These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

Transitioning from CareBear to Killer

First post
Author
Nikk Narrel
Moonlit Bonsai
#21 - 2013-08-15 18:14:22 UTC
Omnathious Deninard wrote:
ISD Gallifreyan wrote:
While I do not believe either of these proposals have much value from balance perspective, I cannot lock it for any rules violations.

So you send it to F&I to die.

F&I.... AH

Welcome, to Fantasy Island!

Smiles everyone, smiles!

(waves to musicians and dancing girls to begin performing)

And what wishes can we make come true for you, our new guests ...?
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen
Doomheim
#22 - 2013-08-15 18:17:59 UTC
Omnathious Deninard wrote:
ISD Gallifreyan wrote:
While I do not believe either of these proposals have much value from balance perspective, I cannot lock it for any rules violations.

So you send it to F&I to die.


I am glad to be informed that its an ISD's role to measure the value of proposals on game balance, but have the dev's been notified of this?

I wonder though, can there be a feature added to the site to allow members to register disdain for moving threads critical of CCP to sub threads to die, or should just the +1 button be used here to do so?
ISD Gallifreyan
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
ISD Alliance
#23 - 2013-08-15 18:25:20 UTC
We follow the rules.
This is the section for this discussion.

If it has merit, the Devs will see it here.

Please make your argument supporting where these proposed ideas are balanced for all players.

ISD Gallifreyan

Lt. Commander

Community Communication Liaisons (CCL)

Interstellar Services Department

Wingmate
Perkone
Caldari State
#24 - 2013-08-15 18:29:11 UTC
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen wrote:
Wingmate wrote:
i love it when moron scrubs say they want to make eve go 'back to its roots' by making the game easier for their playstyle (irony number 1), ignoring the fact that removing traders/manufacturers/miners from the game just means that item prices will go through the damned roof (irony number 2).

While I fully understand the psychosis that accompanies a scrub which can only get kills whoring off of blobs of 10+ players or more in size trying to enhance their e-peen by spuriously bashing others with red herring arguments...

...please do try to keep this thread at the level of excellence we have all come to expect from an EVEO forum discussion.

Now, no one suggested removing traders/manufacturers/miners/your mother from EvE. Said parties enjoyed high success prior to the numerous hisec nerfs mentioned in the blog being made. A return to previous-to-nerf state will not 'kill EVE' as you hyperbole. Barring other changes like forced periodic undocks, can we not at least agree on rolling back the nerfs mentioned here?


i was referring to the idea of auto-undocks when i was talking about driving miners, industrialists, and the like out of the game.

i make spreadsheets for pretty cheap. contact me for more info.

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=197433

Maximus Aerelius
PROPHET OF ENIGMA
#25 - 2013-08-15 18:40:34 UTC  |  Edited by: Maximus Aerelius
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen wrote:
Omnathious Deninard wrote:
ISD Gallifreyan wrote:
While I do not believe either of these proposals have much value from balance perspective, I cannot lock it for any rules violations.

So you send it to F&I to die.


I am glad to be informed that its an ISD's role to measure the value of proposals on game balance, but have the dev's been notified of this?

I wonder though, can there be a feature added to the site to allow members to register disdain for moving threads critical of CCP to sub threads to die, or should just the +1 button be used here to do so?


Leave ISD alone FFS. They have a hell of a job to do monitoring all those "NERF CLOAKYS" threads for trolls and have rules and guides.

On Topic: The "Cannot Leave Corp During War Dec" is a catch 22:

Say you didn't want the war and couldn't get out of your Corp...you're stuck. What if your Corp is in perpetuals\multiple wars? Stuck forever? And people will unsub and EVE will die. I don;t want that but I agree jumping out during War Decs to avoid them needs to be looked at. Maybe a 30 days from War Dec Start till you can leave or something? I don't know.
Nikk Narrel
Moonlit Bonsai
#26 - 2013-08-15 18:47:30 UTC
Maximus Aerelius wrote:
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen wrote:
Omnathious Deninard wrote:
ISD Gallifreyan wrote:
While I do not believe either of these proposals have much value from balance perspective, I cannot lock it for any rules violations.

So you send it to F&I to die.


I am glad to be informed that its an ISD's role to measure the value of proposals on game balance, but have the dev's been notified of this?

I wonder though, can there be a feature added to the site to allow members to register disdain for moving threads critical of CCP to sub threads to die, or should just the +1 button be used here to do so?


Leave ISD alone FFS. They have a hell of a job to do monitoring all those "NERF CLOAKYS" threads for trolls and have rules and guides.

On Topic: The "Cannot Leave Corp During War Dec" is a catch 22:

Say you didn't want the war and couldn't get out of your Corp...you're stuck. What if your Corp is in perpetuals\multiple wars? Stuck forever? And people will unsub and EVE will die. I don;t want that but I agree jumping out during War Decs to avoid them needs to be looked at. Maybe a 30 days from War Dec Start till you can leave or something? I don't know.

I would say put on a timer, maybe for 24 hours, where you are still flagged as being in the corp for hostiles to shoot at.
ISD Gallifreyan
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
ISD Alliance
#27 - 2013-08-15 18:48:47 UTC  |  Edited by: ISD Gallifreyan
I have no distain for moving threads I don't like.
I do not think this is an Anti-CCP thread.

I do think the idea is borderline Trolling

Quote:
5. Trolling is prohibited.

Trolling is a defined as a post that is deliberately designed for the purpose of angering and insulting other players in an attempt to incite retaliation or an emotional response. Posts of this nature are disruptive, often abusive and do not contribute to the sense of community that CCP promote.

However I do not think that is the spirit of the suggestion so I have not locked it, so as to allow further discussion as a balanced Moderator.

Please continue to support your Suggestion.

ISD Gallifreyan

Lt. Commander

Community Communication Liaisons (CCL)

Interstellar Services Department

Maximus Aerelius
PROPHET OF ENIGMA
#28 - 2013-08-15 18:58:10 UTC
Nikk Narrel wrote:
Maximus Aerelius wrote:
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen wrote:
Omnathious Deninard wrote:
ISD Gallifreyan wrote:
While I do not believe either of these proposals have much value from balance perspective, I cannot lock it for any rules violations.

So you send it to F&I to die.


I am glad to be informed that its an ISD's role to measure the value of proposals on game balance, but have the dev's been notified of this?

I wonder though, can there be a feature added to the site to allow members to register disdain for moving threads critical of CCP to sub threads to die, or should just the +1 button be used here to do so?


Leave ISD alone FFS. They have a hell of a job to do monitoring all those "NERF CLOAKYS" threads for trolls and have rules and guides.

On Topic: The "Cannot Leave Corp During War Dec" is a catch 22:

Say you didn't want the war and couldn't get out of your Corp...you're stuck. What if your Corp is in perpetuals\multiple wars? Stuck forever? And people will unsub and EVE will die. I don;t want that but I agree jumping out during War Decs to avoid them needs to be looked at. Maybe a 30 days from War Dec Start till you can leave or something? I don't know.

I would say put on a timer, maybe for 24 hours, where you are still flagged as being in the corp for hostiles to shoot at.


What about 72hrs Nikk just to give a bit more ummppf?
Nikk Narrel
Moonlit Bonsai
#29 - 2013-08-15 19:03:46 UTC
Maximus Aerelius wrote:
Nikk Narrel wrote:
Maximus Aerelius wrote:
Leave ISD alone FFS. They have a hell of a job to do monitoring all those "NERF CLOAKYS" threads for trolls and have rules and guides.

On Topic: The "Cannot Leave Corp During War Dec" is a catch 22:

Say you didn't want the war and couldn't get out of your Corp...you're stuck. What if your Corp is in perpetuals\multiple wars? Stuck forever? And people will unsub and EVE will die. I don;t want that but I agree jumping out during War Decs to avoid them needs to be looked at. Maybe a 30 days from War Dec Start till you can leave or something? I don't know.

I would say put on a timer, maybe for 24 hours, where you are still flagged as being in the corp for hostiles to shoot at.


What about 72hrs Nikk just to give a bit more ummppf?

That sounds reasonable.

Any longer than that, and I would be concerned over collateral effects to pilots simply wanting to leave, but with bad timing.

Also, I would qualify, that if they had dropped roles in preparation to leave before the war was declared, they be exempt by virtue of clear intent to leave pre-existing the possible motive of avoiding a war dec.
Something like a 24 hour grace period to leave after roles dropped, so they had a chance to log in and complete the exit.
ISD Gallifreyan
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
ISD Alliance
#30 - 2013-08-15 19:09:16 UTC
Nikk Narrel wrote:
Maximus Aerelius wrote:
Nikk Narrel wrote:
Maximus Aerelius wrote:
Leave ISD alone FFS. They have a hell of a job to do monitoring all those "NERF CLOAKYS" threads for trolls and have rules and guides.

On Topic: The "Cannot Leave Corp During War Dec" is a catch 22:

Say you didn't want the war and couldn't get out of your Corp...you're stuck. What if your Corp is in perpetuals\multiple wars? Stuck forever? And people will unsub and EVE will die. I don;t want that but I agree jumping out during War Decs to avoid them needs to be looked at. Maybe a 30 days from War Dec Start till you can leave or something? I don't know.

I would say put on a timer, maybe for 24 hours, where you are still flagged as being in the corp for hostiles to shoot at.


What about 72hrs Nikk just to give a bit more ummppf?

That sounds reasonable.

Any longer than that, and I would be concerned over collateral effects to pilots simply wanting to leave, but with bad timing.

Also, I would qualify, that if they had dropped roles in preparation to leave before the war was declared, they be exempt by virtue of clear intent to leave pre-existing the possible motive of avoiding a war dec.
Something like a 24 hour grace period to leave after roles dropped, so they had a chance to log in and complete the exit.


This seems like a decent balaced perspective for improving this mechanic.

ISD Gallifreyan

Lt. Commander

Community Communication Liaisons (CCL)

Interstellar Services Department

Omnathious Deninard
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#31 - 2013-08-15 19:49:27 UTC
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen wrote:
Omnathious Deninard wrote:
ISD Gallifreyan wrote:
While I do not believe either of these proposals have much value from balance perspective, I cannot lock it for any rules violations.

So you send it to F&I to die.


I am glad to be informed that its an ISD's role to measure the value of proposals on game balance.

You still seem to be misinformed as to the ISD, he simply did his duty in moving it to the correct forums. There are so many threads that get started in F&I they get buried quickly and tend to never resurrect.

If you don't follow the rules, neither will I.

Aglais
Ice-Storm
#32 - 2013-08-15 19:50:27 UTC
"Make it so that every fifteen minutes you are warped to a random player and cannot warp away until something explodes, if you are docked you are undocked and then the previous thing happens." Is this the extreme you think things should move towards? Because it's nonsense.

No. This completely detracts from the game and turns it into pointless fighting.
War Kitten
Panda McLegion
#33 - 2013-08-15 19:52:05 UTC
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen wrote:


I am glad to be informed that its an ISD's role to measure the value of proposals on game balance, but have the dev's been notified of this?


Becoming an ISD member doesn't mean they can't offer their opinions any more.

If your ideas were more thought out and/or better, they'd still have gotten moved to F&I I bet. It is the proper sub-forum for discussion of such things.

I don't judge people by their race, religion, color, size, age, gender, or ethnicity. I judge them by their grammar, spelling, syntax, punctuation, clarity of expression, and logical consistency.

Previous page12