These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

ISIS for skills?
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Ai Shun
#21 - 2014-02-24 19:44:32 UTC
Batelle wrote:
Agreed, aside from the one very good (and previously mentioned) reason of not duplicating effort and wasting dev time. It would really be great if all that functionality was in game, but it isn't, and I'd personally much rather see an industry UI facelift than fix something that is very well handled by those apps.


Same here. I'd rather see that effort expended on something that adds value to gameplay than replicating something available out of game by beating a square peg into a round hole.
Mario Putzo
#22 - 2014-02-24 19:48:45 UTC
Ai Shun wrote:
Batelle wrote:
Agreed, aside from the one very good (and previously mentioned) reason of not duplicating effort and wasting dev time. It would really be great if all that functionality was in game, but it isn't, and I'd personally much rather see an industry UI facelift than fix something that is very well handled by those apps.


Same here. I'd rather see that effort expended on something that adds value to gameplay than replicating something available out of game by beating a square peg into a round hole.


\o/ moer deployable equipment that is only usable in 1/4 of available space please!
Batelle
Federal Navy Academy
#23 - 2014-02-24 19:51:58 UTC
Mario Putzo wrote:

\o/ moer deployable equipment that is only usable in 1/4 of available space please!


I am not aware of any hisec-only deployables.

"**CCP is changing policy, and has asked that we discontinue the bonus credit program after November 7th. So until then, enjoy a super-bonus of 1B Blink Credit for each 60-day GTC you buy!"**

Never forget.
Ai Shun
#24 - 2014-02-24 19:55:50 UTC
Mario Putzo wrote:
\o/ moer deployable equipment that is only usable in 1/4 of available space please!


Let's pretend there is truth to that statement for a moment ...

I'd still prefer CCP to work on something additional that benefits 25% of the game rather than them wasting their resources on something that is already available to 100% of the game.
Previous page12