EVE General Discussion

Personally I think the stargate thing is asinine. Unless the rules for it will be like the rules for POS, it means that they're going to be spending years working on content only a few powerful alliances will get to use. We've had that before with the previous sov overhaul. You know, the one that needs overhauled because it was craptacular?

Tyrell build replicants

Thats Tanhauser you are thinking of

That 15% number is baseless , the number of characters in null has nothing to do with the number of subscribers who would identify as "nullsecers" Simple math dictates that if 15% of characters are in null sec (your definition of a nullseccer apparently) and even one of them has an alt in high sec, the number of true "nullseccers" is above 15% lol. For example I have 4 accounts worth of characters and most of them are in high sec.

Imagining "nullseccers" are some kind of minority (and that this supposed minority is getting content that somehow no one else can use because of the magic wall that keep people out of null sec....) is a common defense mechanism used by high sec only players used to justify their prejudice.

has CCP said anything if they will do more with walking in stations? i am very curious and hope they do.

Yes. Also is not reallyr elevant what people feel in their soul. What is relevant is what gameplay people are inolved; if one spend most of his game time in HS doesn't matter what he feels in the deepth of his souls. And doesn't matter if they're suicide ganking, suicide ganking is typical HS gameplay.
And is enough to open the in game map statistics or dotlan to see players distribution and roughly what are they doing.

These categories (highseccer, lowseccer, null-seccer...) are bullcraps for forum anyway.

Perosnally I hate HS, I go there only to buy/sell stuff and try to leave as soon as I can, spending most of my time in low or null. However thinking that a game company could or should ignore players demographics is naive, as well as trying to convince anyone that 80-90% of the palyerbase doesn't exist or is a fake; any "request" or development based on this is simply doomed to fail.

That's what people keep saying. Personally, I think those people are full of crap. I don't doubt that both projects fed off each other to some extent, but saying that makes it sound like there was no point to Incarna but to be the tech demo for another as-yet-unreleased MMO, which I don't think is the case. In fact I think it's clearly NOT the case.

If it was just a testbed, it would never have been deployed to TQ. It would have stayed on CCP's internal servers alongside all the other abandoned prototypes we never get to see. For it to make it onto TQ means that CCP must have felt there was some merit to introducing it to EVE independent of its technical value for WoD.

And if we weren't ever supposed to leave the CQ, that damn button wouldn't be there to mock us, nor would the door be so prominent.

Remote-repped your post.

All triteness aside for a second, seriously. It wasn't a VAST majority, and I dispute that it was a majority at all. Those protests attracted a few thousand players. Out of several hundred thousand subscriptions.

Most of the protestors weren't there because the idea of an ambulatory pod pilot terminally rustles their jimmies. They were there because of a combination of a leaked (ill-advised) company newsletter, shoddy execution of the content, wild misinterpretation and mob mentality. A fair few were there solely because they were Goons, and The Mittani said they should be there.

So please give this whole "vast majority don't want it" thing a rest. It's patently untrue: the vast majority is at most apathetic.

Yet another 8 months noobs pretending to lecture everyone about EVE and about events happened when he was still struggling in Stormwind.

Thats confusing, soooo about walking in stations, can we get some in next expansion?

That quoted post upthere was the cyno, Tippia should be materializing imo