EVE Information Portal

You perfectly summed up the point of the changes, which is hindering power projection across the map.

I whole heatedly agree with these changes, and support the developers intentions of creating player-made jumpgates.

I only need one they may feel safer with 5

so sov is broken in null yes not cap ship. If you dont want to run eve online any more just shut it down. I now have 15 account I super 3 how are training to get into supers, a rorq account, a jf account, and training up another jf account and was going to train up 2 more of my account so I have a jf of each race. I dont think I'll be doing this now and will most likey not get the other 3 supers. Because what the point of have jump drive ships anymore. If these change go thought you will lose most of your null account who have caps in null. Because I will not be playing on any of my 15 accounts after November. Oh and I was looking in to getting 2 more account but wont be now so your loseing out on 17 account go job on killing eve

I think these changes will be good as a whole..

It will change up the way Null is played. Capitol movement will have more strategic value.. it will matter where you deploy them.

Smaller associations will be more willing to use their bigger toys, without having to feel under the constant threat of getting dropped at any moment (they still will, but they will feel safer)

3rd party involvement in Sov war will be less of a thing.. (except when it comes to Provi)

For instance what i can see as a result of this change Stainwagon will want/need to challenge HERO for Catch, which they are currently in a position where they could attack with capitols without too much timer fuss. Now it would come to a dissension for N3/PL to Commit capitols to help their preferred region owner secure their space, and risk opening up the North for attack from a capitol force of CFC.

It may give some renters the balls to form up a new alliance to try and claim Sov on from their overlords in hope that they would be too busy elsewhere or deem it not worth the effort.



The biggest thing that will come out of this really is that you will see less PL cap fleets dropping on random cruisers in low sec out of boredom. And you wont see the same cap fleet defend/attack two different sides of a region in the space of a hour.

This is a righteous burn, and I agree that this idea is so bad that those responsible for it should be the next to be laid off.

How dare you hate on the poor masses that live in eve and scrap out very little in life in this game. These poor poor people are going to fall off the bored and die due to starvation from the mighty Ark that fuels their live's being strangled R.I.P. MOA/poor people.

Dear CCP,

I likely will not quit but I wanted to thank you for really suggesting "fixes" that destroy all the fun I actually have in the game.

Reality check: NOT ALL OF US LIKE PVP. SOME OF US ACTUALLY ENJOY LOGISTICS.

Thank you for making suggestions that make the game suck for us. Sure, I'm going to stargate jump a 7 bil JF filled with minerals or product into null.

By the way this will, as usual, hurt the little guy. The big alliances with all the ISK will be able to continue to do what they want the rest of us will just have to accept all the risk as usual.

If you wanted to make some positive changes, try taking the Tech 2 BPO's from the Goons and spreading the wealth.

im sure this has been posted before but it pretty much suggests that this is fail on arrival https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1rDMQpeKE-HzGKmFRTR69HJCk4McHyHz020Qs4Rgg414/htmlview?pli=1&sle=true#gid=0

And after this change, it just seems that there will be islands in null and low where supers are pocketed and are essentially unbeatable. Cant see how this is a good thing.

Hmmm with these changes you'll be flying T1 freighters down nullsec pipes because (a) hold more (b) cheaper and (c) Jump Freighters will need to use the stargate anyway.