These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Jester Trek Latest Blog

First post First post
Author
Desivo Delta Visseroff
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#841 - 2014-03-25 20:21:38 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
Khergit Deserters wrote:
Jill Chastot wrote:
Also for the grr goons squad (because of tinfoil)

"mynnnaMarch 25, 2014 at 5:39 AM

Erotica1 had an alt in a goon membercorp (or perhaps it was his main character, who knows) and when he brought attention to himself trying to brag about his actions we shot him in the head for it.
"

Good point. If something is too disgusting for Goons, it's probably something that's proscribed by every civilized society in the world.


There is more to it than that.


Please do share. I have a slow day at the office and this thread is amazing!


Edit: Page snipe!

I was hunting for sick loot, but all I could get my hands on were 50 corpses[:|]..............[:=d]

Forum Clone 77777
Doomheim
#842 - 2014-03-25 20:21:40 UTC
Nalelmir Ahashion wrote:
[quote=Ramona McCandless]
Considering in game isk can be turned into plex\Aur etc which is worth RL cash and using plex u may "pay" sub and considering there is some RL cash value to isk in EVE you point is invalid.


Considering youre wrong, and plex/aur is not actually worth jack in real cash, yes, you can actually buy aurum and plex for real cash, but its an ingame item, you dont own ingame items or assets, theyre CCPs.

So youre wrong, get over it.
Danalee
Pandemic Horde Inc.
Pandemic Horde
#843 - 2014-03-25 20:22:05 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Danalee wrote:
---


Well, you lied to her.

What happened to him is the following by analogy:

Your daughter comes out of a store with a lollipop inhand, happy as can be.

A grown man comes up to your daughter and promises her that if she gives him her lollipop, he will give her two back in return.

Your daughter thinks about this for a moment, and decides that two lollipops are indeed better than one.
She complies and gives him her lollipop.

The grown man, now holding her lollipop, then additionally informs her that in order for her to get the double lollipop deal, she has to get off the street she is on, and follow him down this dark alley.

Your daughter thinks that "but he is still holding my lollipop! and maybe its true that I will still get the second one".

So she complies and follows him down the dark alleyway.

There suddenly more grown men appear, and begin demanding that she performs various degrading and humiliating activities in order to get back her lollipop. They also record the entire 2hr activity for their own and their "friends" enjoyment.

I leave the rest to your imagination.

That is what happened here.


Are you kidding me? I'd never lie to my grandmother, she's got a sixth sense about telling fibs and has a mean left hook to boot!

I'll play along with your "analogy" if you replace my daughter with a grown freakin' working man.
He's still holding the lollipop and is following some teenagers to a back alley to perform song and dance acts to get more "lollipops" from them.

D.

Bear

Proud member of the Somalian Coast Guard Authority

Member and Juror of the Court of Crime and Punishment

Batelle
Federal Navy Academy
#844 - 2014-03-25 20:22:32 UTC  |  Edited by: Batelle
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Batelle wrote:
I agree. And that is in no way, shape, or form, extortion or blackmail. Its a breach of contract. You must be a terrible lawyer.


I suppose you could argue that extortion/blackmail are a form of breach of contract.
But that is why you are not a lawyer.

I wouldn't argue those things, because that would be ******* stupid, not because I'm not a lawyer. Your example describes a breach of contract. Its basically the same in the bonus room, except that a the lolipop contract holds up in a court of law (in principle) while the Eve contract concerning pixel spaceships would not.

"**CCP is changing policy, and has asked that we discontinue the bonus credit program after November 7th. So until then, enjoy a super-bonus of 1B Blink Credit for each 60-day GTC you buy!"**

Never forget.

Pew Terror
All of it
#845 - 2014-03-25 20:23:57 UTC
What kind of disconnected individuals are all of you that the discussion about this is purely about the legal implications...
Kadl
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#846 - 2014-03-25 20:24:18 UTC
EVE is an internet spaceship game. It is not a Teamspeak game where we coerce people to do humiliating stupid things, and pressure them into an emotional frenzy. There are a number of defenders for Erotica1 here who seem to have forgotten that the EVE sandbox has boundaries based on the relevance to internet spaceships on one company's set of servers.

A good sportsman can congratulate, be friendly, and kind to his opponents. Poor winners disrespect their opponents, gloat and continuously remind the losers of their loss. It is utterly clear that Erotica1 is a terrible sportsman, who does not understand the boundaries of EVE the internet spaceship game. Why am I seeing all these complaints about sore losers, but nothing about the bad winners? Sportsmanship must be cultivated among all players.

The boundaries of EVE are all of those things which bring you advantage within the game. Scamming, ganking, and stealing of in game items are all obviously part of the EVE game. The meta game including spying obviously can also bring in game advantages. EVE has a rich and interesting meta game, but all of that should provide additional advantages in game.

Erotica1 successfully scammed Sohkar out of everything. Congratulations! Erotica1 continued to humiliate Sohkar after he had all of his stuff. Reprehensible! That was bad sportsmanship. It may have been illegal. CCP may wish to provide sanctions so as to reduce the effects of these events on their game. They may also wish to figure out policies which improve sportsmanship in the game for everyone.
Salvos Rhoska
#847 - 2014-03-25 20:24:43 UTC
Batelle wrote:
An agreement made in Eve, or an agreement concerning the transference of eve assets, obviously does not constitute a contract.


Which is exactly why what happened outside of the game constitutes blackmail/extortion instead.

The second the interchange between these parties was taken outside of the game, the ingame context ceased to apply.
Cultural Enrichment
Jenkem Puffing Association
#848 - 2014-03-25 20:25:17 UTC
Hahahahahahahaha How The **** Is Cyber Bullying Real Hahahaha ***** Just Walk Away From The Screen Like ***** Close Your Eyes Haha
Navi Annages
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#849 - 2014-03-25 20:25:57 UTC
Kadl wrote:
EVE is an internet spaceship game. It is not a Teamspeak game where we coerce people to do humiliating stupid things, and pressure them into an emotional frenzy. There are a number of defenders for Erotica1 here who seem to have forgotten that the EVE sandbox has boundaries based on the relevance to internet spaceships on one company's set of servers.

A good sportsman can congratulate, be friendly, and kind to his opponents. Poor winners disrespect their opponents, gloat and continuously remind the losers of their loss. It is utterly clear that Erotica1 is a terrible sportsman, who does not understand the boundaries of EVE the internet spaceship game. Why am I seeing all these complaints about sore losers, but nothing about the bad winners? Sportsmanship must be cultivated among all players.

The boundaries of EVE are all of those things which bring you advantage within the game. Scamming, ganking, and stealing of in game items are all obviously part of the EVE game. The meta game including spying obviously can also bring in game advantages. EVE has a rich and interesting meta game, but all of that should provide additional advantages in game.

Erotica1 successfully scammed Sohkar out of everything. Congratulations! Erotica1 continued to humiliate Sohkar after he had all of his stuff. Reprehensible! That was bad sportsmanship. It may have been illegal. CCP may wish to provide sanctions so as to reduce the effects of these events on their game. They may also wish to figure out policies which improve sportsmanship in the game for everyone.


CCP can do nothing legally for any personal conversations that happen outside of the game. Get real.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8-JfK-wwFU

baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#850 - 2014-03-25 20:26:49 UTC
Desivo Delta Visseroff wrote:


Please do share. I have a slow day at the office and this thread is amazing!


Edit: Page snipe!


That would be for Erotica 1 to tell you but I will say that we had no issues with the scams.
Mag's
Azn Empire
#851 - 2014-03-25 20:28:08 UTC
Nalelmir Ahashion wrote:
Ramona McCandless wrote:

I doesnt apply because there was no cash value to anything.

No money changed hands.

Im not sure extortion can even be a thing without a threat of violence


Considering in game isk can be turned into plex\Aur etc which is worth RL cash and using plex u may "pay" sub and considering there is some RL cash value to isk in EVE you point is invalid.
I won't point out your errors. But I think the biggest problem with your post, is that you believe what you posted.

Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the Lions will ignore you in the Savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless.

Forum Clone 77777
Doomheim
#852 - 2014-03-25 20:28:25 UTC  |  Edited by: Forum Clone 77777
Also, why was no one having issues with this supposed "blackmailing" or "extortion" when a few years ago at fanfest, one of the CSM members had a bunch of teamspeak recordings where they had caught people in, iirc, their wormhole, and they had people sing songs on their teamspeak to be let go as a form of ransom.
How is this different? I dont know if the people who sang on these recordings were allowed to go free afterwards, but I dont see the difference, and back then, it was a hilarious and awesome idea, now because erotica 1 does it, and because maybe hes getting different results. Its terrible and its against the law and he should be banned, seriously?

Also, its not like any of this is personal in any way, granted, I can imagine it might FEEL personal to the person it happens to, but in EVE, we are just a few clicks away from being a completely different person with different looks and a different name.
Its not like kids being bullied at school only to go home and have their facebook spammed with insults, thats something you cant quite escape in the same way we can just ignore whatever anyone says in EVE.
And its not directed at us the same way it is in EVE, we are anonymous, whats is really being "insulted" and "made fun of" are our EVE characters.

Or maybe Im just really being incapable of feeling the emotions of my dear forum warrior character? Not sure.
Happy Campers
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#853 - 2014-03-25 20:28:57 UTC
The proposed "e-bullying" was not done ingame, rather on a private comms server. Had this been on eve voice or chat or purely ingame this would be a matter for CCP to handle IMHO. If you feel this could be over the line, send the recording to the relevant authorities IRL and leave it to them to decide what to do or not do about it.

I don't see this as a case for the police, but I see this even less as a case for CCP. EVE and CCP should remain neutral in this type of scenario IMHO.
Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
#854 - 2014-03-25 20:29:38 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
Desivo Delta Visseroff wrote:


Please do share. I have a slow day at the office and this thread is amazing!


Edit: Page snipe!


That would be for Erotica 1 to tell you but I will say that we had no issues with the scams.



Arg! That just makes it more interesting!

Bring back DEEEEP Space!

Jill Chastot
WE FORM BL0B Inc.
Goonswarm Federation
#855 - 2014-03-25 20:29:46 UTC
Money ----> Plex-----> AUR
AUR/Plex <-----////////--------- Money


RMT is bad mhmk?

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=298596&find=unread OATHS wants you. Come to the WH "Safety in eve is the greatest fallacy you will ever encounter. Once you accept this you will truely enjoy this game."

Batelle
Federal Navy Academy
#856 - 2014-03-25 20:30:09 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Batelle wrote:
An agreement made in Eve, or an agreement concerning the transference of eve assets, obviously does not constitute a contract.


Which is exactly why what happened outside of the game constitutes blackmail/extortion instead.

The second the interchange between these parties was taken outside of the game, the ingame context ceased to apply.


And what do we have out of game? One dude voluntarily humiliating himself, absent any kind of threat or coercion from the others present.

"**CCP is changing policy, and has asked that we discontinue the bonus credit program after November 7th. So until then, enjoy a super-bonus of 1B Blink Credit for each 60-day GTC you buy!"**

Never forget.

Salvos Rhoska
#857 - 2014-03-25 20:30:22 UTC
Navi Annages wrote:
CCP can do nothing legally for any personal conversations that happen outside of the game. Get real.


The perpetrators coerced the victim into an out of game context, by means of his (or CCPs) ingame assets.
What happened in that out of game context, is potentially illegal.

I don't think CCP wants its services being used as a means for individuals to perpetrate crimes against other players.
Infact much of the EULA and CCP's informal policy, including some key elements of the CSM constitution notably, explicitly forbid people using ingame assets against the people who are playing the game.
Toshiro Ozuwara
Perkone
#858 - 2014-03-25 20:31:55 UTC  |  Edited by: Toshiro Ozuwara
Batelle wrote:
Blaming the victim in RL sexual violence = not okay, and such rationalization is in and of itself morally reprehensible since the rationalization itself does measurable harm to real people who are or are yet to be victims of sexual assault.

Blaming the victim in RL for other crimes = you blame the victim where appropriate given the circumstances and blame the criminal always.

Blaming the victim in Eve scam = okay. Eve is a dangerous place and assumed to be dangerous, and since we can't blame the eve-criminal for valid gameplay, we can certainly blame the victim for being stupid and greedy.

Yes, but we're not talking about the consequences within Eve. We're talking about the consequences outside of Eve. Sure, different domains have different standards and rules. But the idea of shifting the blame to the victim is a very HTFU sort of thing, which we generally don't endorse as an ideal in Western society, IRL.

When this guy was kept on voice comms for 2 hours, when his wife became involved, when they mocked his RL speech impediment, this wasn't Eve inside the game client anymore. It became very personal and very RL very fast.

People are mixing a lot of domains here. All that matters is how CCP wants their game to be played and perceived by the non-Eve playing world. If they are cool with this, then it's settled. If they are not, then there is that too.

It didn't take long to locate the tracking beacon, deep inside the quarters for sleepin' They thought they could get away Not today, it's not the way that this kid plays

Navi Annages
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#859 - 2014-03-25 20:32:00 UTC  |  Edited by: Navi Annages
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Navi Annages wrote:
CCP can do nothing legally for any personal conversations that happen outside of the game. Get real.


The perpetrators coerced the victim into an out of game context, by means of his (or CCPs) ingame assets.
What happened in that out of game context, is potentially illegal.

I don't think CCP wants its services being used as a means for individuals to perpetrate crimes against other players.
Infact much of the EULA and CCP's informal policy, including some key elements of the CSM constitution notably, explicitly forbid people using ingame assets against the people who are playing the game.



"Potentially" Good luck going to small claims court over 20 bucks. lawl

In this case it should goto small claims court. That way Judge Judy will get Eve more air time and potentially more subscriptions.

Erotica could make EvE even more E-Famous.


Erotica For CSM!!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x8-JfK-wwFU

Mag's
Azn Empire
#860 - 2014-03-25 20:32:38 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Navi Annages wrote:
CCP can do nothing legally for any personal conversations that happen outside of the game. Get real.


The perpetrators coerced the victim into an out of game context, by means of his (or CCPs) ingame assets.
What happened in that out of game context, is potentially illegal.

I don't think CCP wants its services being used as a means for individuals to perpetrate crimes against other players.
Infact much of the EULA and CCP's informal policy, including some key elements of the CSM constitution notably, explicitly forbid people using ingame assets against the people who are playing the game.
He didn't hold any assets, he gave them away.

Also you do not legally own any assets in Eve, they all belong to CCP.

Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the Lions will ignore you in the Savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless.