EVE General Discussion

They might for encouraging that sort of behaviour?

What all of the people who defend this have failed to answer is this.

Whilst accepting that scamming, stealing and being a bit of a douche in a game is one thing.

Having done that. Why continue for an hour and a half , knowing that someone was increasingly distressed., to the point it evidently reached?

I do find it slightly disturbing that people think it is OK to push it to this extent.

Not one person has answered that question out of the usual folks that are worried about Eve's philosophy. "The game must not be diluted" is not an excuse for what went on here.

Its the act. Nobody laughs at an assault, especially if it involves kicking to the head. You said you would laugh at something that is a serious and arrestable event.

:facepalm:

Actually you can, it's an incite to riot and public order offence.

if that's the case then is the "victim" stabbing erotica since his part in all of this is worse than ero's.
ero's part is very tame in comparison to the tirade of racial slurs and real life threats from the guy that hypothetically got kicked in the face.

CCP has an unique opportunity to distance themselves from these bottom feeders - Erotica1 and cohorts -, but only if they act fast.

Well, having someone spaz out on teamspeak can be pretty funny, this is not the first of such recordings either, its absolutely nothing new, and usually stuff like this is laughed at.

A better question is, if this guy was in such stress over this teamspeak session, why didnt he just leave? I mean, if someone was annoying me on teamspeak, Id just leave, hell, you can even just mute/ignore them.

Since the last two pages of this thread have drifted rather off topic. Here's a recap:

1. Erotica1 is a sad, morally reprehensible sadist who delighted in tormenting someone who clearly didn't know better. He continues to take perverse pleasure in trauma he caused then and furore he's causing now.

2. The victim of said abuse completely lost his cool and went beserk. Some people, mostly those grasping at straws to defend the erstwhile E1, are using some of that verbal diatribe to justify everything E1 did. They're misguided at best, complicit at worst.

3. CCP is being put into a "damned if they do, damned if they don't" scenario. Not good. Not good at all.

4. Salvos is a pain the posterior, and his comments regarding a hypothetical future roundkick-to-the-face scenario have not really helped except to derail the debate. However, much as it pains me to admit it, he's largely made some extremely valid points elsewhere in this thread.

I think that pretty much covers it.

Out of game cannot be CCP's responsibility.

I guess however, that it says something if you spend your time hacking on what must obviously be the more challenged. Why not create a RL-sect or something.