Dreads:
Just give them something meaningful to shoot at in FozzieSov.

Maybe it's time to unleash them upon the battleship hordes?

Battleships fleets struggle to survive even now, and after Fozziesov they would become completely irrelevant. Svipuls or Ishtars will out-maneuver them and capture command-node thingies in other systems of constellation, with significantly lower risk. And if BS fleet chose to use triage - they chose to lose.

Larger ships (which are battleships and capitals) are in advantage when you want to hold the grid. And you never want to hold the grid in Fozziesov. Unless your titan jump instead of bridge.


I can not guess what CCP is planning.

However, this is an interesting point raised here.

Will there be any reason to use anything bigger than BC for large scale fights after Zero hour of Fozziesov ? New players are less inclined to jump several systems in BS, using JB or being bridged by Titan gives us the "fatigue", and if we intend to defend multiple systems in constellation with limited manpower (small alliances fighting for foothold in 0.0), using BS will slow you down. And capturing structures will now be done by means of "magic" -wand.

What will be the drive to invest in anything bigger than BC ?


constellation warfare offers an interesting opportunity for warfare. basically now that a fight is over several systems... choke hold system gates will be just as valuable as the capture annoms themselves. you could have a bunch of carriers with t3 and insta pop those bc's who are trying to get to the next system to capture that annom. or you could have blappy dreads with tackle... this then would escalate to supers being dropped to kill the gate camp... and then counter drop and so on...

There are no stupid Questions... just stupid people... CCP Goliath wrote:

Ugh ti-di pooping makes me sad.

ugh zug
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#333 - 2015-04-17 15:05:15 UTC  |  Edited by: ugh zug
caps don't need any help.

-the carrier is still very much a force multiplier in any fleet with plenty of utility to offer.
-dreads are still going to be needed to pos bash, wh site escalate, and dispatching the occasional trolling rogue pl titan in lowsec.
-the super carriers are very much like their lower priced counterpart a force multiplier, and hey with the jump changes you might actually be able to use fighter bombers outside of tidi.
-titans are really just trophy ships... you don't need a role when you have a space penis 14km in length to ram down unsuspecting gates. that being said they still do just fine killing other capitals, so what's the problem?

what you guys are really complaining about is the jump changes that made using your very expensive ship painful, thus you feel you were owed something. really now let's consider the old system. was it balanced to be able to send an army of giant space penii half way across the universe to crush some tiny speck of an alliance trying to start out in null, and be back at home in the same day? no not even remotely. heck if 98% of your space isn't even used outside of moon mining *edit and renters*, do you really deserve to hold onto it?

Want me to shut up? Remove content from my post,1B. Remove my content from a thread I have started 2B.

Karash Amerius
The Seven Shadows
Scotch And Tea.
#334 - 2015-04-17 16:36:46 UTC
d0cTeR9 wrote:
Karash Amerius wrote:
d0cTeR9 wrote:
People that do not own supers or regularly use caps, shouldn't have any say in this...



We are having a good discussion here...lets not muck it up with opinions like this.


Actually we are not.

There's a LOT of people who clearly do NOT use caps and/or supers that think they know what they are talking about. That's a problem, because there's a lot more of those people than of players that actually use the damn things.

It's the same thing as the carrier nerfs. Anyone with a bit of knowledge and brains knew how to deal with skynet, which is why you never saw those players complain about it. Just noobs that got their precious t3 cruiser (or faction cruiser) popped when they jumped a gate with a small gate camp defending their SOV/space and they had carrier support...

CCP bends over backward to listen to them, its always been like that, and now the game is a washed down version of what it was before.

Yes caps and supers are strong... that's the point of them (they are far from OP... they used to be 5-6 years ago, not anymore). With the way things are going, a LOT of us are worried mooring will be a death trap to supers (and yes caps).

Personally, i use a POS to log into my super and safe log off. Without that bubble, its a LOT more work simply to log in and out (and logging always require me to log my alt in system first). Without that safety 'mechanism', some (maybe a lot) of us would have to abandon this part of EVE (personally i really like flying supers, i do wish they were more useful though).


Sorry, I think you misinterpret this thread, unless you are already an expert at Capital play within Fozzysov - which you are not, of course. We are talking about Capitals within this new era right? I would think there are no experts here, just jaded vets and pilots looking to protect their interests, and their "fun". We should get away from all that and actually see how things should be in the future.

All opinions need to be put through the meat grinder, even mine. No need to artificially limit this discussion.

Karash Amerius Operative, Sutoka

Rowells
Blackwater USA Inc.
Pandemic Horde
#335 - 2015-04-17 16:48:11 UTC
ugh zug wrote:
caps don't need any help.

-the carrier is still very much a force multiplier in any fleet with plenty of utility to offer.
-dreads are still going to be needed to pos bash, wh site escalate, and dispatching the occasional trolling rogue pl titan in lowsec.
-the super carriers are very much like their lower priced counterpart a force multiplier, and hey with the jump changes you might actually be able to use fighter bombers outside of tidi.
-titans are really just trophy ships... you don't need a role when you have a space ***** 14km in length to ram down unsuspecting gates. that being said they still do just fine killing other capitals, so what's the problem?

what you guys are really complaining about is the jump changes that made using your very expensive ship painful, thus you feel you were owed something. really now let's consider the old system. was it balanced to be able to send an army of giant space penii half way across the universe to crush some tiny speck of an alliance trying to start out in null, and be back at home in the same day? no not even remotely. heck if 98% of your space isn't even used outside of moon mining *edit and renters*, do you really deserve to hold onto it?

the primary purpose from induction is becoming less valuable. Dreads intitial introduction was intended for structure bashing, which is expected to go the way of the mullet, restricted to very specific circumstances and not very useful elsewhere. And the same aspect would be applied to supercarriers somewhat, since that is the primary reason they have so much dps at their disposal. Titans have switched roles often enough, so long as capitals are worth killing their job will still be there, albeit less so. And carriers roles as remote repair ships remains mostly untouched, except in the realm of repping structures.
Karash Amerius
The Seven Shadows
Scotch And Tea.
#336 - 2015-04-17 16:51:09 UTC
d0cTeR9 wrote:


CCP bends over backward to listen to them, its always been like that, and now the game is a washed down version of what it was before.



Also this...just...will never die as a feeling in Eve. It has been with us since Beta; players just don't accept that change happens all the time in Eve, and that their preferred game play is under threat. No one is threatening your way of life by having a "washed down version" of EVE.

Eve always evolves...and whether you want to be a part of that or not, is of course, entirely up to you.

Karash Amerius Operative, Sutoka

Faren Shalni
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#337 - 2015-04-17 19:46:23 UTC
Skia Aumer wrote:
Gremoxx wrote:
What will be the drive to invest in anything bigger than BC ?

Yes.
For ratting.


AFKtar says nope

So Much Space

Asuka Solo
I N E X T R E M I S
Tactical Narcotics Team
#338 - 2015-04-17 20:46:52 UTC
Rowells wrote:
I hate to bring up real-life examples but, would you say anyone who doesnt smoke pot shouldn't be allowed to make rules on it? You can't voice opinion on being gay if you are not gay yourself? Or that you shouldn't have any say in politics, because you are not a politician?

Might as well start having to request API checks before posting in any feedback threads, in case anyone who doesnt meet the preferred requirements tries to make an argument.


Exactly that. Herewith follows an extremely metaphorical post.....

To put it bluntly, if lawmakers the world over smoked pot, pot wouldn't be illegal. If governments taxed it, national budgets would be more than they are now....

The forums aren't the place to check validity of opinions, because quite frankly, opinions are like assholes... we all have em... and the forums are a place to share that crap.. unfortunately. that being said, the price of crap depends on its quality and when determining the quality of crap, caliber and validity are kings. And to find that kind of substance, you have to look beyond the forums, such as killmail records which would indicate you've lost a few caps in your day, less so than those you've killed. As such, your entitled to an opinion on capital ships and supers..... at least in the eyes of your peers whether you acknowledge that or not.....

Just because you don't like gay people, doesn't mean you should stop gay people from having relations with people who are into that sort of thing.. I just don't want to be involved in them doing it. Out of sight, out of mind. Leave the politics to the politicians and go on with YOUR NORMAL LIFE. Unless they threaten to change your lifestyle, in which case, go on strike, off with their heads or [insert appropriate course of action here].

To bring it back to eve terms.... if homosexuality is frowned upon in countries with lawmakers that themselves aren't gay.... then cap ships online will be frowned upon by people who don't play capships online..... as such, those players should learn to shut up and let those who do want to play cap ships online have their game in the areas they play it in... out of sight, out of mind.... Eve is a sandbox after all, not an alleyway shooter with one way of going about things......

Eve is about Capital ships, WiS, Boobs, PI and Isk!

Rowells
Blackwater USA Inc.
Pandemic Horde
#339 - 2015-04-17 21:47:02 UTC  |  Edited by: Rowells
Asuka Solo wrote:
The forums aren't the place to check validity of opinions


how are forums NOT the place to check validity of opinions?

It seems like you are more concerned with who is speaking, rather than what they are saying.

Also, by virtue of your previous statement, regardless of what your opinion is, if you do not fall into those categories you have no say in it. Which kinda invalidate 3/4 paragraphs that you just wrote.
Rowells
Blackwater USA Inc.
Pandemic Horde
#340 - 2015-04-17 21:50:49 UTC
Professor Maddoc wrote:
Just a question, i dont pretend to know anything about this but it interests me none the less. oh an im newb so go easy on me plz lol

Why doesn't CCP just stop players being able to produce these ships and replace them? introduce some sort of new tech, maybe drop from these new Jove battleship with doomsdays, reverse engineer or somein to a whole new tech lvl of battleships ect that replaces the current super training?

I mean if these ships are "broke" why fix them? just replace them much like what is being done with sov, but replace them with ships that ppl who currently fly these ships will be excited to fly.

Im no pretending to know anything as u can tell, just a question :D

This would be a very new pardigm for CCP. I can't recall any ship lines ever being removed entirely. They have a tendency to repurpose them rather than trash them.