These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Matching Fleet PvP

Author
baltec1
Bat Country
The Initiative.
#21 - 2013-07-22 11:43:41 UTC
Every MMO that has added Arena PVP has ended up with PVP everywhere outside of the arena die off.
Tron 3K
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#22 - 2013-07-22 11:57:35 UTC
Yes since WoW has this mechanism that means we must have it here.. Can we get also bright colors and I want a Mohawk Nightelf too! *******! Do it!
Willie Horton
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#23 - 2013-07-22 11:59:48 UTC
Forums Bot wrote:


1. It will completely change the game for worse that will lead the game to a death spiral. Well as all other activities in Eve, you have the right to not participate in it. Why not let people who want to have fair fights to have it? I would be happy if 1/20 of the population would find fun in it. Well what if more people start to doing it? Well that makes this idea even better wouldn't you say so?


4. CCP doesn't care how many accounts each player has because they make money either way. Well I think they do care. It is not sustainable to grow subscriptions by only forcing people to add more accounts. I think it is in their business interest to grow player base.

5. CCP is afraid of losing vets to gain new players. No they don't. If they somehow can find a way to start retaining new players, the number they gain will far exceed the the entire current player base which is probably around 200k give or take. Compared to on-the-death-role" WoW's 8 million, this is nothing at all. If EvE can attractive just 10% of people who are leaving WoW, it'll then be the popular game you are claiming it to be.


It will change game from worse for you ,not for others .In sandbox what is good for you is almost never good for other side.

Who is forcing you to make new account ?Also game works like this for ten years and together with Blizzard MMO it is only sub based that is still on market.So what is not working there for CCP?

You cant stop player leaving game after some time.It is normal to make breaks and to feel you are lacking goals in some game if you are veteran.
EvE is not game for any kind of player.Do you really think game will be better if we would have like 5 mil players ?This game is for niche part of MMO player base,and it was like that from start .That is what is making EvE so special.You cant play it like other games.
EVE as it is now will never attract player from theme park MMOs,some of them will stay and like it ,but in most cases they will not play EvE.Death penalty in EVE is to much for majority of those players .







War Kitten
Panda McLegion
#24 - 2013-07-22 12:18:39 UTC  |  Edited by: War Kitten
Forums Bot wrote:
I am sure if CCP wants to implement such a mechanism they'll come up with a far better design.


You're right, IF they wanted to, they could.

But they don't want to - it's antithetical to open world sandbox games like EVE, and thwarts emergent gameplay.

/thread

I don't judge people by their race, religion, color, size, age, gender, or ethnicity. I judge them by their grammar, spelling, syntax, punctuation, clarity of expression, and logical consistency.

Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#25 - 2013-07-22 13:07:26 UTC
Forums Bot wrote:
2. Rich alliances will pour resources to dominate new players. Well, since fleets have to roam to find fights, doing so will risk the fleet to be destroyed by a much large force and lose all the expensive stuff. Isn't it the wet dream comes true scenario for some people who are looking for shinny kill mails?

Back up a sec. I thought the whole idea of your suggestion was to stop these power differences. The big alliance would simply join the arena then safely roam about in high sec like you are until you got paired and warped to an arena to fight. They wouldn't be fitting up bling ships for a regular roam in null.

It doesn't fit in EVE, so it won't get done. You basically want a change to the very definition of what EVE is, and for what? So that some WoW players rage quitting WoW will come here? No thanks. I'll stick with the stable population we currently have.

In your idea you make no mention of how fleets will be matched up, numbers isnt a good enough metric. When you have a well thought out idea that doesn't break the spirit of EVE and is more than "yeah, make an arena!" then feel free to post it in the place this belongs - Features & Ideas Discussion.

Oh and CCP are afraid of losing Vets. Otherwise they wouldn't have backed out the aurum changes. EVE is marketed by what is done by players. without the vets, nothing would happen.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Cavalira
Habemus
#26 - 2013-07-22 16:12:04 UTC
You know 90% (if not 99%) of all FC's tend to go for smaller gangs than themselves. Why would one of these :riskaverse: FCs sign up his fleet?
P3ps1 Max
Tactical Withdrawal Team
The Rejected.
#27 - 2013-07-22 16:40:16 UTC
Irrulam wrote:
interfere with someone else's business (in space) is one of the most important aspects of EVE


Nerf High Sec I say.

Wait this is a sandbox.

Oh yea, and how is this "interfering" with someone's game? When two mutual party's are wanting a 10v10 fleet battlePirate
Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#28 - 2013-07-22 16:47:37 UTC
These "brilliant idea" people are crawling out of the wood work this week.

If their ideas were any good, why wouldn't they be game makers making money off of it? I know I would.
P3ps1 Max
Tactical Withdrawal Team
The Rejected.
#29 - 2013-07-22 16:56:38 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
"brilliant idea"



Toasting to Guinness .... cheers.
YuuKnow
The Scope
#30 - 2013-07-22 20:33:42 UTC  |  Edited by: YuuKnow
I don't like the specifics of the your proposal, but the idea of allowing fleets seeking quick/improtu fights to advertise that they are looking for a fight is interesting.

A dedicated "Fleet Fights" chat where fleets looking to quick and impromptu fights can advertise their location and composition could be one way of doing it, but this would be bait for trickery though...

... perhaps an 'Enemy Fleet Finder' option which fleets toggle on to broadcast their composition for similar fleets to see and then seek them and engage.

There's promise here if it can be fleshed out a bit.

yk
Unsuccessful At Everything
The Troll Bridge
#31 - 2013-07-22 20:36:50 UTC
I think it would be far easier for CCP to simply integrate a button into the esc menu that allows people to go back to WoW.

Since the cessation of their usefulness is imminent, may I appropriate your belongings?

Murk Paradox
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#32 - 2013-07-22 20:49:58 UTC
Why do people just not register in current tournaments, or create their own?

This post has been signed by Murk Paradox and no other accounts, alternate or otherwise. Any other post claiming to be this holder's is subject to being banned at the discretion of the GM Team as it would violate the TOS in regards to impersonation. Signed, Murk Paradox. In triplicate.

Karsa Egivand
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#33 - 2013-07-22 21:37:04 UTC
Paul Otichoda wrote:
Naes Mlahrend wrote:
Paul Otichoda wrote:
I would like some way of fair fights.

While I know this is impossible I'd still hope CCP changes novice FW plexs to not allow in tech 2 equibed ships. That would make these sites so much fairer for new players.


It seriously doesn't take that long to train most T2 items...


its going to take me 9 days to train light missiles to level 5 from level 4. Is that considered short for low sp players?


You know, we have covered this before... those 2% of damage only very rarely will be the deciding factor in a fight. Even players of many years (and their SP) are flying happily with their weapon spec. skill at lvl. 4.
Maxpie
MUSE LLP
#34 - 2013-07-23 00:00:58 UTC
OP, I give you a counteroffer. CCP releases a series of prints for ships that have preset, established setups that cannot be changed. These will be sort of watered down versions of their actual ship counterpart. Maybe the equivalent of a T1 fit, but there are module or rig slots, they are built-in, so all ships perform exactly the same.

Thus, when you see the 'Rupture A' or whatever it will be called, you will know exactly the fit. This way you can make your own pre-arranged arena matches.

No good deed goes unpunished

Elliavir
Miskatonic Mercantile
#35 - 2013-07-23 00:31:31 UTC
EVE is driven by player-created content... and, one would assume if there were a lot of interest in arena-type matches, you'd see a lot of player-organized tournaments. And, if those were going on, you might see a push for tools to make organizing such matches easier and/or system-managed matches.

But, you don't. Arena-style PvP fits in well in games that are essentially PvE, because it provides additional content for players.

But, arena-style PvP comes at significant developer cost. There is usually a perception that arena combat be "balanced" and "fair". Which often leads to a lot of developer effort to adjust the same characters and gear to be workable in both PvP and PvE. And that frequently turns into separate rulesets for PvP and PvE - which I dislike immensely. A couple of years ago, I read an interview with one of Blizzard's developers, who answered the question of "what would you warn yourself not to do if you could go back in time?" with "put PvP in WoW".

If you are interested in "fair fights" to the exclusion of other types of fights, EVE is not a good place to call your gaming home. If you are looking for good fights, crappy fights, varied fights, unexpected fights, stupid fights, funny fights - and maybe an occasional fair fight - then EVE is full of content for you.
Roime
Mea Culpa.
Shadow Cartel
#36 - 2013-07-23 00:53:59 UTC
Preventing NPC corp alts from posting would be a measure to ensure fair forum posting.

PVP in EVE should not be an e-sport.

.

Tiberius Mal
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#37 - 2013-07-23 02:29:02 UTC
through all the replies I'm not sure I follow the objective you're trying to reach with your idea. And I'll admit it does sound like some people are interpreting your idea incorrectly and answering something that you didn't propose.

regardless, I'll summarize some points that you'll never win with CCP:
1) You'll never get Instanced PvP: because it's too prone to abuse and it is opposite of the sandbox mentality. period.
2) you'll never be provided a game mechanic that guarantees 'fair' fights. period.


If you can come up with an idea that doesn't violate those concepts, you'd be talking about a (maybe) original idea that's worth discussing further. What i THINK you mean to suggest is something like the following:

A) An extension of the dueling system that will allow you to arrange a limited engagement (existing game mechanic) with many players at once. This would allow 'legal' highsec and lowsec group fights without a complicated series of one-of-one duels among a group of people.
-- does not violate either of the rules above
-- has likely already been proposed.

Or, maybe:

B) A fleet advertisement/notification system that broadcasts in the Constellation channel, or maybe some interface like the incursion finder. You can list your fleet details and it will track your movement. Other fleets looking for fights can find you through the interface, head to your location and then let nature take it's course (within existing game mechanics).
-- does not violate either of the rules above
-- very prone to abuse by falsifying your fleet composition.... or just leading you to slaughter each time you track down one of those 'roaming" fleets.
Felicity Love
Doomheim
#38 - 2013-07-23 02:40:27 UTC
... Warsong Gultch/Nebula, here I come... Roll

"EVE is dying." -- The Four Forum Trolls of the Apocalypse.   ( Pick four, any four. They all smell.  )

Forums Bot
Doomheim
#39 - 2013-07-23 02:51:09 UTC
First, this will by no means dumb down PvP. Fleets roam and find good fights is all I propose. There will be no queue, no button to do anything instantly, and fleets do not have to have fixed setup, just equal in ship count, or if you insist, roughly equal count.

Second, "EvE is driven by player-created content" is a myth to me. I don't see any difference between EvE and other games in this aspect. The well advertised EvE career paths are missioning, mining, exploring, crafting, and trading. There are other activities players can participate in, such as FW, Incursion, Sov fighting, and etc. CCP create mechanisms for all of these activities and players participate in them. What's so special about it? What content did players create? You may point out that there are activities such as BvR and Burn Jita. But events similar to these can be found in other games too without claiming the content is mainly driven by players.

Third, there other not so civil posts that I don't want to adress cause I don't want to be dragged down to your level.
Roime
Mea Culpa.
Shadow Cartel
#40 - 2013-07-23 03:57:43 UTC
Forums Bot wrote:
Fleets roam and find good fights is all I propose.


Well, fleets roam and find good fights all the time without your proposal. They don't need flags or new mechanics.

Why do you think it is needed?

.