These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Jester Trek Latest Blog

First post First post
Author
PinkPanter
Valhalla Drinking Team
#5221 - 2014-03-27 14:11:54 UTC  |  Edited by: PinkPanter
Giovanni erkelens2 wrote:
*counts down to the time someone kills himself due a scam or bonusroom in eve*


if that happens we're all ****** cause the number of rules that will step in not mentioning what will the community do will literally put this game to ****.

It's the whole point. You have so much freedom to be a ******** here yet some go EVEN further.

It's the basic flaw of all that defend this dude. You are the ones that have a chance to get rolled over in the end just because one guy went one step too far and some other vulnerable one couldn't handle it (and then hurt himself or wen using so much legal **** that will create so much attention that law enforcement and legislators will step in)
olan2005
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#5222 - 2014-03-27 14:11:56 UTC  |  Edited by: olan2005
embrel wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:

Because my point was to demonstrate why ignoring what Sokhar did or brushing it off as 'justified' demonstrates that this is just an irrational Ero1 witch hunt.


To me these are two distinct cases of people no behaving as we would expect mature persons to.

There's no justification for racist or else rants, as well as there is no justification for continuing with the bonus room long after everyone involved should have noted that the person is on his way to snap.

This is not an irrational witch hunt. It's very clear that RL-threats, racism and so on are inacceptable, so I don't see anything to discuss regarding the final words of Sokhar.

It's however not clear where the line is or should be in E1's bonus room. And this is what the community can discuss. CCP will do whatever they feel is right anyway.

Also, the people that see this thread as a harassment of E1... yeah, guess Kimye/Justin/Paris etc. also feel harassed every now and then, but somehow this is also a consequence of their own decisions.

My view and then I'll try not to post in the thread anymore: This should not lead to a ban, but I would like CCP to discretely hand out warnings, that, should in the future emerge a similar discussion there will be consequences.

Scamming is fine, ganking is fine, I like Eve. But I don't see how you can consider it fun to set up such a room.


I think you hit the nail on the head with that . Where is the line in these situations. For all discussions and commentators most agree, myself including scamming is fine. But once scam is completed and you have all possible assets extracted , is it ok to prolong the ordeal for the sucker ( victime , self inflicted) for tear extraction as it is called in-game. Should the EULA be more stringent on that aspect of scamming. Me personally i say yes . As for punshment i will disagree , there should be perma ban for Erotica1 for taking it too far, then putting this public domain which has a consequence for the whole community. There should be a temp ban for the sucker (victim ,self inflicted ) for the racism , and threats that followed. Why the lesser punishment . He was under self inflicted emotional duress, which was not completely under his control as his assets where being held to ransom , by that he had to play or loose everything he built up in his eve carrier . Coercion is used by Erotica1 , the scenario was set up by erotica1 , The control to end this was completely in Erotica1 hands . Ultimate responsibility is with the scammer Erotica1 for this entire situation
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#5223 - 2014-03-27 14:12:22 UTC  |  Edited by: Remiel Pollard
Mario Putzo wrote:
Salvos Rhoska wrote:

You think it is legal to deliberately drive a two-ton truck at people to the result of pinning them against a garage-door?


Nope, prove intent to injure, could those people have moved out of the way at any point?


Whether he could have moved out of the way wouldn't apply to my guilt if I'd caused harm. I would still be entirely responsible for the harm caused. The bottom line is, though, no harm was caused. As far as he knows, I meant to stop the truck where I did. And the results were better than I could have hoped for, the prick had been putting my mother through all kinds of emotional blackmail and I wanted him gone. Not dead, gone. I've never wanted anyone dead in my life. I wanted him gone because he was a threat to my mother, and that is all. And he grabbed his **** and took off that night, never to show his face again.

Who here can say they would NOT want the same?

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#5224 - 2014-03-27 14:12:36 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:


This is the community expressing its condemnation of Erotica1's conduct.


No, this is a segment of the community expressing it's condemnation, and expecting that condemnation to translate into direct action against a person who broke no definitive rules. And it's wrong.

I and other members of this community are not condemning Erotica1 (though we are not necessarily condoning it either).

But we recognize the fact that not only was what Sohkar did worse than anything Erotica1 did or could have done to precipitate it, but also the response of the enraged portion of the community (asking for his expulsion and wishing physical violence on him) is also worse than what Erotcia1 does.

You don't fix the ills of a society by being worse than the ills you want to fix. That only works in action movies.
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#5225 - 2014-03-27 14:12:42 UTC
Aralyn Cormallen wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Erotica 1 wrote:
All isk, assets, and skillpoints will be freely given up as the bonus round continues. I will read speeches, sing songs, and do other silly things.

EVE is just a game and we should all be able to win and lose stuff without attaching too much seriousness.

Thanks to CCP for an awesome sandbox. When I have a bit more time, I'll write a short 10 or so page response on this matter.


Remember guys, if he loses, I get that stuff, so put him through the wringer. I want freaking Lady Gaga and everything!


I vote for making him read this thread out loud, can he outpace our posting speed Twisted


Now THAT is a challenge!

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

lollerwaffle
Perkone
Caldari State
#5226 - 2014-03-27 14:12:52 UTC
LordOfDespair wrote:
lollerwaffle wrote:

Nope. Still the same one liner. Try again.


Assuming you deserve anything more. Cute.

Try again. Dismissing arguments with one liners is pretty weak. I'm sorry if I was brought up to have the decency of reading and responding to the opinions of other people by at least providing coherent points. It's not my fault the way you turned out.

Or as you would put it:
You're stupid and wrong lol
Regis Solo
Federal Defense Union
Gallente Federation
#5227 - 2014-03-27 14:13:28 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
LordOfDespair wrote:


You guys try to justify ANYTHING, no wonder you think what E1 is doing is okay.


That, or I just don't like lynch mobs summoned up by Ripard Teg.


Lynch mob is a bit extreme, he's only calling for Erotica 1 to be banned from a simple computer game.
Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#5228 - 2014-03-27 14:13:59 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Aralyn Cormallen wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Erotica 1 wrote:
All isk, assets, and skillpoints will be freely given up as the bonus round continues. I will read speeches, sing songs, and do other silly things.

EVE is just a game and we should all be able to win and lose stuff without attaching too much seriousness.

Thanks to CCP for an awesome sandbox. When I have a bit more time, I'll write a short 10 or so page response on this matter.


Remember guys, if he loses, I get that stuff, so put him through the wringer. I want freaking Lady Gaga and everything!


I vote for making him read this thread out loud, can he outpace our posting speed Twisted


I wanted him to sing 'Wind Beneath My Wings' while simultaneously faking an orgasm, or 'Smells like teen spirit' in spoken word form, by the style of William Shatner.


Remiel wins the thread! +1
Prince Kobol
#5229 - 2014-03-27 14:14:55 UTC  |  Edited by: Prince Kobol
Jenn aSide wrote:
Salvos Rhoska wrote:


This is the community expressing its condemnation of Erotica1's conduct.


No, this is a segment of the community expressing it's condemnation, and expecting that condemnation to translate into direct action against a person who broke no definitive rules. And it's wrong.

I and other members of this community are not condemning Erotica1 (though we are not necessarily condoning it either).

But we recognize the fact that not only was what Sohkar did worse than anything Erotica1 did or could have done to precipitate it, but also the response of the enraged portion of the community (asking for his expulsion and wishing physical violence on him) is also worse than what Erotcia1 does.

You don't fix the ills of a society by being worse than the ills you want to fix. That only works in action movies.


Whilst the rules are not definitive, they rarely are for a reason, there is certainly the room in them for CCP to declare if E1 was in wrong and punish him.

It is wrong to express any kind of violence, physical or mental on anybody, totally 100%.

Was Sohkar in the wrong, yes he was, however he did apologise for his words and one might say the words he spoke was when he was very distressed.

Unless you are saying that at no time in your life you have said something whilst being in a high emotional state and then deeply regretted them later.
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#5230 - 2014-03-27 14:15:08 UTC
Regis Solo wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
LordOfDespair wrote:


You guys try to justify ANYTHING, no wonder you think what E1 is doing is okay.


That, or I just don't like lynch mobs summoned up by Ripard Teg.


Lynch mob is a bit extreme, he's only calling for Erotica 1 to be banned from a simple computer game.


Many have called for far worse, and have both condoned and expressed their desire to see harm come to Ero in real life. It is a witch hunt. And the people calling for mere bans are ignoring Sokhar's much-more-banworthy offenses.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#5231 - 2014-03-27 14:15:12 UTC
Regis Solo wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
LordOfDespair wrote:


You guys try to justify ANYTHING, no wonder you think what E1 is doing is okay.


That, or I just don't like lynch mobs summoned up by Ripard Teg.


Lynch mob is a bit extreme, he's only calling for Erotica 1 to be banned from a simple computer game.


Cyber-Lynch mob then.

Oh and there have been calls in this thread for actual physical violence towards Erotica1.
Ralph King-Griffin
New Eden Tech Support
#5232 - 2014-03-27 14:16:34 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
Salvos Rhoska wrote:


This is the community expressing its condemnation of Erotica1's conduct.


No, this is a segment of the community expressing it's condemnation, and expecting that condemnation to translate into direct action against a person who broke no definitive rules. And it's wrong.

I and other members of this community are not condemning Erotica1 (though we are not necessarily condoning it either).

But we recognize the fact that not only was what Sohkar did worse than anything Erotica1 did or could have done to precipitate it, but also the response of the enraged portion of the community (asking for his expulsion and wishing physical violence on him) is also worse than what Erotcia1 does.

You don't fix the ills of a society by being worse than the ills you want to fix. That only works in action movies.

its good to see that every time someone falls asleep/phone dies , someone steps infront of the mob to shout back.
Crumplecorn
Eve Cluster Explorations
#5233 - 2014-03-27 14:16:47 UTC
PinkPanter wrote:
Giovanni erkelens2 wrote:
*counts down to the time someone kills himself due a scam or bonusroom in eve*


if that happens we're all ****** cause the number of rules that will step in not mentioning what will the community do will literally put this game to ****.
People have already died over stuffs in MMOGs.

Witty Image - Stream

Not Liking this post hurts my RL feelings and will be considered harassment

Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#5234 - 2014-03-27 14:16:53 UTC
Prince Kobol wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:
Salvos Rhoska wrote:


This is the community expressing its condemnation of Erotica1's conduct.


No, this is a segment of the community expressing it's condemnation, and expecting that condemnation to translate into direct action against a person who broke no definitive rules. And it's wrong.

I and other members of this community are not condemning Erotica1 (though we are not necessarily condoning it either).

But we recognize the fact that not only was what Sohkar did worse than anything Erotica1 did or could have done to precipitate it, but also the response of the enraged portion of the community (asking for his expulsion and wishing physical violence on him) is also worse than what Erotcia1 does.

You don't fix the ills of a society by being worse than the ills you want to fix. That only works in action movies.


Whilst the rules are not definitive, they rarely are for a reason, there is certainly the room in them for CCP to declare if E1 was in wrong and punish him.


And doing so would be wrong. Even so, if he gets punished and the racist death threat guy doesn't, that would be a worse wrong.
Ralph King-Griffin
New Eden Tech Support
#5235 - 2014-03-27 14:17:23 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
Regis Solo wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
LordOfDespair wrote:


You guys try to justify ANYTHING, no wonder you think what E1 is doing is okay.


That, or I just don't like lynch mobs summoned up by Ripard Teg.


Lynch mob is a bit extreme, he's only calling for Erotica 1 to be banned from a simple computer game.


Cyber-Lynch mob then.

Oh and there have been calls in this thread for actual physical violence towards Erotica1.

pichfork wielding loonies
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#5236 - 2014-03-27 14:17:41 UTC
Regis Solo wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
LordOfDespair wrote:


You guys try to justify ANYTHING, no wonder you think what E1 is doing is okay.


That, or I just don't like lynch mobs summoned up by Ripard Teg.


Lynch mob is a bit extreme, he's only calling for Erotica 1 to be banned from a simple computer game.


Perma banned.

Which is basically the death sentence of their life in EVE. I mean, if the despicable Ripard Teg can claim that being asked to read Wikipedia and sing Disney songs is "torture", then it's not exactly a stretch to say that perma banning is capital punishment.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

LordOfDespair
Deep Dark Fantasy.
#5237 - 2014-03-27 14:18:02 UTC
lollerwaffle wrote:
LordOfDespair wrote:
lollerwaffle wrote:

Nope. Still the same one liner. Try again.


Assuming you deserve anything more. Cute.

Try again. Dismissing arguments with one liners is pretty weak. I'm sorry if I was brought up to have the decency of reading and responding to the opinions of other people by at least providing coherent points. It's not my fault the way you turned out.

Or as you would put it:
You're stupid and wrong lol

You just strawmanned again. Way to prove my point. All I had to do was give you one liners. Imagine if I actually tried to give you a reasonable argument.

Now you see why is pointless to take you seriously.
lollerwaffle
Perkone
Caldari State
#5238 - 2014-03-27 14:19:28 UTC
Prince Kobol wrote:
To begin with if you read my opening post no where do I state my own opinion.

Yes my opinion is that he should be banned, he took something which I proud we have and need to keep in game, something which I do myself, something that is unique to Eve.. scamming, and crossed the line.

Yes it is only my opinion and luckily I am able to voice it , just as other people are allowed to voice so long as it does not break any forum rules.

If he has broken the rules, so much the better as it no longer becomes a morale or ethical issue for CCP lifting the burden on them somewhat.

However unlike a few others I believe that rules and laws are not written in stone. Life is not Black and White. Rules and Laws can not account for every action and situation that can occur.

You will always have exceptions hence why rules and laws are changed, modified, added, removed over time.

E1 deliberately takes his scams out of game for the sole reason to cause as much humiliation as he can thinking that he will not / could not be banned.

Why record it, post it on a website if you are not out to cause maximum humiliation?

Those saying that he only did so because Eve sucks sucks (which it does) is a very poor excuse. He does so to record everything, unless you can now record using Eve Voice?

He was even kicked from Widot, which is a cesspool of a forum because even they did not like what he was doing. Believe me it takes some doing to get kicked from there and perma banned.

E1 claims he left, it was his choice and was told by directors to stay, yet Mynnna stated he was kick due to him boasting about his antics.

Who do you believe, E1 or Mynnna?

E1 is not good for our community and in no way enhances it. All he is doing is reinforcing the view that many outside of Eve already have which is we all deranged psychopaths trying to make life hell for everybody in anyway we can when in reality we have a great community for the most part.

Apologies for misquoting your opening post. A bit hard to remember something from 270+ pages back (well done on the threadnought btw).

Anyway, the thing is, yes rules get modified and changed all the time and I concede that. However, if a rule is changed, it should not be applied retrospectively to an action that was within its boundaries when it occurred.

The actions of Erotica 1 were in the eyes of many, despicable, distasteful etc. However, they did not breach any rules (in fact deliberately taking steps to avoid breaking any rules). Subsequently the calls for him to be permabanned based on the nature of his activities show that many people think along the lines of 'That person should be banned because I don't like him'.

w.r.t Erotica 1's moral character, I am not defending, nor am I condemning his behaviour. I will, however, defend his right to such behaviour if they occur WITHIN the rules.
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#5239 - 2014-03-27 14:20:09 UTC
LordOfDespair wrote:
lollerwaffle wrote:
LordOfDespair wrote:
lollerwaffle wrote:

Nope. Still the same one liner. Try again.


Assuming you deserve anything more. Cute.

Try again. Dismissing arguments with one liners is pretty weak. I'm sorry if I was brought up to have the decency of reading and responding to the opinions of other people by at least providing coherent points. It's not my fault the way you turned out.

Or as you would put it:
You're stupid and wrong lol

You just strawmanned again. Way to prove my point. All I had to do was give you one liners. Imagine if I actually tried to give you a reasonable argument.

Now you see why is pointless to take you seriously.


Strawman...

You keep using this word as if you think you know what it means.

Could you tell us please? And also, provide an example. Thanks. Just so that we know how we should be arguing with you from now on.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

David Kir
Hotbirds
#5240 - 2014-03-27 14:20:26 UTC
olan2005 wrote:


I think you hit the nail on the head with that . Where is the line in these situations. For all discussions and commentators most agree, myself including scamming is fine. But once scam is completed and you have all possible assets extracted , is it ok to prolong the ordeal for the sucker ( victime , self inflicted) for tear extraction as it is called in-game. Should the EULA be more stringent on that aspect of scamming. Me personally i say yes . As for punshment i will disagree , there should be perma ban for Erotica1 for taking it too far, then putting this public domain which has a consequence for the whole community. There should be a temp ban for the sucker (victim ,self inflicted ) for the racism , and threats that followed. Why the lesser punishment . He was under self inflicted emotional duress, which was not completely under his control as his assets where being held to ransom , by that he had to play or loose everything he built up in his eve carrier . Coercion is used by Erotica1 , the scenario was set up by erotica1 , The control to end this was completely in Erotica1 hands . Ultimate responsibility is with the scammer Erotica1 for this entire situation



You have all of my respect; this is one of the few rational responses I have seen on this thread.

Friends are like cows: if you eat them, they die.