These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Jester Trek Latest Blog

First post First post
Author
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#281 - 2014-03-25 15:34:10 UTC  |  Edited by: Jonah Gravenstein
Malcolm from Marketing wrote:

What real life punishments did they suggest? I see in game punishments but nothing more in this post? ( unless they ninja edited )
Did you somehow miss the bit about a permaban? That's a real world punishment.

Quote:
I'm wondering what all these defenders of Erotica would say should the victim in question take it to the extreme and harm himself or family in any way. It's still just a game right?
This hasn't happened, if it did then many of the defenders, not necessarily of Erotica, of which I've seen few, if any; but of the right to scam would probably be amongst the first to offer their help, we're not all heartless tossers, we know where to draw the line, people hurting others or themselves over a videogame is where it is drawn.

Krusty the Klown wrote:
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:
actions that are carried out within a virtual world.


I have to interject here. The action in question was not carried out in a virtual world.

The exchange took place between two players rather than the characters in a 3rd party application no less and it was done after E1 had convinced the other party to relinquish all of his stuffs so no further in-game benefit was possible either, yet it kept going for 2+ hours.
It's carried out within the context of the game and its virtual world, all assets involved are technically the property of CCP anyway. I haven't seen any evidence that anything beyond voluntary humiliation and the loss of virtual assets and cash happened.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#282 - 2014-03-25 15:34:27 UTC
Malcolm from Marketing wrote:


I'm wondering what all these defenders of Erotica would say should the victim in question take it to the extreme and harm himself or family in any way. It's still just a game right?


Right.

What I would say is "wow, that's an unstable person who should not have been playing EVE online of visiting a comms channel with some easily google-able person like Erotica1 in the 1st place"

I don't see why people like you are always willing to blame some outside force (like video games, online griefers ect ect) for things that demonstrate inside problems.

In other words, anyone who would hurt themselves or their family over imaginary space money was F'd up to begin with. if it really worked that way, I would have slaughtered my whole neighborhood when i lost my JUMP FREIGHTER during a war dec (i was drunk and decided to autopilot to jita), because those things cost a lot.
Ramona McCandless
Silent Vale
LinkNet
#283 - 2014-03-25 15:34:27 UTC
Ameline Veil wrote:
I can't believe how many people in this community think that they are the righteous crusaders of Darwin's will.
How on earth can you arrogate yourself to decide who should be on "your" internet and who not?


This cuts both ways, btw

"Yea, some dude came in and was normal for first couple months, so I gave him director." - Sean Dunaway

"A singular character could be hired to penetrate another corps space... using gorilla like tactics..." - Chane Morgann

TigerXtrm
KarmaFleet
Goonswarm Federation
#284 - 2014-03-25 15:34:31 UTC  |  Edited by: TigerXtrm
Ramona McCandless wrote:
Malcolm from Marketing wrote:

I'm wondering what all these defenders of Erotica would say should the victim in question take it to the extreme and harm himself or family in any way. It's still just a game right?


And what if they did it if the only thing I did was gank them? Should I feel somehow responsible for it then too?

Or if I kick them from my corp?

Or if I maroon them in a WormHole in their pod and close the exit?

Or I destroy their alliance and steal all the things?

Should I feel responsible for what they do then?


That's a horrible comparison.

One is just playing the game and its mechanics. The other is emotionally grinding a person down with absolutely no in-game benefit. Humiliating and insulting a person for the sheer reason of 'lolz'.

To extend the school analogy; you're comparing losing a match of soccer during school gym hours to a kid being bullied outside of school, being made fun of and pushed around until they snap and harm themselves. Losing a match is part of the game. Being an ***hole to someone is not.

My YouTube Channel - EVE Tutorials & other game related things!

My Website - Blogs, Livestreams & Forums

Edward Olmops
Gunboat Commando
#285 - 2014-03-25 15:34:48 UTC
Well, I personally find the behaviour described in the blog disgusting, but I doubt that CCP can or should act as some sort of moral instance. They have to react if someone gets harassed personally in RL - but there will always be fringe cases, people claiming this or that was only targeting the character, not the player and whatnot.

Couldn't we just install some sort of Stellar Court of Justice for these things?
Elected judges, like CSM members that can produce a verdict in certain situations so the community can sort this out.
Schmata Bastanold
In Boobiez We Trust
#286 - 2014-03-25 15:34:56 UTC
Did somebody hold a gun at that guy's head to make him do all those idiotic things? Seriously, you can have no idea about who Erotica1 is and what he does in Eve and still not let him put you through those silly things. You got baited into isk doubling scheme, fine, cut your loses and walk away.

Do I condone what Ero and his bros are doing? Nope. Would I let them do it to me? Nope. Instead of faith I have brain. And that one thing, what's it called... Oh, I know, self respect.

Invalid signature format

Kara Vix
Perkone
Caldari State
#287 - 2014-03-25 15:35:04 UTC
If CCP takes no action against Erotica, then they are sanctioning this behavior and are no better than he is. I expect better from them.
Darek Castigatus
Immortalis Inc.
Shadow Cartel
#288 - 2014-03-25 15:36:35 UTC
Ameline Veil wrote:
I can't believe how many people in this community think that they are the righteous crusaders of Darwin's will.
How on earth can you arrogate yourself to decide who should be on "your" internet and who not?

Statements like "the invisible fist of darwin" or "he's so stupid, he deserved it" just disgust me.


I can't believe how many people in this community think that they are the righteous crusaders of CCP's will.
How on earth can you arrogate yourself to decide who should be on "your" internet and who not?

Statements like "this is outright torture" or "he's a sociopath who should be banned" just disgust me.

See, I can wave that flag just as hard as you can. Alternatively we could have a sensible discussion about it.

Let me know which one you chose.

Pirates - The Invisible Fist of Darwin

you're welcome

arabella blood
Keyboard Jihad
#289 - 2014-03-25 15:37:11 UTC
Aaaaand we are on page 15 and no Erotica1 comment yet. Banned already?

Troll for hire. Cheap prices.

Schmata Bastanold
In Boobiez We Trust
#290 - 2014-03-25 15:38:43 UTC
arabella blood wrote:
Aaaaand we are on page 15 and no Erotica1 comment yet. Banned already?


I bet he is busy monetizing that free publicity :)

Invalid signature format

Pandora Barzane
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#291 - 2014-03-25 15:38:47 UTC
arabella blood wrote:
Aaaaand we are on page 15 and no Erotica1 comment yet. Banned already?


nope, and wont happen. he's enjoying the precious tears though.

Ruskarn Andedare
Lion Investments
#292 - 2014-03-25 15:38:58 UTC
Ramona McCandless wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:
Neltharak Idrissil wrote:
Malcolm from Marketing wrote:
[quote=Malcanis]


I recall CCP found their morals pretty easily when Mittens stepped out of line at Fan fest.
Did he break any laws? No.
Did he break any in game rules? No.

Was what he did morally reprehensible on every level? Yes

This scenario with Erotica, while different in it's approach, boils down to the same basic elements and should be taken seriously by CCP.


Calling for people to kill themselves IS breaking a law. So yes, yes he did and paid for it.


In what country is calling for people to kill themselves against the law? Please link.


Um Ill be honest here, pretty sure its against the law in the UK. (Suicide Act 1961)


Confirmed

cps.gov.uk
Bethan Le Troix
Krusual Investigation Agency
#293 - 2014-03-25 15:40:47 UTC
I have listened to some of the sound recording and read the articles & comments on Jestertrek and the Minerbumping site. I don't know if the Mittani's site will cover this story. His site is one of the most intelligent but he probably won't touch it given he was involved in a similar event. I haven't found Malcanis replies on this OP but he usually says peculiar things.

I personally think it's alright to do bumping and suicide ganking in-game in that it's usually a roleplay activity or involves actions to disrupt other business or protect your own business interests. Scamming is a bit dodgy but it is usually fairly obvious what is trying to be done. Pilots names, huge bounties on their heads or continual spamming of ridiculous offers gives away what they are about and trying to do. As regards UI loopholes such as open trade where people can change what is being offered mid-exchange to steal the other guys stuff should be stopped by CCP along with any other market discrepancies but that's just my opinion. I don't think new players falling foul of UI loopholes reflects well on CCP or any of us. It crosses a line in the sand.

On the other hand I don't think people such as Erotica should be using TS or other voice software to scam people. If you throw the 'I will double your ISK' comments out in in-game chat channels and people bite then they deserve all they get. All except new players will know this is a scam and new players will probably only get caught once and not with that much ISK lost. But if you invite people into a TS channel and scam them for everything they have that is not on and Erotica and her cohorts should have the sense to realise that. It is one step away from telephone 'cold-callers' or door to door salesmen scamming old age pensioners out of their RL savings.

I think anyone should be able to deduce from the victims voice on the sound recording, even though he has an American accent, that he is a vulnerable person. I get the feeling he was not greedy and genuinely thought he was going to gain ISK I'm not sure why but I get that feeling. It is morally bankrupt to treat someone like that even though it probably would be difficult to argue in a court of law that a crime had been committed. It is even more ugly to take the **** out of someone who has a handicap or disability such as a speech impediment. Once Erotica got to this point she had in my view crossed the line beyond which CCP should take action on Erotica's account.

I think CCP should therefore return any transferred assets from Erotica to the victim and take some kind of action against Erotica and maybe against the other offenders in TS channel. Suspensions for the other offenders and maybe removal of Erotica and all her in-game assets
Malcolm from Marketing
Klaatu Technologies
#294 - 2014-03-25 15:41:02 UTC
Ramona McCandless wrote:
Malcolm from Marketing wrote:

I'm wondering what all these defenders of Erotica would say should the victim in question take it to the extreme and harm himself or family in any way. It's still just a game right?


And what if they did it if the only thing I did was gank them? Should I feel somehow responsible for it then too?

Or if I kick them from my corp?

Or if I maroon them in a WormHole in their pod and close the exit?

Or I destroy their alliance and steal all the things?

Should I feel responsible for what they do then?


Yeah, no.

None of your examples come even close to what Erotica goes out of his way to do, try again.
Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#295 - 2014-03-25 15:41:04 UTC
arabella blood wrote:
Aaaaand we are on page 15 and no Erotica1 comment yet. Banned already?


Banned people can't "like" a post and guess who just for an Erotica1 like!!!

(hint: me)
Ramona McCandless
Silent Vale
LinkNet
#296 - 2014-03-25 15:41:17 UTC  |  Edited by: Ramona McCandless
TigerXtrm wrote:


That's a horrible comparison.

One is just playing the game and its mechanics. The other is emotionally grinding a person down with absolutely no in-game benefit. Humiliating and insulting a person for the sheer reason of 'lolz'.



No it isnt. I did all of those things to people for "lolz".


And if you think having the things I listed done to you wouldnt grind you down, I can happily pop an alt in your Alliance (if your main has one) and you can give her Director rights.

"Yea, some dude came in and was normal for first couple months, so I gave him director." - Sean Dunaway

"A singular character could be hired to penetrate another corps space... using gorilla like tactics..." - Chane Morgann

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#297 - 2014-03-25 15:41:19 UTC
arabella blood wrote:
Aaaaand we are on page 15 and no Erotica1 comment yet. Banned already?

USTZ I believe, it's still early there.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Malcolm from Marketing
Klaatu Technologies
#298 - 2014-03-25 15:43:54 UTC
Lady Areola Fappington wrote:
Malcolm from Marketing wrote:

What real life punishments did they suggest? I see in game punishments but nothing more in this post? ( unless they ninja edited )

I'm wondering what all these defenders of Erotica would say should the victim in question take it to the extreme and harm himself or family in any way. It's still just a game right?



I'm not an erotia supporter per se, but I'll take a shot. I'd say "Wow, I feel bad for that person's family. It's sad they couldn't get him the mental health care he so obviously needed."


...Just like in every other incident I see, where video games and a mental disorder collide to tragic results.


Agreed.

Only the authorities and mainline media will be looking for any and all triggers in even increasing detail. Blame has to land somewhere no?

I wouldnt say CCP would be over joyed at their game being a deciding factor.
Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#299 - 2014-03-25 15:44:17 UTC
Bethan Le Troix wrote:
I have listened to some of the sound recording and read the articles & comments on Jestertrek and the Minerbumping site. I don't know if the Mittani's site will cover this story. His site is one of the most intelligent but he probably won't touch it given he was involved in a similar event. I haven't found Malcanis replies on this OP but he usually says peculiar things.

I personally think it's alright to do bumping and suicide ganking in-game in that it's usually a roleplay activity or involves actions to disrupt other business or protect your own business interests. Scamming is a bit dodgy but it is usually fairly obvious what is trying to be done. Pilots names, huge bounties on their heads or continual spamming of ridiculous offers gives away what they are about and trying to do. As regards UI loopholes such as open trade where people can change what is being offered mid-exchange to steal the other guys stuff should be stopped by CCP along with any other market discrepancies but that's just my opinion. I don't think new players falling foul of UI loopholes reflects well on CCP or any of us. It crosses a line in the sand.

On the other hand I don't think people such as Erotica should be using TS or other voice software to scam people. If you throw the 'I will double your ISK' comments out in in-game chat channels and people bite then they deserve all they get. All except new players will know this is a scam and new players will probably only get caught once and not with that much ISK lost. But if you invite people into a TS channel and scam them for everything they have that is not on and Erotica and her cohorts should have the sense to realise that. It is one step away from telephone 'cold-callers' or door to door salesmen scamming old age pensioners out of their RL savings.

I think anyone should be able to deduce from the victims voice on the sound recording, even though he has an American accent, that he is a vulnerable person. I get the feeling he was not greedy and genuinely thought he was going to gain ISK I'm not sure why but I get that feeling. It is morally bankrupt to treat someone like that even though it probably would be difficult to argue in a court of law that a crime had been committed. It is even more ugly to take the **** out of someone who has a handicap or disability such as a speech impediment. Once Erotica got to this point she had in my view crossed the line beyond which CCP should take action on Erotica's account.

I think CCP should therefore return any transferred assets from Erotica to the victim and take some kind of action against Erotica and maybe against the other offenders in TS channel. Suspensions for the other offenders and maybe removal of Erotica and all her in-game assets


If he is a vulnerable person why is he playing EVE. If he's under someone's care they dropped the ball, if he's not then he's competent to make his own decisions and thus face the consequences of same.

According to him he's a grown married man knowledgeable enough to play EVE....but apparently not enough to use google.
Ramona McCandless
Silent Vale
LinkNet
#300 - 2014-03-25 15:44:19 UTC
Malcolm from Marketing wrote:
Ramona McCandless wrote:
Malcolm from Marketing wrote:

I'm wondering what all these defenders of Erotica would say should the victim in question take it to the extreme and harm himself or family in any way. It's still just a game right?


And what if they did it if the only thing I did was gank them? Should I feel somehow responsible for it then too?

Or if I kick them from my corp?

Or if I maroon them in a WormHole in their pod and close the exit?

Or I destroy their alliance and steal all the things?

Should I feel responsible for what they do then?


Yeah, no.

None of your examples come even close to what Erotica goes out of his way to do, try again.


IThat was one of my points, to be fair.

How weak a thing do I need to do before Im not supposed to have an opinion if he freaks out and murders his kids?

"Yea, some dude came in and was normal for first couple months, so I gave him director." - Sean Dunaway

"A singular character could be hired to penetrate another corps space... using gorilla like tactics..." - Chane Morgann