These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Golum before and after Rubicon
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Flashbang Thereal
S0utherN Comfort
#1 - 2013-09-30 10:55:16 UTC
Ok, so let me get this straight. The maruders wil get their own little siege module. Is that right?

So they wil basicly become like some sort of mini dread?

Sounds interesting in terms of pvp over soverignety/poskilling etc. Cheaper to bridge into warzone, cheaper to loose. If the price dont jump out of controll like its likely to do right after patch release.

I have been thinking about skilling up to a golum for some time now. For anomaly ratting and stuff like that to make isk. But have not got around to it yet.

Is it any good for making isk the way it is now? And how wil rubicon effect that? Wil it become bether? Worse? Anyone know?
Rengerel en Distel
#2 - 2013-09-30 11:04:33 UTC
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=273500&find=unread

There's a 200 page thread for you to have all your questions answered. Fixing your spelling ... you're on your own.

With the increase in shiptoasting, the Report timer needs to be shortened.
Flashbang Thereal
S0utherN Comfort
#3 - 2013-09-30 11:47:19 UTC
Rengerel en Distel wrote:
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=273500&find=unread

There's a 200 page thread for you to have all your qons answered. Fixing your spelling ... you're on your own.


Did it make you feel good to point out my bad spelling.
No need for innsults for my spelling. I am aware of my bad spelling due to the fact that my native language are far from english.

If you dont want to answer my questions i do not see any point of clicking reply on this tread.
Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
#4 - 2013-09-30 12:04:45 UTC
Flashbang Thereal wrote:
Rengerel en Distel wrote:
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=273500&find=unread

There's a 200 page thread for you to have all your qons answered. Fixing your spelling ... you're on your own.


Did it make you feel good to point out my bad spelling.
No need for innsults for my spelling. I am aware of my bad spelling due to the fact that my native language are far from english.

If you dont want to answer my questions i do not see any point of clicking reply on this tread.



Don't feel bad. He's just like that.

"He has mounted his hind-legs, and blown crass vapidities through the bowel of his neck."  - Ambrose Bierce on Oscar Wilde's Lecture in San Francisco 1882
Clue 3K
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#5 - 2013-09-30 12:09:33 UTC
Flashbang Thereal wrote:
Rengerel en Distel wrote:
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=273500&find=unread

There's a 200 page thread for you to have all your qons answered. Fixing your spelling ... you're on your own.


Did it make you feel good to point out my bad spelling.
No need for innsults for my spelling. I am aware of my bad spelling due to the fact that my native language are far from english.

If you dont want to answer my questions i do not see any point of clicking reply on this tread.

Seems he did answer it by giving you a link to a post that was started way before yours.. 
I'm only on this because my main, Tron 3K, is banned till 9/30/2013! Don't give me any likes!
Silvetica Dian
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#6 - 2013-09-30 12:25:50 UTC
the new version is still up in the air due to CCP going deaf in that thread due to the shouting.
Whatever they finally decide it looks like the new version will be better than the old version.
Hopefully they give only 1 ewar component to each hull as Golem having a web bonus as well as a painter bonus makes no sense. Maybe giving the web bonus to 2 hulls and the paint bonus to 2 hull is the way or at least making the web bonus to range on the golem. idk.
but OP the new ship will be better and more versatile with the bastion mode and the bonus to MJD frequency. you will not be disappoint.

Money at its root is a form of rationing. When the richest 85 people have as much wealth as the poorest 3.5 billion (50% of humanity) it is clear where the source of poverty is. http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/jan/20/trickle-down-economics-broken-promise-richest-85
Bernie Nator
Seal Club Six
Plug N Play
#7 - 2013-09-30 12:59:58 UTC
I imagine he'll add an l into the middle of his name and keep searching for the one ring.
Solstice Project
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#8 - 2013-09-30 14:08:40 UTC  |  Edited by: Solstice Project
Bad spelling, because it's not the native language is one thing...
...but spelling names wrong is a completely different one.
Gel Musana
LOL a Sticky Situation
#9 - 2013-09-30 18:45:19 UTC
Silvetica Dian wrote:
the new version is still up in the air due to CCP going deaf in that thread due to the shouting.
Whatever they finally decide it looks like the new version will be better than the old version.
Hopefully they give only 1 ewar component to each hull as Golem having a web bonus as well as a painter bonus makes no sense. Maybe giving the web bonus to 2 hulls and the paint bonus to 2 hull is the way or at least making the web bonus to range on the golem. idk.
but OP the new ship will be better and more versatile with the bastion mode and the bonus to MJD frequency. you will not be disappoint.


Maybe after that marauders will be worthless for missioning... I am trying to remain positive and hope for the best.

Ideology  s-h-i-t  list https://gate.eveonline.com/Profile/Gel%20Musana
Archa4 Badasaz
Vangazhi
#10 - 2013-09-30 19:19:39 UTC
Update
is the latest update.
Problem I have - My Golem becomes slower, less agile and has smaller drone bay. And i Gain, basically, range on torps.
Zimmy Zeta
Perkone
Caldari State
#11 - 2013-09-30 20:02:57 UTC  |  Edited by: Zimmy Zeta
The question is: will the missile bonus of the new Golem be extended to include the new Rapid Heavy Missile Launchers that will be introduced in Rubicon?

Because that would be quite interesting.

I'd like to apologize for the poor quality of the post above and sincerely hope you didn't waste your time reading it. Yes, I do feel bad about it.
Solhild
Doomheim
#12 - 2013-09-30 20:22:05 UTC
Solstice Project wrote:
Bad spelling, because it's not the native language is one thing...
...but spelling names wrong is a completely different one.


And Golem isn't an English word so the excuse doesn't work anyway!
John Holt
State War Academy
Caldari State
#13 - 2013-09-30 21:33:23 UTC
Archa4 Badasaz wrote:
Update
is the latest update.
Problem I have - My Golem becomes slower, less agile and has smaller drone bay. And i Gain, basically, range on torps.



You also lose the shield boost bonus. Don't forget that one.

Done my time in null sec, now I'm just a Privateer wandering around High and Low Sec.
Zaxix
State War Academy
Caldari State
#14 - 2013-09-30 22:14:47 UTC
Solhild wrote:
Solstice Project wrote:
Bad spelling, because it's not the native language is one thing...
...but spelling names wrong is a completely different one.


And Golem isn't an English word so the excuse doesn't work anyway!

And the ship name is prominently displayed in the game, so it really doesn't matter what language it's in. Reading and paying attention is hard.

Bokononist

 
None ofthe Above
#15 - 2013-09-30 22:58:17 UTC
My precious ... marauder?

The only end-game content in EVE Online is the crap that makes you rage quit.
Flashbang Thereal
S0utherN Comfort
#16 - 2013-10-01 08:07:22 UTC
I shure hope it wil stay good enough for ratting. Becouse eventough my tengau <------ see what i did there spellcheckers??
is maxed out. It just aint clearing those anomalies quick enough to come anywhere near what i can make with my archon. And using archon is really not an option where i am atm. Takes to long to replace if i get hotdroped.
baltec1
Bat Country
The Initiative.
#17 - 2013-10-01 08:12:21 UTC
Oh good they fixed it again.
Barrogh Habalu
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#18 - 2013-10-01 10:16:06 UTC
John Holt wrote:
You also lose the shield boost bonus. Don't forget that one.

This was reverted for now, back to 1.0 version of proposition.

Now OP go and read the first post in that F&I thread, would be faster than posting new threads here.

Future of T3 cruisers - multi-tool they aspired to be instead of sledgehammer they have become