CSM Campaigns

You only need to do it once. You can continue to gank at -10 as proven by a LOT of gankers. The only time you need to pay that is when you decide you want to reuse that character for something else, then it's just *click* consequences undone.

Brain fart : What would happen if CCP reduced the Jump Fatigue if you're travelling in your own sov ?

Then blocs seize and maintain "island" systems to allow then to more rapidly project power over a larger area of the map.

The way ganking is right now they pretty much just need to see the fittings, calculate the number of catalysts they need and then warp to the target. CODE. has industrialized ganking. Not sure but they may even use a spreadsheet for it!

The only change I see that would make any real sense without killing ganking or making high sec a theme park would be to add a random element to concord response times. I am thinking a random number that either adds or subtracts from the response time. You could get a 5 second response in a .5 or maybe one that takes 45 seconds. You just won't know. You may even get enough time to kill multiple targets before they show up or loose all your ships with the target barely touched.

It's become too push button and easy. They have the advantage since they know their target and exactly how many ships to bring. Having something they can't plan for would balance things out a bit.

Sure they could just bring more ships but even that would make them work harder at it.

Why would the laws of physics change when you're at home?

Look, the whole point of the jump fatigue mechanic is to stop large forces rapidly moving long distances without consequence; so far its working reasonably well. And if someone does want to make a large amount of instant travels very quickly, the option remains open to them, it's just that there's a cost.

You have my vote :)

Please lets get the warp speed of battlecruisers back to before ccp have killed them since they were nerfed

I understand Eve is about feelings, but the CSM shouldnt be. We are at war with the CFC for a year now, but I would still vote for one of them if I think they can do a good job. If you think I couldn't do that job, then you re right, don't vote for me.

I agree on this, but I still want to add something for the active anti-ganking to be able to get a fight.

[quote=Tora Bushido]Greetings

Social Corp/ NPC
You shouldn't be able to stay longer then 2-3 months in a NPC corp. Players should be able to create small social corps with max 10 players in it, which can’t be war decced (can still be ganked). But they also can’t own a pos, poco or future structure and they can’t war dec someone else. This might look bad, as they can freely do anything they want, but if you look at it more closely, they can still do the same things as they could do in an NPC corp. Only this way they have the chance to build up a corp. See it as a stage between NPC and a corp.


Whilst I agree players shouldn't be in an NPC corps longer than a few months to deny them the possibility of owning a POS as a small group would deny them a part of the game where they cannot develop BPOs as you need a POS To do this, unless of course you can get CCP to reverse BPO research back to stations.

i run 3 accounts and 6 of my characters run a POS quite successfully for bpo research and manufacture in high sec, are you telling me i should no longer be able to do this as a little guy?

There are lots of individuals who are also runnig solo corps of 6 charchtes or less. I play this why as i go by the maxim in eve trust no one.

I apologise if this has already be brought up but its difficult reading 11 pages on a phone.

Wait, are you serious about that mining thing?
A SLOT Game for Miners? What?

All other ideas are great, but I honestly can't believe the Slot Game thing is no troll.

Edit: A Minigame for Miners would be great indeed, but not as luck based as a Slot Machine. That would **** economy

Never ever.
You da untrollest