EVE General Discussion

**** the suicides what about the spun nuts who shoot up their own bases?

Emails sent to all of the above. Dont worry.

You wouldn't have the first idea what I have and have not done with my life. This is just more unsubstantiated mouth-frothing forum diarrhoea brought to us by our good friends 'moral reactionism' and 'cognitive dissonance'. I didn't dismiss the service they've provided. Please quote the exact point of anything I've said where I dismiss the service they've done. I didn't even address the service they've done, did I. I just asked you a question. Are people in the military or emergency services committing suicide because of their service, or because of something else? It's a fair question. One that I'm sure is easier for you to dismiss because actually answering it would require you not to be angry at me anymore, right?

Of course, you're just enjoying being angry at me, aren't you. There are many out there who enjoy being angry at me, and they all fall into similar categories: science denial, reality denial, irrational perception and perspective, etc. The list goes on. You have a lot of catching up to do, though, if you're trying to make me feel bad about something I haven't actually done. You're talking to someone who experienced guilt trips from family and friends his whole life. I'm pretty resilient to them now. I don't have any reason to explain myself to you other than the hope in humanity I have that your mind is actually capable of some rational consideration of what I've presented to you.

For the ones I worked with, they said its the only way they know how for a long while
And that 00 buckshot is an adequate method for dealing with the problem
Also learned many fun and entertaining things that resulted in an NCIS visit for terrorist ties

Worth it

Something that should be done whether suicide exists or not. It's unfortunate that it took suicides to bring the issue to anyone's attention. The question remains, though: are people in the service committing suicide because of their service, or for something else?

If you can't even bring yourself to ask this question, and just assume you know the answer, then you are no better than the creationist who claims the earth is 6000 years old and no amount of evidence will convince him otherwise.

"those" soliders commit suicide because they've done things they shouldn't have done/witnessed them, they joined the army thinking it was a joy ride, they were too weak, and you see it most in the US because the US doesn't wage normal wars but filled with genocides , murderers (lets get this thread going), the US army is a disgrace much alone the US itself. Tell me when has the last time US actually did something to defend and didn't stick it's **** in matters that they shouldn't.

but don't think i'm saying this and you will write off because i'm an E1 supporter, it's just a matter that my country has a hate relationship with the US for quite some time because the **** they committed in our grounds well that and we have some entities that the US claims are terrorists but are in fact our national guard lmfao (but yea thats a whoooooole other debate).


Time to abandon thread

I'm not parroting anything. I provided an article that demonstrated actual rational criticism of a conclusion formed from statistics. The source is irrelevant, it's the content that matters and how well formed the argument is. If this exact same article had been produced by the Daily Fail, word for word, I would have linked it from there as well. The bottom line is, it's asking a hard question, but a relevant question. I suggest you find the question difficult because you might be afraid of the answer, or the question itself conflicts with a preconceived but unsubstantiated conclusion.

I'm not trying to substituted my intellect with anything, either. Even the smartest people in the world still cite their sources. You think Richard Dawkins, one of the most cited authors in history, doesn't cite his work? Doesn't work with knowledge established by other? No, crediting the work of others is more important than one's pride in their intellect. If anything, it demonstrates intellectual honesty - I didn't think of this question, someone else did, and I'm not going to pretend it was my idea.

I don't need to provide my own analysis because a perfectly acceptable critical analysis has already been done. What you are asking of me is therefore intellectually redundant until a conclusion can be drawn from the existing analysis, which I'll bet my bottom dollar you haven't even read. This makes any analysis I make doubly redundant, since I'll bet every dollar after my bottom one that you wouldn't read that either.

Being made fun of on the internet is not, in any way shape or form, analogous to real torture.

Ever. I don't care if you lose your space pixels or not.

He thinks he is a wit.

You are not as complex as you think, you use words and concepts that you only partially understand in order to obfuscate the truth, which is that you are a rather shallow and insecure individual. Most of us here have degrees and we have heard all of the drivel that you are test-marketing in your posts. Here is a tip, it's not that people don't like you because they don't understand you, it's because you are generally off putting and banal.

At this point Erotica 1 and his alts / sycophants will do just about anything to redirect attention from their little sadist circle.

They tried to:

start new threads
troll
shift topics
play whataboutism
**** on the issue of suicides in the military (i dont know why, this is stupid - but, they are sociopaths, who knows..)

All they did is simply dig a deeper hole for themselves.

BAN THE SADISTS ONE AND ALL.