EVE General Discussion

Please explain to me and the other forum readers how my name is as you portray?

reading your posts all i see is a self entitled spoilt brat whining that he can´t have everything his own way



The underlined part, you see it, you are complaining about making a choice and not liking the consequences, its a game, they all have rule sets, yes its a sandbox, but a sandBOX has limitations, that´s why its not a beach, you personally just don´t like the mechanic and the ways to counter it, well you made the informed choice did you not, so HTFU

yea that would be something cool, if it makes the level 1 grinding go away I'm all for it, encouraging people to play factional warfare to gain the tags even better, i think some do not try it yet especially new players because they are worried of the negative impact, did see a lot of comments about it on the forums

It would be a good case. It's just that it's not what's going on here. The game mechanics do nothing of the sort. If anything, they encourage interaction because one of the solutions available to the OP's problem is to rely on other people for certain services.

No. You're forgetting the underlying activity that generates the (supposed) needs for the two. Tags-for-sec doesn't make sec grinding easier because you still have to grind to make use of it: either you grind rats for tags or you grind ISK for tags. When you start your trip back to Sec -2, you have neither because you've blown up people, which yields neither tags nor ISK.

With tags-for-standing, you don't have to grind to make use of it: either you grind rats for tags (which you probably already picked up as part of the NPC killing that gave you the bad sec standing) or you grind ISK to buy tags (ISK you definitely already earned as part of killing NPCs). The grind that you're supposed to do to get back to neutral standings has already happened as part of the activity that led you to negative standings — it is skipped. The process is made hellalot easier.

Again, the “punishment” for PvP is enforced PvE. Tags-for-sec does not change this. To make the same thing work with standings, you'd have to reverse it, or it's simply a mechanic to outright skip that punishment. So the “punishment” for PvE would have to be enforced PvP — not tags or ISK or anything else you could pick up in the process of the PvE itself.

god you just repeat the same sentence over and over again like robots, people like you should just leave eve because you are hindering the developement of the game, go buy a gamboy and play some old mario, those games never change

you did not even take the time to read through the thread in detail, its not about making things easy, its the opposite, the level 1 mission grinding is boring to bring up standings, thats why we want another mechanic which is more challanging

you just repeat what others say, nothing new, just standart ignorance without even looking at what was said

Wouldn't this cause issues with people flip-flopping between militias in FW to always be on the winning side?

You haven't managed to explain why our argument is invalid beyond you not wanting consequences for your actions & blocking people who actually provide very valid reasoning against your suggestion. You're suggesting CCP remove the consequences for bad pve choices & we're telling you why that is a bad idea.

hey dude, just read through the things I mentioned a hundred times already, consequences are fine, there just needs another mechanic to fix it, got that now? can not be that hard, please move along if you don't get it! the bricks of my house are more flexible then you

no, i just don't want the game to be as annyoing as you, therefore no level 1 missions for faction standing repair but a more challanging mechanic

i know you want those level 1 missions like you want me to explain the same thing for hours, but there are people who want a better challange, because this one is getting boring -> blocked

my tactic was to make them give up :) but you maybe right, thats an unstoppable troll invasion :D