Player Features and Ideas Discussion

....Also can you please introduce way to rent assembly lines to public ? let Corps compete for their rental fees like POCOs

I don't understand, there is no 'balance' here it is very simple. You either can build capitals in low or you can't (unless you want to make a loss). My argument is that the difference in cost to produce should be small enough that they can be built in low, which is what was mentioned at the fanfest panel but is not shown in this thread.

Not really sure where there idea of balance has come in or why you are pointing out that some regions are riskier because it is unrelated to my point.

I think you think this is like mining, like null should make 50m/hr vs 20m/hr in low or something to balance risk. That is not the case, it is you can build with profit or you can build with loss, simple.

>Yes, this is a good idea. But i think Hyasyoda mobile labs needs a big buff (For the Caldari Epic)

Hyasyoda mobile labs:
Time multiplier for Research ME: 0.7 (was 0.75).
Time multiplier for Research TE: 0.7 (was 0.75).
Time multiplier for copying: 0.6 (was 0.65).
Time multiplier for invention: 0.5 (was 0.5)

So we need only this Lab for a POS, but it will be expensive.

245 pages of ideas, discussions and requests from those of us who are merely "a small portion of the community" (CCP's description of us, not our own description)

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=194625

for more than a year now, and there are threads before that as well we have requested, begged, pleaded, presented, outlined, and whined about POS's and this summer, well, you know...

o/
Celly Smunt

First off would just like to say the thought of an industry release was enough to bring me back to game, but still think there’s quite a bit of work to do to make it as popular as Apocrypha.

Couple of things that for me personally need addressing:

1) Mobile labs and advanced mobile labs need renaming or changing to actually reflect their names - so one named for TE and one for ME research or actually give both all of the research options. There’s no reason for both to not have all 4 types of research now slots are removed so rebalance them to offer 2 tiers of bonus would be a wise move to make it more accessible and understandable.

2) The storage space sucks – there is no reason not to vastly increase the storage space 10 fold on all arrays, it simply allows players to put more at risk whilst making installing jobs easier. Previously to install 100 component jobs I had to move a bunch of T2 materials between 10 arrays, the most annoying part being not all of the materials fit in a single array so it wasn’t a simple case of moving things between arrays. This is a needlessly annoying task, that also makes group industry more frustrating too logging on an off between alts to move materials between arrays and to install jobs is just pointless gameplay.

Also just a quick additional thing is like many others I really think some bonus needs to be in place for multiple arrays. I’ve also done highsec POS bashing for profit and we used to choose our targets based on the number of arrays and their sale value. So either there needs to be an incentive to keep more expensive stuff in space or loot needs to drop from industry jobs in progress when a array is destroyed. The risk and reward balance only works if there is a driver for people to shoot highsec POS’s.

Fozzie acknowledged on the stream the bad bad bad place missiles are in, combines with POS defense overall

Any news on making the Starbase Defense Management skill only needing anchoring 4 and not 5? Like that one guy said at fanfest.

What size tower are you using?

Have you accounted for the fact you will only need 1 of each assy array and one adv lab and one hyasoda etc, now that there are no more slots?

Because being able to produce things faster has no outcome on how much isk per month you can make...

NO, they MUST be in the physical item doing the production, research, invention etc