These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

CCP killing high sec wargames

First post
Author
YUMAD BRO
ZZ Cow
#1 - 2011-11-10 23:50:51 UTC  |  Edited by: CCP Phantom
Ah CCP I think you are about there.....
You have almost killed High-sec War games totally.

Good job!!!

Edit: Profanity removed, CCP Phantom.
T' Elk
Strategically Bad
Goonswarm Federation
#2 - 2011-11-10 23:52:03 UTC
Even though I support you, I'm still going to hate on you because you created a new thread. Useless OP is useless.

~Badposter since FOOOOREEEEEVAAAAAR~ I come back after 2 years to THIS? ~Now 4 years apparently

YUMAD BRO
ZZ Cow
#3 - 2011-11-10 23:55:00 UTC
ahhh :(


And here I thought we could be friends :(
Alara IonStorm
#4 - 2011-11-10 23:56:22 UTC
Hey OP...

Just gonna go ahead and get this out early.

Why you mad Bro.
ACE McFACE
Dirt 'n' Glitter
Local Is Primary
#5 - 2011-11-10 23:56:58 UTC
Posting in a well thought out thread with both the pros and cons of this recent change and no bias what so ever

OP must be someone who likes to pad thier killboard by buying 1000 shuttles, ejecting them from and Orca or something, then smartbombing them

Now, more than ever, we need a dislike button.

Zircon Dasher
#6 - 2011-11-10 23:58:03 UTC
Alara IonStorm wrote:
Hey OP...

Just gonna go ahead and get this out early.

Why you mad Bro.


Because HEMAD BRO was already taken?

Why Alara IonSrorm?

Nerfing High-sec is never the answer. It is the question. The answer is 'YES'.

MatrixSkye Mk2
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#7 - 2011-11-10 23:58:54 UTC
YUMAD BRO wrote:
Ah CCP I think you are about there.....
You have almost killed High-sec War games totally.

Good job!!!




Fuckin Tards

/sigh

Hi sec "elite" PVPers by far have got to be the loudest, whining forum cry babies.

Successfully doinitwrong™ since 2006.

Alara IonStorm
#8 - 2011-11-11 00:00:43 UTC
Zircon Dasher wrote:

Why Alara IonSrorm?

I wanted a first and last name that would be Spacey.

Alara fit the bill and IonStorm comes from a level of Command and Conquer Tiberium Sun where EVA says Warning IonStorm detected.
YUMAD BRO
ZZ Cow
#9 - 2011-11-11 00:01:08 UTC
ahh...

you guys really luvs me :)

Gogela
Epic Ganking Time
CODE.
#10 - 2011-11-11 00:01:10 UTC  |  Edited by: Gogela
I agree too.. but didn't need a new thread.

Anyway, the OP is probably mad because corps alliance hopping or otherwise avoiding wardecs is now totally legal, rendering high sec POS's invulnerable or really any warfare against any corp that isn't totally braindead completely meaningless and a waste of isk for the aggressor. The OP is right... high sec war is dead. My corp deced an alliance a while back and the corps just bailed out. It's totally lame. The lameness of high sec wars is so bad that I don't even care anymore about my sec status. There's nothing in empire but safety. Empire is sparkle pony land. Safe. F it.

Signatures should be used responsibly...

Y U NO
Doomheim
#11 - 2011-11-11 00:01:20 UTC
Y U NO WHINE ABOUT IT ON THE FORUMS!?
Alara IonStorm
#12 - 2011-11-11 00:05:11 UTC
MatrixSkye Mk2 wrote:

/sigh

Hi sec "elite" PVPers by far have got to be the loudest, whining forum cry babies.

Dude show some respect.

Slaved Mega's and Vindie's with non aggressed RR inside the docking radius is the pinnacle of EVE PvP.

They only Wardec the most dangerous PvE Corps. Exhumer V and everything.
stoicfaux
#13 - 2011-11-11 00:48:40 UTC
So the implication is that CCP needs subs and is thus making high-sec safer for n00bs and carebears to encourage new subs, while simultaneously telling the hi-sec "PvPers" to man up and go to null-sec after the winter expansion?

Pon Farr Memorial: once every 7 years, all the carebears in high-sec must PvP or they will be temp-banned.

Jaroslav Unwanted
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#14 - 2011-11-11 00:52:39 UTC
stoicfaux wrote:
So the implication is that CCP needs subs and is thus making high-sec safer for n00bs and carebears to encourage new subs, while simultaneously telling the hi-sec "PvPers" to man up and go to null-sec after the winter expansion?



Not really, except "war-dec shield" nothing really changed or will change, even said wardec shield policy is not really an change.

After an winter we will see lots of destroyers killing exhumers and mission Battleships/tengues .. and if for whatever reason some chose to fit at least 110k ehp with decent omni tank they will get just two tornados and torn it to peaces.

It will get like a fairy land for gankers, those hard-born decent people who cry over safe "high security" systems.
Nova Fox
Novafox Shipyards
#15 - 2011-11-11 00:54:03 UTC
would you guys be happier if they make low sec a place to live.

Dust 514's CPM 1 Iron Wolf Saber Eve mail me about Dust 514 issues.

Jaroslav Unwanted
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#16 - 2011-11-11 00:55:11 UTC
Nova Fox wrote:
would you guys be happier if they make low sec a place to live.


Thats actually not that bad idea.
XIRUSPHERE
In Bacon We Trust
#17 - 2011-11-11 00:57:07 UTC
Why are you crying already? They hot fixed a narrow band of aggression your precious 1337 invincible RR on station undock still does not inherit the session penalties associated with aggression that it should. They have shown us how stupidly simple and fast it is to fix and the cats out of the bag for a mechanics fix that is long long overdue.

If you want to continue to be a 1337 PVP god then just join PL in matar FW where you can drop supers on lone PVE fit drakes.

The advantage of a bad memory is that one can enjoy the same good things for the first time several times.

One will rarely err if extreme actions be ascribed to vanity, ordinary actions to habit, and mean actions to fear.

Tanya Powers
Doomheim
#18 - 2011-11-11 00:59:57 UTC  |  Edited by: CCP Phantom
YUMAD BRO wrote:
Ah CCP I think you are about there.....
You have almost killed High-sec War games totally.

Good job!!!





Join goonswarm and do whatever you like has you like, don't care about ccp, care about goons. Blink
zama118
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#19 - 2011-11-11 01:03:50 UTC
tbh the topic has little intrest to me

but as far as i can see it. CCP is leveling the playing feild, so instead of haveing like 5 neut logi and god knows what else to gank the crap out of one ship, you now have to fight as in ship to ship (or gank with lots of ships in a wardec)

killing war decs far from, bringing new life to a stale game macanic it might be

worst that will happen is people find a way around the changes (which they will)
Hwong Jian
Perkone
Caldari State
#20 - 2011-11-11 01:18:51 UTC
I'm confused.

OP, is this thread about the change to corp hopping made 32 days ago?

Or is this thread about the new warning for neutral RR?
12Next page