These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Jester Trek Latest Blog

First post First post
Author
Wulfy Johnson
NorCorp Security
#5061 - 2014-03-27 12:55:34 UTC
Moloney wrote:
I would like to point out that it does not matter whether E1 broke the EULA or not.

The point being made by people in this thread is that we do not want to be associated with such a morally wrong and disgraceful example of a human being.

We would like to play Eve.

We would like to think that when such a disgraceful representative of our game boasts publicly about being the scum of the planet, that appropriate repercussions are handed out to state "this is not right, this will not be accepted by anyone and under no circumstances should anyone believe it a good idea to replicate this persons actions "


I second this draft.
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#5062 - 2014-03-27 12:56:16 UTC
lollerwaffle wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:


That is literally how a game works.

To him, game = real life and should be treated the same way.


So, like with damn near all "problems" with EVE, this is because some numbskull can't separate real life from a videogame?

**** it, I'm going to go kill a miner.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Xuixien
Solar Winds Security Solutions
#5063 - 2014-03-27 12:56:49 UTC
Well wow, 250 pages now.

In other news, Erotica 1 is Bonus Rooming himself and live streaming it.

Cuz it's just space pixels.

And reading The Code ain't torture, yo.

Epic Space Cat, Horsegirl, Philanthropist

lollerwaffle
Perkone
Caldari State
#5064 - 2014-03-27 12:56:51 UTC
PinkPanter wrote:
lollerwaffle wrote:


Wow, you really, really don't understand what I've been posting despite my repeated emphasis. You must be as thick as that alt of Sokhar who needs things spelt out in black and white. Ok, final attempt:

A. Your feelings about the moral character of another player should not be justification that the person should be perma-banned by CCP.

B. If you think that personal feelings are sufficient grounds for CCP to ban another player, that implies that you are OK with CCP banning YOU if another player deems you to be offensive etc.

C. In this case, if I felt you were offensive, should CCP ban you too?

If you're still confused at this point, please read (A) above again to understand the point I'm trying to make. If you understand my premise now, well done, it only took 3 pages and 10 posts but we got there in the end.

Ok, to address your post itself: Humiliation of a player that can opt out at any time is more serious than issuing a RL death threat over a video game, because it is 'justified'? Does that mean that if I find your posting style offensive and it is driving me into a rage, I would be fully justified in issuing RL death threats to you?

(Sorry, I posted the above on the assumption you will get what I am inferring. To make it easy to understand what I'm talking about, I am responding specifically to your stated "One gets perma ban for doing this deliberately other gets a warning or a shortie for going bonanza (although he can be justified because he was simply pushed to the limit)")


A. if he goes telling how it's set up to bypass in game laws (he's luring people out of logged comms) to avoid ban then yeah he should get kicked because he knows his actions are wrong from the start and the only purpose he is to inflict some sort of harassment for personal amusement.

B. If I do it in a manner that deliberately tries to avoid in game laws yet you use this platform as a ignition of this whole process then yeah. No different that a botter.

C. I'm within CCP rules so your attempt is nothing but personal and has no ground for them to even look at it.

I'm not thick it's just you have no idea what are you talking about because E1 actions all base from within this game and it is his platform to lure targets out to avoid banhammer.

Despite laying it out in very easy to follow chunks, you can still throw random arguments which have NO bearing to my posts. I give up. Sorry, English isn't my first language too but you are just really really really too thick to talk to.
LordOfDespair
Deep Dark Fantasy.
#5065 - 2014-03-27 12:56:54 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
baltec1 wrote:
LordOfDespair wrote:


"Unless something is against the rules its okay" is such a shallow and dimwitted way of thinking about things.

Do you seriously need somebody to tell you what is okay and what isn't?


This is a game at advertises than you will be scammed, robbed, stabbed in the back and killed again.

CCP are not going to ban people because your feelings got hurt.


Then lets play the recording over speakers at the next Fanfest at the unveiling of the Monument, as a shining testament to that.

It is, afterall, what is advertised, as you say.


Then everybody will know what kind of sick perverted community we are! Great idea.

Alana Charen-Teng
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#5066 - 2014-03-27 12:56:59 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:
A few weeks ago, I got doxed by players in this game. They sent a mail to my personal email, mentioned two of my family members by name, and passively threatened me to leave them alone with a smiley face at the end of it.

I petitioned it, but was told that external evidence cannot be used and is even harder to link to in-game entities. I was told not to discuss it with anyone, and I shouldn't, but now it's important that I talk about it.

If I'd forwarded that email to a game site, or Jester, or someone, on the substantiated belief that the person who doxed me was a dangerous individual and a threat to the community, would that random unknown player, someone not known in the community at all, be under the same scrutiny that Ero is now? No.

The whole lot of you high sec dwellers would all be telling me, 'haha, serves you right, you shouldn't mess with people who don't want to pvp." I've shared the information and in-game identity of the player in question with people I trust, so that they know to watch their backs. I've been forced to close Facebook, email and YouTube accounts and various other accounts around the internet that I'm associated with. But if I'd shared the evidence with Riptard, what would he make of it? Do you think he'd post it in one of his articles about how EVE is dying because of the meanie scammers and gankers? If you're saying yes, then you're wrong: the player in question is an afk miner with five accounts and hubris up to his earballs. Riptard wouldn't do anything to endanger his own people now, would he.

I'll tell you something that no one in the New Order, Goons, or any of these groups that you all so hate with so much passion would never do. They'd never dox you. They'd never threaten your real life entity, and they'd never use your family as leverage.

Want to hear the scariest part? This person actually contacted my mother on Facebook to tell her she was an awful person for raising such an arse of a son. You know what she did?

She called me, apologised for being a horrible mother and cried for three hours before I calmed her down and reminded her that I'm an adult and it's just a game they're talking about. By the end of the conversation, she actually understood what EVE is about, she understood the nature of the game. She's 55 years old and gets this game better than half you 15-20 somethings curled up in your little safety bubbles in highsec do.

Do you know what I did to the last person who made my mother cry? I drove a two-tonne truck straight at him, slammed on the breaks when I realised what I was doing and stopped it with him pinned between a bullbar and a garage door. He was unharmed, thank ****, because I would have been entirely responsible for any injury he sustained. And I would have ACCEPTED that responsibility for my EMOTIONAL reaction.

My point is, the vile person who doxed me and did that to my mother, he's still playing this game. He's out there right now, thinking that what he did has no consequences. He's gonna do it again. Does anyone care? Probably not, no, not until it happens to you anyway.

You think Ero did something wrong here? I submit to you that the most evil people in the game are the carebears who would like nothing more than to foist him on a stake. You need to learn to get some perspective, reconnect to ******* reality and stop being so goddamn entitled.


*slow clap*

I honestly don't even know what 'doxxing' is. Who is this individual?

Thread still going strong, I see. May it never die.
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#5067 - 2014-03-27 12:57:12 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
baltec1 wrote:
LordOfDespair wrote:


"Unless something is against the rules its okay" is such a shallow and dimwitted way of thinking about things.

Do you seriously need somebody to tell you what is okay and what isn't?


This is a game at advertises than you will be scammed, robbed, stabbed in the back and killed again.

CCP are not going to ban people because your feelings got hurt.


Then lets play the recording over speakers at the next Fanfest at the unveiling of the Monument, as a shining testament to that.

It is, afterall, what is advertised, as you say.


We put up rage mails at almost every fanfest. This isnt new.
LordOfDespair
Deep Dark Fantasy.
#5068 - 2014-03-27 12:58:02 UTC
Crumplecorn wrote:
LordOfDespair wrote:
Crumplecorn wrote:
Moloney wrote:
I would like to point out that it does not matter whether E1 broke the EULA or not.

The point being made by people in this thread is that we do not want to be associated with such a morally wrong and disgraceful example of a human being.

We would like to play Eve.

We would like to think that when such a disgraceful representative of our game boasts publicly about being the scum of the planet, that appropriate repercussions are handed out to state "this is not right, this will not be accepted by anyone and under no circumstances should anyone believe it a good idea to replicate this persons actions "
So you are literally saying "CCP should ban anyone I don't like".

You realise that ends with everyone banned right?


You are litterally strawmanning the **** out of his statement.

Fallacy central here.

"I would like to think that when a person I don't like boasts publicly about being a person I don't like, that appropriate repercussions are handed out to state "I don't like this, this will not be accepted by me and under no circumstances should anyone believe it a good idea to replicate this persons actions "

'We' turns into 'I' since he can only speak for himself. Judgements about E1's status as the 'scum of the planet' are personal opinion and thus can be generalised as above. The result it literally "CCP should ban anyone I don't like".



You are trying to rationalize a logical fallacy.

LOL
Marcia en Welle
Doomheim
#5069 - 2014-03-27 12:58:21 UTC
253 pages!! What the hell. Someone needs to kill this over played topic already!

You could have been contributing to the pirate faction rebalance, or the massive reprocessing rebalance, you know stuff that is actually important and going to affect people in game. But instead you are all giving Erotica even more pleasure and fame.
Sentamon
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#5070 - 2014-03-27 12:58:31 UTC
some appropriate music for the next 50 pages

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VgvM7av1o1Q

~ Professional Forum Alt  ~

Salvos Rhoska
#5071 - 2014-03-27 12:59:02 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
baltec1 wrote:
LordOfDespair wrote:


"Unless something is against the rules its okay" is such a shallow and dimwitted way of thinking about things.

Do you seriously need somebody to tell you what is okay and what isn't?


This is a game at advertises than you will be scammed, robbed, stabbed in the back and killed again.

CCP are not going to ban people because your feelings got hurt.


Then lets play the recording over speakers at the next Fanfest at the unveiling of the Monument, as a shining testament to that.

It is, afterall, what is advertised, as you say.


We put up rage mails at almost every fanfest. This isnt new.


Ok, lets do it then.
LordOfDespair
Deep Dark Fantasy.
#5072 - 2014-03-27 13:00:02 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:
LordOfDespair wrote:
Crumplecorn wrote:
LordOfDespair wrote:
"Unless something is against the rules its okay" is such a shallow and dimwitted way of thinking about things.

Do you seriously need somebody to tell you what is okay and what isn't?
You just managed to miss the sole purpose of all explicitly stated rules everywhere in all of the past, present and future.

Kudos.


Oh sod off.

Have you seen the EvE Eula? It is so vague you can find a way to do practically ANYTHING and say it isn't against the rules.


No, it's not that vague. It's quite specific, actually.

Tell me, you go from telling us that the rules should take second seat to our better judgement to implying that the rules need to be more specific.

How did you even learn to work your keyboard?


Wrong.

And nice insult. Can't argue without it? Lol.
Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#5073 - 2014-03-27 13:00:15 UTC
Giovanni erkelens2 wrote:
Moloney wrote:
I would like to point out that it does not matter whether E1 broke the EULA or not.

The point being made by people in this thread is that we do not want to be associated with such a morally wrong and disgraceful example of a human being.

We would like to play Eve.

We would like to think that when such a disgraceful representative of our game boasts publicly about being the scum of the planet, that appropriate repercussions are handed out to state "this is not right, this will not be accepted by anyone and under no circumstances should anyone believe it a good idea to replicate this persons actions "


this. my sir. this is what i wnat to hear.


theres hope.


Hope for tyranny and injustice. Because that's what you people are asking for.

The existence of the witch hunt crowd should scare everyone here. Look at all these people willing to totally ignore rules, laws, important values of fairness and due process ect ect just to get at someone they don't like.

We've literally fought terrible wars against people who thought like this. Documents like the Magna Carta and the U.S. Constitution exist to stamp out arbitrary use of power (such as 'I don't like you, so now you get to go away').

But there are still plenty of people who think these vile ideas are valid when in fact it's these vile ideas are the true evil and people like E1 are just the side affect and consequence of our freedoms.
Crumplecorn
Eve Cluster Explorations
#5074 - 2014-03-27 13:00:45 UTC
Moloney wrote:
I would like to point out that it does not matter whether E1 broke the EULA or not.

The point being made by people in this thread is that we do not want to be associated with such a morally wrong and disgraceful example of a human being.

We would like to play Eve.

We would like to think that when such a disgraceful representative of our game boasts publicly about being the scum of the planet, that appropriate repercussions are handed out to state "this is not right, this will not be accepted by anyone and under no circumstances should anyone believe it a good idea to replicate this persons actions "
Actually, here's a comparison that may make clear what is wrong with this 'thinking':

This is pretty much what Russia said about gays recently.

Witty Image - Stream

Not Liking this post hurts my RL feelings and will be considered harassment

Big Lynx
#5075 - 2014-03-27 13:00:52 UTC
Sentamon wrote:
some appropriate music for the next 50 pages

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VgvM7av1o1Q


MUCH BETTER: HERE
lollerwaffle
Perkone
Caldari State
#5076 - 2014-03-27 13:01:06 UTC
Marcia en Welle wrote:
253 pages!! What the hell. Someone needs to kill this over played topic already!

You could have been contributing to the pirate faction rebalance, or the massive reprocessing rebalance, you know stuff that is actually important and going to affect people in game. But instead you are all giving Erotica even more pleasure and fame.

Every night before 9pm I procrastinate a lot before doing work.
Mallak Azaria
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#5077 - 2014-03-27 13:01:08 UTC
Now that I've sobered up I've realised how dumb this thread is & most of the people in it. Would anyone like to join Goonwaffe?

This post was lovingly crafted by a member of the Goonwaffe Posting Cabal, proud member of the popular gay hookup site somethingawful.com, Spelling Bee, Grammar Gestapo & #1 Official Gevlon Goblin Fanclub member.

Katkon Darnok
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#5078 - 2014-03-27 13:01:12 UTC
Xuixien wrote:
I question "significant". Got some hard numbers? Sources?


Don't go down this road, my friend. It ends with a big black hole that is much deeper than EVE. It has been widely reported in US press recently, for instance, that military suicides are at an all-time high. You're presumably not looking for a number that allows you to sit back, in the comfort of your living room, and say: "Nah, it's not that bad. Those numbers are insignificant." It's one thing to bash folks about the game and loss of virtual assets, it's quite another to go down this road. Please avoid it altogether.
Danalee
A Blessed Bean
Pandemic Horde
#5079 - 2014-03-27 13:01:57 UTC
PinkPanter wrote:

I'm not thick it's just you have no idea what are you talking about because E1 actions all base from within this game and it is his platform to lure targets out to avoid banhammer.


Yes, you are quite thick. If the recording had been with ingame means (Eve voice) the result would have been a perma ban on shokar and kuddos to ero for not taking steps against him.

I'm gonna post this every time someone beats the poor dead horse;

What happend;
Ero: Give me your isk and I double it.
Adult ATC: Here's all my isk
Ero: haha, you need to come on teamspeak and win a bonus round where I invent the rules as we go
Adult ATC: ok
Ero: read this text please
Adult ATC: Ok, N-BOMB, Gaybash, shout, scream, rant
Ero: Sing songs
Adult ATC: NO! N-BOMB, Gaybash, shout, scream, rant
Adult ATC: I'l gonna kill you!
Adult ATC: My wife will come and scream at you some more

How it should have been;
Ero: Give me your isk and I double it.
Adult ATC: Here's all my isk
Ero: haha, you need to come on teamspeak and win a bonus round where I invent the rules as we go
Adult ATC: Wait what? Naaaah... You scammed me, well played.

What normal people do:
Ero: Give me your isk and I double it.
Adult ATC: No way dude, I know it's just pixels but I want to buy space bling with them.
D.

Bear

Proud member of the Somalian Coast Guard Authority

Member and Juror of the Court of Crime and Punishment

Crumplecorn
Eve Cluster Explorations
#5080 - 2014-03-27 13:02:07 UTC
LordOfDespair wrote:
You are trying to rationalize a logical fallacy.

LOL
If you don't have an actual response I can't really follow up, so I guess we're done.

Witty Image - Stream

Not Liking this post hurts my RL feelings and will be considered harassment