Player Features and Ideas Discussion

I am not referring to either of the particular (multiple) threads in particular. The use of segmentation of issues makes it impossible to discuss observations that are common to more than one issue. If you feel the need to close this thread as duplicitous, please tell exactly which "one" thread it belongs inside.




So much about the current planned changes with the introduction of new structures is vague to the point that feedback is not possible.

Here are a few as an example:

*Does the new way to harvest datacores mean any existing method will be eliminated?

*How will Entosis be used in high security?

*The Entosis blog claimed :

"This means that Entosis Linking will replace shooting of structures in every part of the Sovereignty system. After the June release, shooting of structures will not play any part in Sovereignty."

If that is true, when is it possible to shoot at a particular structure so as to destroy it?



I am left to wonder if the tactic is to decide upon a course of action and then open a thread or multiple threads for discussion as a form of quieting dissent. That is to say, all this has actually been decided and CCP has provided MULIPLE avenues for discussion as a means to let folks vent frustrations without any true intention to act upon suggestions.

In my opinion, this has become the way things are done, and it is insulting.




Tell us your actual plans. We are big boys and girls. We understand this is your game and you can do as you like with it. Either we like it and move on or we don't and move out. Enough of this "hide the ball" already.

There is too much of your plan that is hidden for us to contribute in an effective way. Either reveal it all or stay quiet and hit us with the suprise when it is ready. This fake " Tell us how you would improve this" crap is insulting