These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Live Events Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

Provist manhunt - a better live event?

First post
Author
Paul Otichoda
Perkone
Caldari State
#1 - 2014-04-20 11:39:43 UTC
I want to gauge people's reaction to the provist manhunt live event now that its over.

While I only participated on one of the fights it seemed a much better than the disaster that was Operation Spectre mainly because most of it was held in high sec and as such let small groups and solo players have a chance, even if the ships died so quickly anyone in a slow ship never had a chance of even seeing the target. That being said the events held in low sec once again show how hard it is for small group to fight against the alliances.

Overall I'd say a much better effort
Cultural Enrichment
Jenkem Puffing Association
#2 - 2014-04-20 13:29:04 UTC
Low sec spawns were system-wide fights with gate camps, station camps, fights to hold the grid with the carriers and potential for fights to happends in the neighbouring systems.

Highsec spawns were punching balls/DPS race where all you did was locking a target and shooting it until it died (quickly), while taking half a dozen jumps under heavy TiDi were all you had to do was looking at your screen.

Quote:
That being said the events held in low sec once again show how hard it is for small group to fight against the alliances.

Maybe if these small groups actually tried to have the same degree of organization, involvment and preparation as these "large" groups, they would stand a better chance. And really, 40 PL in navy apocs is not that large of a fleet, and would not have dominated the fight if the 800 other people in local were risking something bigger than a destroyer.

But I guess the problem is that low sec events were actual fights instead of simply bashing a helpless carrier who dont agress you with more than 2 dragonfly at once.
Paul Otichoda
Perkone
Caldari State
#3 - 2014-04-20 14:55:37 UTC
Cultural Enrichment wrote:


Quote:
That being said the events held in low sec once again show how hard it is for small group to fight against the alliances.

Maybe if these small groups actually tried to have the same degree of organization, involvment and preparation as these "large" groups, they would stand a better chance. And really, 40 PL in navy apocs is not that large of a fleet, and would not have dominated the fight if the 800 other people in local were risking something bigger than a destroyer.


You did see the local during operation spectre right? The actor instructions where scrolled off the screen in an instant by "x armour" or "x shield" you can't co-ordinate under those conditions. And are you really expecting a group of random players within 5 minutes to have organised into full combat squads with voice coms and a logi support wing?

And the reason everyone even for the small ships was because if you took a large (slow) ship in the high sec events its all over by the time you're there
Cultural Enrichment
Jenkem Puffing Association
#4 - 2014-04-20 15:35:09 UTC
Paul Otichoda wrote:
Cultural Enrichment wrote:


Quote:
That being said the events held in low sec once again show how hard it is for small group to fight against the alliances.

Maybe if these small groups actually tried to have the same degree of organization, involvment and preparation as these "large" groups, they would stand a better chance. And really, 40 PL in navy apocs is not that large of a fleet, and would not have dominated the fight if the 800 other people in local were risking something bigger than a destroyer.


You did see the local during operation spectre right? The actor instructions where scrolled off the screen in an instant by "x armour" or "x shield" you can't co-ordinate under those conditions. And are you really expecting a group of random players within 5 minutes to have organised into full combat squads with voice coms and a logi support wing?

And the reason everyone even for the small ships was because if you took a large (slow) ship in the high sec events its all over by the time you're there

I went to that last event in a machariel (modified for the occasion with 3 warp speed rigs and 2 nanofibers) , by the time I came in, no carrier was below 80% shield. You are simply making excuses for people to be dumb, lazy, antisocial and entilted.
Paul Otichoda
Perkone
Caldari State
#5 - 2014-04-20 16:46:20 UTC
Cultural Enrichment wrote:
Paul Otichoda wrote:
Cultural Enrichment wrote:


Quote:
That being said the events held in low sec once again show how hard it is for small group to fight against the alliances.

Maybe if these small groups actually tried to have the same degree of organization, involvment and preparation as these "large" groups, they would stand a better chance. And really, 40 PL in navy apocs is not that large of a fleet, and would not have dominated the fight if the 800 other people in local were risking something bigger than a destroyer.


You did see the local during operation spectre right? The actor instructions where scrolled off the screen in an instant by "x armour" or "x shield" you can't co-ordinate under those conditions. And are you really expecting a group of random players within 5 minutes to have organised into full combat squads with voice coms and a logi support wing?

And the reason everyone even for the small ships was because if you took a large (slow) ship in the high sec events its all over by the time you're there

I went to that last event in a machariel (modified for the occasion with 3 warp speed rigs and 2 nanofibers) , by the time I came in, no carrier was below 80% shield. You are simply making excuses for people to be dumb, lazy, antisocial and entilted.


I was taking my expectations from the Thursday event where my colleague in Hyperion wasn't even on grid when the last dread died. From what I can tell the final fight was actually a good long affair because they actually supported themselves with logi. Also most people consider a 500m ship a rather large investment to just be thrown away in combat
Eran Mintor
Metropolis Commercial Consortium
#6 - 2014-04-20 21:10:22 UTC
To the OP. Event was good. Would have been great if the Provists were actually trying to achieve some goal rather than suicide capitalships for fun and profit. There was a time when live events like this drove some story and the event actors actually roleplayed with everyone in the IGS forums! Those were the best events.

To the other posters telling people to bring bigger ships: no. Not everyone wants to fly in a fleet of strangers and prefer solo. Small stuff is better in that situation. But hey, if you want to buy me a machariel that will likely die to TiDi you're more than welcome to do so, but considering I was one of the first few people to arrive at the last three events I'm quite satisfied. I just wish I had specialized more for scan resolution for those damn pods...
Paul Otichoda
Perkone
Caldari State
#7 - 2014-04-20 21:31:18 UTC
Eran Mintor wrote:
To the OP. Event was good. Would have been great if the Provists were actually trying to achieve some goal rather than suicide capitalships for fun and profit. There was a time when live events like this drove some story and the event actors actually roleplayed with everyone in the IGS forums! Those were the best events.


I do wonder if it's setting up some kind of storyline for the upcoming update. Most likely is a caldari civil war as caldari prime suceeds from the state along with other planets. The provists were fighting close to the gallente border. But yes it does seem the world has taken backseat to the sandbox. I'm all for letting people make the story but every sandbox needs a few buckets
Jandice Ymladris
Aurora Arcology
#8 - 2014-04-21 20:14:21 UTC
I did enjoy this event, offered something for everyone, in all timezones.

Minor complaint from me is the lack of storydrive. Most actors didn't explain their purpose to be there, save 'to die for the True Caldari Way as martyrs'

However, all in all, a very enjoyable event, one that helped me greatly in writing reports! Went all out for it!

Did like the fact it wasn't something totally out the blue, but related to older newsreports. The Provists were all member of the 37th squadron, and were part of the trial where they got dishonourably discharged, a severe punishment in the State. So it's not unthinkable they offered their knowledge of Caldari Navy assets to the Dragonaurs in exchange for revenge.

Providing a new home for refugees in the Aurora Arcology

March rabbit
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#9 - 2014-04-21 21:40:11 UTC  |  Edited by: March rabbit
Cultural Enrichment wrote:
Low sec spawns were system-wide fights with gate camps, station camps, fights to hold the grid with the carriers and potential for fights to happends in the neighbouring systems.

in other words: just 1234567890th 0.0 sec battle.

good if you like it. me - don't.


to the OP: personally i didn't participate. Just had no interest. Killing carriers who are not trying to survive? Fighting with blobbers and campers? Bring BS into low-sec (LoL) or into Caldari space (for Gallente Militia member)?
Nope. Thanks.

The Mittani: "the inappropriate drunked joke"

Eran Mintor
Metropolis Commercial Consortium
#10 - 2014-04-21 21:43:22 UTC
March rabbit wrote:
Cultural Enrichment wrote:
Low sec spawns were system-wide fights with gate camps, station camps, fights to hold the grid with the carriers and potential for fights to happends in the neighbouring systems.

in other words: just 1234567890th 0.0 sec battle.

good if you like it. me - don't.


Which is why you're in a NPC FW corp. Cool story bro.
March rabbit
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#11 - 2014-04-21 21:46:11 UTC
Eran Mintor wrote:
March rabbit wrote:
Cultural Enrichment wrote:
Low sec spawns were system-wide fights with gate camps, station camps, fights to hold the grid with the carriers and potential for fights to happends in the neighbouring systems.

in other words: just 1234567890th 0.0 sec battle.

good if you like it. me - don't.


Which is why you're in a NPC FW corp. Cool story bro.

quick-witted! Shocked

The Mittani: "the inappropriate drunked joke"

CCP Falcon
#12 - 2014-04-21 23:11:53 UTC
Eran Mintor wrote:
Would have been great if the Provists were actually trying to achieve some goal rather than suicide capitalships for fun and profit.


Maybe they were, and just didn't want to trust capsuleers with that information? Or maybe they weren't.

Not everything has to be spelled out in black and white.

CCP Falcon || EVE Universe Community Manager || @CCP_Falcon

Happy Birthday To FAWLTY7! <3

Eran Mintor
Metropolis Commercial Consortium
#13 - 2014-04-21 23:28:15 UTC  |  Edited by: CCP Falcon
Hai Falcon!

Certainly there is the possibility that some hidden agenda was being carried out but the evidence isn't there. The dialogue and locations of fighting had little significance/meaning from anyone not CCP. Im not hating you guys, I appreciate the event and thought it was pretty well done. The only issue I had is the lack of any RP from the actors like we've had in the past. The events leading up to the Incursions were a great example of how a little carrot dangled infront of RPers noses goes a long way to add to an event.

I agree not everything should be black and white but perhaps you understand a little more what I'm talking about. It's hard for RPers to even speculate beyond the Provists seeking martyrdom.

Also, if they don't trust capsuleers how do they manage to fly together as capsuleers? Lol

Feeeeeeed usssss!

Cheers. Miss you <3
Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
#14 - 2014-04-21 23:51:55 UTC
CCP Falcon wrote:


Maybe they were, and just didn't want to trust capsuleers with that information? Or maybe they weren't.

Not everything has to be spelled out in black and white.


It's not about it being spelt out. It's about there being visual clues to something deeper so that people have an avenue to start trying to dig deeper. Right now there is no way to dig deeper without wild ass guessing as to what they were doing, since they were at inconsistent locations in systems with no pattern to the system locations anyone could derive either.
Also be great if people trying to dig deeper got feedback, even if it was 'You find nothing' so they at least know someone bothered to read their mail.

On the event, it was better run. The Null Blocs are always going to dominate these things though if they care to be there. Talking about 'entitlement' or any other rubbish is silly. Null Blocs are already set up for years for fleet combat. High Sec isn't. So alternative ways to interact with the event that can be accomplished by a smaller fleet under fire is also desirable. i.e. obviously a smaller fleet can't kill carriers, but there could be much smaller objectives either on grid, or even off grid providing there is some kind of reasonable clue, for those smaller fleets to attempt to get done before they get shot out of the sky.
The Events don't have to just be replicating the current state of Sov warfare where there is only one objective and biggest fleet wins pretty much.

However the reward was simply inappropriate. They were offering nearly ten times the value of the ships in reward. Over 500 Billion. And when it was correctly predicted beforehand by the playerbase that PL would walk away with most of the low sec plex, CCP must have known that one of the big null blocs at least would do that. For a 500 Bil reward, using the standard bounty system there should have been at least 5 Trillion in ship value that players had to fight their way through to destroy. Since about 10% of actual ship value ends up getting paid out most of the time.
A much better reward would have been skinned ships using the new Aur store ships, or Aurum, or specific Caldari clothing.
Cool cosmetic rewards, maybe even with isk value (Though not 500 billion) of it's self. But not a powerful game item like plex.
Gilbaron
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#15 - 2014-04-22 01:07:44 UTC
the one thing that was really sad about the event was that those who were saved by PL showed up to the next event only to be killed there.

letting them live and continue the story from there would have been a much better solution
Makoto Priano
Kirkinen-Arataka Transhuman Zenith Consulting Ltd.
Arataka Research Consortium
#16 - 2014-04-22 01:07:48 UTC
o/

Second Eran on the please-more-arpee-please angle. That said, definitely liked the varied timezones and the warning. As a US TZ player, it's really hard to have a presence. :x Got in a little bit of Ishu-v-Provist banter, which was fun, even if I didn't have much chance to pursue before everything hit the fan. ;)

Itsukame-Zainou Hyperspatial Inquiries: exploring the edge of the known, advancing the state of the art. Would you like to know more?

GizzyBoy
I N E X T R E M I S
Tactical Narcotics Team
#17 - 2014-04-22 05:17:06 UTC  |  Edited by: GizzyBoy
In hs i think a 15 man npc gang would have been better,

or if you shoot the npc actor you get a timer that allows all the npc actors to engage you.
Maybe make it another colour/state ? that way at least the rest of the hs actors can engage alot more things.

haven't attempted a ls live events yet.

other than that, shooting caps is always fun.

Rewards wise you could have just given 1plex each to 10 random people on the kill mails, and gotten a similar participation level.
Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
#18 - 2014-04-22 09:34:07 UTC
The point of live events is that the actors are under exactly the same rules as the players are. Sometimes the actors will be suspect. Sometimes the players will be the ones going suspect instead. Sometimes everyone will go suspect. But there are no 'special' Live Event Actor rules.

If fleet vs fleet without wardecs is an issue in highsec, then maybe we need to lobby for the ability to create fleet wide limited engagements, (That would then also mean that Logi could rep their own fleet without going suspect since everyone had the same limited engagement tags). But that's a bit more of a complex mechanic and may start to confuse people again, as well as opening up additional gank opportunities. May not be a bad thing overall, but you would also need to introduce some mechanic (Intel Tab, I'm looking at you) to determine if your target was in a fleet, and who else was in the same fleet, so that you could engage a suspect safely rather than engage a suspect and discover 30 other ships on the undock were also in fleet with them.
War Kitten
Panda McLegion
#19 - 2014-04-22 13:52:14 UTC  |  Edited by: CCP Falcon
Eran Mintor wrote:
Hai Falcon!

Certainly there is the possibility that some hidden agenda was being carried out but the evidence isn't there.


Take the evidence you have, figure out the story....

The Provists stole billions in Capital Ship assets from the Caldari Navy.
The CN provided epic tears and wasted billions more on bounties.
The CN assets got blown up in the end.

Epic Troll on the part of the Provists, egg on the face of the Caldari Navy.

Op success.

I don't judge people by their race, religion, color, size, age, gender, or ethnicity. I judge them by their grammar, spelling, syntax, punctuation, clarity of expression, and logical consistency.

Eran Mintor
Metropolis Commercial Consortium
#20 - 2014-04-22 14:57:26 UTC  |  Edited by: CCP Falcon
War Kitten wrote:
Eran Mintor wrote:
Hai Falcon!

Certainly there is the possibility that some hidden agenda was being carried out but the evidence isn't there.


Take the evidence you have, figure out the story....

The Provists stole billions in Capital Ship assets from the Caldari Navy.
The CN provided epic tears and wasted billions more on bounties.
The CN assets got blown up in the end.

Epic Troll on the part of the Provists, egg on the face of the Caldari Navy.

Op success.


Um. No.
12Next page