These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Live Events Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Probably the WORST event I've wasted my time on in my 10 years of EVE ...

First post First post
Author
El Jin'meiko
Warcrows
THE OLD SCHOOL
#941 - 2013-11-11 14:47:02 UTC  |  Edited by: El Jin'meiko
Dracvlad wrote:

I don't see any reason why there cannot be a hisec based alliance that takes on null sec entities apart from the obvious issue of trusting others that are likely to be 0.0 spy accounts. You are correct in terms of the limited type of activities that hisec entities could do, however at a strategic level hisec players can now have a go at their moon mining with siphons, hisec players can setup bases in deep 0.0 (if CCP set up personal structures correctly) and from there roam and interdict to their hearts content. 0.0 is now vulnerable long term to destroying their renters and removing their moon income, and in any case you don't need capitals and supers if your entire intention is to stop them from making use of their space.

To be honest if it was not for the ease of spy accounts I would be trying to create this very type of alliance. But I know that its impossible, because all they have to do is get one person into your alliance and everything you try will fail.

In terms of caps, I am based in hisec mostly, but I have caps, not supers or Titans, but carriers and dreads, also one could look now at the BLOPS as a very effective way of doing things.

My own alliance is currently raiding into 0.0 and having a lot of fun as part of a coalition, basically keep it small and tight and you can keep it relatively secure against the 0.0 alliance plex based account spy system, and at times you can bring together a reaonable sized force to do things. If hisec players want to get back at 0.0 entities it is entirely possible and a lot of fun:



Lets be honest there are plenty of solo and small gang types that do, I've enjoyed roaming out from wh space and I have enjoyed flying with a few of the NPC 0.0 groups, all of which enjoy more challenging types of PvP without the need for CTA's, none of which want SOV, or want to take part in SOV. This is what nullsec blocs use to justify themselves as a 'powerful' entity, "If you want this space come and take it", most nullsec corps have moved around to wherever the grass is greener.

My opinion is only groups that want to build supers need move to SOV space, that and to inflate their leaders ego, truth is anyone who can play eve can rat in someone elses space and be fine and sure you'll get caught out by the occasional gate camp if you have no scout.
epicurus ataraxia
Illusion of Solitude.
Illusion of Solitude
#942 - 2013-11-11 14:48:03 UTC
Karynn Denton wrote:
epicurus ataraxia wrote:

No I have friends who deserve them.


Aren't they all leaving with you in a mass exodus?


Some are some are waiting a little longer to see how this plays out,We will see.

There is one EvE. Many people. Many lifestyles. WE are EvE

El Jin'meiko
Warcrows
THE OLD SCHOOL
#943 - 2013-11-11 14:51:48 UTC
CCP don't care, they'll only care when the the playerbase all slowly go inactive due to having no one to gang up on and act all superior to, or when they realize that superior content generation makes them far cooler than being "internet viking warrior nerds who drink a lot and find it 'cool' to bully people"
epicurus ataraxia
Illusion of Solitude.
Illusion of Solitude
#944 - 2013-11-11 14:57:35 UTC
El Jin'meiko wrote:
CCP don't care, they'll only care when the the playerbase all slowly go inactive due to having no one to gang up on and act all superior to, or when they realize that superior content generation makes them far cooler than being "internet viking warrior nerds who drink a lot and find it 'cool' to bully people"

After the Extinction level event, I wonder how long it took the dinosaurs to realise that all the prey had gone?

There is one EvE. Many people. Many lifestyles. WE are EvE

Killerjock
Von Neumann Industries
#945 - 2013-11-11 15:02:20 UTC
Dracvlad wrote:
I don't see any reason why there cannot be a hisec based alliance that takes on null sec entities apart from the obvious issue of trusting others that are likely to be 0.0 spy accounts. You are correct in terms of the limited type of activities that hisec entities could do, however at a strategic level hisec players can now have a go at their moon mining with siphons, hisec players can setup bases in deep 0.0 (if CCP set up personal structures correctly) and from there roam and interdict to their hearts content. 0.0 is now vulnerable long term to destroying their renters and removing their moon income, and in any case you don't need capitals and supers if your entire intention is to stop them from making use of their space.


There's a number of people here that need to understand that some - maybe most - of the people who are stably in hisec aren't there out of fear, or noobieness, or incapacity. Some certainly are, but others are there because that is the way they decided to play their game.

We pay a subscription to have access to the EVE galaxy; but each of us has a life outside the game and some of us have more time and energy to spend in it, others don't.

All nullsec blocs started in hisec. Every single one of those people has owned a rookieship in some 1.0 system. At a certain point - some sooner, some later - they took a ship to losec, and then to nullsec.
Everyone can do this if they really want to.
Why do some think everyone should wish to play the game the way they play it? EVE's a PVP game and all that - true, so what? The most valid reason why people do not move to nullsec is they do not want to.
Those who do want it, eventually move to WH, or to losec, or directly to null through renting or joining an alliance.

So the simple reason there's no hisec alliance organized enough to take on a nullsec alliance? Those who are, and are willing to, have moved out of hisec or are about to do so.
epicurus ataraxia
Illusion of Solitude.
Illusion of Solitude
#946 - 2013-11-11 15:09:54 UTC
Killerjock wrote:
Dracvlad wrote:
I don't see any reason why there cannot be a hisec based alliance that takes on null sec entities apart from the obvious issue of trusting others that are likely to be 0.0 spy accounts. You are correct in terms of the limited type of activities that hisec entities could do, however at a strategic level hisec players can now have a go at their moon mining with siphons, hisec players can setup bases in deep 0.0 (if CCP set up personal structures correctly) and from there roam and interdict to their hearts content. 0.0 is now vulnerable long term to destroying their renters and removing their moon income, and in any case you don't need capitals and supers if your entire intention is to stop them from making use of their space.


There's a number of people here that need to understand that some - maybe most - of the people who are stably in hisec aren't there out of fear, or noobieness, or incapacity. Some certainly are, but others are there because that is the way they decided to play their game.

We pay a subscription to have access to the EVE galaxy; but each of us has a life outside the game and some of us have more time and energy to spend in it, others don't.

All nullsec blocs started in hisec. Every single one of those people has owned a rookieship in some 1.0 system. At a certain point - some sooner, some later - they took a ship to losec, and then to nullsec.
Everyone can do this if they really want to.
Why do some think everyone should wish to play the game the way they play it? EVE's a PVP game and all that - true, so what? The most valid reason why people do not move to nullsec is they do not want to.
Those who do want it, eventually move to WH, or to losec, or directly to null through renting or joining an alliance.

So the simple reason there's no hisec alliance organized enough to take on a nullsec alliance? Those who are, and are willing to, have moved out of hisec or are about to do so.

Quite true,unfortunately there are those who think EVE is just PvP in blobs. Hisec to them is just a means of replacing or paying for their losses.
I play the game in more than HISEC but to be only in null would send me insane,not going to criticise but wow no thanks.
To me that is not the issue,but trying to force nullsec mentality on hisec? really? whoever thought up that idea and then making it very clear that the other players were something to be abused for some sick twisted joke or party favour needs a good sense of reality injected.
unfortunately the lack of response, where they have responded so quickly before, means they underestimated the rage it would cause.
I choose not to be abused.
End of story.

There is one EvE. Many people. Many lifestyles. WE are EvE

Maximus Aerelius
PROPHET OF ENIGMA
#947 - 2013-11-11 15:10:08 UTC  |  Edited by: Maximus Aerelius
epicurus ataraxia wrote:
Karynn Denton wrote:
epicurus ataraxia wrote:
No I have friends who deserve them.


Aren't they all leaving with you in a mass exodus?


Some are some are waiting a little longer to see how this plays out,We will see.


Or biding their time until their subscription runs out while in that time perhaps plotting how to scam, steal, spy, gank, disrupt and play the part of ebil piwate on the unsuspecting noobs who dwell in the NPC corps and who are on trial accounts. Perhaps some people are thinking of ways as disgusting as that which CCP have regarded them in that killing the children prevents them from becoming stronger in adulthood or in this case killing the trial accounts and noobs removes possible subscribers. I think we know that from the outset EVE Online is a very daunting place and you'll pay with cold hard cash until you find your niche that you can make enough to buy PLEX (I've personally only ever funded my accounts with cold hard cash and on yearly subscription but that wil certainly change if I choose to resubscribe) but if these ebil piwates start pwning noobs left right and center how many do you think will keep putting that cash to feed the machine that kills them?

On the flip side this would act as a Darwinian model of getting rid of the weak as this not only gives the noobs a sense of the reality of EVE Online but it also helps them to HTFU as that seems to really get them interested in Null Sec or PvP from what I've seen so far. The weak will leave and the strong will survive, if they are allowed to get that far. I wonder how many times you have to kill a noob before they just pack up and head of to play a console game? A challenge to the social experiement it could well be.

As for the Null Blocs, well, they'll keep PLEXing until there's no more PLEX and eventually no more CCP. With DUST514 being a F2P game I don't really see a revenue stream from that and WoD isn't released yet AFAIK.

Some people have been in this game from it's outset and have amassed stockpiles of ore, BPO's and components. For someone like this ship loss isn't really anything to worry about and they could even offer a SRP for those willing to participate. Now we know from James315 that CCP doesn't interfere in these kinds of tactics as all the Null Seccers will agree that this is "a sandbox".

Imagine this as a "Noobaggedon" if you will only it runs all year round until there are no more noobs to kill and those that are left pay through the roof for a PLEX of which the price has continued to rise until 1) There are no more PLEX 2) People spend all their time just trying to get the ISK for a PLEX until the first condition is met.

A bleak outlook that some may very well be considering as it is nearly the end of Monday and the working day and nothing from CCP has been heard not even a "We are sincerely sorry but we are still monitoring and are in discussions".
epicurus ataraxia
Illusion of Solitude.
Illusion of Solitude
#948 - 2013-11-11 15:22:27 UTC  |  Edited by: epicurus ataraxia
Maximus Aerelius wrote:
epicurus ataraxia wrote:
Karynn Denton wrote:
epicurus ataraxia wrote:
No I have friends who deserve them.


Aren't they all leaving with you in a mass exodus?


Some are some are waiting a little longer to see how this plays out,We will see.


Or biding their time until their subscription runs out while in that time perhaps plotting how to scam, steal, spy, gank, disrupt and play the part of ebil piwate on the unsuspecting noobs who dwell in the NPC corps and who are on trial accounts. Perhaps some people are thinking of ways as disgusting as that which CCP have regarded them in that killing the children prevents them from becoming stronger in adulthood or in this case killing the trial accounts and noobs removes possible subscribers. I think we know that from the outset EVE Online is a very daunting place and you'll pay with cold hard cash until you find your niche that you can make enough to buy PLEX (I've personally only ever funded my accounts with cold hard cash and on yearly subscription but that wil certainly change if I choose to resubscribe) but if these ebit piwates start pwning noobs left right and center how many do you think will keep putting that cash to feed the machine that kills them?

On the flip side this would act as a Darwinian model of getting rid of the weak as this not only gives the noobs a sense of the reality of EVE Online but it also helps them to HTFU as that seems to really get them interested in Null Sec or PvP from what I've seen so far. The weak will leave and the strong will survive, if they are allowed to get that far. I wonder how many times you have to kill a noob before they just pack up and head of to play a console game? A challenge to the social experiement it could well be.

As for the Null Blocs, well, they'll keep PLEXing until there's no more PLEX and eventually no more CCP. With DUST514 being a F2P game I don't really see a revenue stream from that and WoD isn't released yet AFAIK.

Some people have been in this game from it's outset and have amassed stockpiles of ore, BPO's and components. For someone like this ship loss isn't really anything to worry about and they could even offer a SRP for those willing to participate. Now we know from James315 that CCP doesn't interfere in these kinds of tactics as all the Null Seccers will agree that this is "a sandbox".

Imagine this as a "Noobaggedon" if you will only it runs all year round until there are no more noobs to kill and those that are left pay through the roof for a PLEX of which the price has continued to rise until 1) There are no more PLEX 2) People spend all their time just trying to get the ISK for a PLEX until the first condition is met.

A bleak outlook that some may very well be considering as it is nearly the end of Monday and the working day and nothing from CCP has been heard not even a "We are sincerely sorry but we are still monitoring and are in discussions".



Nice article,
Unfortunately It was not just noobageddon it was the entire customer base apart from a favoured group that were abused, because abuse it was,ccp had plenty of time to explain whether this was intentional.
They have not.
Not even a holding post
the nearest thing was a post, concerning us not understanding, they mean we didn't understand how the mechanism for humiliating us could have been more efficiently done?
silence means assent.
A darwinian model of a prey/predator relationship only applies if the customers regarded as prey continue to hang around to be abused.
CCP have no place playing the predator.
Good luck to them bringing in more prey after this.

There is one EvE. Many people. Many lifestyles. WE are EvE

Maximus Aerelius
PROPHET OF ENIGMA
#949 - 2013-11-11 15:42:06 UTC
epicurus ataraxia wrote:

You've completely misread my post my friend. Go back and re-read it. I think I've been one of the most active people against what happened on 07-11 and holding CCP to account so I'm completely with you.
Octoven
Stellar Production
#950 - 2013-11-11 15:44:08 UTC  |  Edited by: Octoven
Killerjock wrote:
Dracvlad wrote:
I don't see any reason why there cannot be a hisec based alliance that takes on null sec entities apart from the obvious issue of trusting others that are likely to be 0.0 spy accounts. You are correct in terms of the limited type of activities that hisec entities could do, however at a strategic level hisec players can now have a go at their moon mining with siphons, hisec players can setup bases in deep 0.0 (if CCP set up personal structures correctly) and from there roam and interdict to their hearts content. 0.0 is now vulnerable long term to destroying their renters and removing their moon income, and in any case you don't need capitals and supers if your entire intention is to stop them from making use of their space.


There's a number of people here that need to understand that some - maybe most - of the people who are stably in hisec aren't there out of fear, or noobieness, or incapacity. Some certainly are, but others are there because that is the way they decided to play their game.

We pay a subscription to have access to the EVE galaxy; but each of us has a life outside the game and some of us have more time and energy to spend in it, others don't.

All nullsec blocs started in hisec. Every single one of those people has owned a rookieship in some 1.0 system. At a certain point - some sooner, some later - they took a ship to losec, and then to nullsec.
Everyone can do this if they really want to.
Why do some think everyone should wish to play the game the way they play it? EVE's a PVP game and all that - true, so what? The most valid reason why people do not move to nullsec is they do not want to.
Those who do want it, eventually move to WH, or to losec, or directly to null through renting or joining an alliance.

So the simple reason there's no hisec alliance organized enough to take on a nullsec alliance? Those who are, and are willing to, have moved out of hisec or are about to do so.


Generally most players in high sec are not there because they joined the game and decided I do not want to move here or there, nor are they afraid of going to null. Typically it has been more about playing commitment. High sec is a very appealing area for those who like small casual play styles.

- No sov to worry about holding
- No need to defend your space
- Less attention needed to do activities, thus allowing you to multi-task
- No bubbles or bombs to slow down your playing
- Access to major trade hubs allowing trading and market play
- Level 4 missions
- Helping or assisting newer players
- Access to lore

These are the things that appeals to high sec players, null sec requires a more intense approach to playing and limits the factors that appeals to casual game play. Not all null space is this way, and fortunately recently has become less like it as well. CCP is focusing more toward small scale game play. We can see this with the mobile structures for instance. Giving players the ability to poke each other in the eye and get under each other's skin.

I would say that high sec players are more relaxed and tend to play more casually with less impact on the choices they make. Null sec players like that. It certainly has nothing to do with fear of the space...just the type of game play played. This is why people often shift around between high, low, null, and wh depending on how often and how much energy they wish to put into the game.
Maximus Aerelius
PROPHET OF ENIGMA
#951 - 2013-11-11 15:50:48 UTC
Octoven wrote:
Killerjock wrote:
Dracvlad wrote:
I don't see any reason why there cannot be a hisec based alliance that takes on null sec entities apart from the obvious issue of trusting others that are likely to be 0.0 spy accounts. You are correct in terms of the limited type of activities that hisec entities could do, however at a strategic level hisec players can now have a go at their moon mining with siphons, hisec players can setup bases in deep 0.0 (if CCP set up personal structures correctly) and from there roam and interdict to their hearts content. 0.0 is now vulnerable long term to destroying their renters and removing their moon income, and in any case you don't need capitals and supers if your entire intention is to stop them from making use of their space.


There's a number of people here that need to understand that some - maybe most - of the people who are stably in hisec aren't there out of fear, or noobieness, or incapacity. Some certainly are, but others are there because that is the way they decided to play their game.

We pay a subscription to have access to the EVE galaxy; but each of us has a life outside the game and some of us have more time and energy to spend in it, others don't.

All nullsec blocs started in hisec. Every single one of those people has owned a rookieship in some 1.0 system. At a certain point - some sooner, some later - they took a ship to losec, and then to nullsec.
Everyone can do this if they really want to.
Why do some think everyone should wish to play the game the way they play it? EVE's a PVP game and all that - true, so what? The most valid reason why people do not move to nullsec is they do not want to.
Those who do want it, eventually move to WH, or to losec, or directly to null through renting or joining an alliance.

So the simple reason there's no hisec alliance organized enough to take on a nullsec alliance? Those who are, and are willing to, have moved out of hisec or are about to do so.


Generally most players in high sec are not there because they joined the game and decided I do not want to move here or there, nor are they afraid of going to null. Typically it has been more about playing commitment. High sec is a very appealing area for those who like small casual play styles.

- No sov to worry about holding
- No need to defend your space
- Less attention needed to do activities, thus allowing you to multi-task
- No bubbles or bombs to slow down your playing
- Access to major trade hubs allowing trading and market play
- Level 4 missions
- Helping or assisting newer players
- Access to lore

These are the things that appeals to high sec players, null sec requires a more intense approach to playing and limits the factors that appeals to social game play. Not all null space is this way, and fortunately recently has become less like it as well. CCP is focusing more toward small scale game play. We can see this with the mobile structures for instance. Giving players the ability to poke each other in the eye and get under each other's skin.

I would say that high sec players are more relaxed and tend to play more casually with less impact on the choices they make. Null sec players like that. It certainly has nothing to do with fear of the space...just the type of game play played. This is why people often shift around between high, low, null, and wh depending on how often and how much energy they wish to put into the game.


Some of your comments I have disagreed with but I fully commend you for understanding the above and applaud the clear description.
epicurus ataraxia
Illusion of Solitude.
Illusion of Solitude
#952 - 2013-11-11 15:55:25 UTC  |  Edited by: epicurus ataraxia
Maximus Aerelius wrote:
epicurus ataraxia wrote:

You've completely misread my post my friend. Go back and re-read it. I think I've been one of the most active people against what happened on 07-11 and holding CCP to account so I'm completely with you.



Ok got itSmile initial brain freeze sorry

There is one EvE. Many people. Many lifestyles. WE are EvE

Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
Astral Alliance
#953 - 2013-11-11 16:25:32 UTC  |  Edited by: Dracvlad
Octoven wrote:
Killerjock wrote:
Dracvlad wrote:
I don't see any reason why there cannot be a hisec based alliance that takes on null sec entities apart from the obvious issue of trusting others that are likely to be 0.0 spy accounts. You are correct in terms of the limited type of activities that hisec entities could do, however at a strategic level hisec players can now have a go at their moon mining with siphons, hisec players can setup bases in deep 0.0 (if CCP set up personal structures correctly) and from there roam and interdict to their hearts content. 0.0 is now vulnerable long term to destroying their renters and removing their moon income, and in any case you don't need capitals and supers if your entire intention is to stop them from making use of their space.


There's a number of people here that need to understand that some - maybe most - of the people who are stably in hisec aren't there out of fear, or noobieness, or incapacity. Some certainly are, but others are there because that is the way they decided to play their game.

We pay a subscription to have access to the EVE galaxy; but each of us has a life outside the game and some of us have more time and energy to spend in it, others don't.

All nullsec blocs started in hisec. Every single one of those people has owned a rookieship in some 1.0 system. At a certain point - some sooner, some later - they took a ship to losec, and then to nullsec.
Everyone can do this if they really want to.
Why do some think everyone should wish to play the game the way they play it? EVE's a PVP game and all that - true, so what? The most valid reason why people do not move to nullsec is they do not want to.
Those who do want it, eventually move to WH, or to losec, or directly to null through renting or joining an alliance.

So the simple reason there's no hisec alliance organized enough to take on a nullsec alliance? Those who are, and are willing to, have moved out of hisec or are about to do so.


Generally most players in high sec are not there because they joined the game and decided I do not want to move here or there, nor are they afraid of going to null. Typically it has been more about playing commitment. High sec is a very appealing area for those who like small casual play styles.

- No sov to worry about holding
- No need to defend your space
- Less attention needed to do activities, thus allowing you to multi-task
- No bubbles or bombs to slow down your playing
- Access to major trade hubs allowing trading and market play
- Level 4 missions
- Helping or assisting newer players
- Access to lore

These are the things that appeals to high sec players, null sec requires a more intense approach to playing and limits the factors that appeals to casual game play. Not all null space is this way, and fortunately recently has become less like it as well. CCP is focusing more toward small scale game play. We can see this with the mobile structures for instance. Giving players the ability to poke each other in the eye and get under each other's skin.

I would say that high sec players are more relaxed and tend to play more casually with less impact on the choices they make. Null sec players like that. It certainly has nothing to do with fear of the space...just the type of game play played. This is why people often shift around between high, low, null, and wh depending on how often and how much energy they wish to put into the game.


I agree with you, in fact the only reason I am still playing is the siphons and the personal structures, I was just about to close my accounts and then read the update and thought hmm interesting!

In terms of this event, I think its sad to see that CCP has still not reacted to it and I think that will result in lost accounts, its highly possible they are having a indepth debrief and checking logs, but then again they may not. The silence is rather worrying for those that were very upset by this, CCP has definately take their eye off the ball here.

When the going gets tough the Gankers get their CSM rep to change mechanics in their favour.

Blocked: Teckos Pech, Sonya Corvinus, baltec1, Shae Tadaruwa, Wander Prian, Daichi Yamato, Jonah Gravenstein, Merin Ryskin, Linus Gorp

Halaxi
Mind Games.
Suddenly Spaceships.
#954 - 2013-11-11 16:53:39 UTC
Dracvlad wrote:

In terms of this event, I think its sad to see that CCP has still not reacted to it and I think that will result in lost accounts, its highly possible they are having a indepth debrief and checking logs, but then again they may not. The silence is rather worrying for those that were very upset by this, CCP has definately take their eye off the ball here.


The live events team and others are probably having a proper debrief, as you've said. If you are wanting a proper response, give them time to do so.

Also, consider this. Yes the TiDi was ****, and travelling many jumps through it was ****, and getting massacred at the end was, you guessed it, ****, just pause for a minute. You could have stopped travelling after the first couple of 10% TiDi jumps, you could have given up before you jumped into lowsec, and before you jumped into null, and you could have went and did something else.

I'm not excusing the fact that you were led through an experience that left you disatisfied, and could have been planned better (my earlier posts agree that you Empire folks had a poorer time of it), but just take the time to realise that you could have gotten off the failtrain and did something else. There is a bit of personal responsability that you have to take here.

Of course, it will be a minor miracle if the rabblerabble brigade realises this rather than sperging, but you never know.

Hal.
Why yes, yes I am going to shoot you.
Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
Astral Alliance
#955 - 2013-11-11 17:01:41 UTC  |  Edited by: Dracvlad
Halaxi wrote:
Dracvlad wrote:

In terms of this event, I think its sad to see that CCP has still not reacted to it and I think that will result in lost accounts, its highly possible they are having a indepth debrief and checking logs, but then again they may not. The silence is rather worrying for those that were very upset by this, CCP has definately take their eye off the ball here.


The live events team and others are probably having a proper debrief, as you've said. If you are wanting a proper response, give them time to do so.

Also, consider this. Yes the TiDi was ****, and travelling many jumps through it was ****, and getting massacred at the end was, you guessed it, ****, just pause for a minute. You could have stopped travelling after the first couple of 10% TiDi jumps, you could have given up before you jumped into lowsec, and before you jumped into null, and you could have went and did something else.

I'm not excusing the fact that you were led through an experience that left you disatisfied, and could have been planned better (my earlier posts agree that you Empire folks had a poorer time of it), but just take the time to realise that you could have gotten off the failtrain and did something else. There is a bit of personal responsability that you have to take here.

Of course, it will be a minor miracle if the rabblerabble brigade realises this rather than sperging, but you never know.

Hal.


First of all I am not quitting Eve because of this, also I did not go, I expected a lagfest and that was my reason not to go, one of my corpmates did go however and gave me a detailed run down of what was going on.

I think you don't get it like so many other 0.0 focussed players, the hisec players knew they would lose their ships, no issue for them, but you say they should have gotten off the failtrain and it was their fault for doing that, well perhaps some of them wanted to complete and be part of this event and was not going to let TiDi stop them, just like 0.0 players continue to fight in heavy Tidi, hell they could log there too, but they don't. They wanted to complete and be part of that event and I have respect for those that tried to inspite of the mess that the event turned into, they had every right to expect better...

When the going gets tough the Gankers get their CSM rep to change mechanics in their favour.

Blocked: Teckos Pech, Sonya Corvinus, baltec1, Shae Tadaruwa, Wander Prian, Daichi Yamato, Jonah Gravenstein, Merin Ryskin, Linus Gorp

Rekkr Nordgard
Steelforge Heavy Industries
#956 - 2013-11-11 17:03:21 UTC
Halaxi wrote:
Dracvlad wrote:

In terms of this event, I think its sad to see that CCP has still not reacted to it and I think that will result in lost accounts, its highly possible they are having a indepth debrief and checking logs, but then again they may not. The silence is rather worrying for those that were very upset by this, CCP has definately take their eye off the ball here.


The live events team and others are probably having a proper debrief, as you've said. If you are wanting a proper response, give them time to do so.

Also, consider this. Yes the TiDi was ****, and travelling many jumps through it was ****, and getting massacred at the end was, you guessed it, ****, just pause for a minute. You could have stopped travelling after the first couple of 10% TiDi jumps, you could have given up before you jumped into lowsec, and before you jumped into null, and you could have went and did something else.

I'm not excusing the fact that you were led through an experience that left you disatisfied, and could have been planned better (my earlier posts agree that you Empire folks had a poorer time of it), but just take the time to realise that you could have gotten off the failtrain and did something else. There is a bit of personal responsability that you have to take here.

Of course, it will be a minor miracle if the rabblerabble brigade realises this rather than sperging, but you never know.

Hal.



"You could have had a much better time with the live event by not participating in the live event"

Is that really the best defense of this you could come up with?
Maximus Aerelius
PROPHET OF ENIGMA
#957 - 2013-11-11 17:05:41 UTC
Halaxi wrote:
Dracvlad wrote:

In terms of this event, I think its sad to see that CCP has still not reacted to it and I think that will result in lost accounts, its highly possible they are having a indepth debrief and checking logs, but then again they may not. The silence is rather worrying for those that were very upset by this, CCP has definately take their eye off the ball here.


The live events team and others are probably having a proper debrief, as you've said. If you are wanting a proper response, give them time to do so.

Also, consider this. Yes the TiDi was ****, and travelling many jumps through it was ****, and getting massacred at the end was, you guessed it, ****, just pause for a minute. You could have stopped travelling after the first couple of 10% TiDi jumps, you could have given up before you jumped into lowsec, and before you jumped into null, and you could have went and did something else.

I'm not excusing the fact that you were led through an experience that left you disatisfied, and could have been planned better (my earlier posts agree that you Empire folks had a poorer time of it), but just take the time to realise that you could have gotten off the failtrain and did something else. There is a bit of personal responsability that you have to take here.

Of course, it will be a minor miracle if the rabblerabble brigade realises this rather than sperging, but you never know.

Hal.


While I appreciate what you are saying I believe that "rabblerabble brigade" AKA paying customers and those with legitimate concerns regarding not only this even but also the aftermath have the right to question the very people who missold this event to them.

Further to the above people spent their RL time (even taking time of work so they could participate) jumping through that 10% TiDi in the hope to add content, experience something unique and make it to the destination to participate not to have CCP end the event by blowing the objective before most of the fleets had arrived.

It seems that CCP may very well just be spending all their time on the most recent scandal rather than addressing this one or they be in heavy debriefing sessions. No response on here or Twitter (OFC as this is the new official communications for EVE Online). Those that want to view the latest and what "Customer Support over the course of the weekend" re-investigated while we are still awaiting a further update response view this. It may amuse you while you wait another day or so

Nice Job CCP. Now Can We All Get 17m Free Skillpoints Also?
Constantin Baracca
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#958 - 2013-11-11 17:12:31 UTC
Maximus Aerelius wrote:
Halaxi wrote:
Dracvlad wrote:

In terms of this event, I think its sad to see that CCP has still not reacted to it and I think that will result in lost accounts, its highly possible they are having a indepth debrief and checking logs, but then again they may not. The silence is rather worrying for those that were very upset by this, CCP has definately take their eye off the ball here.


The live events team and others are probably having a proper debrief, as you've said. If you are wanting a proper response, give them time to do so.

Also, consider this. Yes the TiDi was ****, and travelling many jumps through it was ****, and getting massacred at the end was, you guessed it, ****, just pause for a minute. You could have stopped travelling after the first couple of 10% TiDi jumps, you could have given up before you jumped into lowsec, and before you jumped into null, and you could have went and did something else.

I'm not excusing the fact that you were led through an experience that left you disatisfied, and could have been planned better (my earlier posts agree that you Empire folks had a poorer time of it), but just take the time to realise that you could have gotten off the failtrain and did something else. There is a bit of personal responsability that you have to take here.

Of course, it will be a minor miracle if the rabblerabble brigade realises this rather than sperging, but you never know.

Hal.


While I appreciate what you are saying I believe that "rabblerabble brigade" AKA paying customers and those with legitimate concerns regarding not only this even but also the aftermath have the right to question the very people who missold this event to them.

Further to the above people spent their RL time (even taking time of work so they could participate) jumping through that 10% TiDi in the hope to add content, experience something unique and make it to the destination to participate not to have CCP end the event by blowing the objective before most of the fleets had arrived.

It seems that CCP may very well just be spending all their time on the most recent scandal rather than addressing this one or they be in heavy debriefing sessions. No response on here or Twitter (OFC as this is the new official communications for EVE Online). Those that want to view the latest and what "Customer Support over the course of the weekend" re-investigated while we are still awaiting a further update response view this. It may amuse you while you wait another day or so

Nice Job CCP. Now Can We All Get 17m Free Skillpoints Also?


Wait.... they took care of this in the interim? With this flamethread going on? There are people who don't even play EVE that have been getting in touch with me to hear what a complete mess this event was, and they took care of that?

That's hard to believe.

"What good will it be for someone to gain the whole world, yet forfeit their soul? Or what can anyone give in exchange for their soul?"

-Matthew 16:26

Anna Karhunen
Inoue INEXP
#959 - 2013-11-11 17:20:15 UTC
Constantin Baracca wrote:


Wait.... they took care of this in the interim? With this flamethread going on? There are people who don't even play EVE that have been getting in touch with me to hear what a complete mess this event was, and they took care of that?

That's hard to believe.

Maybe Erotica1 has doubled one of the Devs' ISK.

As my old maths teacher used to say: "Statistics are like bikinis: It's what they don't show that's interesting". -CCP Aporia

epicurus ataraxia
Illusion of Solitude.
Illusion of Solitude
#960 - 2013-11-11 17:49:57 UTC
Anna Karhunen wrote:
Constantin Baracca wrote:


Wait.... they took care of this in the interim? With this flamethread going on? There are people who don't even play EVE that have been getting in touch with me to hear what a complete mess this event was, and they took care of that?

That's hard to believe.

Maybe Erotica1 has doubled one of the Devs' ISK.

What did they have to do to win the bonus round? No wait.....Shocked

There is one EvE. Many people. Many lifestyles. WE are EvE