Player Features and Ideas Discussion

As an idea for BALANCE a FULL capital fleet that is OP now.

1. Implement NEW skills for control of squad of dedicated function( interceptors, logies, interdictors etc)
2. Implement "Capital fleet" as additional option for FLEET structure.
2.1. Bonuses must be in greed SUPER carrier ONLY.
2.2 Squad leader must have a NEW SKILL "capital squad leadership" activated ONLY inside SUPER on GRID
2.3. implement "FLAGSHIP" that is needed to "activate" capital modules/functions - a TITAN ON GRID with special skills and bonuses, probably some kind of "siege"/"flagship" mode module gives it less HP, it might be RISKY to use such fleet. Really risky.
2.4. Capital REMOTE REPAIR modules will be USABLE only together with FLAGSHIP active status.
2.5. Remote modules works ONLY inside SQUAD.

Fleets under 1 squad without major changes.
Capital local modules and capacitor modules do not need an active FLAGSHIP.
It will give ability for new alliances/small alliances to make their events, or for rattling on carriers as now.

Those who WILL use a capital FULL fleet - will be used to temper their balls.

Clearly the Perkone supercap fleet is in desperate need of this awful mess of a supposed balance change.

Have a Titans bonuses instead boost the bonuses of wing commanders, requiring extra skills. You already have one for maximum fleet comp, have another for cascading bonuses. Screw having to be on grid, titan is just outsourced intel/telemetry etc.

Wait, so you need a Titan, on grid, for supers to do their jobs? That's remarkably stupid.

Could you say some more? Open your mind, deal with the world.

Capitals need a separate fleet composition/fleet skills and fleet rules. At least because ships itself ARE bigger and needs more qualified pilots and crew on them as sub-capital ships.
Sub-capital and capitals differense implemented not by me, but by EVE and society of EVE-players.

T.ex. Drones are mechanisms, since Fighters and Fighter Bombers steers by NPC pilots... Also one of reason why more that 1 squad of capitals need to be a "capital fleet".

I really wish the F&I forum was an AFK cloaky so you couldn't find this area :(

Now you're just throwing random words and phrases out there. What you just said makes no sense at all lending credence to the theory that you're nothing more than a terribly bad troll.

What you just asked has no bearing on what suid0 said so I'm going to ignore it from that point of view.

PL use titans a lot more than most other groups. They're obviously not that afraid of risking them.

How is a titan a "Win EVE" button at the moment? They're pretty much a very large coffin unless used tactically and in a fairly sizable group.

Your arguments are pathetic, your use of pseudo-english in order to seem stupid is laughable and your trolling is possibly the worst I've yet seen on these forums.

Try harder if you're going to troll.

Yeh, teach HEN button in your reality is important .
Native speakers make a misstakes, so nothing to be noticed for non-native language speaker.
Argue grammar with your mamma. (c)

Full fleet of capitals - what we speaking about. Please hold this line or leave thread.

I don't know about that. From reading your OP it seems we're talking about how to make the most unnecessary and pointless changes to the game which would upset nearly everyone with capital ships and break a great deal of the balance. One might take that as a troll.

As I'm sure you're already aware, I do.

Nice idea but we already have stealth bombers that work very well at that. All giving capitals projected smartbombs would do is mean they can nuke subcaps all that much better which is sort of against what CCP have been moving towards, I think.