These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Jester Trek Latest Blog

First post First post
Author
Capt Starfox
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#3241 - 2014-03-26 18:02:36 UTC
Mr Epeen wrote:
Capt Starfox wrote:
Mr Epeen wrote:
Capt Starfox wrote:
but Ero and friends didn't do so to cause in real life mental distress. To try and get some tears? Sure,


Wat?

Making someone cry seems pretty RL distressful to me.

Mr Epeen Cool


He never cried. Yelled a lot, but not cry.

Way to try and lie your way into looking like you know what you're talking about.


I wasn't commenting on what happened. I was commenting on the seeming contradiction of what you said that I quoted. If you are trying to get tears, then you are by definition trying to cause distress. Hope that clears things up for you.

Mr Epeen Cool


So tears are bad now? Is this the end of Eve as we know it?

Abandon all hope ye who x up in fleet

Navi Annages
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#3242 - 2014-03-26 18:03:03 UTC
David Kir wrote:
[quote=Erotica 1

This is one of the most disgusting posts in this thread and borders on the real world crime of swatting. Looks like you wish for me and my family to suffer real world fear over some internet spaceship alleged pixel scam thing. Get some help.


Yeah, that was stupid.

You, however, have no business talking about disgusting.

You've gone too far to have any authority on that subject.

This isn't about the scam.
It's about the way you treated that man.

I'm not one of those who think that CCP should ban you.
I'm not against scamming, either.
And yes, I've seen far worse than this.

But players like you are a large part of what drives people away from EVE, and I'd rather have ten more newbies around, rather than a "content creator" like you.


[/quote]

How he treated a racist piece of scum? He'll end up in an orange jumpsuit keep pushing it. Sohkar will goto jail.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8-JfK-wwFU

lollerwaffle
Perkone
Caldari State
#3243 - 2014-03-26 18:03:17 UTC
Bethan Le Troix wrote:
Has CCP made a comment on this issue since the first one telling us all to be polite to each other? 158 pages and it's still going strong.

It does seem like the use of this 'bonus room' idea is premeditated in that I think others have said the conversation was moved from EVE voice to a TS channel. So Erotica 1 probably knew beforehand that there could be some comeback on him if he conducted his actions through EVE voice.

I also don't understand why Erotica 1 didn't realise it had gone too far once the victims wife intervened and started asking Erotica 1 what was happening. Would he like this to happen to one of his family members, wife or children?

A lot of replies are focusing on the anger of the victim directed at Erotica 1 on the sound recording and on possibly violent suggestions towards Erotica 1 within replies to this post. People will react in different ways to being bullied and some will react aggressively and/or with violence. It's completely understandable if you mess with people to expect a reaction. Play with fire and you will get burned.

Or the 'victim' could just disconnect from TS and, MAGIC! He's no longer a victim (only of a scam, not of abuse/harassment etc.)
Xuixien
Solar Winds Security Solutions
#3244 - 2014-03-26 18:03:39 UTC
Goldiiee wrote:
Xuixien wrote:


I don't think CCP cares about losing one unknown player. They're not going to permanently remove a content creator over it.

I would beg to differ if the 'Content Creator' is repeatedly causing 'one unknown player' to quit, bad reviews from that one player can become bad reviews from many players, not to mention the bad press and the subscribers that will not try EVE based on that press. The true number of lost revenue is subjective, but evident nonetheless. As a company owner is (Should be) concerned about every customer not just the loud ones.


What about all the players who stick around because of E1s content?

Epic Space Cat, Horsegirl, Philanthropist

Navi Annages
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#3245 - 2014-03-26 18:04:21 UTC
Lucretia DeWinter wrote:
Crumplecorn wrote:
Lucretia DeWinter wrote:
In all honestly, if it were my scam, I would have pulled the plug on it when it was obvious the participant was getting emotionally distressed with something like "look, I'm sorry, you are not going to continue in this Bonus Round and you're not getting your stuff back."
So you'd decide at an arbitrary point in time to kick the client out and keep their stuff? Then it really would be a scam.


Not arbitrary as such, no.

I'd decide based on my interpretation of the situation given the facts at hand. After my client had lost his rag once already and was clearly going to lose it big time if this went on in the subtle and cleverly constructed manner it does - to make people quit by their own decision - even if that takes hours

Then yes, I'd consider that a cutoff and it could even be in The Rules - rulle 427(b): A client shall not lose their temper or demonstrate emotional instability.

I'd basically be deciding when enough was enough and things were going beyond The Game.


That's nice. Make sure to incorporate that your client will be serving time in an orange jumpsuit. Keep pushing it I dare you.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8-JfK-wwFU

KnowUsByTheDead
Sunlight...Through The Blight.
#3246 - 2014-03-26 18:05:39 UTC
Feyth Yinleq wrote:
More than 150 pages of posts and nothing constructive yet.

I said what I had to say earlier. I had to puke multiple times because of the pretendingly honest posts from Erotica 1.
But I will not join the debates again.

Now, I am waiting for CCP to share with us what they have decided on this matter. I am quite surprised it took them so long, especially as they were aware of this recording for one entire month, as it appears to be.

Having not seen a significant word from them yet, I am inclined to believe they don't care and will endorse what happened eventually. As I will certainly not find my place in a community ready to welcome such behaviors without raising an eyebrow, I have to act by the only mean of action that could potentially be effective, my wallet.

So, I am starting the count down now: 20 hours till I cancel my accounts definitely.

I know, this desperate move is useless, but all that evil needs to prevail is for the good men to do nothing, I am sure you know this quote.
And no, you cannot have my stuff, without any sign of CCP within 20 hours, I will trash and biomass everything in a final demonstration of the lack of value of virtual assets in a game. We shouldn't have had to discuss for more than 150 pages here, as there is no admittable debate to have when the dignity of a human being and the decency of a community are at stake.


Smarter to leave your assets and accounts inactive. Makes more of a statement.

Means isk not being spilled through the system.

Even better, make an uber-statement and convert all of your assets to PLEX first.

After all...

The more ya know...

Blink

Once you realize what a joke everything is, being the comedian is the only thing that makes sense.

Ais Hellia
Jita Honor Industries Union
#3247 - 2014-03-26 18:05:52 UTC  |  Edited by: Ais Hellia
Goldiiee wrote:
, not to mention the bad press and the subscribers that will not try EVE based on that press.


Many comments about bad press here
but wasn't it Ripard Teg who brought this matter up and made a big deal out of it?
how's he not responsible for a hypothetical bad press that may come out off this?
should he be banned alongside Erotica if the only reason to ban erotica is to avoid bad press?Roll
PotatoOverdose
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#3248 - 2014-03-26 18:06:05 UTC  |  Edited by: PotatoOverdose
Ah, I see the witch hunt is proceeding apace. Still trying to get someone banned because he offends you're own personal, subjective code of ethics? Good, good. I mean who needs well defined rules and policy that can be applied to all equally and evenhandedly when we can make our judgements based on feelings alone, amirite?
Mario Putzo
#3249 - 2014-03-26 18:06:06 UTC  |  Edited by: Mario Putzo
Bethan Le Troix wrote:
Has CCP made a comment on this issue since the first one telling us all to be polite to each other? 158 pages and it's still going strong.

It does seem like the use of this 'bonus room' idea is premeditated in that I think others have said the conversation was moved from EVE voice to a TS channel. So Erotica 1 probably knew beforehand that there could be some comeback on him if he conducted his actions through EVE voice.

I also don't understand why Erotica 1 didn't realise it had gone too far once the victims wife intervened and started asking Erotica 1 what was happening. Would he like this to happen to one of his family members, wife or children?

A lot of replies are focusing on the anger of the victim directed at Erotica 1 on the sound recording and on possibly violent suggestions towards Erotica 1 within replies to this post. People will react in different ways to being bullied and some will react aggressively and/or with violence. It's completely understandable if you mess with people to expect a reaction. Play with fire and you will get burned.


No CCP has not made a formal reply, and they won't. They will make a decision and the only parties that will know what happens are the ones involved.

As should have been the case from the get go. If Sohkar was put off he could have gone to CCP. This thread is entirely a product of Ripard Teg instigating a witch hunt against someone he has personal disdain for. Simply reading his blog on the subject will tell you he is biased in his position on this and has already taken it upon himself as a representative of CCP to call Erotica 1 out, and label him with a bunch of slanderous labels.

CCP will only discuss this with Erotica, and perhaps Sohkar, but I doubt even Sohkar will be privy to the discussion with CCP as Erotica 1 is the only on that needs learn of any CCP decision.

And it is entirely up to Erotica 1 to share details of that discussion with anyone.
Xuixien
Solar Winds Security Solutions
#3250 - 2014-03-26 18:06:12 UTC
David Kir wrote:
Erotica 1 wrote:


This is one of the most disgusting posts in this thread and borders on the real world crime of swatting. Looks like you wish for me and my family to suffer real world fear over some internet spaceship alleged pixel scam thing. Get some help.


Yeah, that was stupid.

You, however, have no business talking about disgusting.

You've gone too far to have any authority on that subject.

This isn't about the scam.
It's about the way you treated that man.

I'm not one of those who think that CCP should ban you.
I'm not against scamming, either.
And yes, I've seen far worse than this.

But players like you are a large part of what drives people away from EVE, and I'd rather have ten more newbies around, rather than a "content creator" like you.




How he "treated" Sohkar?

You mean the part where they asked him to sing Gummy Bears to the Rescue?

Epic Space Cat, Horsegirl, Philanthropist

Bayonnefrog
Blueprint Mania
#3251 - 2014-03-26 18:06:12 UTC
Feyth Yinleq wrote:
More than 150 pages of posts and nothing constructive yet.

I said what I had to say earlier. I had to puke multiple times because of the pretendingly honest posts from Erotica 1.
But I will not join the debates again.

Now, I am waiting for CCP to share with us what they have decided on this matter. I am quite surprised it took them so long, especially as they were aware of this recording for one entire month, as it appears to be.

Having not seen a significant word from them yet, I am inclined to believe they don't care and will endorse what happened eventually. As I will certainly not find my place in a community ready to welcome such behaviors without raising an eyebrow, I have to act by the only mean of action that could potentially be effective, my wallet.

So, I am starting the count down now: 20 hours till I cancel my accounts definitely.

I know, this desperate move is useless, but all that evil needs to prevail is for the good men to do nothing, I am sure you know this quote.
And no, you cannot have my stuff, without any sign of CCP within 20 hours, I will trash and biomass everything in a final demonstration of the lack of value of virtual assets in a game. We shouldn't have had to discuss for more than 150 pages here, as there is no admittable debate to have when the dignity of a human being and the decency of a community are at stake.


Then you will end up biomassing yourself because I don't think they'll respond in that time frame. I'll take your pixel treasures if you're going to trash them :)
Bagrat Skalski
Koinuun Kotei
#3252 - 2014-03-26 18:06:16 UTC  |  Edited by: Bagrat Skalski
Xuixien wrote:
Goldiiee wrote:
Xuixien wrote:


I don't think CCP cares about losing one unknown player. They're not going to permanently remove a content creator over it.

I would beg to differ if the 'Content Creator' is repeatedly causing 'one unknown player' to quit, bad reviews from that one player can become bad reviews from many players, not to mention the bad press and the subscribers that will not try EVE based on that press. The true number of lost revenue is subjective, but evident nonetheless. As a company owner is (Should be) concerned about every customer not just the loud ones.


What about all the players who stick around because of E1s content?


**** content, do not want this thread too, too long. I play because of skill queue.
Tollen Gallen
Glory of Reprisal Enterprise
#3253 - 2014-03-26 18:06:50 UTC
Xuixien wrote:
Goldiiee wrote:
Xuixien wrote:


I don't think CCP cares about losing one unknown player. They're not going to permanently remove a content creator over it.

I would beg to differ if the 'Content Creator' is repeatedly causing 'one unknown player' to quit, bad reviews from that one player can become bad reviews from many players, not to mention the bad press and the subscribers that will not try EVE based on that press. The true number of lost revenue is subjective, but evident nonetheless. As a company owner is (Should be) concerned about every customer not just the loud ones.


What about all the players who stick around because of E1s content?



How many is that?......nvm i dont care.. this thread is already 160 odd pages to long.



I like Cheese.

Zimmy Zeta - I f*cking love martinis. the original ones, with gin, not that vodka martini crap. Your old Friends can use me for 7 days, free!!!

stoicfaux
#3254 - 2014-03-26 18:07:07 UTC
Bethan Le Troix wrote:
Has CCP made a comment on this issue since the first one telling us all to be polite to each other? 158 pages and it's still going strong.

Patience. IIRC, it took them nearly a week to post a decision about the mittani incident.

A well thought out, measured response trumps shooting from the hip, and CCP understands that. (Not counting rapid fire launchers, of course.)

Pon Farr Memorial: once every 7 years, all the carebears in high-sec must PvP or they will be temp-banned.

Gizznitt Malikite
Agony Unleashed
Agony Empire
#3255 - 2014-03-26 18:07:31 UTC

I have several points to contribute to this thread naught.

1.) CCP absolutely has the right to intercede in this manner. Yes, they were on a "private" TS server, but they were using it in conjunction with EvE. If I make an EvE Fansite that post RL threats to CCP or EvE players, that details how to cheat in the game, or advocates other EULA breaking activities, CCP absolutely has the right to shut down my accounts and ban me from their game.

2.) All parties to this event misbehaved. As such, ban them both, or ban neither.

a.) The "victim" made RL threats, used racial slurs, profanity, and more. A mature adult would step away from the computer, leave teamspeak, and act a lot more mature. There is NO EXCUSE for his outbursts, and they should be called out for behaving in such a pisspoor manner over a game!

b.) E1 and crew setup their "bonus round" with the specific intention of "breaking" people. This is their end goal, and the scam is just the tool they use to get their desired results. This is disgusting on an interpersonal level, and their behavior should be ostracized. Unfortunately, for most people, there is an ambiguous line between harassment-in-fun and reveling in the pain of others. To clarify the difference, having RvB/Goons sing to gain entrance into a WH is harassment in fun. The ransom offer is made in good faith, and while the act is potentially embarrassing, it isn't aimed to maximize suffering. Perhaps I'm misjudging E1, but I don't believe there is EVER any intention of "doubling isk", and the end goal is to witness their victim suffer. Such abhorrent behavior should not be applauded, but spat upon. Unfortunately, I don't believe there is any truly enforceable rule CCP can implement that won't hurt/alienate the more acceptable forms of harassment-in-fun activities.

3.) Bullying keeps getting tossed around. There are several types of bullying in this world:

a.) The schoolyard bully: This is the guy that asks to borrow your hat, and then refuses to give it back unless you do embarassing things on the playground. This bullying can be easily avoided (don't give him your hat). This bully can be easily defeated (give up your hat and walk away). The only power this bully has is the power you give them. In the wasy that count, this is type of bullying that took place on E1's "bonus room" soundcloud. An adult should be able to cope with this type of harassment without crying fowl and running to the police.

b.) The maleficent bully: This is the bully that steals your items, physically assaults you, vandalizes your home, makes you feel for your safety, and goes out of their way to make you miserable. This bully cannot be easily escaped, as they stalk you and maneuver to block your escape. This is they type of bullying that should involve bringing in the authorities and prosecuting, but this is NOT the type of bullying that went on here. This is what the cyber-bullying movement is trying to stomp out, and you calling E1's actions cyberbullying is a disservice everyone. It's simply a pathetic use of an inflammatory buzzword to force CCP's hand and gain media attention, and y'all should feel ashamed for following this path!
Berendas
Ascendant Operations
#3256 - 2014-03-26 18:07:42 UTC
Ais Hellia wrote:
Many comments about bad press here
but wasn't it Ripard Teg who brought this matter up and made a big deal out of it?
how's he not responsible for a hypothetical bad press that may come out off this?
should he be banned alongside Erotica if the only reason to ban erotica is to avoid bad press?Roll

Not alongside, instead of.
Xuixien
Solar Winds Security Solutions
#3257 - 2014-03-26 18:07:43 UTC
Mario Putzo wrote:
Bethan Le Troix wrote:
Has CCP made a comment on this issue since the first one telling us all to be polite to each other? 158 pages and it's still going strong.

It does seem like the use of this 'bonus room' idea is premeditated in that I think others have said the conversation was moved from EVE voice to a TS channel. So Erotica 1 probably knew beforehand that there could be some comeback on him if he conducted his actions through EVE voice.

I also don't understand why Erotica 1 didn't realise it had gone too far once the victims wife intervened and started asking Erotica 1 what was happening. Would he like this to happen to one of his family members, wife or children?

A lot of replies are focusing on the anger of the victim directed at Erotica 1 on the sound recording and on possibly violent suggestions towards Erotica 1 within replies to this post. People will react in different ways to being bullied and some will react aggressively and/or with violence. It's completely understandable if you mess with people to expect a reaction. Play with fire and you will get burned.


No CCP has not made a formal reply, and they won't. They will make a decision and the only parties that will know what happens are the ones involved.

As should have been the case from the get go. If Sohkar was put off he could have gone to CCP. This thread is entirely a product of Ripard Teg instigating a witch hunt against someone he has personal disdain for. Simply reading his blog on the subject will tell you he is unbiased in his position on this and has already taken it upon himself as a representative of CCP to call Erotica 1 out, and label him with a bunch of slanderous labels.

CCP will only discuss this with Erotica, and perhaps Sohkar, but I doubt even Sohkar will be privy to the discussion with CCP as Erotica 1 is the only on that needs learn of any CCP decision.


Just pointing it out: When it's in writing, it called "libel".

Epic Space Cat, Horsegirl, Philanthropist

Navi Annages
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#3258 - 2014-03-26 18:07:49 UTC
Ais Hellia wrote:
Goldiiee wrote:
, not to mention the bad press and the subscribers that will not try EVE based on that press.


Many comments about bad press here
but wasn't it Ripard Teg who brought this matter up and made a big deal out of it?
how's he not responsible for a hypothetical bad press that may come out off this?
should he be banned alongside Erotica if the only reason to ban erotica is to avoid bad press?Roll



Riptard's one sided twisted article. http://evenews24.com/2014/03/25/jesters-trek-the-bonus-round/

My signature is the truth.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8-JfK-wwFU

Goldiiee
Bureau of Astronomical Anomalies
#3259 - 2014-03-26 18:08:28 UTC
Xuixien wrote:
Goldiiee wrote:
Xuixien wrote:


I don't think CCP cares about losing one unknown player. They're not going to permanently remove a content creator over it.

I would beg to differ if the 'Content Creator' is repeatedly causing 'one unknown player' to quit, bad reviews from that one player can become bad reviews from many players, not to mention the bad press and the subscribers that will not try EVE based on that press. The true number of lost revenue is subjective, but evident nonetheless. As a company owner is (Should be) concerned about every customer not just the loud ones.


What about all the players who stick around because of E1s content?

I would not want to guess at the number of either, but would the ones that enjoy E1's 'Content' leave if it wasn't there? or would they find new 'Content' to enjoy? Or more importantly would it be possible to have both inexperienced players and 'Content' that didn't drive them away, or prevent them form ever trying EVE in the first place.

If this particular scam was discouraged, or vacated from EVE entirely would E1 quit?

Things that keep me up at night;  Why do we use a voice communication device to send telegraphs? Moore's Law should state, Once you have paid off the last PC upgrade you will need another.

KnowUsByTheDead
Sunlight...Through The Blight.
#3260 - 2014-03-26 18:08:43 UTC
PotatoOverdose wrote:
Ah, I see the witch hunt is proceeding apace. Still trying to get someone banned because he offends you're own personal, subjective code of ethics? Good, good. I mean who needs well defined rules and policy that can be applied to all equally and evenhandedly when we can make our judgements based on feelings alone, amirite?


This is GD, bro.

Facts do not come into play here.

Evidently logic seems to be devoid as well.

vOv

Once you realize what a joke everything is, being the comedian is the only thing that makes sense.