These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Jester Trek Latest Blog

First post First post
Author
Lady Areola Fappington
#261 - 2014-03-25 15:21:19 UTC
Ramona McCandless wrote:

Its not the case that E1 and the secret police, turned up at their house, put a bag on their head and took them away for a little light simulated drowning followed by having the genitals tickles with a carbattery and then losing fingers.



Tell me more, please. Only, somewhere private. And wear something sexy while you do it.

7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY? No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided. --Eve New Player Guide

Malcolm from Marketing
Klaatu Technologies
#262 - 2014-03-25 15:21:46 UTC  |  Edited by: Malcolm from Marketing
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:
Anna Karhunen wrote:
I read the Jester's blog post, but I haven't read any of the comments there, nor here. My opinion based on what Erotica1 has done, is to permaban him and all his accounts. No mercy whatsoever, no refunds for money spent. Nada.

Would you care to expand upon why Erotica and the like should suffer real world punishment for actions that are carried out within a virtual world that does not forbid said actions, no matter how distasteful you or I may find them?

Perspective is a quality that some in this thread appear to be lacking. If you don't like something that somebody is doing within the confines of Eve, then punish them for it, in game. Threats of real world violence for actions carried out within the context of Eve are not acceptable, people who make such threats, or condone them should be stomped on from a great height by both CCP and local authorities.


What real life punishments did they suggest? I see in game punishments but nothing more in this post? ( unless they ninja edited )

I'm wondering what all these defenders of Erotica would say should the victim in question take it to the extreme and harm himself or family in any way. It's still just a game right?
Azami Nevinyrall
172.0.0.1
#263 - 2014-03-25 15:23:09 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
Azami Nevinyrall wrote:
Billy Hix wrote:
Azami Nevinyrall wrote:


Are you going to wait until that happens?

Are you going to sit idly by?

Or are you going to do something about it?


They hope that they will have another game out by then that will keep them in the money. They really don't care about Eve, they care about making them money, currently Eve does that so they do as little as possible to keep the money. If things go wrong and they have a fallback to keep Hilmar in his $1000 Japanese jeans then Eve can die for all they care.

In this specific case, if this guy actually did do something. And it hit mainstream media, CCP would be dead by Friday!



No they wouldn't, because not everyone would blame CCP for some random guy's massive over-reaction. I certainly wouldn't

I don't want anything bad to happen to someone, but if they did something to themselves based on something that happened in a totally voluntary entertainment software setting, that would say to me that this person should not have had access to the internet in the 1st place. It wouldn't say anything about CCP or EVE Online to me (or other reasonable people).

I agree with you.

But, if something was to happen. If this was a legitimately unstable person that was a victim and missed a dose of their medication. The mass media, especially American Media, would spin it in whatever way would get them the highest ratings.

Tell me, what would get higher ratings?

Someone who forgot to take his pills and went on a rampage.
Or
Someone who got publicly humiliated on a videogame, then went on a rampage.

...

Darek Castigatus
Immortalis Inc.
Shadow Cartel
#264 - 2014-03-25 15:23:25 UTC  |  Edited by: Darek Castigatus
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
arabella blood wrote:
if it repeats everytime, something must be going on...

Try it.

You will see for yourself there is a dedicated department of stonewall/spindoctor/whitewash posters who's purpose here is is to wage forum wars as a supplement to EVE.

They are the ones who cause this repetition, and it is their purpose here.

Try it for yourself. It doesn't take much to set them off.
Try expressing an opinion that questions or undermines a prominent null entity, for example.


Now you're starting to sound like Dinsdale, trust me that's never a good thing.

The problem you have is that you make stupid or outrageous claims and expect everyone to automaticly agree with you, then when we decide instead to prove them wrong or challenge you to back them up you instantly shift the goalposts and try to make out you said something different that makes us totally wrong and therefore you can instantly claim victory, Rinse and Repeat. You did it for thirty pages in the other thread which the ISD rightly consigned to the forum gutter and you're doing it again here.

If you had the balls to actually try and have a discussion with people you wouldn't be having such a hard time.

Pirates - The Invisible Fist of Darwin

you're welcome

Ramona McCandless
Silent Vale
LinkNet
#265 - 2014-03-25 15:24:17 UTC
Lady Areola Fappington wrote:
Ramona McCandless wrote:

Its not the case that E1 and the secret police, turned up at their house, put a bag on their head and took them away for a little light simulated drowning followed by having the genitals tickles with a carbattery and then losing fingers.



Tell me more, please. Only, somewhere private. And wear something sexy while you do it.


I have just the thing. I have to use babypowder to get into it though.

"Yea, some dude came in and was normal for first couple months, so I gave him director." - Sean Dunaway

"A singular character could be hired to penetrate another corps space... using gorilla like tactics..." - Chane Morgann

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#266 - 2014-03-25 15:24:17 UTC
arabella blood wrote:
LoL. Only reason why Erotica1 decided not to run for CSM eventually is because Malcanis is already enough ;)
If you feel that you can do better, run for CSM.

Malcanis IMHO has done a good job, and many people voted for him based not only on his platform, but also for his habit of being bluntly honest, and not mincing words on idiots.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#267 - 2014-03-25 15:24:38 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
arabella blood wrote:
if it repeats everytime, something must be going on...

Try it.

You will see for yourself there is a dedicated department of stonewall/spindoctor/whitewash posters who's purpose here is is to wage forum wars as a supplement to EVE.

They are the ones who cause this repetition, and it is their purpose here.

Try it for yourself. It doesn't take much to set them off.
Try expressing an opinion that questions or undermines a prominent null entity, for example.


Yep, lawyer lol

The thing that is the most irritating about you so far (and we saw it in the other thread) is that you project a whole lot.

You think other people are as inherently dishonest as you are, so you take people telling you the truth to their opinions are "spin" or as "an agenda" when the reality is that it's most likely you spinning things because of some agenda.

As i always say to Dinsdale, no one is out to get you or even think you are important enough to lie to. You are just like the rest of us, just one individual.
Salvos Rhoska
#268 - 2014-03-25 15:25:06 UTC  |  Edited by: Salvos Rhoska
Malcolm from Marketing wrote:
---


If it was me or you doing it, these same individuals protecting Erotica1's "innocence" would be screaming for our blood and banning.

Some of them earn directly from Erotica1, as does CODE.
Others are present in the "bonus room" recordings, getting their circle-jerk on with sweaty palms and heavy breathing.

@Jenn aSide: You aren't smart enough to take me on. I understand that irritates your fragile ego. Especially because you KNOW it to be true. You think you are a big fish in a virtual world and that is very important to your feelings of self-worth. But I'm sorry, you just don't have what it takes to come at me. You will lose every time. It doesn't even cause me any effort or challenge. Its like swatting aside a whining mosquito.
Krusty the Klown
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#269 - 2014-03-25 15:25:19 UTC
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:
actions that are carried out within a virtual world.


I have to interject here. The action in question was not carried out in a virtual world.

The exchange took place between two players rather than the characters in a 3rd party application no less and it was done after E1 had convinced the other party to relinquish all of his stuffs so no further in-game benefit was possible either, yet it kept going for 2+ hours.
Notorious Fellon
#270 - 2014-03-25 15:26:39 UTC
Beyond repulsive.

Although the "torturers" may well be within the lines of the EULA and TOS, it begs the question; if you were CCP would you want someone like this using your service as a means to find suitable targets for their twisted and morbid fantasies?

I would not. They would be banned and sent on their way. Who you choose to associate with reflects upon you. If this is allowed to persist, then CCP is no better than this foul excuse for a human being.

Crime, it is not a "career", it is a lifestyle.

Ramona McCandless
Silent Vale
LinkNet
#271 - 2014-03-25 15:28:50 UTC
Malcolm from Marketing wrote:

I'm wondering what all these defenders of Erotica would say should the victim in question take it to the extreme and harm himself or family in any way. It's still just a game right?


And what if they did it if the only thing I did was gank them? Should I feel somehow responsible for it then too?

Or if I kick them from my corp?

Or if I maroon them in a WormHole in their pod and close the exit?

Or I destroy their alliance and steal all the things?

Should I feel responsible for what they do then?

"Yea, some dude came in and was normal for first couple months, so I gave him director." - Sean Dunaway

"A singular character could be hired to penetrate another corps space... using gorilla like tactics..." - Chane Morgann

Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#272 - 2014-03-25 15:29:13 UTC
Azami Nevinyrall wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:
Azami Nevinyrall wrote:
Billy Hix wrote:
Azami Nevinyrall wrote:


Are you going to wait until that happens?

Are you going to sit idly by?

Or are you going to do something about it?


They hope that they will have another game out by then that will keep them in the money. They really don't care about Eve, they care about making them money, currently Eve does that so they do as little as possible to keep the money. If things go wrong and they have a fallback to keep Hilmar in his $1000 Japanese jeans then Eve can die for all they care.

In this specific case, if this guy actually did do something. And it hit mainstream media, CCP would be dead by Friday!



No they wouldn't, because not everyone would blame CCP for some random guy's massive over-reaction. I certainly wouldn't

I don't want anything bad to happen to someone, but if they did something to themselves based on something that happened in a totally voluntary entertainment software setting, that would say to me that this person should not have had access to the internet in the 1st place. It wouldn't say anything about CCP or EVE Online to me (or other reasonable people).

I agree with you.

But, if something was to happen. If this was a legitimately unstable person that was a victim and missed a dose of their medication. The mass media, especially American Media, would spin it in whatever way would get them the highest ratings.

Tell me, what would get higher ratings?

Someone who forgot to take his pills and went on a rampage.
Or
Someone who got publicly humiliated on a videogame, then went on a rampage.


I know 'the media' outright lies about things and embellishes things for ratings/money. So I know something like that would be exploited by them...

...Which doesn't matter if you are a reasonable person who doesn't believe the hype and examines things for yourself.

I believe about the media the same thing i believe about everything else: It doesn't matter that they lie for profit, what matters is matters what I am willing to believe. The truth is the only thing that counts, and the truth in the matter would be that the person who hurt themselves shouldn't have been online, not that CCP made a game about space pirates.
arabella blood
Keyboard Jihad
#273 - 2014-03-25 15:29:42 UTC
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:
arabella blood wrote:
LoL. Only reason why Erotica1 decided not to run for CSM eventually is because Malcanis is already enough ;)
If you feel that you can do better, run for CSM.

Malcanis IMHO has done a good job, and many people voted for him based not only on his platform, but also for his habit of being bluntly honest, and not mincing words on idiots.


The ultimate political defence: "come try for yourself eh?"

Lets agree to desagree :)

(On a side note, i would run, if i had more time and thought i played long enough to be a deserving candidate)

But lets keep this thread on focus. We cant have all thread turned into "monster thread about csm" - that can actually suggest something wrong with it ;)

Troll for hire. Cheap prices.

Ameline Veil
uncooperative freight company
#274 - 2014-03-25 15:30:19 UTC
I can't believe how many people in this community think that they are the righteous crusaders of Darwin's will.
How on earth can you arrogate yourself to decide who should be on "your" internet and who not?

Statements like "the invisible fist of darwin" or "he's so stupid, he deserved it" just disgust me.
Lady Areola Fappington
#275 - 2014-03-25 15:31:16 UTC  |  Edited by: Lady Areola Fappington
Malcolm from Marketing wrote:

What real life punishments did they suggest? I see in game punishments but nothing more in this post? ( unless they ninja edited )

I'm wondering what all these defenders of Erotica would say should the victim in question take it to the extreme and harm himself or family in any way. It's still just a game right?



I'm not an erotia supporter per se, but I'll take a shot. I'd say "Wow, I feel bad for that person's family. It's sad they couldn't get him the mental health care he so obviously needed."


...Just like in every other incident I see, where video games and a mental disorder collide to tragic results.

7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY? No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided. --Eve New Player Guide

Vol Arm'OOO
Central Co-Prosperity Union
#276 - 2014-03-25 15:32:05 UTC
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen wrote:
I wish to voice my support for Erotica1's right to do what he does, regardless of how people 'feel' about how he does it.

Consider. Free speech laws (in countries that have them) were created not to protect polite or correct speech, but to protect all speech, including impolite and even vile speech...

Erotica1's right to scam and mess with people should not be infringed, for doing so by introducing rules would be comparible to removal of freedom of speech laws.

In short, in the same way we may denounce what vile, stupid or intolerant things are said under free speech laws -- no one should ever remotely consider removing (or even limiting) said free speech rights.

That is the slippery slope many have been going down in this thread, with claims Erotica1 'crossed a line' and 'rules should be put in place'.

Tyranny's are created from such do-gooder notions.

Denounce what Erotica1 does, but do not denounce his right to do it, and continue to do it.

Jester is wrong on this one, a person is either free or not free; EvE is either sandbox or not, there is no good mix between food and poison, you just get poisoned food.

F


Free speech laws apply to nations, not private virtual constructs.

I don't play, I just fourm warrior.

Ramona McCandless
Silent Vale
LinkNet
#277 - 2014-03-25 15:32:30 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Its like swatting aside a whining mosquito.



Joe?

"Yea, some dude came in and was normal for first couple months, so I gave him director." - Sean Dunaway

"A singular character could be hired to penetrate another corps space... using gorilla like tactics..." - Chane Morgann

Malcolm Shinhwa
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#278 - 2014-03-25 15:32:55 UTC
Malcanis wrote:

Is it CCP's responsibility to police out of game interaction between their players where no law has been broken?

If so, where does that responsibility end? Should they ban a player when his wife complains about him playing EVE instead of doing the chores?

If I hook up with another EVE player who happens to be from say Japan, should CCP have the right and duty to ban me if the GM involved disapproves of inter-racial relationships? What about homosexual relationships?

What if I encourage another player to log in to fleet and miss church on sunday?

Where exactly does CCP's "responsibility" end?


Actually, when the particular "victim" in this instance threaten to murder Erotica 1's mother over a video game, some laws were probably broken. Jester wants people to talk to the women folk about the recording because he's apparently sexist. But I wonder what Erotica 1's mother thinks about that little gem.

[i]"The purpose of fighting is to win. There is no possible victory in defense. The sword is more important than the shield and skill is more important than either. The final weapon is the brain. All else is supplemental[/i]."

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#279 - 2014-03-25 15:33:18 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Actually, I looked it up to check before I used it. It means what I think it means.

Masochism is enjoying suffering inflicted upon oneself.
Sadism is the term you where looking for, which does not apply anyways, because I do not enjoy the suffering inflicted, only the fulfillment and vindication of justice from the abused to the abuser.

Remiel Pollard wrote:
what you're saying is that you would applaud the violence?

I have not said that. I am not saying that.

Remiel Pollard wrote:
You are quite the concerning individual. Please avoid having children and stay away from other peoples' babies. Thank you.


Coming from a self-professed autist, that means very little.

Not to mention you have no business telling people to stay away from children or babies, but I don't expect an autist to have the necessary social and empathic capacity to recognise that.

Glass house, pot and kettle, all that. I would not bring your mental condition up otherwise, but your direct inference that I should for some reason not be allowed near children based on anything I have said here is incredibly offensive, and I attribute it to your lack of understanding of normal social graces, owing to your condition.


I'll give you the masochist/sadist thing, but, the next thing after that was a lie. You did indeed say that. Don't make me link your post again.

As for autism, what makes you think it's concerning? You call it a mental condition but, seeing as how it's a genetic one and the mental states that are associated with it are comorbid and not a direct result, there isn't a psychiatrist in the world that calls it a mental condition. No, I don't have a condition. Come back when you're more informed on what autism is. Especially the part about high-functioning autistics like myself tending to have rather keen insights and, you know, coming up with things like the theory of relativity and all that.

You can TRY to strike a nerve on me with something that you perceive as a weakness, but it comes across as little more than prescriptive retaliation, having little else other than "I didn't say that" when you quite clearly did. It's almost like a broken record with you.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Praetor Meles
Black Mount Industrial
Breakpoint.
#280 - 2014-03-25 15:33:49 UTC
Apologies if this is going over old ground in the wider discussion...wanted to take a bit of time to think about it on my own first!

There is a comment under the blog that has stuck with me while thinking about this:

There is no additional in-game benefit for them to do this. That is the point. They already have all of his assets. There is one sole purpose to do what they do, and it is despicable to do this to another human being just for your own enjoyment.”

In game terms only, they have scammed the guy. Without a doubt, this is allowed and I would always support it. He was naive enough to contract over all his stuff and, well, sadly, that’s his problem. Eve is a cold hard place, and that’s how it should be. But.

It’s the what-happened-next that I have a real issue with. You are dealing with people who have deep-rooted psychological issues if they are finding this amusing. The guy is in obvious distress, and still they continue. Who knows what is going on with their victim in real life – from the sounds of it he could be a very vulnerable human being (in a potentially already complex domestic situation considering his wife’s actions). The conduct of the bullies is at best grotesque, and at worse indicative of people who, if not reined in, are going to go on to...bigger things. I’m not a big believer that in-game behaviour is indicative of real life behaviour, but we’re not talking about some guy merciless hunting down and popping some poor dude’s ships time and again, or somebody awoxing, or griefer war-deccing. Remember, there is absolutely no material gain in what they did. They already had his stuff. What followed was for their amusement only. They inflicted harm on another human being for “lols”. You know, like a psychopath might. Remember. No actual advantage to their behaviour at all.

Now, why should CCP, or the rest of the Eve community, care?

Simple. One day, these clowns are going to go too far (if they haven’t already). It doesn’t take too much of a stretch of the imagination to see a situation like this spiral out of control. Maybe the guy logs off and harms himself? What then? In many countries, that would end with the equivalent of the FBI kicking in somebody’s door. Hell, in many countries what they’ve already done so far could lead to that. Now, why should CCP or us care – it didn’t happen in-game, right? Again...”Eve Online bullies drove my son to harm himself”...not a stretch of the imagination too far to see that on the front page of a newspaper on a slow news day. Setting aside any moral or legal issues, this kind of thing could bring the worst kind of publicity imaginable to CCP. And, by extension, us individually. “You play Eve...isn’t that they game where...?”

Eve is already notorious in the gaming community for its harsh and unforgiving nature. Idiots like the ones cheering each other on in “the bonus room” are going to lead to the wider community perhaps turning the spotlight on Eve. And then it really could be game over.

[insert random rubbish that irritates you personally] is further evidence that Eve is dying/thriving*

  • delete as required to make your point