These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Two years later: Walking in Stations

First post
Author
Ramona McCandless
Silent Vale
LinkNet
#501 - 2013-12-17 21:36:41 UTC
Thellorms Nor'Fein wrote:

You know... I understand what your saying. But I think that this creature you speak of is simply what others (including myself) are refering to as someone who simply does not believe in or supports WiS. It REALLY is that simple...

Edit: But then again, it could just go on forever what "supporting WiS" really is or means, and that is NOT something I am here to debate.


Well Ive been called it half a dozen times in this thread and I havent once said I was against WiS so I was wondering who these WiS-Haters are because I havent seen a single one, as in a real one, yet.

"Yea, some dude came in and was normal for first couple months, so I gave him director." - Sean Dunaway

"A singular character could be hired to penetrate another corps space... using gorilla like tactics..." - Chane Morgann

Thellorms Nor'Fein
Federal Bounty Services
#502 - 2013-12-17 21:44:10 UTC
Ramona McCandless wrote:
Thellorms Nor'Fein wrote:

You know... I understand what your saying. But I think that this creature you speak of is simply what others (including myself) are refering to as someone who simply does not believe in or supports WiS. It REALLY is that simple...

Edit: But then again, it could just go on forever what "supporting WiS" really is or means, and that is NOT something I am here to debate.


Well Ive been called it half a dozen times in this thread and I havent once said I was against WiS so I was wondering who these WiS-Haters are because I havent seen a single one, as in a real one, yet.


I've read this entire thread and haven't once seen someone direct that term towards you specifically. And yes, it is true I have not seen you 'naysay' WiS. I think it's important to remember when people refer to such a thing, they are refering to a majority (or minority, depending on how you look at it) or general group of players. They could even be referring to their memory of 'naysayers' from back when Incarna was actually release. What I'm saying is, I think it's just a generalization for lack of better grammar (of which I'm guilty). *shrugs*

Ahh, Jita... - http://i.imgur.com/UHGT4xc.jpg

Ramona McCandless
Silent Vale
LinkNet
#503 - 2013-12-17 21:46:46 UTC
Thellorms Nor'Fein wrote:


I've read this entire thread and haven't once seen someone direct that term towards you specifically. And yes, it is true I have not seen you 'naysay' WiS. I think it's important to remember when people refer to such a thing, they are refering to a majority (or minority, depending on how you look at it) or general group of players. They could even be referring to their memory of 'naysayers' from back when Incarna was actually release. What I'm saying is, I think it's just a generalization for lack of better grammar (of which I'm guilty). *shrugs*


Cool thats cleared that up.

And no its fine, its just Im always wary of a rabble stirring up against "the others" and then the label of "other" being applied to anyone who questions the status quo

Cos they rock

"Yea, some dude came in and was normal for first couple months, so I gave him director." - Sean Dunaway

"A singular character could be hired to penetrate another corps space... using gorilla like tactics..." - Chane Morgann

Chance Harper
Doomheim
#504 - 2013-12-18 10:18:40 UTC
Zifrian wrote:
I'm a fan if wis and want to see more....but....given their recent patches, I'm not convinced they have the capacity to develop wis in a way that won't completely suck dev time from the rest of the game. I want more spaceship and space content than they are providing now so unless they can find the manpower, I'd rather it stay as it is.


I noticed that alot of ppl who are against WiS (not Zifrian, cuz he is a fan of WiS. I just use his last sentence as an example) so why is the only thing they write. "i want more spaceships and space" but never give any examples. But asks the WiS fans to give examples what WiS should have or what would it make useful.

So dear spaceships fans, plz tell us what more ships and space do you want. because really i cant see what we need more space for? There are soo many empty 0.0 systems that are not used, what more ships would you like to have for what purpose. I am not against any of these but i would like some decent discussion about it and to read some good ideas.
Arduemont
Rotten Legion
#505 - 2013-12-18 10:52:09 UTC  |  Edited by: Arduemont
Jenn aSide wrote:
Arduemont wrote:

You mean the fanfest one where Hilmar asks the crowd whether they want WiS and the feed is drowned out by people cheering? And then he awkwardly says something about 'maybe next year'? You mean that video? That's a rhetorical question by the way.


I mean the one I linked where Seagull said it's a spaceship game... etc


Bolded and underlined for emphasis.

Also, as it seems relevant at this point. The whole "Pro-FiS" and "Pro-WiS" crowd thing is bullshit. Most people who direct comments at me with "you WiS people" in it, spend less time undocked and shooting at spaceships (players) than I do. Frankly, I am more pro-FiS than they are, I just happen to want WiS developement. The implication that I don't care for the current space gameplay of my favorite game is complete ****.

When it comes to the current dream of manufacturable star gates and new space, I am against it because it's a stupid waste of resources and a terrible work around for the problems we have. I am against it because it is not what our in-space game-play needs. I am not against it because it's using resources that could be used on WiS game-play (although I would prefer development spent towards that goal).

Next time you think about starting an argument with "you WiS people", just close your reply window and don't bother.

Thellorms Nor'Fein wrote:
Now THIS I want to see. Do you have a link by chance?

Sorry, but I only really post from work, so I can't crawl through the old fanfest videos looking for it. When I get back I spend my time blowing up internet spaceships rather than trawling youtube videos. It occurred during one of the last big presentations of the day, like the CCP presents presentations or something. You can find the last fanfest footage on CCP's youtube channel. I am afraid I will have to leave you to find it in there.

"In the age of information, ignorance is a choice." www.stateofwar.co.nf

Lipbite
Express Hauler
#506 - 2013-12-18 11:13:40 UTC  |  Edited by: Lipbite
There is no point to bother with development of anything but spaceship PvP when almost half of company's income is coming from people paying for PLEXes to skip most of content. I bet until EVE will not start sinking we won't see anything actually interesting but cheap and boring PvP-oriented mini-games (to boost PLEX sales).
Davon Mandra'thin
Das Collective
#507 - 2013-12-18 11:27:46 UTC  |  Edited by: Davon Mandra'thin
Dracvlad wrote:
Davon Mandra'thin wrote:

People also regularly ask for AFK Cloaking to be nerffed. Adding new space to Eve is a terrible idea, a massive proportion of our current space is basically uninhabited. There is swathes of sov null, NPC null and low sec with no one for 10 jumps in any direction. What do we need new space for?


Have you thought about this space having no local and not within jump range of current space? The force projection is one of the reasons why many systems are empty, as well as the poor rewards from those systems without IHUB's. I should know as I spend most of my time in 0.0 using that type of space. CCP could test a number of things with a new region if they want to, most notably removing local.

EDIT: I would suggest not being dismissive of other things developed within Eve, the new region is a great idea, will bring interest, improving sov warfare will improve the game if done right, the new POS system and new deployable structures will add to the game, and the added immersion of WiS will add to the game.


Adding new space into the game because your current space is broken is not a good idea. It will only make it worse. Instead of 'starting from scratch' they need to fix the current space. If null and low are empty because force projection is broken, and IHUB's concentrate their benefits so people don't leave those systems, then fix those things. I am not suggesting I have a perfect solution to either of those things, but there are many possible solutions. If not having local is such a good idea, then remove local from null.

Adding new space on top of old broken space will make it worse. People will be even more spread out. I am not being dismissive of the idea, I have always been against it. I've put a fair amount of thought into. New space, is a disaster waiting to happen. Fixing force projection, and our empty low and nullsec systems will mean there is much more 'usable space' added to the game than adding a new space that will be exploited and need balancing itself.

All the above said, this isn't really the topic for it. It suffices to say that I think adding new space is a terrible idea and I would prefer their 5 year plan to be heading towards some WiS content. After the Incarna riots CCP promised to spend the immediate future fixing and iterating on current features. An admirable goal, and so far so good, but manufacturable star gates and new space is a Jesus feature, and PI and WiS are being left un-iterated on completely against their promise.

Infinity Ziona wrote:
Those Swathes (of empty space) exist only in your imagination. The majority of systems in EVE have POS, local residents and there is usually an outpost within one or two jumps. NPC space is full of people, both big alliances, roaming gangs and nuetrals


Open up your star map during peak time and select 'Average Players In Space (Over 30mins)' and look at nullsec and lowsec. Do the same with players docked up, maybe look at the number of jumps. All those zeros are not my imagination.
Aralyn Cormallen
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#508 - 2013-12-18 13:39:24 UTC  |  Edited by: Aralyn Cormallen
Stitcher wrote:

But seriously, what would it hurt just to add a racially-appropriate common room/bar to each station where pilots can go. no weapons, just stand around chatting and maybe with a few gaming tables to play Poker or Slay or whatever. What exactly would be the harm to that? Okay, it's an expenditure of resources - is it REALLY that critical and are resources REALLY that tight and are you REALLY so miserly that you're going to say a flat "no, that should not happen"?

It took 18 months to produce a racially-appropriate bedroom to each station where pilots can go. no weapons, just stand around without chatting and definitely without a few gaming tables to play Poker or Slay or whatever.

I'm not willing to see that amount of time get flushed again for the same amount of naff-all. And yes, I'm well aware the cry of "the 18 months was to build Carbon, not the bedrooms", well, quite frankly, I don't trust CCP to not decide they need another superfluous engine for the new walking in stations. They did it last time, blowing all that time creating a replacement for something they already had a working prototype of, and with WoD in the can, there is nothing tying them to Carbon anymore (and since one character alone threatened the lives of many video cards, do we have even a scrap of proof that the current engine can cope with multiple characters at once without going into full meltdown mode again, we don't). That is where the fundamental disconnect is - you are convinced CCP can produce vastly more than they produced last time, in a fraction of the time they spent last time, without any evidence to support that, while I am convinced CCP will perform exactly as they did at the last attempt, as we have seen nothing to indicate otherwise.
Arduemont
Rotten Legion
#509 - 2013-12-18 13:44:19 UTC  |  Edited by: Arduemont
Aralyn Cormallen wrote:

It took 18 months to produce a...


This is where I would usually insult your intelligence, but apparently I am not allowed to do that. Instead I will say, go back and read the thread. They didn't take 18 months to make the CQs. That engine wasn't superfluous. CARBON is also the basis for all the new UIs, the V3 textures and TiDi amongst many other things. I wouldn't be surprised if all of the changes since Incarna were made with the CARBON engine.

Nothing tying them to the games engine... right... aside from the fact that the entire game runs on it you mean? Right?

Aralyn Cormallen wrote:
I'm well aware the cry of "the 18 months was to build Carbon, not the bedrooms"


It's not just a cry, it's verifiable fact. With links and references to devs saying it all over the thread. If you can find one dev post to the contrary, then i'll metaphorically eat my hat.

"In the age of information, ignorance is a choice." www.stateofwar.co.nf

Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#510 - 2013-12-18 14:00:25 UTC
Arduemont wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:
Arduemont wrote:

You mean the fanfest one where Hilmar asks the crowd whether they want WiS and the feed is drowned out by people cheering? And then he awkwardly says something about 'maybe next year'? You mean that video? That's a rhetorical question by the way.


I mean the one I linked where Seagull said it's a spaceship game... etc


Bolded and underlined for emphasis.

Also, as it seems relevant at this point. The whole "Pro-FiS" and "Pro-WiS" crowd thing is bullshit. Most people who direct comments at me with "you WiS people" in it, spend less time undocked and shooting at spaceships (players) than I do. Frankly, I am more pro-FiS than they are, I just happen to want WiS developement. The implication that I don't care for the current space gameplay of my favorite game is complete ****.

When it comes to the current dream of manufacturable star gates and new space, I am against it because it's a stupid waste of resources and a terrible work around for the problems we have. I am against it because it is not what our in-space game-play needs. I am not against it because it's using resources that could be used on WiS game-play (although I would prefer development spent towards that goal).

Next time you think about starting an argument with "you WiS people", just close your reply window and don't bother.


See, that's the problem with you WiS people, and why you are LOSING the battle, and why sentiment will harden even further against what you want if someone at CCP's executive board is stupid enough to do the things you types are asking for.

You can't even see that you are actually part of a group and that others might not want the fluff you are asking for.

You can dislike and ignore the realities of the current situation all you want. It's dumb but that's your choice. Or you could try to understand it and learn to work with it. Doesn't matter to me, CCP is currently giving me what I want (focus on space).
Arduemont
Rotten Legion
#511 - 2013-12-18 14:09:03 UTC  |  Edited by: Arduemont
Jenn aSide wrote:
whiny little ***** noises


Your the minority here.

PS: Where's your killboard?

"In the age of information, ignorance is a choice." www.stateofwar.co.nf

Ishtanchuk Fazmarai
#512 - 2013-12-18 14:11:49 UTC
Thellorms Nor'Fein wrote:
(...)

And on that note, the only solution I see if hiring an independant staff for the sole purpose of fleshing out and developing station environments and meaningful avatar gameplay outside of the ships in a manner that does not detract from the original spirit of EVE Online. But given that this not only has not happened, but I've seen (rather read about) a couple of significant lay offs at CCP, I'm lead to believe that CCP does not have this capacity anymore. I'm left imagining CCP as a bare handful of people doing only what it takes to keep the game afloat via content patches (that they so boldly call expansions), and completely incapable of embracing and developing what this thread has been (originally) all about. This has really put a hamper on my hope for the future of EVE Online, because I feel too that no one at CCP is strong enough to take this game in the bold new directions that advancements like this would allow. This, everything that's been discussed in this thread, only opens doors to the possibility of a greater and more notable epic that is EVE Online.

Well, anyways... I'll keep hoping for it's future. And I will do my best to continue to enjoy what is currently before me. Yes, I am a player that plays EVE Online because of what I HOPE it will become. Viewed as a foolish notion by many, it seems easily forgotten that this is how you support software developers that you believe in. With the upcoming promise of another space epic that seemingly offers what a lot of us here are looking for, and then some, it's entirely possible I may not be here much longer. But here, right now, I believe in CCPs past visions (yes, that means the promises they failed to deliver), and hope that they will come. I know there are people in CCP who dare to dream bigger, and reality (and the cowering management in the corner) be damned of all of it. Time will tell what comes of it.


Well, I think that CCP is falling behind the power curve. They have time and resources to do X stuff, and yet they ought to do X+1 stuff in the same time. And they are behaving as if they were really in dire need for resources. We can guess that DUST being a money pit isn't helping. But also doesn't helps that EVE is becoming a game that is sold to its current users more than to potential new users.

People not buying your content, will not buy your "fixed" or "restated" content. You don't expand the farm by fixing the kitchen sink, no matter how bad it stinks. And provided the massive, hellish complexity of EVE content after 10 years, avatars are the only thing that is a blank sheet and still could be shaped to draw in new players and thus new resources. EVE needed Incarna in 2011 and the needs still are the same. Just CCP now haves 2 years less and their backlog has grown 3 years longer... and still can't answer the million dollar question:

Why should play EVE now someone who didn't played it for the last 10 years?

There is no reason, and thus no new customers.

Roses are red / Violets are blue / I am an Alpha / And so it's you

Davon Mandra'thin
Das Collective
#513 - 2013-12-18 14:23:34 UTC  |  Edited by: Davon Mandra'thin
Arduemont wrote:
Aralyn Cormallen wrote:

It took 18 months to produce a...


This is where I would usually insult your intelligence, but apparently I am not allowed to do that. Instead I will say, go back and read the thread. They didn't take 18 months to make the CQs. That engine wasn't superfluous. CARBON is also the basis for all the new UIs, the V3 textures and TiDi amongst many other things. I wouldn't be surprised if all of the changes since Incarna were made with the CARBON engine.

Nothing tying them to the games engine... right... aside from the fact that the entire game runs on it you mean? Right?

Aralyn Cormallen wrote:
I'm well aware the cry of "the 18 months was to build Carbon, not the bedrooms"


It's not just a cry, it's verifiable fact. With links and references to devs saying it all over the thread. If you can find one dev post to the contrary, then i'll metaphorically eat my hat.


That's a good post +1.

Jenn aSide wrote:
Arduemont wrote:

I know your serious, your also...

Then stop posting lol, your making yourself look like a fool.


He does look bad posting like that. But he's still infinitely better than you.
Notorious Fellon
#514 - 2013-12-18 14:43:36 UTC
I apologize to all the WiS folks who made this thread and were voicing their opinions constructively before I went off on a tangent. My apologies.

Please, carry on.

Crime, it is not a "career", it is a lifestyle.

Elizabeth Brown
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#515 - 2013-12-18 14:55:20 UTC
What a surprise. Jenn's trolling has reduced the thread to bitching again.

Why are you even here?
Erica Dusette
Division 13
#516 - 2013-12-18 15:13:19 UTC
Heh, some people may whine this way or that, others may argue this way or that. But WiS is still a legitimate EVE topic of discussion, whatever way you look at it, so I don't think you can try to generalize why WiS supporters like to post here anymore than it's detractors.

It's a good thread *shrug*. And obviously a topic important enough to merit posting in for a ton of people from both sides.

Ideas, suggestions, debates, pros-and-cons.

I'm a WiS supporter and I'm not squeamish, and I don't believe I'm "fighting" for anything - merely advocating and encouraging it, like I would any part of any game I wanted to see developed further. What?

Most of the arguing and trolling doesn't seem to accomplish much other than to give the thread more bumps. Jenn aSide obviously doesn't like the idea of WiS for whatever his/her personal reason are and yeah ok, I'm not going to attack you over that and I'd think it kinda dumb if vice-versa too.

*Adds Jenn to the list of avatars to buy a drink or ten for in the future* Bear

Jack Miton > you be nice or you're sleeping on the couch again!

Part-Time Wormhole Pirate Full-Time Supermodel

worмнole dιary + cнaracтer вιoѕвσss

Ambassador Crane
Hellhound Productions
#517 - 2013-12-18 15:34:05 UTC
As much as Jenn annoys me as well with her regular "you WiS people" or "your type" (feels almost like your being racist or something :P) She/he does bring good cannon fodder for all the regular, weak, excuses of why WiS shouldn't be worked on. So frankly, in some ways, I do enjoy the input given because it gives me a chance to show just how weak it is.

However, Jenn needs to understand that although most of us in this thread want to see work done to WiS, we're all subscribed to Eve because we love the FiS too. I love my spaceships. I thoroughly enjoy spaceship PVP. I love working the market. I even take part in PVE content (mostly in the form of "exploration" and wormhole diving). I don't focus myself on one sole aspect of this game because I enjoy so many aspects about it. But I want to see this game develop into the complete sci-fi simulator it has the potential to be. And I see WiS as being a crucial key to that.

Also, the regular statements like “The people who Want WiS are LOSING, as evidenced by the fact that there is no WiS development for the forseeable future.” is weak as well. POS revamp. I didn’t follow the entire threadnaught for it when CCP said it wasn’t important and people backlashed, but I haven’t heard anything further about that being worked on either. Null Sov. Again, they’ve said a few times they understand it sucks, but nothing beyond that either. No given time frame for when they plan to revamp it. I can think of a few other issues that people have brought up but with no evident plans on the horizon to work on it. However, as for WiS, it’s unnecessary to come back here time and time again to tell people the same thing over and over in just slightly different words, which has been all you’ve done. I can pretty much sum up everything you’ve said. “I love my FiS. I don’t care about WiS. Neither should CCP. You’re all delusional for thinking they should. I’m the cool one because I’m not fighting an uphill battle.” However, this mentality you seem to have that CCP isn’t working on it because they’re listening to what their players want is rather delusional as well. So welcome to the looney bin.

Ishtanchuk Fazmarai also made an excellent point. Some bitter-vets (which I don’t consider Jenn to be since she/he thinks Rubicon was the best expansion ever….which I still get a good laugh about) don't want to see this game expanded beyond FiS because one, the "you can't teach old dogs new tricks" mentality. Two, I think to a small extent they're scared of TOO much community growth, which WiS has the potential imo to bring, because it might bring in what they feel to be the wrong sorts of people for Eve. Three, they’re scared of another attempt at a “greed is good” or gold ammo Nex store. Four, they’re scared CCP will fall back into the old way of pumping out new features without fixing the existing problems. Reasons 3 and 4 is why I see CCP as unwilling to touch it for the time being. Anything related to Incarna, a release that really backlashed on them hard, they’re going to be too scared to go back and work on extensively.
Erica Dusette
Division 13
#518 - 2013-12-18 15:47:15 UTC
Just imagine if we had WiS. You could all be punching and strangling each other ingame as you're posting this here.

If that's not a selling point right there then I dunno...

Jack Miton > you be nice or you're sleeping on the couch again!

Part-Time Wormhole Pirate Full-Time Supermodel

worмнole dιary + cнaracтer вιoѕвσss

Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#519 - 2013-12-18 15:57:48 UTC  |  Edited by: Jenn aSide
Ambassador Crane wrote:
As much as Jenn annoys me as well with her regular "you WiS people" or "your type" (feels almost like your being racist or something :P) She/he does bring good cannon fodder for all the regular, weak, excuses of why WiS shouldn't be worked on. So frankly, in some ways, I do enjoy the input given because it gives me a chance to show just how weak it is.

However, Jenn needs to understand that although most of us in this thread want to see work done to WiS, we're all subscribed to Eve because we love the FiS too. I love my spaceships. I thoroughly enjoy spaceship PVP. I love working the market. I even take part in PVE content (mostly in the form of "exploration" and wormhole diving). I don't focus myself on one sole aspect of this game because I enjoy so many aspects about it. But I want to see this game develop into the complete sci-fi simulator it has the potential to be. And I see WiS as being a crucial key to that.


And that's what I dislike. EVE works because it's a focused, lean-mean niche game that isn't watered down in 14 different directions like SWTOR and Star Trek Online.

Everything CCP has tried to do outside of that focus (DUST/WoD/WiS) has failed to take off (we'll have to see about Valkyrie). From where then does the confidence that a game company that has done one thing right can then go on to build some "complete sci-fi simulator" come from?

I think you are overly optimisitic and not recognizing the risk. CCP's non-FiS ventures (DUST/WoD/WiS) have done some damage to CCP and diverting attention away from core EVE again just doesn't make any kind of sense.


Quote:

Also, the regular statements like “The people who Want WiS are LOSING, as evidenced by the fact that there is no WiS development for the forseeable future.” is weak as well. POS revamp. I didn’t follow the entire threadnaught for it when CCP said it wasn’t important and people backlashed, but I haven’t heard anything further about that being worked on either. Null Sov. Again, they’ve said a few times they understand it sucks, but nothing beyond that either.


SOV null is being worked on (at the down under event that it was aid that a total revamp hasn't been worked on but changes and improvements could be seen next summer).

The POS revamp thing is a prime example of why forums are largely irrelevant, if the pos revamp threadnaught didn't illicit change, why do you think this thread will? CCP is a company, right or wrong they are designing the game the way they think it should be, not the way we think it should be.


Quote:

No given time frame for when they plan to revamp it. I can think of a few other issues that people have brought up but with no evident plans on the horizon to work on it. However, as for WiS, it’s unnecessary to come back here time and time again to tell people the same thing over and over in just slightly different words, which has been all you’ve done. I can pretty much sum up everything you’ve said. “I love my FiS. I don’t care about WiS. Neither should CCP. You’re all delusional for thinking they should. I’m the cool one because I’m not fighting an uphill battle.” However, this mentality you seem to have that CCP isn’t working on it because they’re listening to what their players want is rather delusional as well. So welcome to the looney bin.


As i told others, you dislike how I say it doesn't change the facts on the ground. I'm not claiming that CCP isn't working on WiS because I said so. i'm saying CCP isn't working on WiS. Period. Disliking that and disliking the New Vision is a personal perogative.

You are making assumptions about my mentality and that's a mistake. This is a discussion forum, if y'all don't like to discuss things then why post?

Quote:

Ishtanchuk Fazmarai also made an excellent point. Some bitter-vets (which I don’t consider Jenn to be since she/he thinks Rubicon was the best expansion ever….which I still get a good laugh about) don't want to see this game expanded beyond FiS because one, the "you can't teach old dogs new tricks" mentality. Two, I think to a small extent they're scared of TOO much community growth, which WiS has the potential imo to bring, because it might bring in what they feel to be the wrong sorts of people for Eve. Three, they’re scared of another attempt at a “greed is good” or gold ammo Nex store. Four, they’re scared CCP will fall back into the old way of pumping out new features without fixing the existing problems. Reasons 3 and 4 is why I see CCP as unwilling to touch it for the time being. Anything related to Incarna, a release that really backlashed on them hard, they’re going to be too scared to go back and work on extensively.


Non-sense (#1 especially), I'm not anti-progress, I'm anti against things I don't think are good ideas.

EVE is an excellent, focused, deep niche game. You are right on number 2 as I'd prefer it not become some kind of virutal wal-mart of people who don't like or care for what has been up to no the core theme of the game.

I've played niche IP based games where the developers made the game to appeal to a "beyond core" audience (like Mechwarrior: Vengenence among others) and it's been a sucky experience . I don't want that for EVE though I understand that CCP will do what they must.
Ramona McCandless
Silent Vale
LinkNet
#520 - 2013-12-18 17:04:47 UTC
Notorious Fellon wrote:
I apologize to all the WiS folks who made this thread and were voicing their opinions constructively before I went off on a tangent. My apologies.

Please, carry on.



This is the best post in this thread


There will never be one as good

Well, unlikely to be.

"Yea, some dude came in and was normal for first couple months, so I gave him director." - Sean Dunaway

"A singular character could be hired to penetrate another corps space... using gorilla like tactics..." - Chane Morgann