These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Jester Trek Latest Blog

First post First post
Author
Qalix
Long Jump.
#601 - 2014-03-25 18:28:45 UTC
Praise the Yeti wrote:
The people calling for Erotica 1 to be banned based on that recording........why are you not calling for Shadoo and Grath Telkin to be banned also based on the very public recordings of them (by defacto) engaging in what could be perceived to be exactly the same activity?

Please share those links. I haven't heard of them doing anything like that before.
Malcolm Shinhwa
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#602 - 2014-03-25 18:29:08 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Erotica1s ingame activities are fine.

It is his out of game activities which are in my view absolutely illegal.

Play that recording to any judge or jury, and explain the context to them, and they will imo certainly find in favor of the plaintiff.


"I will hunt you mother ******* down and gut your ******* asses." -- Sohkar.

And you're going to put this in front of what jury?

[i]"The purpose of fighting is to win. There is no possible victory in defense. The sword is more important than the shield and skill is more important than either. The final weapon is the brain. All else is supplemental[/i]."

Salvos Rhoska
#603 - 2014-03-25 18:29:33 UTC
To those arguing that the assets are owned by CCP, then it falls incumbent on CCP to press charges on Erotica1 for ransoming their ingame proprietary property against an individual who has paid CCPfor use of them, by means of extortion/blackmail occuring OUTSIDE of thee game.

Erotica1s ingame activities are not a cause of dispute. He has aquired those assets legitimately ingame.
What he then does to those people from whom he has aquied them OUTSIDE of the game, is illegal.

Lets say I manage to scam you out of your assets ingame. You transfer them to my character from yours.
Then subsequently I show up at your door or call you at work, and tell you that if you do this ans this, I will return your assets to you.

It breaks numerous stipulations of the EULA and various other less formal publicstions of policy issued by CCP to do so.
There is to be NO external, out of game, involvment with other players in regards to the services that CCP provides ingame.

Erotica1 is treating these people OUTSIDE THE GAME in this fashion, illegally, against the EULA designed to protect players as clients from exactly this kind of conduct.
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#604 - 2014-03-25 18:29:53 UTC
Toshiro Ozuwara wrote:
Malcanis wrote:
Did you or did you not advocate whipping up a damaging media shitstorm?

Damaging to whom? If the content is as benign as you would have us believe, then there will be no shitstorm.


Where do I support or even defend what erotica1 does

Do you understand that there's a middle ground between the lynch mob and unconditional support?

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Big Lynx
#605 - 2014-03-25 18:30:10 UTC
Wesley Otsdarva wrote:
http://massively.joystiq.com/2014/03/25/heres-some-of-the-cyberbullying-that-happens-in-eve-online/

So here goes for news coverage.



finally this scamming *hits strikes back on ero (and maybe on CCP?)
Azami Nevinyrall
172.0.0.1
#606 - 2014-03-25 18:30:28 UTC
TigerXtrm wrote:
Wesley Otsdarva wrote:
http://massively.joystiq.com/2014/03/25/heres-some-of-the-cyberbullying-that-happens-in-eve-online/

So here goes for news coverage.


Oh ****. Shocked

If CCP does nothing about it, they're basically endorsing it...

...

Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
#607 - 2014-03-25 18:30:56 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
Wesley Otsdarva wrote:
http://massively.joystiq.com/2014/03/25/heres-some-of-the-cyberbullying-that-happens-in-eve-online/

So here goes for news coverage.


Good, perhaps people will learn that EVE online is grown folks business and stay in their thempark MMOs all swaddled in cotton safe from the 'griefers'..



Grown folks don't want to pay to be around people such as the kind that the press will have everybody thinking are players in this game.

And if you want to be all about "toughness", I don't see you petitioning CCP for perma-death. As long as it's all a game, nobody has a stance on anything relating to "HTFU".

Bring back DEEEEP Space!

Dave Stark
#608 - 2014-03-25 18:31:00 UTC
31 pages?
damn having a job really means i miss out on all the fun.

people still mad that dumb people are dumb, and some one took advantage of it. like every day both in and out of the game?

if so, i'm not sure why this has really got to 31 pages since there's not really much of a story here other than "dumb people be dumb, and people profit from it".
Speedkermit Damo
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#609 - 2014-03-25 18:32:29 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
Neltharak Idrissil wrote:
Malcolm from Marketing wrote:
[quote=Malcanis]


I recall CCP found their morals pretty easily when Mittens stepped out of line at Fan fest.
Did he break any laws? No.
Did he break any in game rules? No.

Was what he did morally reprehensible on every level? Yes

This scenario with Erotica, while different in it's approach, boils down to the same basic elements and should be taken seriously by CCP.


Calling for people to kill themselves IS breaking a law. So yes, yes he did and paid for it.


In what country is calling for people to kill themselves against the law? Please link.


It isn't. inciting others to drive someone to suicide probably is.

Protect me from knowing what I don't need to know. Protect me from even knowing that there are things to know that I don't know. Protect me from knowing that I decided not to know about the things that I decided not to know about. Amen.

TigerXtrm
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#610 - 2014-03-25 18:33:15 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
Wesley Otsdarva wrote:
http://massively.joystiq.com/2014/03/25/heres-some-of-the-cyberbullying-that-happens-in-eve-online/

So here goes for news coverage.


Good, perhaps people will learn that EVE online is grown folks business and stay in their thempark MMOs all swaddled in cotton safe from the 'griefers'..


The sh*t that goes on in this game has nothing to do with 'grown folks', in fact it's quite the opposite. Cyber bullying has nothing to do with scamming and it has nothing at ALL to do with an 'adult' game. How you ever get to this notion is completely beyond me. In what weird world do you live where behavior like this, online or not, is considered normal?

My YouTube Channel - EVE Tutorials & other game related things!

My Website - Blogs, Livestreams & Forums

Jayem See
Perkone
Caldari State
#611 - 2014-03-25 18:33:30 UTC
Dave Stark wrote:
31 pages?
damn having a job really means i miss out on all the fun.

people still mad that dumb people are dumb, and some one took advantage of it. like every day both in and out of the game?

if so, i'm not sure why this has really got to 31 pages since there's not really much of a story here other than "dumb people be dumb, and people profit from it".


And then carry the charade on for personal pleasure and ego-stroking.

I don't see how you can realistically justify the extent of the situation they put this guy through. The rest of it was purely for enjoyment. Some people find that objectionable.

Aaaaaaand relax.

Desivo Delta Visseroff
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#612 - 2014-03-25 18:34:02 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
Toshiro Ozuwara wrote:
Malcanis wrote:
Did you or did you not advocate whipping up a damaging media shitstorm?

Damaging to whom? If the content is as benign as you would have us believe, then there will be no shitstorm.


Where do I support or even defend what erotica1 does

Do you understand that there's a middle ground between the lynch mob and unconditional support?



Asking for some here to recognize ration, reason and to conceptualize abject concepts objectively, can be an uphill battle against a mudslide.

I was hunting for sick loot, but all I could get my hands on were 50 corpses[:|]..............[:=d]

Lady Areola Fappington
#613 - 2014-03-25 18:34:56 UTC
Azami Nevinyrall wrote:
TigerXtrm wrote:
Wesley Otsdarva wrote:
http://massively.joystiq.com/2014/03/25/heres-some-of-the-cyberbullying-that-happens-in-eve-online/

So here goes for news coverage.


Oh ****. Shocked

If CCP does nothing about it, they're basically endorsing it...



I know whatcha mean, man. I feel the same way about GLBT discrimination and homophobia. If you aren't doing anything about it, you endorse it.

Say, have you marched in a pride parade, donated money to GLBT support orgs, or other such things? I mean if not, you're basically endorsing GLBT discrimination.

7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY? No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided. --Eve New Player Guide

Lia Mandel
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#614 - 2014-03-25 18:35:05 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
Toshiro Ozuwara wrote:
Malcanis wrote:
Did you or did you not advocate whipping up a damaging media shitstorm?

Damaging to whom? If the content is as benign as you would have us believe, then there will be no shitstorm.


Where do I support or even defend what erotica1 does

Do you understand that there's a middle ground between the lynch mob and unconditional support?


Well, on matters like this I would have the expectation of a CSM member to have a clear position and not playing Switzerland.
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#615 - 2014-03-25 18:35:26 UTC  |  Edited by: Jonah Gravenstein
Wesley Otsdarva wrote:
http://massively.joystiq.com/2014/03/25/heres-some-of-the-cyberbullying-that-happens-in-eve-online/

So here goes for news coverage.

Sneaky gets it.
sneaky (via the massively comments sections) wrote:

Elsewhere in a COD lobby near you....

It's not news, it's not even new, people have been abusing each other via the medium of online games and chat rooms for years. It's not unique to Eve.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Tom Gerard
Glorious Nation of Kazakhstan
#616 - 2014-03-25 18:35:48 UTC
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyberbullying#In_Gaming

According to the law the only criminal in this case is the contestant that made threats of RL Violence:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Title_18_of_the_United_States_Code


CCP should stay as far away from this as possible and let the local police handle any threats if the Bonus Room operators feel threatened.

Now with 100% less Troll.

Anslo
Scope Works
#617 - 2014-03-25 18:35:57 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
Toshiro Ozuwara wrote:
Malcanis wrote:
Did you or did you not advocate whipping up a damaging media shitstorm?

Damaging to whom? If the content is as benign as you would have us believe, then there will be no shitstorm.


Where do I support or even defend what erotica1 does

Do you understand that there's a middle ground between the lynch mob and unconditional support?

You have not been advocating a middle ground.

In this situation, there is no middle ground. This is not just about scamming. Scam are a part of eve, that will not change.

This is about players standing against the vitriolic and toxic nature of certain groups in eve who strive to ensure hate and spite are promoted so they get their 'kicks.'

This is not a call for a themepark. This is a call to return civility to the game.

[center]-_For the Proveldtariat_/-[/center]

Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
#618 - 2014-03-25 18:36:18 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
Toshiro Ozuwara wrote:
Malcanis wrote:
Did you or did you not advocate whipping up a damaging media shitstorm?

Damaging to whom? If the content is as benign as you would have us believe, then there will be no shitstorm.


Where do I support or even defend what erotica1 does

Do you understand that there's a middle ground between the lynch mob and unconditional support?



Well your comparison of the opinions around this matter to that of anti-gay mentalities from page 2 kinda reeked of red herring. Such as it was, I have seen that tactic in other arguments around political matters, the "oh so you want to crack down on (insert protected group here)" track.

For this reason, I stopped reading your posts at page 2 and saw this one I'm responding to. I hope you will debate the matter more openly from here on.

Bring back DEEEEP Space!

La Nariz
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#619 - 2014-03-25 18:36:37 UTC  |  Edited by: La Nariz
^^: I don't think he cares about a potential Timothy McVeigh in the making liking/disliking/reading his posts.

Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Send this and other recordings to Wired, PCGamer and other gaming/virtual related sites and publications
They'll have a field day printing bad press all over this.


Who would that hurt and who would that benefit?

Would it benefit the victim of the scam?
Hell no, the victim doesn't get their possessions back and the public humilation would make it worse / can't be removed.

Would it benefit Erotica 1? Possibly it gives him notoriety and it won't remove his morally ambiguous gains.

Would it benefit CCP? No its a PR nightmare waiting to happen. This kind of baying for blood isn't sated with a simple banning either.

Would it benefit the playerbase/game?
No it will inevitably reduce the sandboxiness of the game as more rules are put in place to prevent such a disaster from happening again.


It hurts all of us and makes you literally eve cancer for suggesting it. Thanks for making the case against allowing npc alts to post stronger though.

This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Improve the forums, support this idea: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=345133

Kara Vix
Perkone
Caldari State
#620 - 2014-03-25 18:37:17 UTC
Lia Mandel wrote:
Malcanis wrote:
Toshiro Ozuwara wrote:
Malcanis wrote:
Did you or did you not advocate whipping up a damaging media shitstorm?

Damaging to whom? If the content is as benign as you would have us believe, then there will be no shitstorm.


Where do I support or even defend what erotica1 does

Do you understand that there's a middle ground between the lynch mob and unconditional support?


Well, on matters like this I would have the expectation of a CSM member to have a clear position and not playing Switzerland.


I would expect a CSM member to have no opinion and just moderate the forum so that it does not devolve into name calling. I wouldn't expect a blue tag opinion either as that should be discussed with legal and not published on the forum.