These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

CSM Campaigns

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

♥ Manfred Sideous ♥ for ♥[CSM 10]♥

First post
Author
Mario Putzo
#41 - 2014-12-08 17:18:05 UTC  |  Edited by: Mario Putzo
What are your thoughts on the relationship between Cruisers and BattleCruisers and Battleships. Ever since the Warp Speed Changes, this game has become very cruiser heavy, coupled with the buffs in the cruiser rebalance it seems that anything larger is irrelevant in todays game. (Exception being Drone based ships *Cough* Domi *Cough* that can project damage on any size target up and down the spectrum of course)

Looking at Battlecruisers do you feel that BC's are in need of improvements? What would you change about them, if nothing why not?

Looking at BS do you feel that BS's are in need of improvements? What would you change about them, if nothing why not?

I have been around for a while, and recall the good days where BC's and BS's and Cruisers all played an integral role in fleet make ups. BC > Cruisers > BS > BC. It was a nice little food chain, that demanded intel on enemy fleets so you could effectively counter what they were bringing to the field. Today 2/3rds of that chain are broken, and we are left with Cruisers trying to counter cruisers...and due to the nature of that, you see a perceived imbalance in ships, namely T3s or the king of range dictating, the Ishtar.

Do you think it is T3's and Ishtars that are the problem, or could it infact be that presently there is no bigger fish in the pond worth using to snuff them out? Or a little from column A, a little from column B?
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#42 - 2014-12-08 18:10:39 UTC
Good luck Manny, I hope you get a seat.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Tappits
Sniggerdly
Pandemic Legion
#43 - 2014-12-08 18:14:54 UTC
Manfred is in my top 2 list.
Belhorn Battlebeard
Banda di Amici
Pandemic Horde
#44 - 2014-12-08 18:57:30 UTC
7 votes from me m8 Lol
Xander Phoena
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#45 - 2014-12-08 19:17:27 UTC
You have my sword, etc.

www.crossingzebras.com

Rhavas
Noble Sentiments
Second Empire.
#46 - 2014-12-08 19:20:07 UTC
Manfred Sideous wrote:
Midori Tsu wrote:
One of my main concerns is ship balance, and i'd like to learn more about your thoughts on it. As someone who flies T3s in a routine fashion, I'd like to hear you would balance T3s. I'd also like to know how you believe Ishtars are overpowered, do you think that sentries should be looked at as well?


T3s as they stand are better than BS , HAC , Command Ships they dominate fights as they do most thing very well all at once. I am not a game designer but it feels like they do too much well at once. Tank , Speed , Sig , DPS & DPS Application. Please point to a HAC , BS , BC hull that can do all of the above other than the Ishtar. I am not quite sure what to do with the Ishtar either but its still pretty op. I think maybe reducing the dronebay size is the answer.


Hi Manny, I thought you were a great candidate last year, sure you will get in and be great.

One note of caution however: remember the wormhole T3 meta needs to be kept in mind and is not the same as the null T3 meta. I would suggest that "Nerf the crap out of everything" is not the right answer there either.

Would you call for instance an armor tanked ECM Tengu OP at that level? I wouldn't but yet it is a very common wormhole fit.

Author of Interstellar Privateer Shattered Planets, Wormholes and Game Commentary

LUMINOUS SPIRIT
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#47 - 2014-12-08 19:36:23 UTC
No. your legion harbors members that scam newbros in recruitment channels. Not cool Manny, not cool.

http://www.reddit.com/r/Eve/comments/2onm30/new_player_scammed_in_corp_recruitment_channel/

you are not fit to be on CSM until you clean up PL.
Elise Randolph
Habitual Euthanasia
Pandemic Legion
#48 - 2014-12-08 19:37:26 UTC
I'm going to vote the **** out of Manny, easily the most qualified CSM of any candidate running so far.

~

BadAssMcKill
Aliastra
#49 - 2014-12-08 19:51:03 UTC
LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:
No. your legion harbors members that scam newbros in recruitment channels. Not cool Manny, not cool.

http://www.reddit.com/r/Eve/comments/2onm30/new_player_scammed_in_corp_recruitment_channel/

you are not fit to be on CSM until you clean up PL.


>newbro >12m sp
Dirk Action
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#50 - 2014-12-08 19:52:41 UTC
LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:
No. your legion harbors members that scam newbros in recruitment channels. Not cool Manny, not cool.

http://www.reddit.com/r/Eve/comments/2onm30/new_player_scammed_in_corp_recruitment_channel/

you are not fit to be on CSM until you clean up PL.


lol

i'm sure manny will surely be able to dictate to each corp in PL how they are not allowed to make their own policies on things like scamming

Roll
Hendrick Tallardar
Doomheim
#51 - 2014-12-08 19:53:23 UTC  |  Edited by: Hendrick Tallardar
LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:
No. your legion harbors members that scam newbros in recruitment channels. Not cool Manny, not cool.

http://www.reddit.com/r/Eve/comments/2onm30/new_player_scammed_in_corp_recruitment_channel/

you are not fit to be on CSM until you clean up PL.


That scam was perpetrated in a private convo. CCP allow you to do that, they don't allow scams to be don INSIDE the recruitment channel.

Secondly, if we are going to define a 12million SP pilot with a nearly 1billion ISK ship as a "newbro" then I'm an adorable newbie and should be free from being PVP'd.

Edit - Also lmao at you thinking Manny isn't "fit to be on CSM" because people in his alliance use valid mechanics CCP openly support and even warn players about.
JEFFRAIDER
THIGH GUYS
#52 - 2014-12-08 19:55:52 UTC
LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:
No. your legion harbors members that scam newbros in recruitment channels. Not cool Manny, not cool.

http://www.reddit.com/r/Eve/comments/2onm30/new_player_scammed_in_corp_recruitment_channel/

you are not fit to be on CSM until you clean up PL.


**** THE NEWBROS
LUMINOUS SPIRIT
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#53 - 2014-12-08 20:05:45 UTC  |  Edited by: LUMINOUS SPIRIT
BadAssMcKill wrote:
LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:
No. your legion harbors members that scam newbros in recruitment channels. Not cool Manny, not cool.

http://www.reddit.com/r/Eve/comments/2onm30/new_player_scammed_in_corp_recruitment_channel/

you are not fit to be on CSM until you clean up PL.


>newbro >12m sp


Lol, you think its about you or your recruitment scams, or particular details of this scam? No my friend, its not. its about something bigger.

Its about creating and exploiting wedges in the community. Right now I opened up a wedge - Manfred's tolerance of scamming. Now, if someone on say evenews24.com or tmc picks this up, they are going to ask him a question - whats his stance on recruitment scams in his organization?

He has three answers.

1) He supports it. result - alienates half the normal people who will consider him nothing better then a CODE scumbag or a Goon scammer. Lost votes, others will spin this against him. He loses the election, again. Frankly, if he does support it, then he is no different from CODE. Scammers are scammers, all the same.

2) He fluffs the answer and appears weak and indecisive. Other candidates will exploit this at a minimum. Noone likes evasive politicians.

3) He says he is against. He will have to throw you under the bus of course, or at least that dude of yours, to make a show of commitment. This will have a positive effect on his image and differentiate him from Goon and other scamming candidates. Lots of potential for good spin here.

Take it from me, I was senior campaign manager for several Ontario provincial elections. I know how this **** works.

EDIT - oh lol look at this, in time it took me to type this, already 3! posts defending recruitment scams, one questioning Manfred's ability to enforce rules across his! organization, and one post got edited. Definitely a wedge, and definitely worthy of further note by journalists.
Hendrick Tallardar
Doomheim
#54 - 2014-12-08 20:14:55 UTC
LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:
BadAssMcKill wrote:
LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:
No. your legion harbors members that scam newbros in recruitment channels. Not cool Manny, not cool.

http://www.reddit.com/r/Eve/comments/2onm30/new_player_scammed_in_corp_recruitment_channel/

you are not fit to be on CSM until you clean up PL.


>newbro >12m sp


Lol, you think its about you or your recruitment scams, or particular details of this scam? No my friend, its not. its about something bigger.

Its about creating and exploiting wedges in the community. Right now I opened up a wedge - Manfred's tolerance of scamming. Now, if someone on say evenews24.com or tmc picks this up, they are going to ask him a question - whats his stance on recruitment scams in his organization?

He has three answers.

1) He supports it. result - alienates half the normal people who will consider him nothing better then a CODE scumbag or a Goon scammer. Lost votes, others will spin this against him. He loses the election, again. Frankly, if he does support it, then he is no different from CODE. Scammers are scammers, all the same.

2) He fluffs the answer and appears weak and indecisive. Other candidates will exploit this at a minimum. Noone likes evasive politicians.

3) He says he is against. He will have to throw you under the bus of course, or at least that dude of yours, to make a show of commitment. This will have a positive effect on his image and differentiate him from Goon and other scamming candidates. Lots of potential for good spin here.

Take it from me, I was senior campaign manager for several Ontario provincial elections. I know how this **** works.

EDIT - oh lol look at this, in time it took me to type this, already 3! posts defending recruitment scams, one questioning Manfred's ability to enforce rules across his! organization, and one post got edited. Definitely a wedge, and definitely worthy of further note by journalists.


Do you have real world medical training to determine that these people are "normal" and that anyone who supports in-game scamming (which the developers of this game do) are "abnormal"?

Take it from me, I'm an international lawyer and you can be sued for libel over this statement.
Literally Space Moses
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#55 - 2014-12-08 20:17:42 UTC
LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:
BadAssMcKill wrote:
LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:
No. your legion harbors members that scam newbros in recruitment channels. Not cool Manny, not cool.

http://www.reddit.com/r/Eve/comments/2onm30/new_player_scammed_in_corp_recruitment_channel/

you are not fit to be on CSM until you clean up PL.


>newbro >12m sp


Lol, you think its about you or your recruitment scams, or particular details of this scam? No my friend, its not. its about something bigger.

Its about creating and exploiting wedges in the community. Right now I opened up a wedge - Manfred's tolerance of scamming. Now, if someone on say evenews24.com or tmc picks this up, they are going to ask him a question - whats his stance on recruitment scams in his organization?

He has three answers.

1) He supports it. result - alienates half the normal people who will consider him nothing better then a CODE scumbag or a Goon scammer. Lost votes, others will spin this against him. He loses the election, again. Frankly, if he does support it, then he is no different from CODE. Scammers are scammers, all the same.

2) He fluffs the answer and appears weak and indecisive. Other candidates will exploit this at a minimum. Noone likes evasive politicians.

3) He says he is against. He will have to throw you under the bus of course, or at least that dude of yours, to make a show of commitment. This will have a positive effect on his image and differentiate him from Goon and other scamming candidates. Lots of potential for good spin here.

Take it from me, I was senior campaign manager for several Ontario provincial elections. I know how this **** works.

EDIT - oh lol look at this, in time it took me to type this, already 3! posts defending recruitment scams, one questioning Manfred's ability to enforce rules across his! organization, and one post got edited. Definitely a wedge, and definitely worthy of further note by journalists.


Man, such a puppetmaster. Truely Manny is crumbling before your might.

Alternatively, lol nerd no one cares.

#T2013

LUMINOUS SPIRIT
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#56 - 2014-12-08 20:20:15 UTC
Hendrick Tallardar wrote:
LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:
BadAssMcKill wrote:
LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:
No. your legion harbors members that scam newbros in recruitment channels. Not cool Manny, not cool.

http://www.reddit.com/r/Eve/comments/2onm30/new_player_scammed_in_corp_recruitment_channel/

you are not fit to be on CSM until you clean up PL.


>newbro >12m sp


Lol, you think its about you or your recruitment scams, or particular details of this scam? No my friend, its not. its about something bigger.

Its about creating and exploiting wedges in the community. Right now I opened up a wedge - Manfred's tolerance of scamming. Now, if someone on say evenews24.com or tmc picks this up, they are going to ask him a question - whats his stance on recruitment scams in his organization?

He has three answers.

1) He supports it. result - alienates half the normal people who will consider him nothing better then a CODE scumbag or a Goon scammer. Lost votes, others will spin this against him. He loses the election, again. Frankly, if he does support it, then he is no different from CODE. Scammers are scammers, all the same.

2) He fluffs the answer and appears weak and indecisive. Other candidates will exploit this at a minimum. Noone likes evasive politicians.

3) He says he is against. He will have to throw you under the bus of course, or at least that dude of yours, to make a show of commitment. This will have a positive effect on his image and differentiate him from Goon and other scamming candidates. Lots of potential for good spin here.

Take it from me, I was senior campaign manager for several Ontario provincial elections. I know how this **** works.

EDIT - oh lol look at this, in time it took me to type this, already 3! posts defending recruitment scams, one questioning Manfred's ability to enforce rules across his! organization, and one post got edited. Definitely a wedge, and definitely worthy of further note by journalists.


Do you have real world medical training to determine that these people are "normal" and that anyone who supports in-game scamming (which the developers of this game do) are "abnormal"?

Take it from me, I'm an international lawyer and you can be sued for libel over this statement.


Erotica 1 vs Rippard Teg.

White knights win.

gg.

Keep fanning the flames though, more posts and reposts, the better.
LUMINOUS SPIRIT
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#57 - 2014-12-08 20:22:06 UTC
Literally Space Moses wrote:


Alternatively, lol nerd no one cares.


Perhaps. depends if this gets picked up and fanned by Manfred's rivals, or wont.

My job is to highlight an issue.
Hendrick Tallardar
Doomheim
#58 - 2014-12-08 20:48:27 UTC
LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:


Erotica 1 vs Rippard Teg.

White knights win.

gg.

Keep fanning the flames though, more posts and reposts, the better.


Erotica 1 involved out of game harassment. Please point to where Manny (or any PL member involved with that scam) was involved with out of game harassment. If you think in-game scamming is a major issue and should automatically disqualify a player from running for CSM then I highly suggest you petition CCP to remove any candidate whose group scams other players.
LUMINOUS SPIRIT
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#59 - 2014-12-08 21:40:56 UTC
Hendrick Tallardar wrote:
LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:


Erotica 1 vs Rippard Teg.

White knights win.

gg.

Keep fanning the flames though, more posts and reposts, the better.


Erotica 1 involved out of game harassment. Please point to where Manny (or any PL member involved with that scam) was involved with out of game harassment. If you think in-game scamming is a major issue and should automatically disqualify a player from running for CSM then I highly suggest you petition CCP to remove any candidate whose group scams other players.


Hendrick Tallardar wrote:
LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:


Erotica 1 vs Rippard Teg.

White knights win.

gg.

Keep fanning the flames though, more posts and reposts, the better.


Erotica 1 involved out of game harassment. Please point to where Manny (or any PL member involved with that scam) was involved with out of game harassment. If you think in-game scamming is a major issue and should automatically disqualify a player from running for CSM then I highly suggest you petition CCP to remove any candidate whose group scams other players.


Lol. Please point where I said Manfred was involved with any of the above. Learn to read replies.

The question was 'what is normal people in EVE - those who scam, or those who do not'? Erotica 1 episode demonstrated that majority of people are against scamming, ergo that is the normal behavior. And in any situation where there is a popularity contest between a normal and a scammer - normal wins.
Dirk Action
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#60 - 2014-12-08 21:43:51 UTC
LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:
BadAssMcKill wrote:
LUMINOUS SPIRIT wrote:
No. your legion harbors members that scam newbros in recruitment channels. Not cool Manny, not cool.

http://www.reddit.com/r/Eve/comments/2onm30/new_player_scammed_in_corp_recruitment_channel/

you are not fit to be on CSM until you clean up PL.


>newbro >12m sp


Lol, you think its about you or your recruitment scams, or particular details of this scam? No my friend, its not. its about something bigger.

Its about creating and exploiting wedges in the community. Right now I opened up a wedge - Manfred's tolerance of scamming. Now, if someone on say evenews24.com or tmc picks this up, they are going to ask him a question - whats his stance on recruitment scams in his organization?

He has three answers.

1) He supports it. result - alienates half the normal people who will consider him nothing better then a CODE scumbag or a Goon scammer. Lost votes, others will spin this against him. He loses the election, again. Frankly, if he does support it, then he is no different from CODE. Scammers are scammers, all the same.

2) He fluffs the answer and appears weak and indecisive. Other candidates will exploit this at a minimum. Noone likes evasive politicians.

3) He says he is against. He will have to throw you under the bus of course, or at least that dude of yours, to make a show of commitment. This will have a positive effect on his image and differentiate him from Goon and other scamming candidates. Lots of potential for good spin here.

Take it from me, I was senior campaign manager for several Ontario provincial elections. I know how this **** works.

EDIT - oh lol look at this, in time it took me to type this, already 3! posts defending recruitment scams, one questioning Manfred's ability to enforce rules across his! organization, and one post got edited. Definitely a wedge, and definitely worthy of further note by journalists.


u truly are a metagame master

u have singlehandedly ruined manfred "manny ♥" sideous' career of fake videogame politics

the world shall fear u 5evrmore