EVE Information Portal

/SACASM

Combat recons no longer appear on D-Scan.... is this a bug??!!!?>!>!>!>!>!>!!>one

You think you're being clever, however you're failing quite badly. You lack internet skills. Let me spell it out: how is every fleet in null being MWD shield Ishtars fun? How could it possibly be good for the health of the game?

Hi,

The Rorqual is still pretty useless, it's been like that for the last 20+ patches.

Also I noticed something changed with belts, but nothing actually changed except for some added graphics. People mining are generally afk or have their graphics turned down all the way so that they can run multiple accounts at once. Mining is literally the most boring thing in eve and it is still an awful profession because CCP hasn't fixed null ore anomalies yet.

Please go poke Fozzie and tell him that null ore anoms still need to be fixed, arkonor is still garbage, and that I'm still right from EVE Vegas.

Thanks for removing the Industry Teams.
Though I have been using them they were a pet hate of mine when announced with the Industry changes. I can now go back to building stuff from my corp hangars without feeling the need to shunt the materials all over the galaxy chasing Teams.

Please remove the eye-fatigue-generating fade up, fade down, fade up, fade down, ad nauseum effect on windows and window backgrounds, when focus is changed or a popup window is displayed. This is particularly annoying when working with many windows, such as when you are updating a bunch of market orders.

At the very least, add a button to allow us to disable this behavior.

JAN 2015: NEW/EXISTING ISSUES & FEEDBACK (with suggestions):

CORP SELLING DRAG/DROP: "Drag and drop" selling still does not function when attempting to drag items to sell from a corporate hangar. Only way to sell multiple items is to select them all, then sell, or right-click and select "sell" to force the client to add that item to existing open selling window.

NEOCOM ICONS STUCK AS "TRANSLUCENT": The Neocom panel is unable to be made opaque. Disturbing considering its top "E" (EVE) symbol, avatar pic, training graphic and bottom clock areas are opaque. PROBLEM: Hard to distinguish icons from bright graphics in background. Good example: when using "Carbon" theme with TRANSPARENCY=0. The icons are difficult enough to distinguish, but especially in a Caldari station with bright/reflective backgrounds (or in space with a bright star) "underneath" the Neocom.

TAB VISIBILITY: "Tabs" are not clearly distinguishable. They are simply words. Providing dividing lines to help discern/define where you can drag to/select would help.

"SEARCH FOR RECIPIENTS" UI BUG: No matter how big you resize this window (Example: clicking "To" when creating a new mail), the input field is overlapped by the "SEARCH" button.

PERSONAL ASSETS UI BUG: When open, the name of the systems/stations overlap all the background "columns with lines" (Quantity,Group,Size,Slot,Volume).

NOTIFICATION SETTINGS DUPLICATE BUG: "CLONE ACTIVATION" is listed TWICE under: "Notification Settings: Category Subscriptions: Miscellaneous".

CONTRACT BUG: When right-click "Create Contract" of anything, the default opening Creat Contract window has the bottom two lines overlapping: "On behalf of (corp wallet name)" overlapped by "Outstanding Contracts: (x/xx)". Only way to read it is to expand from your own default size.

CONTRACT ICON BUG: Still not being notified/flashing of a new contract UNTIL "Contracts" icon is actually clicked. Seems pointless to be notified "after the fact".

NOTIFICATIONS BUG: Notification settings still not behaving according to any changes of delay time or stack sizes, even when changed via slider options in Notification settings.

SCIENCE/INDUSTRY UI: Manufacturing jobs do not update themselves when jobs are delivered, in terms of "xx/11" manufacturing slots, for example. One must close the Industry window, then reopen it to clear all "delievered"(faded) jobs.

DARKENING/REFOCUSING CLIENT: Constant color shade "refocusing" is distracting. Example: When trying to split-drag (CTRL+drag) an item from one place to another, the center window will pop up asking how much to move, but the entire screen darkens. Gets a bit distracting when split-dragging 50 items "quickly" and not able to see the rest of your inventory (this is using "Carbon" theme). It's behavior is almost identical to when one hits the ESC key.

ICONS: Icons would be more visible and efficient if we could "color"/"tint" certain icons to help visually distinguish hwhat are industrial icons versus inventory icons versus business icons, etc. Especially considering grouping does not seem to work.

GROUPING: "Grouping" icons does not seem to function as intended.

OVERVIEW NAVIGATION ICONS: It would help if the warp/approach/jump/etc symbols above the Overview were larger. Though they appear to be bolder, they have then been reduced in size, with no ability to resize them (like one can with in-station icon sizes).

ALLIANCE MEMBERSHIP APPLICATIONS: There still has not been a solution to be "notified" if/when any corp has submitted an Alliance application - unlike how Corp applications are notified in the "Mail: Communications" tab.

WINDOW CORNERS/BORDERS: The window corners visually do not always "line up" next to each other. On some instances, when windows do line up next to each other, the 1 pixel line merges adjacently, forming a more visible 2 pixel line. But when they do not merge, you can see the background between a 1-2 pixel gap, even though the client insists your windows are "snapped next to each other".

Win7Pro64-bit - USING "CARBON", 0 Transparency, NO Window Blur, NO Match Theme

Right. But oddly enough this is not mentioned in the patch notes, nor are any consequential changes (if there are any).

Well, looks like Module Tiericide - Round 2 is yet another major failure to really listen to player feedback.

For the modules which were supposed to be "tiericided", it looks like there was no change to the BPO material requirements for the T1 versions and no change to the reprocessing materials for the meta 1 versions. I'm guessing no change to NPC drop rates, either, so, for modules which have a high drop rate, meta 1 versions should continue to end up being cheaper than T1 versions (except in cases of deliberate market manipulation).

Thus, we continue with no reason to use most T1 modules, and no reason to build them (except as a component for T2 modules).

Sigh.

Should we also talk about how stupid it was to identically prefix the meta versions of the prop and hull upgrade modules with the same "Type-D Restrained" rather than mix them up, with different prefixes for each module (ex. "Beta Restrained Expanded Cargohold", "Mark I Restrained Nanofiber Structure", etc.)?

Has anyone at CCP ever done a search by name, with automatic name completion? Do you know how much easier this is to do when the prefix is different, rather than all the same? If you make the prefix different for each type, then it is only necessary to type in "Beta" or "Mark I", rather than "Type-D Restrained Expanded" or "Type-D Restrained Nanofiber".

And, why do we still have single-quoted names, like 'Basic', rather than just Basic? Again, search-by-name works better without the unnecessary single-quotes.

Hey now. I realize us liberal democratic Gallentes are nice people and aren't ones to burn our Quasimodo's at the stake like the Amarr would, but do we need to make our ships look similarly deformed?

I for one think the much more symmetrical redesign of the Exeq is MUCH better looking.