These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

CSM Campaigns

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

♥ Manfred Sideous ♥ for ♥[CSM 10]♥

First post
Author
Anderton Faln
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#81 - 2014-12-09 13:21:02 UTC
Endie von Posts wrote:
ETNY


Please don't even joke about that.
leetcheese
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#82 - 2014-12-09 15:39:43 UTC
you know you've got my vote :3
Sion Kumitomo
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#83 - 2014-12-10 03:10:20 UTC
Manny has consistently impressed me with his knowledge of game mechanics and his ability to theorycraft the implications of potential game changes. He has a deep knowledge, a wealth of experience, and the work ethic that the CSM needs. Vote for Manny, CCP needs to hear what he has to say.

On twitter @siggonK

Kossaw
Body Count Inc.
Mercenary Coalition
#84 - 2014-12-10 03:55:51 UTC
My own Eve career has drifted in and out of Manny's path many time over the years. Not only is Manny one of the MOST knowledgeable guys in Eve, he's also possibly the nicest guy Ive met in game.

While being "nice" doesnt make you a great CSM - being knowledgeable,active, helpful and most importantly a great communicator does make you a great CSM.

WTB : An image in my signature

Capqu
Half Empty
xqtywiznalamywmodxfhhopawzpqyjdwrpeptuaenabjawdzku
#85 - 2014-12-10 12:33:43 UTC
Quote:
ArrowShip Balance & Iteration- T3 cruisers are grossly out of balance as well as the ishtar. Bombers are still dictating fleet tactics in nullsec. Command Ships are still way to flimsy to reliably use them on field. Missiles are absolutely useless in anything larger than a small gang (cruise missiles have 70hp lol). Shield comps are woefully at a disadvantage to armor comps.The list goes on and on.


voting based on this alone


game desperately needs balance changes and this hits most of the problems on the head

ISHTARS LMAO
Manfred Sideous
H A V O C
Fraternity.
#86 - 2014-12-11 03:28:07 UTC
Thanks for all the support and replies. If anyone has any has any questions im happy to answer them.

@EveManny

https://twitter.com/EveManny

Mario Putzo
#87 - 2014-12-11 18:36:14 UTC
Manfred Sideous wrote:
Thanks for all the support and replies. If anyone has any has any questions im happy to answer them.


Asked a couple questions a couple pages back but I think they were lost in the post attributing other players actions to you. So I will just ask again.


What would you change about T3's and Ishtars?

Do you think the rise in OPness of T3's and Ishtars is attributable to the fact that BC's (natural Cruiser hunters) are essentially garbage currently?

What are your thoughts on BC's and BS's?

I remember back in 09/10 there was a nice little food chain. HACS/T3 > BS > BC > HACS/T3. IMO It seems that food chain is dead these days.
Pike Chargrim
Carebear Empire
#88 - 2014-12-11 19:04:48 UTC
Ditto for me:

Pike Chargrim wrote:
In your opinion:

1) what is currently broken about lowsec?
2) how would you fix it?
3) how do you see low-sec fitting into the universe as a whole going forward?

Your post mentions something about FW, but there is more to lowsec than FW.

l0rd carlos
the king asked me to guard the mountain
#89 - 2014-12-15 08:30:38 UTC  |  Edited by: l0rd carlos
Thank you for your earlier response.

What is your position on fighter assignment? For example a Nyx assigns fighters from the edge of a POS to a T1 frigate which is somewhere else in the system.

with kind regards
l0rd carlos

Youtube Channel about Micro and Small scale PvP with commentary: Fleet Commentary by l0rd carlos

Manfred Sideous
H A V O C
Fraternity.
#90 - 2014-12-15 13:08:02 UTC
Mario Putzo wrote:
Manfred Sideous wrote:
Thanks for all the support and replies. If anyone has any has any questions im happy to answer them.


Asked a couple questions a couple pages back but I think they were lost in the post attributing other players actions to you. So I will just ask again.


What would you change about T3's and Ishtars?

Do you think the rise in OPness of T3's and Ishtars is attributable to the fact that BC's (natural Cruiser hunters) are essentially garbage currently?

What are your thoughts on BC's and BS's?

I remember back in 09/10 there was a nice little food chain. HACS/T3 > BS > BC > HACS/T3. IMO It seems that food chain is dead these days.



T3's and Ishtar's - I was having this discussion with some wormhole people the other day. It feels like the Tengu is the biggest violator currently. If anything the Loki might need slight tweeks. Ishtars I think reduce the drone bay to 200m3. They can carry 1 set sentries 1 medium 1 small set of drones.

The problem with Nullsec PVP is bombers. They are still completely ******** and coupled with how easy probing is now the GODBOMB run is a actual thing and threat at all times. They severely restrict fleet concepts in nullsec. When my opponent brings Dominix's I'd love to bring Alphafleet but doing so is suicide due to bombers.


Yeah BC,BS & Hacs are way outside the meta especially in Nullsec. Most times its just better to bring a T1 cruiser than a Hac. BC's are so woefully inept next to T3's. Command ships aren't in much better shape and most BS are laughable at best in nullsec.

@EveManny

https://twitter.com/EveManny

Manfred Sideous
H A V O C
Fraternity.
#91 - 2014-12-15 13:24:29 UTC
Pike Chargrim wrote:
Ditto for me:

Pike Chargrim wrote:
In your opinion:

1) what is currently broken about lowsec?
2) how would you fix it?
3) how do you see low-sec fitting into the universe as a whole going forward?

Your post mentions something about FW, but there is more to lowsec than FW.




The problem with lowsec is simple. There is no meaningful reason to be there other than PVP. It offers no unique features or advantages. Think about it with me what do the other areas have that are unique.

Hisec - Safety
Nullsec - Sov ownership , Supercapital production
Wormholes - Sleepers , Semi-Isolationism
Lowsec- Hmmm something should go here. I mean I guess FW but thats basically sov war with training wheels.

What I would change is:

Lowsec should be the premier industrial area of Eve. It should have the best and most efficient factory lines available in Eve. Players should be able to contract protection from Factions. Basically put in a system where players can purchase standings to FW by purchasing a 30 day certificate from the faction of their choosing. The isk then gets divided amongst FW members every month. Furthermore when factory lines are utilized it unlocks benefits for that faction.


So basically you end up with a system where lowsec is busy with builders and industrialist. Faction Warfare members now have meaningful reasons to patrol and protect their factions space. They have reason in which to raid opposing factions and reasons for conquest of opposing factions space. Because whoever is providing stable and safe areas will get more business. Furthermore with increased traffic and population it gives more reasons for piracy to exist.


I see lowsec as basically empire space and the factions are basically Mafia families. They extort money for protection services from people wanting to engage in industry in lowsec. But the hook has to be that doing production is so much cheaper and efficient in lowsec versus hisec that it draws builders there.

@EveManny

https://twitter.com/EveManny

Manfred Sideous
H A V O C
Fraternity.
#92 - 2014-12-15 13:33:20 UTC
l0rd carlos wrote:
Thank you for your earlier response.

What is your position on fighter assignment? For example a Nyx assigns fighters from the edge of a POS to a T1 frigate which is somewhere else in the system.

with kind regards
l0rd carlos


A few things. Fighter assignment is kinda dumb because the carrier/supercarrier pilots drone skills are meaningless. This needs to be addressed. Secondly its a very contentious subject as lone carriers and supercarriers are easy to kill with bumps. So making them sit to far away from pos shields means instant death should someone land on grid and call in friends. However it is frustrating to have a capital slink back into the shields whenever someone tries to stop them assigning fighters. Furthermore you see pilots using sticks to assign fighters from. A stick is a online tower that has not had the forcefield turned on . The forcefield can be turned on instantly if the capitals are in any danger. Honestly I don't have the answer but I understand the problem from all sides and its permutations . If I had to stab in the dark I think capitals need to be somewhere between 5000-7500 meters minimum from the Forcefield to assign fighters. Thats a stab in the dark though if CCP were actually willing to look at the issue id wanna talk more with the community to look for better ideas.

@EveManny

https://twitter.com/EveManny

l0rd carlos
the king asked me to guard the mountain
#93 - 2014-12-15 14:03:11 UTC
They can also assign from the inside of the edge of a deadspace pocket. Only way to point them is to burn 15 minutes with a interceptor.
But thanks for your answer, looks like you know the mechanics.

If I may, I want to give you my personal opinion. I guess you can read from my wording that I am not very fond of the current mechanics. A nyx or thanatos on a medium / large POS with ECM and guns is very hard to remove, at least for a smaller fleet. While they only risk 3x Frigs, they have over 7000 DPS that can hit Interceptors. The Risk / Reward scale is way out of balance on this one. The drone module changes to fighters and the latest Jump mechanic changes made them pop up more and more around lowsec.

I would remove the fights assignment all together, why is it there? What benefit does eve have from this.

It eve gets "abused" in PvE. I had an alt in a corp that rent space, assign fighters from a gank / tracking nyx to a brick tanked carrier. The carrier always had cap to jump, had ~7000 DPS and a immense tank. (+ scram + web) 200+ mil ISK/h farming machine in a cyno jammed system. gf gf.

No need to response, I just wanted to vent. Thanks again for your response, changes are high you will be getting my vote.

Youtube Channel about Micro and Small scale PvP with commentary: Fleet Commentary by l0rd carlos

Hiasa Kite
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#94 - 2014-12-15 14:41:06 UTC
Whenever you're fighting in Catch, you might be able to zoom in at a ship and see me leaning out a window, shaking g my fist at you. For the CSM however, you'll be getting my vote.

+1 my dear frenemy.

"Playing an MMO by yourself is like masturbating in the middle of an orgy." -Jonah Gravenstein

Manfred Sideous
H A V O C
Fraternity.
#95 - 2014-12-16 12:48:25 UTC
Hiasa Kite wrote:
Whenever you're fighting in Catch, you might be able to zoom in at a ship and see me leaning out a window, shaking g my fist at you. For the CSM however, you'll be getting my vote.

+1 my dear frenemy.


Thanks for the support.

@EveManny

https://twitter.com/EveManny

Alekseyev Karrde
Noir.
Shadow Cartel
#96 - 2014-12-16 17:36:21 UTC
I was sad to see Manny be forced to withdraw last year, happy to support him this year!

Alek the Kidnapper, Hero of the CSM

Xenuria
#97 - 2014-12-17 04:06:03 UTC
You have my vote.
Manfred Sideous
H A V O C
Fraternity.
#98 - 2014-12-22 17:46:14 UTC
Thanks for all the support. Please feel free to post any questions.

@EveManny

https://twitter.com/EveManny

Manfred Sideous
H A V O C
Fraternity.
#99 - 2014-12-24 21:56:16 UTC
Merry Christmas Eve.

@EveManny

https://twitter.com/EveManny

Leyla Celeste
Doomheim
#100 - 2014-12-26 03:22:54 UTC
Best of luck Manny. Do better than I did!(which isn't hard haha)