These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Jester Trek Latest Blog

First post First post
Author
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#1421 - 2014-03-26 00:31:18 UTC
Silvara Nocturn wrote:

This entire thread is arguing semantics and bad analogies and should be nuked.


It should.
Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
#1422 - 2014-03-26 00:31:31 UTC
Silvara Nocturn wrote:
All this could not have happened without eve assets so its not entirely out of game. I think ccp could make a case for this if they want to take action.

This entire thread is arguing semantics and bad analogies and should be nuked.



Ahem... "nuked".


From where?

Bring back DEEEEP Space!

Genseric Tollaris
Hard Cog Industry
#1423 - 2014-03-26 00:33:04 UTC
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:
Silvara Nocturn wrote:
All this could not have happened without eve assets so its not entirely out of game. I think ccp could make a case for this if they want to take action.

This entire thread is arguing semantics and bad analogies and should be nuked.



Ahem... "nuked".


From where?


Orbit. Its the only way to be sure.
LUMINOUS SPIRIT
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#1424 - 2014-03-26 00:33:18 UTC
Avio Yaken wrote:
Erotica 1 wrote:
To answer a few questions...

I'll be undocking tonight to go find some war targets. I was bored last night, so we spent 600m on decs. I am really bad at pvp though, just look at my kb.

We have had winners. In fact, just about a week ago, the prize pot got so large that we may be awarding an avatar in lieu of isk. Though that client exhibited some troubling Code noncompliant signs, so that is not guaranteed (waiting on additional tests).

Does this mean I get to go around on all the talk shows? I'll consent to doing it with a few prior contestants. No, I'm not dressing up as Ero. Yes, I might be able to be convinced to sing off key. I have sung before in bonus rounds, though escrow agents have asked I never do it again. I'm practicing "Behind Blue Eyes."



can i just ask, WHY you did that? i mean you did psuh this innocent man over the edge for a bullshit gain


Hes a sadist a bully. Those dont need a 'why'.
Sabriz Adoudel
Move along there is nothing here
#1425 - 2014-03-26 00:34:17 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:

Bad press for CCP when knowledge of this and the recording proliferates.

Good press for CCP when they take action on it.

Both press, net profit.

Throwing Erotica1 out on his ass is a paltry price to pay for that.
Nobody will question that CCP is utterly within its rights, and sufficiently justified, to do so.
And nobody will miss him anyways.

As is demonstrated in this thread, and in which I have been keeping count of individual posters and their expressed views, the community is overwhelmingly against what he has done as evidenced in the recording.


Any ban for Ero that isn't met with bans for the people who threatened to kill him or otherwise threatened violence will definitely NOT be good press for CCP at all. Ero would be within his rights to compile a list of them and subpoena CCP to get their RL names to press charges against some of them, and the damage that would do to CCP would be significant. Especially if CCP have not taken action over those threats.

I support the New Order and CODE. alliance. www.minerbumping.com

Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
#1426 - 2014-03-26 00:34:25 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
Silvara Nocturn wrote:

This entire thread is arguing semantics and bad analogies and should be nuked.


It should.


Needs more Tippia, to be honest. That's when the fun really starts.

Mr Epeen Cool
Galdrak
Interplanetary Trade Federation
#1427 - 2014-03-26 00:35:14 UTC
Erotica 1 wrote:
RomeStar wrote:
Erotica 1 wrote:
To answer a few questions...



Bad press is still better than no press at all right :) Business good..?


Yes.
. The bonus round is not designed to be easy. However, those that show full faith win big.

Many contestants say that the bonus round is the most fun they've ever had in EVE, even if they lose everything. Some claim they were about to quit EVE anyway and wanted to go out in style. I can't blame them.


as the sadist said to the masochist when he said hurt me....... NO!

at no point did he stand a chance of getting back anything you scammed from him. playing your game would never lead to him gaining from you. players like you are getting more common in eve, the new psychotic pilots with intelligent rebuttals for awful behaviour,

Snitches Laden
Doomheim
#1428 - 2014-03-26 00:35:27 UTC
Genseric Tollaris wrote:
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:
Silvara Nocturn wrote:
All this could not have happened without eve assets so its not entirely out of game. I think ccp could make a case for this if they want to take action.

This entire thread is arguing semantics and bad analogies and should be nuked.



Ahem... "nuked".


From where?


Orbit. Its the only way to be sure.



game over man game over
Berendas
Ascendant Operations
#1429 - 2014-03-26 00:35:33 UTC  |  Edited by: Berendas
I can't believe this thread has surpassed 70 pages. Sohkar was a fool and payed for it, as is EVE's way. The humiliation, or "bullying" as some of you insist on calling it, only came about as a consequence of his own willful actions. Sohkar is the only person at fault, for being unfamiliar with the rules of EVE. Erotica 1 did nothing more than separate the chaff from the wheat.

The number of people who have this nanny-minded view of EVE is simply staggering. Why should a player get banned because his/her actions reached an arbitrarily designated frustration threshold in another player? Should every player that gets on my lossmails be banned if I can muster up a certain degree of anger about it?


"A scam is what happens when someone takes advantage of your misplaced trust, temporary confusion or ignorance of game rules, and robs you via legal in-game means. When this occurs, there is nothing the Support Team can do for you. Although low and despicable, scams do not violate any game mechanics and can not be compensated for by the GMs, nor can the scammers generally be punished for their actions."

This excerpt from the official EVE knowledge base should be the beginning and end of the entire discussion.
Kethry Avenger
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#1430 - 2014-03-26 00:35:50 UTC
My 2 cents.

I think all the stuff done in the game is ok and in the spirit of EVE. Though if one of the devs could think up a way to warn new players that the rest of us are evil in game and we really will take all your in game stuff and not to trust us right away would probably be good.

I think using EVE to hunt for victims to bully is actually evil and the TOS or EULA should be amended in some way to give CCP more justification for banning these types of players. Until people like this grow up or get their heads fixed they should not be welcome in this community.

I also believe CCP doesn't need to do anything to the EULA and if anyone has made public acts such as these, recording the bulling of others, they should be banned anyway.
John XIII
The Carnifex Corp
#1431 - 2014-03-26 00:37:24 UTC
One time I logged onto the Eve-o forums and didn't see the General Discussion link. That was a good day.

Between Ignorance and Wisdom

admiral root
Red Galaxy
#1432 - 2014-03-26 00:38:09 UTC
Kethry Avenger wrote:
the TOS or EULA should be amended in some way to give CCP more justification for banning these types of players.


They already have all the justification they need - it clearly says that they can ban anyone they want for any reason they want (or no reason at all).

No, your rights end in optimal+2*falloff

Malcolm Shinhwa
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#1433 - 2014-03-26 00:38:53 UTC
Silvara Nocturn wrote:
All this could not have happened without eve assets so its not entirely out of game. I think ccp could make a case for this if they want to take action.

This entire thread is arguing semantics and bad analogies and should be nuked.


Nooooooooo! I've gotten probably 50 fake internet points out of this thread, and apparently make believe stuff is worth freakingthe hell out for... so don't nuke this thread!!!!!

In fact all of my posts have ben "liked" by one side and not the other...so...

Sohkar you poor abused racist bro, I feel you!!!
Ban Erotica 1 ban him so hard his mother feels it in her gut!!!!

and death to the 1-X robots!!!!

[i]"The purpose of fighting is to win. There is no possible victory in defense. The sword is more important than the shield and skill is more important than either. The final weapon is the brain. All else is supplemental[/i]."

Winchester Steele
#1434 - 2014-03-26 00:39:57 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
baltec1 wrote:
Tancred Xero wrote:
Quote:
Permabans for saying something mean? I don't condone taking the mick out of the way someone speaks (unless you're Welsh), nor do I do it (unless you're Welsh), but people like you are the reason a fat guy can get arrested for telling a joke about fat people in England.


Check the length of the recording. That stuff went on for over an hour, with the player's in-game assets being used as leverage to continue the abuse. This was not an isolated off-hand comment.


He could have left at any time.



He could have followed his wife's advice. I (and every married guy) knows that is an extreme suggestion, but this situation warrants it lol.



I always listen to my wife. Especially when she is reading the same thread as me Cool.

...

Snitches Laden
Doomheim
#1435 - 2014-03-26 00:40:53 UTC
Berendas wrote:
I can't believe this thread has surpassed 70 pages. Sohkar was a fool and payed for it, as is EVE's way. The humiliation, or "bullying" as some of you insist on calling it, only came about as a consequence of his own willful actions. Sohkar is the only person at fault, for being unfamiliar with the rules of EVE. Erotica 1 did nothing more than separate the chaff from the wheat.

The number of people who have this nanny-minded view of EVE is simply staggering. Why should a player get banned because his/her actions reached an arbitrarily designated frustration threshold in another player? Should every player that gets on my lossmails be banned if I can muster up a certain degree of anger about it?


"A scam is what happens when someone takes advantage of your misplaced trust, temporary confusion or ignorance of game rules, and robs you via legal in-game means. When this occurs, there is nothing the Support Team can do for you. Although low and despicable, scams do not violate any game mechanics and can not be compensated for by the GMs, nor can the scammers generally be punished for their actions."

This excerpt from the official EVE knowledge base should be the beginning and end of the entire discussion.


I find it interesting how people justify his actions regardless of them being allowed or not by game policy yet these same individuals would have probally acted in the same fashion had this happened to them.

food for thought the the german populous drank the nazi koolaid to and look what it got them. just because something is legally okay doesn't make it morally right.
Louis Robichaud
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#1436 - 2014-03-26 00:42:43 UTC
I'm not sure I have it in me to read a 72 page long threadnaught...

But I'll say this. The problem isn't that Erotica1 scammed the poor bastard. The problem is what happened *afterwards*. Hours of humiliation and abuse. Why? The isk is already won.

It's a sand *box*, not a sand dune. Not all content has value.

I'm not entirely sure where the line is, but it's very obvious that Erotica1 has crossed it by several miles. Ban the creep.

I blog a bit http://hspew.blogspot.ca

Sabriz Adoudel
Move along there is nothing here
#1437 - 2014-03-26 00:43:12 UTC  |  Edited by: Sabriz Adoudel
Finally, some moderation seems to have started.

I sincerely hope the threats of RL violence are removed from this thread now and the people that made them held to account.

Criticizing Ero is fair game, he can give as good as he takes. Saying rules should be changed so that the 'bonus rooms' are no longer OK is fair game too (even though I do not agree). Saying Ero should be bashed IRL, or that "we should shut up until the CSM election so we can find out who he is IRL" is totally unacceptable and should have no place on these forums at all.

I support the New Order and CODE. alliance. www.minerbumping.com

EI Digin
irc.zulusquad.org
#1438 - 2014-03-26 00:44:11 UTC
Snitches Laden wrote:

I find it interesting how people justify his actions regardless of them being allowed or not by game policy yet these same individuals would have probally acted in the same fashion had this happened to them.

food for thought the the german populous drank the **** koolaid to and look what it got them. just because something is legally okay doesn't make it morally right.
aaaaand Godwin's law.

I think this thread has run its course.
Salvos Rhoska
#1439 - 2014-03-26 00:44:13 UTC  |  Edited by: Salvos Rhoska
Sabriz Adoudel wrote:
Any ban for Ero that isn't met with bans for the people who threatened to kill him or otherwise threatened violence will definitely NOT be good press for CCP at all. Ero would be within his rights to compile a list of them and subpoena CCP to get their RL names to press charges against some of them, and the damage that would do to CCP would be significant. Especially if CCP have not taken action over those threats.


No lol.

Let me explain.

Erotica1 is sourcing his victims from WITHIN EVE for purposes of scamming them OUTSIDE OF EVE.

He is predating on the EVE community for targets that he takes from within the game, by means of ingame scams, to an external environment where the "acceptability" of his scams is no longer present.

You can't extend an EVE scam into the real world. It has no legitimacy there, and becomes, infact, criminal.

He failed to recognise that though scamming is ok within EVE, it is NOT ok to extend those scams to an external out of game "Bonus Room" environment.

This is explicitly against just about everything in the EULA.
This alone is all the reason CCP needs to terminate his account.

The above has nothing to do with actually happens in the recording (though it is reprehensible).
CCP does not need to even listen to the recording to have grounds for terminating his account.

CCP is responsible however for protecting its player base by exploitation and predation from OUTSIDE the game environment.
When Erotica1 is making his scams conditional on players stepping OUTSIDE that game environment, where his scams lose any legitimacy either in the games internal context or in IRL law, that is something that CCP absolutely should have an interest in preventing.

If Erotica1 went around seaching the player base for a 13yr old boy who he can scam ingame with ISK doubling, that would be fine (as far as all the rules go). If he tries to start extending those scams to exploiting that 13yr old boy in a context OUTSIDE the game, such as luring him into a "Boy Bonus Room" on his private TS server, it becomes all kinds of colors of illegal and violation of the EULA.

That is exactly what he is doing now, but with less discriminating targetting of victims. He deliberately targets those who are, for one reason or another, stupid or impaired enough in some fashion to fall for the ISK doubling in the first place. Its a selection process that ensures he can find people in WITHIN the EVE game, that he can lure to exploit OUTSIDE of the game.

Has to stop. Absolutely.

Erotica1, on his part, can try to press charges against Sohkar for what he said in the recording, but it will never work.
1) CCP is not responsible for what people say in OUT OF GAME CHANNELS, and therefore its pointless to subpoena them for Sohkar's identity.
2) Erotica1 can however try to subpoena whoever owns the TS server he conducts his private little "Bonus Room" torture cell in for his IP. Good luck with that!
3) Any judge/jury will recognise that Sohkars outbursts are a result of duress, piled with harassment, humiliating and degrading demands.
Moneta Curran
Federal Defense Union
Gallente Federation
#1440 - 2014-03-26 00:44:18 UTC

Greedy idiot subjects himself to ridicule. News at 11.