EVE Information Portal

No, it does not work. After flying for half an hour in a Dram at over 6 Km/s my alt still landed at the Acc. Gate

Have you fought and won yet? Outside LP the real rewards from the level 4 missions have come from the loot and salvage (depending on the mission, of course). If the loot is good, then that is enough.

why would you orbit with railguns? ccp this is horrible, why can't you do anything right?

Dear CCP Fozzie,

First, forgive my noobiness on that matter, but I have some questions witch I cannot find a solid answer.

1 – Appears to me that new type of mission have a clear objective to approximate the pve part to the pvp part of the game, and which the conception I ask for a way to be possible for the play get a specific agent that only give burner missions. That way the player will have more ways to try to approximate the pvp part of the game, because he will have more missions to do. You already said that the reward part of the burner mission will be similar to ordinary level four missions, and giving that consideration I do not see any impediment of an exclusive burner mission agent, seems nobody will be rich doing only that kind of mission. Again, forgive me if you have another argument, please clarify that point.

2 – Again, in the way to approximate the pve to pvp, I ask if will be necessary to fit the warp disruptor / warp scramble modules. This is because in pvp that module seems to be a necessary one, because without it the enemy player will get away. However, the current npc AI do not warp way when in danger of being exploded. So, I ask for a new type of AI for the burner npc, which warp off if not scrambled / disrupted. I do not say warp off grid, but warp to 100km or some distance to be necessary for the play to again, tackle it.

In advanced, thank you for your consideration.

Castelo

PS: I alread post the same question on the test server forum, just to be clear in being listened.

when FW first started, players were motoring vagabonds into frig plexes, and it was quickly ruled an exploit to bypass ship restrictions.. while the npc won't complain, someone losing an expensive AF to your HAC may.. :D

I was excited about this when I first heard, and then I read the fine print on how they will only be included in the normal mission pool.

As a pilot who specializes in only the smaller variety of ships (I only have one battleship skill, and it's at level 3, the large guns/missiles are even worse) this is content I am very interested in that will not be easily accessible. Considering I would either have to get lucky, find a way to get through the normal level 4 missions without skills for piloting larger more powerful ships, or constantly decline missions until I get one, running my faction standing into the ground.

Just played with these burner missions on SiSi. Haha holy crap they're insane.
Me and a friend tried them in twin Hawks with full Crystal set, missile implants and Blue Pill.

Yeah so, we died every time.

Gonna try again tomorrow. Good fun in a small group but holy hell is there gonna be some whining when people try this on TQ for the first time and they try it solo.

Took me three tries to beat the Sansha burner. I lost a Worm and a Hawk, but managed to do it in a buffer fit Daredevil, t2/meta4 fit, no implants, no drugs (I did take the liberty to fit T2 trimarks though).

Apparently even though the visual is that of railguns, it does appear to do EM/Therm damage. Weird. I think that should be fixed.

You say that like its a bad thing...:D

Full EVE experience starts with two accounts. I believe most people who have been around for more than a year have at least two accounts. EVE is just that kind of game where having more than one account is the logical and sensible thing as long as you have 20+ playhours per month (for most people with average isk/h).