These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

[Discussion] Entosis Link Tactics and Ship Balance

First post First post First post
Author
Syn Shi
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#1361 - 2015-03-12 00:00:47 UTC
It appears many think SoV changes will brake up the big alliances. It wont.

They have been sitting stagnant stock piling isk.

They can afford to blob much longer than any new corp will be able to.

And there is no reason for the big alliances to fight.


The only think that will fix Null is when too many people get bored and find something else to spend their money on.


It may create more content for smaller corps but if the big corps choose they can make it so no one will be able to hold anything unless they pay them.........no change.

Stagnant null with some small gimicky fights to throw up more "look how many ships have been lost".
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#1362 - 2015-03-12 00:03:41 UTC
Syn Shi wrote:
The only think that will fix Null is when too many people get bored and find something else to spend their money on.

It may create more content for smaller corps but if the big corps choose they can make it so no one will be able to hold anything unless they pay them.........no change.

Stagnant null with some small gimicky fights to throw up more "look how many ships have been lost".

So, like sov trolling, they need to bore us out of null?

So, with a method like sov trolling then....

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Yolandar
CSR Strategic Reserves
Citizen's Star Republic
#1363 - 2015-03-12 00:15:57 UTC
Geez, even I am going to train up for ROFLCeptors nowBig smile
Look Ma, I'm SOVqueen, taking Eve
all by muhself.
Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support
#1364 - 2015-03-12 00:27:39 UTC
Veskrashen wrote:
Promiscuous Female wrote:
alternatively just hard lock all ships to minimum 3s align except pod and shuttle

look at how easy it is to fix eve

Or, keep it like it is, so that gatecamps don't grant safety and allow you to control disproportionate amounts of space.

Drop systems you don't need and shrink your empire to an appropriate size. See how easy it is to adapt to Fozziesov?

gatecamps aren't ironclad defense

have you heard of wormholes, covert ops cloaks, and titan/blops bs bridging

i understand that you once lost a ship once to a gatecamp and this made you angry but don't blame the gatecamp for you being bad
Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#1365 - 2015-03-12 00:33:02 UTC  |  Edited by: Jenn aSide
SilentAsTheGrave wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:
And I'm not kidding, this discussion was the exact same before dominion, with people (like goons) telling everyone "we will use this to make your game experience suck" and legions of short-sighted utopians on the other side proclaiming "this will be great, those big alliances are gonna get what's coming to them!!".

[Citation Needed]

Not to be ignored is Dominion sov was shipped unfinished due to CCP focusing heavy development on World of Darkness and Dust 514.

I'm serious. I really would like to see some legitimate links to some threads where the masses were chanting this will be the end of goons and goons saying Dominion sov will be terrible before it was released to Singularity and Tranquility. I'm always eager to learn and read up on these things. So please, link me some threads that support your claim.


Happy reading.

http://eve-search.com/thread/1178912-0/page/12

http://eve-search.com/thread/1175850-0

Read through those threadnaughts, then read this one. If it doesn't give you a sense of deja vu you ain't human.

Bonus, a nice article full of optimistic predictions http://www.tentonhammer.com/node/78225
FT Diomedes
The Graduates
#1366 - 2015-03-12 00:37:13 UTC
Disclaimer: everything below is from a grunt's perspective in Dominion Sov warfare. Others may know more about actual decisions various parties made.

People are missing the reason why null sec has been stagnant. It's not so much that Dominion sovereignty was that terrible for the participants (if you used proper tools, i.e. Dreadnoughts, it was not that bad at all). When we fought in Tenal in 2012, there were lots of good fights, we sacrificed a few dozen Drake fleets and a couple of Titans, we wore the enemy down, then they gave up and we reinforced all the things. It was not bad at all.

The following summer we fought in Fountain and there were good, big fights. There were also horrible fights with large numbers of slow cats on each side. Then we went to Delve and life started to stink... Due to the threat of Supercapital hot drops on our Dreadnoughts, and the need to develop more FC's, we ground Delve in stealth bombers. That sucked. We did the same through the Halloween war, until towards the end when we got B-R and other good fights.

After B-R, the large blocs voluntarily gave up the sov fights. This was a conscious decision and resulted in horrible stagnation. I'll say that again: the large blocs mutually agreed not to wage sov warfare. They did not want to risk Supercapital fleets (the loss of which would lead to the loss of moon and rental empires). The large blocs voluntarily started the stagnation.

Why is this important? Because only large blocs will be able to seriously attack another large bloc using Trollsov. If they choose not to attack each other, because REASONS, then we are left with a Trollsov system that is even worse for small groups (who can be trolled by all and sundry) and Nullsec will still appear stagnant on the sov front. But is Eve actually stagnant right now?

Meanwhile, for all the vitriol directed at space aids, it did allow regional conflicts to be fun again (at least in Fountain). I've used my Dreadnoughts and Titan more in the past five months than I did at any point previously in Eve (and in relatively small fights as true force multipliers). We had great fights in southern Fountain in December and January. Small gang fights through NPC null and WH's have been great. N3 has been great about dropping Supercapitals on our roaming T1 cruiser gangs in Delve. Life is good. From what I have seen, life is good elsewhere too. And now you want to screw that up with this nonsense?

If you want to break up the big blocs, you cannot. N+1 is always better than N. No mechanic, short of deus ex machina killing the "+1," will work. Deus ex machina is the antithesis of sandbox (see e.g. T20). So give it a rest...

CCP should add more NPC 0.0 space to open it up and liven things up: the Stepping Stones project.

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support
#1367 - 2015-03-12 00:39:27 UTC
i do like that sov defenders aren't allowed to use force multipliers but god forbid attackers lose their ability to use force multipliers
Basil Pupkin
Republic Military School
#1368 - 2015-03-12 00:48:30 UTC
Goon tears in 1 line : "Bawwwwww Fozzie how dare you make it so we can be harassed a little bit while rolling the whole eve for free".


Seriously, this system is so severely biased for goons I wonder who actually came up with it.

Being teh freightergankbear automatically puts you below missionbear and minerbear in carebear hierarchy.

If you're about to make "this will make eve un-eve" argument, odds are you are defending some utterly horrible mechanics against a good change.

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#1369 - 2015-03-12 00:53:45 UTC
FT Diomedes wrote:
Why is this important? Because only large blocs will be able to seriously attack another large bloc using Trollsov. If they choose not to attack each other, because REASONS, then we are left with a Trollsov system that is even worse for small groups (who can be trolled by all and sundry) and Nullsec will still appear stagnant on the sov front.

Not as long as the smal groups don't have any sov and only want to end the sov of the big groups

eg: massdeath of moa will end us just because apparently moa are the best paid mercs or something

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support
#1370 - 2015-03-12 01:05:16 UTC
Basil Pupkin wrote:

Seriously, this system is so severely biased for goons I wonder who actually came up with it.

agreed, for this reason we need to ensure interceptors cannot use entosis links
SilentAsTheGrave
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#1371 - 2015-03-12 02:13:50 UTC  |  Edited by: SilentAsTheGrave
Jenn aSide wrote:
SilentAsTheGrave wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:
And I'm not kidding, this discussion was the exact same before dominion, with people (like goons) telling everyone "we will use this to make your game experience suck" and legions of short-sighted utopians on the other side proclaiming "this will be great, those big alliances are gonna get what's coming to them!!".

[Citation Needed]

Not to be ignored is Dominion sov was shipped unfinished due to CCP focusing heavy development on World of Darkness and Dust 514.

I'm serious. I really would like to see some legitimate links to some threads where the masses were chanting this will be the end of goons and goons saying Dominion sov will be terrible before it was released to Singularity and Tranquility. I'm always eager to learn and read up on these things. So please, link me some threads that support your claim.


Happy reading.

http://eve-search.com/thread/1178912-0/page/12

http://eve-search.com/thread/1175850-0

Read through those threadnaughts, then read this one. If it doesn't give you a sense of deja vu you ain't human.

Bonus, a nice article full of optimistic predictions http://www.tentonhammer.com/node/78225

This may have backfired on you. Lol

I'm several pages in and out of all the goon posts, all but one is very optimistic of the Dominion sov. Everyone from mittens to vile rat and some other known goon leaders were very optimistic. Shadoo's post was cautious.

Thanks for the link regardless. Blink
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#1372 - 2015-03-12 02:33:21 UTC
They're rather optimistic about this too.

But doubtless it's spin, or ?? (And it's mostly random cfc people here, as well)

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Basil Pupkin
Republic Military School
#1373 - 2015-03-12 02:39:34 UTC  |  Edited by: Basil Pupkin
Promiscuous Female wrote:
Basil Pupkin wrote:

Seriously, this system is so severely biased for goons I wonder who actually came up with it.

agreed, for this reason we need to ensure interceptors cannot use entosis links


For this reason this system needs to be rethinked from the ground up, without participation of CCPeople who are known as goon lap dogs.

Being teh freightergankbear automatically puts you below missionbear and minerbear in carebear hierarchy.

If you're about to make "this will make eve un-eve" argument, odds are you are defending some utterly horrible mechanics against a good change.

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#1374 - 2015-03-12 02:47:25 UTC  |  Edited by: Alavaria Fera
Basil Pupkin wrote:
Promiscuous Female wrote:
Basil Pupkin wrote:

Seriously, this system is so severely biased for goons I wonder who actually came up with it.

agreed, for this reason we need to ensure interceptors cannot use entosis links


For this reason this system needs to be rethinked from the ground up, without participation of CCPeople who are know as goon lap dogs.

Basically, you want a "discussion" that's just all of you having 0.0 fantasies about ending evil cfc

So a hilarious echochamber "discussion". Go have it on reddit or something


You're likely to just get whatever has been planned anyway, since I doubt they'll change much so might as well begin planning out your interceptor fits and start buying so you won't have to when everything is overpriced just before/after the patch

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

bobjoe9
Winnipeg Jets
#1375 - 2015-03-12 03:02:09 UTC
If alliances are holding to much sov(they are for renting reasons) why not just ban renting sov in the EULA/TOS. No reason to hold 80+ systems anymore instead of making alliances defend sov for 4 hours a day when most people only play for a few hours a day.
Promiscuous Female
GBS Logistics and Fives Support
#1376 - 2015-03-12 03:03:18 UTC
bobjoe9 wrote:
If alliances are holding to much sov(they are for renting reasons) why not just ban renting sov in the EULA/TOS. No reason to hold 80+ systems anymore instead of making alliances defend sov for 4 hours a day when most people only play for a few hours a day.

if only

unfortunately ccp has a hard-on for renters
Basil Pupkin
Republic Military School
#1377 - 2015-03-12 03:07:27 UTC
Alavaria Fera wrote:
Basically, you want a "discussion" that's just all of you having 0.0 fantasies about ending evil cfc

So a hilarious echochamber "discussion". Go have it on reddit or something


You're likely to just get whatever has been planned anyway, since I doubt they'll change much so might as well begin planning out your interceptor fits and start buying so you won't have to when everything is overpriced just before/after the patch


I don't want a discussion.
I want a system not made for one coalition, not made by people who balance the game exclusively in the interest of the said coalition.

Being teh freightergankbear automatically puts you below missionbear and minerbear in carebear hierarchy.

If you're about to make "this will make eve un-eve" argument, odds are you are defending some utterly horrible mechanics against a good change.

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#1378 - 2015-03-12 03:08:03 UTC
bobjoe9 wrote:
If alliances are holding to much sov(they are for renting reasons) why not just ban renting sov in the EULA/TOS. No reason to hold 80+ systems anymore instead of making alliances defend sov for 4 hours a day when most people only play for a few hours a day.

This would be great.

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#1379 - 2015-03-12 03:09:18 UTC
Basil Pupkin wrote:
Alavaria Fera wrote:
Basically, you want a "discussion" that's just all of you having 0.0 fantasies about ending evil cfc

So a hilarious echochamber "discussion". Go have it on reddit or something


You're likely to just get whatever has been planned anyway, since I doubt they'll change much so might as well begin planning out your interceptor fits and start buying so you won't have to when everything is overpriced just before/after the patch


I don't want a discussion.
I want a system not made for one coalition, not made by people who balance the game exclusively in the interest of the said coalition.

Yes,true: the removal of us from discussion is only means to an end

ie a system that makes it as easy as possible for people like you to end 0.0 dream of people like us.


How about a magic button in jita that drops all sov

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Kristian Hackett
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#1380 - 2015-03-12 03:10:13 UTC
The amount of laughs I'm getting from the "wah no interceptors" crowd is amazing. There's a bajillion ways to deal with interceptors, be it a single one or a full fleet of them. Needless to say, for those of your worried about a full fleet of interceptors, if you don't have the manpower to protect your core systems from that there's a bigger issue at hand. You need to deal with a bunch of interceptors trolling your system, build a freaking kill squad! Cruor + Garmur for tackle, then something to lay on the DPS (drone cruiser would be a great option here) and a logi just to play it safe. 4 ships, and you can go around swatting ceptors like a Japanese Giant Hornet through a hive of honey bees.

Aircraft Maintenance - Using a high school diploma to fix what a college degree just f***ed up. "Life is too short to drink cheap beer."