These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Two years later: Walking in Stations

First post
Author
Ambassador Crane
Hellhound Productions
#601 - 2013-12-20 04:24:13 UTC
Falin Whalen wrote:
Erica Dusette wrote:
But where we ultimately disagree, and what seems to cause your stance, is that you seem feel avatar gameplay here in EVE can only result in something that's impractical, unfeasible and meaningless in the content it provides. Thus it's not deserving on development resources. And I completely disagree, for reasons and rationale already posted a hundred times in this thread alone.

Well have fun in your virtual bar, drinking virtual drinks, and trying to make virtual frends, while they admire your virtual clothing. That is all the "gameplay" I've heard from your ilk, and frankly you can just go back to WoW for that.


And once again you either only hear/read what you want or haven't read a bit of this thread.
Dani Dusette
Division 13
#602 - 2013-12-20 04:26:19 UTC
Rhes wrote:
Little Dragon Khamez wrote:
Balancing is not the same as development. We've had plenty of balancing but no actual development.


Sure it is. Dozens of ships that nobody ever used are now being regularly flown in fleets and that wouldn't be true if CCP was still trying to cater to the whims of roleplayers.

But it's not just the roleplayers. Smile

Sure, the benefits to the roleplaying community are obvious, but it's scope is so much more (Re: my last post).

In fact from the sounds of what the Devs were testing the "station" aspects, the roleplaying environments, seem to be less of a priority than the actual gameplay elements such as using your avs to accomplish ingame tasks such as data/relic sites.

So really your generalization there about this all being RP-related is completely incorrect.

dαní ㅤㅤ

σиlу ιи dαякиєѕѕ cαи уσυ ѕєє тнє ѕтαяѕ

ISD Ezwal: "Might I inform you that I am as real as it gets?"

Erica Dusette
Division 13
#603 - 2013-12-20 04:28:02 UTC
Posting with my main just to say I completely agree with everything Dani said. Big smile

Jack Miton > you be nice or you're sleeping on the couch again!

Part-Time Wormhole Pirate Full-Time Supermodel

worмнole dιary + cнaracтer вιoѕвσss

Logical 101
PowerCow Farm
#604 - 2013-12-20 04:34:09 UTC
Dani Dusette wrote:
After Incarna if anyone should be pissed at all it's those of us who dreamed of WiS as CCP advertised and promoted it.

Great post by the way, unembarrassed main. I totally respect the vision of something bigger.

However, it is exactly the sentiment that you are expressing which, like many others, I have experienced before and come to accept as a simple fact of life. "CCP advertised and promoted". That's the hook, right there.

Atmospheric Flight

Do you have any idea how stoked I was for this? Imagine it - ships battling it out over large cities, or between high mountains - surface mining, scanning and exploration - direct interaction with planetary assets.

AF was going to make EVE a "whole new game" for us, while staying true to what EVE is. It never happened, but I understand why. It was too difficult to make it happen. People say it all the time when it comes to these features. There's a difference between something that can be done, and something that can be done right. AF makes more sense than WiS, but you're right, maybe it just wasn't as potentially profitable as avatar customization and environments.
Arduemont
Rotten Legion
#605 - 2013-12-20 09:29:16 UTC  |  Edited by: Arduemont
Logical 101 wrote:
Dani Dusette wrote:
After Incarna if anyone should be pissed at all it's those of us who dreamed of WiS as CCP advertised and promoted it.

Great post by the way, unembarrassed main. I totally respect the vision of something bigger.

However, it is exactly the sentiment that you are expressing which, like many others, I have experienced before and come to accept as a simple fact of life. "CCP advertised and promoted". That's the hook, right there.

Atmospheric Flight

Do you have any idea how stoked I was for this? Imagine it - ships battling it out over large cities, or between high mountains - surface mining, scanning and exploration - direct interaction with planetary assets.

AF was going to make EVE a "whole new game" for us, while staying true to what EVE is. It never happened, but I understand why. It was too difficult to make it happen. People say it all the time when it comes to these features. There's a difference between something that can be done, and something that can be done right. AF makes more sense than WiS, but you're right, maybe it just wasn't as potentially profitable as avatar customization and environments.


This is not meant to be offensive in any way, it's just an observation. I just had to call you on it. Your not an alt, you've been playing for 30 days, but you were stoked about atmospheric flight?

The most important factor in creating a good lie is to keep it as close to the truth as possible so not to let things like this slip through. You should have said 'I am an alt, but my main isn't posting in here'. That would have been a more convincing and long lived lie.

"In the age of information, ignorance is a choice." www.stateofwar.co.nf

Naydra Adni
Doomheim
#606 - 2013-12-20 09:37:11 UTC
Logical 101...
first you write "I personally can't imagine anything more lame than leaving my ship to stroll around a space station"
And then you write "I never said that WiS isn't a cool idea,"
so which is it?
forget to switch alts for one of those?
Broker Agent
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#607 - 2013-12-20 09:52:08 UTC
Most people's objections to Avatar content seem to be basically that they don't want it. And that's fine. Everyone is perfectly entitled to not want a feature because they're unlikely to use it. But frankly, I have never run Incursions or been in a war dec, or lived in a WH, or been in factional warfare, but I understand that they add depth to Eve so I am not going to rant on the forums about how I don't want the devs wasting their time on them.

The other objection people seem to have is that they don't think CCP can do it. Which is pish posh. CCP may have made life difficult for themselves by creating incredibly high poly, fully customizable Avatars but Avatar gameplay is a staple of MMOs. The idea that CCP can't do it is rediculous because everyone is doing it, CCP included.
Sura Sadiva
Entropic Tactical Crew
#608 - 2013-12-20 09:55:51 UTC  |  Edited by: Sura Sadiva
Arduemont wrote:
This is not meant to be offensive in any way, it's just an observation. I just had to call you on it. Your not an alt, you've been playing for 30 days, but you were stoked about atmospheric flight?

The most important factor in creating a good lie is to keep it as close to the truth as possible so not to let things like this slip through. You should have said 'I am an alt, but my main isn't posting in here'. That would have been a more convincing and long lived lie.


Also: not a single record, never joined a corporation, not a single kill or loss, never been involved in any fight, sounds like he never undocked... but giving lessons about FiS :)
Aralyn Cormallen
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#609 - 2013-12-20 10:45:54 UTC  |  Edited by: Aralyn Cormallen
Good to see you are seeking to counter that well-reasoned, articulate counter-argument, rather than just attacking the poster… oh, sorry, my mistake.
Erica Dusette
Division 13
#610 - 2013-12-20 10:51:26 UTC  |  Edited by: Erica Dusette
Oh snap!

Slipped up after being distracted by the flattering lines of my avatar's shiny leathers, the stylish yet eye-catching crop top, her glowing, natural sex appeal and unmistakable aura of child-like innocence.

Jack Miton > you be nice or you're sleeping on the couch again!

Part-Time Wormhole Pirate Full-Time Supermodel

worмнole dιary + cнaracтer вιoѕвσss

Arduemont
Rotten Legion
#611 - 2013-12-20 11:19:56 UTC  |  Edited by: Arduemont
Aralyn Cormallen wrote:
Good to see you are seeking to counter that well-reasoned, articulate counter-argument, rather than just attacking the poster… oh, sorry, my mistake.


There wasn't an argument in that post. He never said a word about 'Why CCP shouldn't add Avatar content'. There was nothing to counter. He was just being talkative, and so I was being talkative as well. You just wanted a chance to snipe.

Ooohhh hypocrisy, you are such a sweet and tender lover.

Erica Dusette wrote:


Looks like the forums filtered out the last word in the images URL. So your link didn't work. : P

"In the age of information, ignorance is a choice." www.stateofwar.co.nf

Erica Dusette
Division 13
#612 - 2013-12-20 11:32:56 UTC
Arduemont wrote:
Aralyn Cormallen wrote:
Good to see you are seeking to counter that well-reasoned, articulate counter-argument, rather than just attacking the poster… oh, sorry, my mistake.


There wasn't an argument in that post. He never said a word about 'Why CCP shouldn't add Avatar content'. There was nothing to counter. He was just being talkative, and so I was being talkative as well. You just wanted a chance to snipe.

Ooohhh hypocrisy, you are such a sweet and tender lover.

Erica Dusette wrote:


Looks like the forums filtered out the last word in the images URL. So you link doesn't work. : P

Well that sucks! I can't even swear in secretRoll

Jack Miton > you be nice or you're sleeping on the couch again!

Part-Time Wormhole Pirate Full-Time Supermodel

worмнole dιary + cнaracтer вιoѕвσss

Logical 101
PowerCow Farm
#613 - 2013-12-20 14:55:11 UTC  |  Edited by: Logical 101
Arduemont wrote:
This is not meant to be offensive in any way, it's just an observation. I just had to call you on it. Your not an alt, you've been playing for 30 days, but you were stoked about atmospheric flight?

The most important factor in creating a good lie is to keep it as close to the truth as possible so not to let things like this slip through. You should have said 'I am an alt, but my main isn't posting in here'. That would have been a more convincing and long lived lie.

I will say this one last time.

I am not an alt.

Returning player. Fresh character. This should be fairly easy to digest. If you would like to know who I was before I liquidated several years ago, look up Floppy Disk, Centrada and Mr Trust. Those were my old characters. Their sale threads should be easy to find in the Character Bazaar section/archived (2007, 2012, 2013 respectively).

Now please, stop making yourself look petty, stay on topic, and deliver some content. Try actually responding.

Naydra Adni wrote:
"I personally can't imagine anything more lame than leaving my ship to stroll around a space station"
And then you write "I never said that WiS isn't a cool idea"

Cool concept, but not my cup of tea. I prefer the space game.

Again, should be fairly easy to digest. I can at least have a healthy respect for what others might enjoy, but I personally see it as something boring, vain, and not worth investment. Again, I think it's a failed vampire game, the properties of which will be "salvaged" in the WiS implementation process, but it doesn't belong here.

And it will be a flop. And we will roll eyes. And we will lament our eagerness.
Arduemont
Rotten Legion
#614 - 2013-12-20 15:04:53 UTC  |  Edited by: Arduemont
Logical 101 wrote:
Arduemont wrote:
This is not meant to be offensive in any way, it's just an observation. I just had to call you on it. Your not an alt, you've been playing for 30 days, but you were stoked about atmospheric flight?

The most important factor in creating a good lie is to keep it as close to the truth as possible so not to let things like this slip through. You should have said 'I am an alt, but my main isn't posting in here'. That would have been a more convincing and long lived lie.

I will say this one last time.

I am not an alt.

Returning player. Fresh character. This should be fairly easy to digest. If you would like to know who I was before I liquidated several years ago, look up Floppy Disk, Centrada and Mr Trust. Those were my old characters. Their sale threads should be easy to find in the Character Bazaar section/archived (2007, 2012, 2013 respectively).

Now please, stop making yourself look petty, stay on topic, and deliver some content. Try actually responding.


Chill bro. No need to be a ****.

Arduemont wrote:
This is not meant to be offensive in any way, it's just an observation.

"In the age of information, ignorance is a choice." www.stateofwar.co.nf

Anslo
Scope Works
#615 - 2013-12-20 15:09:08 UTC
Erica Dusette wrote:
Oh snap!

Slipped up after being distracted by the flattering lines of my avatar's shiny leathers, the stylish yet eye-catching crop top, her glowing, natural sex appeal and unmistakable aura of child-like innocence.

Innocent my arse Dusette.

[center]-_For the Proveldtariat_/-[/center]

Logical 101
PowerCow Farm
#616 - 2013-12-20 15:11:56 UTC  |  Edited by: Logical 101
Arduemont wrote:
Chill bro. No need to be a ****.

Actually, I think I was being very chill considering the bulk of those who disagree with me can't seem to get past the fact that I'm not concerned with waiting until I'm back in a player corp to start posting things again. Look at what I post. I'm fairly obviously not a troll. My ego just isn't fragile enough that I'm afraid to say things without a tag.

If you disagree with me, then disagree with me.
Stitcher
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#617 - 2013-12-20 15:24:00 UTC  |  Edited by: Stitcher
Dani Dusette wrote:
Rhes wrote:
Sure it is. Dozens of ships that nobody ever used are now being regularly flown in fleets and that wouldn't be true if CCP was still trying to cater to the whims of roleplayers.

But it's not just the roleplayers. Smile

Sure, the benefits to the roleplaying community are obvious, but it's scope is so much more


Actually, I already explained earlier in the thread that WiS content wouldn't really add anything to the roleplay game.

The primary activities of RP in EVE are emoting - "/me waves", "/me smiles", "/me laughs" and so on - and just talking about stuff that's happened in the universe. If you want an excellent example of the kind of RP that EVE produces, just take a look at this thread.

Having the ability to literally walk into a digital bar doesn't really add much to an RP culture that's based around character-acting somebody who lives in that universe. And the best way to do that is to play yourself.

I am a wormhole industrialist with plenty sharp PvP teeth. I play exactly that - a wormhole industrialist with plenty sharp PvP teeth. The fact that PvP means "Pilot versus Pilot" to my character rather than "Player versus Player" is really the only difference. The player Stitcher flies spaceships, builds tech 3 subsystems and hacks data sites, which means that the character Yakiya Verin Hakatain also flies spaceships, builds tech 3 subsystems and hacks data sites.

The only difference is that he, as a character set in that universe, has in-universe goals. He wants to try and help improve the relationship between the Caldari and Minmatar, he wants to improve humanity's access to posthuman technologies like cloning and, yes, he wants to get rich. Out-of-character, I get some fun and entertainment from play-acting that character and having him interact with other characters. It's like spontaneous freeform make-it-up-as-you-go-along acting.

All of which can be done just by playing the game and chatting with people in text channels. I don't need to walk into an actual bar and see my guy marching about the place in order to do that. Having available WiS environments would do very little indeed to enhance my experience as a roleplayer.

All of which is why I'm keen to see EoF - EVE on Foot - released in such a way as to introduce actual mechanical gameplay activities which I can try out and maybe get rich from and get some PvP from. THAT, I would be able to RP about because it'd maybe furnish me with some adventures and anecdotes to share in-character... while I'm in space, hanging out at the POS, while I'm flying from our highsec static to a market hub or, yes, maybe while I'm in a bar drinking beer and playing poker.

But just having a pretty-looking nightclub to stand around in and emote wouldn't actually enhance a roleplayer's experience any more than it would enhance anybody else's.

AKA Hambone

Author of The Deathworlders

Arduemont
Rotten Legion
#618 - 2013-12-20 15:37:10 UTC  |  Edited by: Arduemont
Logical 101 wrote:

If you disagree with me, then disagree with me.


I don't see anything to disagree with. You've not really giving reasons for Avatar content to not be developed. You've just said you don't want it, and as someone said earlier, your perfectly entitled to not want it in the same way I don't give two ***** about a SOV upgrade.

Edit: Just as an aside, because I am interested, and I am not implying that it is relevant to the thread in any way.. those three characters you said you sold, don't have sell threads in the character bazaar in the archive. One of them offered to sell it in a WTB thread once, but other than that there is no evidence those characters were ever sold. I get in the habit of checking when people reference stuff, such as your character sales, so the scientist in my had to check. Do you have links or anything?

"In the age of information, ignorance is a choice." www.stateofwar.co.nf

Logical 101
PowerCow Farm
#619 - 2013-12-20 15:45:22 UTC
Arduemont wrote:
I don't see anything to disagree with. You've not really giving reasons for Avatar content to not be developed.

And that tells me you haven't read anything I've written. Which is kinda sad, but whatever.

Simply put, because it will not contain all the cool and incredible features that people here have suggested (I just don't see CQ/WoD becoming a platform for things like gunfights, sabotaging actual ships, and just generally being a space cowboy) and will be poorly implemented (because it will be), it is a waste of time and money. This time... and money... is better spent on improving any number of things with the existing game, and adding more and more verticality and dynamic elements to space.

I think where WiS proponents sometimes get it wrong (I'm not saying all the time, just sometimes) is on the execution. I don't actually think the game people are describing here would be a bad thing. Are you kidding me? Hop out of pod, slink past some war targets hanging out in the station, get to enemy ship, do dastardly things? That sounds like a hell of a lot of fun. But at the end of the day, if that grand vision is going to be supplanted by "doable" WiS (avatars standing in a circle), it ain't worth it.
Notorious Fellon
#620 - 2013-12-20 15:48:24 UTC
Stitcher wrote:
Dani Dusette wrote:
Rhes wrote:
Sure it is. Dozens of ships that nobody ever used are now being regularly flown in fleets and that wouldn't be true if CCP was still trying to cater to the whims of roleplayers.

But it's not just the roleplayers. Smile

Sure, the benefits to the roleplaying community are obvious, but it's scope is so much more


Actually, I already explained earlier in the thread that WiS content wouldn't really add anything to the roleplay game.


How can you possibly claim to control what other people would enjoy?

The problem you have is that you seem to think that those who support WiS only want emotes. It couldn't be further from the truth. And even if they did, it isn't on you to determine if they would somehow enjoy the game more or not. You have no ability to dictate what other people would enjoy.

You can have an opinion, but you don't get to control other peoples opinions.

Crime, it is not a "career", it is a lifestyle.