EVE Information Portal

Are you actually able to read? Cause if thats the three things you got from 30+ pages of feedback then i don't know.

Here is a couple options:

Remove the bubble, remove the 5% nerf to nullsec income, remove the 20% initial drawback when module is dropped.
increase the potential increase. Then maybe you will see a potential use for this module.

This whole idea is so ******* stupid you should feel ashamed.

One thing from Sisi that I didn't discover but a friend of mine did -- if you are outside the 30km range of the ESS and send your drones in to attack it, it announces that "NONE" has gotten close to the ESS.

Regarding interceptors, I'd suggest taking a look at my suggestion earlier about adding the hacking minigame to the ESS. (Relinking because it's easy to have actual suggestions buried under a hailstorm of kneejerk reaction posting.) I understand that it's probably too late in the development cycle for this to make it into the 1.1 release, but I'd strongly suggest adding it, as it removes a lot of the power interceptors have interacting with this module on account of their lack of hull bonuses for hacking.

*WOOOOOOOOOOSH*

Hear that? That's the fundamental design flaws flying right on past you. I hope you've enjoyed wasting your time creating the next useless item to clog up the database.

I can see what you're trying to go for with this, but as implemented it's literally terrible for ratters, as:

a) nullsec ratting income already sucks versus many other income options, and making it worse is not going to improve the viability of living in nullsec
b) The amount of EHP means that this thing would take a DPS-fit T3 cruiser 2.5 minutes to burn down, never mind most normal ratting fits
c) The appeal of running one of these in a system is next to zero, as you're putting far too much value at risk for a relatively low benefit. No-one is going to leave 20% of their income sitting in a magic space box at the risk of literally anyone coming along and stealing it.
d) what's the time to push the box up to 25% pay? If it's anything longer than a reasonable person might spend ratting, it's pointless, for the reason I noted in c) - no-one is going to leave their income sitting around when they log off.

Add some of those them thar stasis bubbles ^-^ Pretty please?

Their reasoning was probably that, if widely used, these would open the nullsec bounty isk faucet a bit to wide, and were attempting to rebalance the faucet.

Really, the reception of this would have been much better had they not mentioned the 5% nerf to nullsec income.

That's a very wishful thinking.
Here's the actual gist of it:
Scrap the ESS.

The reception would have been much worse if they hadn't mentioned it, since it would have been discovered at most 3 minutes after deployment. The reception would have been ever so slightly better if they could present any reason whatsoever why that kind of mass nerf is needed, but apparently they couldn't.

If they were worried about the fauceting, they could have just have set it at 100% – 10% + 12.5% or something equally modest as a first step and promise to monitor it for adjustments up and down (and obviously leaving the base amounts since there's no reason to adjust it).

To me this seems like something that would be a lot more interesting in highsec. Basically let people tax PvE in highsec/lowsec through pvp enforcement.

Right, so CCP seems to be determined to use this piece of scrap. So here's a new idea, fresh from my mind meats (and totally crossposted from a post I made elsewhere).

CCP has it the wrong way around. This is a perfect highsec thing. Here's what it'll do (if done properly) for highsec:

1) It'll give missioners/ratters/etc a little bonus for working from one system
2) It'll give ebil pirates a goal for highsec
3) It'll give carebears a delicious honeypot to guard all day long.