These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Jester Trek Latest Blog

First post First post
Author
Navi Annages
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#2241 - 2014-03-26 07:54:08 UTC
Space Juden wrote:
Erotica 1 wrote:


Could you tell me why you guys were so quick to gloss over his personal story of having three kills as an Iraq war veteran if it weren't that it would make it all less funny?


Um he's army. He ain't one of mine.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8-JfK-wwFU

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#2242 - 2014-03-26 07:56:58 UTC
Riot Girl wrote:
CNN? Wow, that's taking a petty grudge too far. Only a sociopath would go that far.


I wouldn't say that, and given that this is not cyber bullying, if CNN calls it such, then it's just bad journalism.

But what else would we expect from CNN these days?

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Iyacia Cyric'ai
Lai Dai Counterintelligence
#2243 - 2014-03-26 07:57:17 UTC
I have no desire to read through 100+ pages of this especially considering the amount of personal attacks and trolling just on the 1st page. But here's my 2 isk:

The victim here showed incredibly naivete and/or greed in letting himself get scammed so badly. I was facepalming in the first few minutes of the recording. The issue here however is the bullying. Had they merely scammed the guy and then said: "Thanks for your isk see ya later, try not to be so gullible next time" then I would have been okay about it. While legal liability against CCP would be rather contentious (what could CCP have done to prevent this given that most of it occured on teamspeak?), it would be incredibly bad for the game's culture if CCP let this slip without at least some punishment being handed down against the cyber bullies, not the mention incredibly stupid from a PR standpoint.

2+ hours of getting a guy with a speech impediment to read intentionally long and tedious drivel while making fun of his pronunciation, making him sing songs for their own entertainment and then harassing his wife who attempted to intervene by asking them to stop is clearly and without a doubt cyber bullying and I personally don't feel it's unreasonable to say it's also tantamount to torture.
Navi Annages
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#2244 - 2014-03-26 07:58:49 UTC  |  Edited by: Navi Annages
Iyacia Cyric'ai wrote:
I have no desire to read through 100+ pages of this especially considering the amount of personal attacks and trolling just on the 1st page. But here's my 2 isk:

The victim here showed incredibly naivete and/or greed in letting himself get scammed so badly. I was facepalming in the first few minutes of the recording. The issue here however is the bullying. Had they merely scammed the guy and then said: "Thanks for your isk see ya later, try not to be so gullible next time" then I would have been okay about it. While legal liability against CCP would be rather contentious (what could CCP have done to prevent this given that most of it occured on teamspeak?), it would be incredibly bad for the game's culture if CCP let this slip without at least some punishment being handed down against the cyber bullies, not the mention incredibly stupid from a PR standpoint.

2+ hours of getting a guy with a speech impediment to read intentionally long and tedious drivel while making fun of his pronunciation, making him sing songs for their own entertainment and then harassing his wife who attempted to intervene by asking them to stop is clearly and without a doubt cyber bullying and I personally don't feel it's unreasonable to say it's also tantamount to torture.


"tantamount to torture" Get over your starbucks drinking self dude. You haven't a clue what torture is needless to say bullying.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8-JfK-wwFU

Trance Oskold
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#2245 - 2014-03-26 08:02:03 UTC
None of that **** matters. What does matter is this:

"CCP may take any action it deems appropriate regarding any User Content, if CCP believes, in its sole discretion, that such User Content violates the EULA or may expose CCP, its licensors and/or its suppliers to liability, damage CCP's relationship with any of its suppliers, licensors, ISPs or other users of EVE, harm anyone or harm CCP's reputation or goodwill."
Endovior
PFU Consortium
#2246 - 2014-03-26 08:02:49 UTC
Iyacia Cyric'ai wrote:
I have no desire to read through 100+ pages of this especially considering the amount of personal attacks and trolling just on the 1st page. But here's my 2 isk:

The victim here showed incredibly naivete and/or greed in letting himself get scammed so badly. I was facepalming in the first few minutes of the recording. The issue here however is the bullying. Had they merely scammed the guy and then said: "Thanks for your isk see ya later, try not to be so gullible next time" then I would have been okay about it. While legal liability against CCP would be rather contentious (what could CCP have done to prevent this given that most of it occured on teamspeak?), it would be incredibly bad for the game's culture if CCP let this slip without at least some punishment being handed down against the cyber bullies, not the mention incredibly stupid from a PR standpoint.

2+ hours of getting a guy with a speech impediment to read intentionally long and tedious drivel while making fun of his pronunciation, making him sing songs for their own entertainment and then harassing his wife who attempted to intervene by asking them to stop is clearly and without a doubt cyber bullying and I personally don't feel it's unreasonable to say it's also tantamount to torture.


There's that word again. For reference, I agree with the position expressed earlier. Words have meanings. Using them wrongly is to dilute those meanings. To use the word 'torture' to describe Erotica1's game is to devalue the very real torture and suffering that even now regularly occurs at the hands of certain governments and paramilitary groups.
Kaivar Lancer
Doomheim
#2247 - 2014-03-26 08:02:55 UTC
Iyacia Cyric'ai wrote:
I personally don't feel it's unreasonable to say it's also tantamount to torture.


I am sure the Hague will add singing karaoke to the Geneva Convention some time soon.
PotatoOverdose
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#2248 - 2014-03-26 08:03:12 UTC
Erotica 1 wrote:


So this DJ guy gets raging mad at me. Others can tell you who he is, most will get the reference. Anyway, I had the misfortune of having gotten on his radar and nothing I could say would calm this guy down. I was told to drop my CSM run and do a number of things otherwise they would expose some real life dirt they found on me, since I had released my NAME to address the people thinking the CSM thing was a troll. I had no idea people would stoop this low over internet spaceships. (oops again.)

If I get one more iota of harassment of this I will release the blackmailers eve-online name. Most people can guess.

Like a moron, I caved in to every single demand. I posted what they wanted me to say on goon forums. I sent silly apology mails, etc etc. You could say it was a taste of my own medicine notched up a bit. I felt this was the prudent approach, yet the onslaught against me continued and escalated, which led me to believe I made the wrong choice. I should have made a stand then. Instead, I took a breather from the limelight.

Guys, there were never any "mayo" pics. There were no underage girls, etc. In the campaign TS event I held, a BU guy's adult girlfriend linked racy pics with "ERO4CSM" written on her body. I did NOT ask for these. I do NOT have these saved. In her words, she "wanted to give nerds something to fap to." Look, I'm not complaining at all... I'm sure many nerds did "fap" to them to be quite honest. There were some funny pics with the clients' FACES OBSCURED with a sign. We said, look, if you want to link a pic that would be funny, but for God's sake, don't make it personally identifiable. Hold up a funny sign over your face. One of those is the Yodaknows pic on minerbumping. Like I said, only a handful, and they are extremely tame. Yeah one guy did write "Erotica 1" in peanut butter on his chest. Funny, gross, and totally not identifiable to the person.

The "dirt" isn't even all that big of a deal, just downright embarrassing. Some years ago, I sold some resale rights stuff online to make some cash. Made some money, cool. Anyway, a guy complains. I look into it, see he's right, apologize and refund his money. I spoke to a rights owner and straightened things out.

So, you're saying Darius Johnson aka former CCP Sreegs blackmailed you? I assume you have some proof of this?
Navi Annages
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#2249 - 2014-03-26 08:03:30 UTC  |  Edited by: Navi Annages
Trance Oskold wrote:
None of that **** matters. What does matter is this:

"CCP may take any action it deems appropriate regarding any User Content, if CCP believes, in its sole discretion, that such User Content violates the EULA or may expose CCP, its licensors and/or its suppliers to liability, damage CCP's relationship with any of its suppliers, licensors, ISPs or other users of EVE, harm anyone or harm CCP's reputation or goodwill."


Good thing CCP can't intervene over an IP called TS3 which they don't own. Sucka.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8-JfK-wwFU

Foxstar Damaskeenus
why did i join this corp
Not Purple Shoot It.
#2250 - 2014-03-26 08:05:58 UTC
PotatoOverdose wrote:
Erotica 1 wrote:


So this DJ ......s out.

So, you're saying Darius Johnson aka former CCP Sreegs blackmailed you? I assume you have some proof of this?



Trouble seems to follow this jerk (Erotica1) around doesn't it.

"[this thread] is a cesspit of trolling and flaming" ISD Buldath

Trance Oskold
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#2251 - 2014-03-26 08:07:11 UTC  |  Edited by: Trance Oskold
I am sure we can all agree on one thing, and that is that this is a pretty crazy thread.
Navi Annages
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#2252 - 2014-03-26 08:11:57 UTC
Trance Oskold wrote:
Navi Annages wrote:
Trance Oskold wrote:
None of that **** matters. What does matter is this:

"CCP may take any action it deems appropriate regarding any User Content, if CCP believes, in its sole discretion, that such User Content violates the EULA or may expose CCP, its licensors and/or its suppliers to liability, damage CCP's relationship with any of its suppliers, licensors, ISPs or other users of EVE, harm anyone or harm CCP's reputation or goodwill."


Good thing CCP can't intervene over an IP called TS3 which they don't own. Sucka.


Actually they can.


Actually they can't. If they do so in this case then guess what? Every time some little minuscule carebear nobody gets scammed, cries or namecalled CCP is gonna have to call out the legal beagles to tend to hurt wounds and find precedents to take action? You think they want to pay lawyers by the hours over nonsense time and time again? Obviously you don't own a business. Deni-ability is one of the first rules.

All of this occurred outside of the fictional world called eve online. This all happened over TS3. If Sohkar wants to file some complaint then perhaps he should contact TS3. Otherwise CCP will simply say "Get Bent".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8-JfK-wwFU

Seraph d'Etoiles
Bitter Vets With Less Time
#2253 - 2014-03-26 08:12:32 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Riot Girl wrote:
CNN? Wow, that's taking a petty grudge too far. Only a sociopath would go that far.


I wouldn't say that, and given that this is not cyber bullying, if CNN calls it such, then it's just bad journalism.

But what else would we expect from CNN these days?


On display here folks. Naivete at its best.

He doesn't really understand a lot what he claims so very meretriciously to be an expert about... on display.... naive ultimately.
Bjurn Akely
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#2254 - 2014-03-26 08:14:18 UTC
Trance Oskold wrote:
None of that **** matters. What does matter is this:

"CCP may take any action it deems appropriate regarding any User Content, if CCP believes, in its sole discretion, that such User Content violates the EULA or may expose CCP, its licensors and/or its suppliers to liability, damage CCP's relationship with any of its suppliers, licensors, ISPs or other users of EVE, harm anyone or harm CCP's reputation or goodwill."


SO what I've been suggesting already is in there. Fine. Interesting. Your move CCP.
Big Lynx
#2255 - 2014-03-26 08:16:36 UTC
Navi Annages wrote:
Trance Oskold wrote:
Navi Annages wrote:
Trance Oskold wrote:
None of that **** matters. What does matter is this:

"CCP may take any action it deems appropriate regarding any User Content, if CCP believes, in its sole discretion, that such User Content violates the EULA or may expose CCP, its licensors and/or its suppliers to liability, damage CCP's relationship with any of its suppliers, licensors, ISPs or other users of EVE, harm anyone or harm CCP's reputation or goodwill."


Good thing CCP can't intervene over an IP called TS3 which they don't own. Sucka.


Actually they can.


Every time some little minuscule carebear nobody gets scammed, cries or namecalled CCP is gonna have to call out the legal beagles to tend to hurt wounds and find precedents to take action? You think they want to pay lawyers by the hours over nonsense time and time again?


that's not about the scam anymore
Frank Pannon
Emerald Swine Escavations
#2256 - 2014-03-26 08:17:17 UTC
Machagon wrote:
Malcanis, I love the job you do on the CSM, and I agree 100% with your point about banning people for non-rulebreaking behaviour, but your bullying as homosexuality metaphor here is a huge stretch, not very helpful, and kind of offensive on its own.

I personally think that Erotica 1's behaviour in the audio log is reprehensible and reflects very poorly on him as a human being. I take on the personality of a pirate with no moral compass when I play this game, and I think that the ISK doubling scam is a great one that I support entirely. But, when I am interacting with other EVE players (rather than their characters) I treat them with the same kindness and respect I would any other human being.

There is definitely a line crossed here where this interaction is no longer about EVE in any way and is just one group of out-of-game people bullying another out-of-game person. They are delighting in the distress of his wife, for god's sake.

I don't think Erotica 1 should be banned. I would theoretically love to see a rules change to make this sort of thing bannable, but in practice that's a terrible rabbit hole to go down and entirely unenforceable besides.

What we CAN do, is reflect as a community and decide whether this is something we are really comfortable with. What we can do is stop believing that defending the amazing concept of the true sandbox means we have to defend the behaviour Erotica 1 displays on TS here. This is not a long con, it is bullying. It's real-world harassment. Please don't use my game as a casting call for real world torture victims.



+1000.
Don Aubaris
#2257 - 2014-03-26 08:17:51 UTC
This morning at CCP-HQ :


C1: you gonna tell him?
C2: me? not me. I did it last time.
C3: Well, I'm not gonna do it either.
C2: Well you know the rule. Last one who joined gets the dirty jobs.
C1: Oh Crap

H. : Good morning!
C1,2,3 : Morning boss.
H: Everything running smoothly?
C2: Yes,boss. All hamsters are running at full speed.
H: Great!
C1 :Euh...boss. You might want to look at this.
H : What is it?
C1 : Just a threadnought boss. That thing from yesterday didn't die yet.
H : what was that thing again?
C1 : you know....Erotica 1
H : oh %beeep%.
C1 : And CNN would like an official reaction.
H: %beep%. %beep%. %BEEP%.


I wonder if his reply stayed within the EULA Smile
Erotica 1
Krypteia Operations
#2258 - 2014-03-26 08:20:39 UTC
PotatoOverdose wrote:
Erotica 1 wrote:


So this DJ guy gets raging mad at me. Others can tell you who he is, most will get the reference. Anyway, I had the misfortune of having gotten on his radar and nothing I could say would calm this guy down. I was told to drop my CSM run and do a number of things otherwise they would expose some real life dirt they found on me, since I had released my NAME to address the people thinking the CSM thing was a troll. I had no idea people would stoop this low over internet spaceships. (oops again.)

If I get one more iota of harassment of this I will release the blackmailers eve-online name. Most people can guess.

Like a moron, I caved in to every single demand. I posted what they wanted me to say on goon forums. I sent silly apology mails, etc etc. You could say it was a taste of my own medicine notched up a bit. I felt this was the prudent approach, yet the onslaught against me continued and escalated, which led me to believe I made the wrong choice. I should have made a stand then. Instead, I took a breather from the limelight.

Guys, there were never any "mayo" pics. There were no underage girls, etc. In the campaign TS event I held, a BU guy's adult girlfriend linked racy pics with "ERO4CSM" written on her body. I did NOT ask for these. I do NOT have these saved. In her words, she "wanted to give nerds something to fap to." Look, I'm not complaining at all... I'm sure many nerds did "fap" to them to be quite honest. There were some funny pics with the clients' FACES OBSCURED with a sign. We said, look, if you want to link a pic that would be funny, but for God's sake, don't make it personally identifiable. Hold up a funny sign over your face. One of those is the Yodaknows pic on minerbumping. Like I said, only a handful, and they are extremely tame. Yeah one guy did write "Erotica 1" in peanut butter on his chest. Funny, gross, and totally not identifiable to the person.

The "dirt" isn't even all that big of a deal, just downright embarrassing. Some years ago, I sold some resale rights stuff online to make some cash. Made some money, cool. Anyway, a guy complains. I look into it, see he's right, apologize and refund his money. I spoke to a rights owner and straightened things out.

So, you're saying Darius Johnson aka former CCP Sreegs blackmailed you? I assume you have some proof of this?


No, I am not saying he did. Someone else. Doesn't matter.

See Bio for isk doubling rules. If you didn't read bio, chances are you funded those who did.

Bjurn Akely
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#2259 - 2014-03-26 08:20:46 UTC  |  Edited by: Bjurn Akely
Seraph d'Etoiles wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Riot Girl wrote:
CNN? Wow, that's taking a petty grudge too far. Only a sociopath would go that far.


I wouldn't say that, and given that this is not cyber bullying, if CNN calls it such, then it's just bad journalism.

But what else would we expect from CNN these days?


On display here folks. Naivete at its best.

He doesn't really understand a lot what he claims so very meretriciously to be an expert about... on display.... naive ultimately.


You're probably a bit naive yourself. Having worked with journalists a bit I can tell you that very few of them report stories that they dig into and get facts. Usually hey have an agenda and tailor the presentation of a story to fit it.

This story is a great tool for someone with the agenda of 'videogames are destroying our youth'. Just spin it so that the 'poor malleable boys doing this to that victim are usually so nice and cuddly, but since they started playing this game...'.

Truth is not something journalists care much about. It's the story. You see this every day in the news. Remember when you last read a story with a subject you know something about? Remember how wrong the journalist got it? Now understand that is true for just about every story.
Asia Leigh
Kenshin.
Fraternity.
#2260 - 2014-03-26 08:21:02 UTC
Victim? Really people? >.>

So let me get this straight....

1. Idiot #1 falls for Idiot #2's isk doubling scam and is invited to play in a 'bonus room'
2. Idiot #2 askes idiot #1 to TS, and he agrees
3. Idiot #1 makes himself look like an ass in front of idiot #2 and his friends.
4. Idiot #2 tells Idiot #1 he gets nothing.
5. Idiot #1 throws a fit, and is marred by his own decision to go along with this

In this case the 'victim' only fell victim to his own stupidity and greed. No one was pointing a gun to this guys face forcing him to participate in this. He could have refused to come on TS, and once he made the decision to join, he could have left at anytime.

Lets be serious here, I'm all for victims rights as much as the next guy/gal is, but unlike a true victim of a true crime this guy actually had choices available to him to avoid this and he choose greed in a video game, over being humiliated. Sorry, but in this case the 'victim' bought this on himself and I can't support the O.P's motive in this tread at this time.

By the way, to the people saying that erotica should be banned for this:

The only in game interaction that took place here was the giving of isk, and contracting of assets which is totally not against the rules. The 'bonus room' as it were took place entirely on a private TS server which CCP has no jurisdiction.
Apply the damn rules equally >.>