These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Faction Warfare: Moving Forward.....

First post First post
Author
Hans Jagerblitzen
Ice Fire Warriors
#461 - 2011-11-03 20:19:26 UTC
Bad Messenger wrote:

You are stuck on idea that nerfing missions solve something


His agenda couldn't be any more obvious :) How do you guys think he afforded that monocle? With the alts he has in every militia, to farm the missions he doesnt want nerfed, of course.

CPM0 Chairman / CSM7 Vice Secretary

Bad Messenger
Rehabilitation Clinic
#462 - 2011-11-03 20:29:20 UTC
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote:
Bad Messenger wrote:

You are stuck on idea that nerfing missions solve something


His agenda couldn't be any more obvious :) How do you guys think he afforded that monocle? With the alts he has in every militia, to farm the missions he doesnt want nerfed, of course.


In fact i stopped farming FW mission after dominion patch, i have still several millions unused lp, so removing mission would benefit me more, still it is not any solution to make FW any better Big smile
Hans Jagerblitzen
Ice Fire Warriors
#463 - 2011-11-03 20:58:41 UTC
Bad Messenger wrote:
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote:
Bad Messenger wrote:

You are stuck on idea that nerfing missions solve something


His agenda couldn't be any more obvious :) How do you guys think he afforded that monocle? With the alts he has in every militia, to farm the missions he doesnt want nerfed, of course.


In fact i stopped farming FW mission after dominion patch, i have still several millions unused lp, so removing mission would benefit me more, still it is not any solution to make FW any better Big smile


So really, you're just here to troll. You're not offering any suggestions yourself, just saying "these ideas suck". Seriously, stop posting in this thread unless you have something useful to say.

/blocked bad messenger for irrelevancy.

CPM0 Chairman / CSM7 Vice Secretary

Bad Messenger
Rehabilitation Clinic
#464 - 2011-11-03 21:41:59 UTC
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote:
Bad Messenger wrote:
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote:
Bad Messenger wrote:

You are stuck on idea that nerfing missions solve something


His agenda couldn't be any more obvious :) How do you guys think he afforded that monocle? With the alts he has in every militia, to farm the missions he doesnt want nerfed, of course.


In fact i stopped farming FW mission after dominion patch, i have still several millions unused lp, so removing mission would benefit me more, still it is not any solution to make FW any better Big smile


So really, you're just here to troll. You're not offering any suggestions yourself, just saying "these ideas suck". Seriously, stop posting in this thread unless you have something useful to say.

/blocked bad messenger for irrelevancy.


I have pointed out in several post why your ideas are not really good and working ideas, but still you insist that i am troll.

Your ideas are not quite unique ones , these same kind of ideas has proposed last 3 years.

Hopefully someone will come out with new fresh ideas.
Bomberlocks
Bombercorp
#465 - 2011-11-04 01:12:55 UTC
Update on FW: I have contacted the CSM about the FW review and they say it is one of the subjects that will be a topic at the december summit. That means it will most likely not appear in the winter patch, but shortly afterwards (hopefully with the AF 4th bonus).
Cearain
Plus 10 NV
#466 - 2011-11-04 03:59:47 UTC
Bomberlocks wrote:
Update on FW: I have contacted the CSM about the FW review and they say it is one of the subjects that will be a topic at the december summit. That means it will most likely not appear in the winter patch, but shortly afterwards (hopefully with the AF 4th bonus).



Did anyone from csm indicate they had any position on what they would like in fw?

Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815

Har Harrison
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#467 - 2011-11-04 04:32:07 UTC
Bad Messenger wrote:
You do not still have any good ideas how to make fw better.

You are stuck on idea that nerfing missions solve something or forcing people to do something.

Ideas has to be so cool that everyone want to plex after those and without rewards. Then you have something.

Please stop posting and leave this thread... You are adding NOTHING of value. All you are doing is filling up the thread with noise which means you can go for 1-2 pages with noise from you and people responding to you without anything meaningful being discussed.

I have posted a number of things that are worth discussing, but the thread moves on 4-5 pages before people see them because of the dribble coming from people such as yourself. And of course, more will come since you will HAVE to respond to this post... Other people have also said similar things.

The majority of the calls about missions is the BALANCE them (as opposed to nerfing them). This could be done by making them all easier, or all harder or some easier and some harder to strike the balance... You also seem to believe that FW missions should be an entitlement for people in FW. I am arguing that they should be the reward for participating in FW activities (PvP and plexing etc...), rather then the ONLY form of FW activity that the farmers perform...

Ruah Piskonit
PIE Inc.
Khimi Harar
#468 - 2011-11-04 04:55:45 UTC
Cearain wrote:
Bomberlocks wrote:
Update on FW: I have contacted the CSM about the FW review and they say it is one of the subjects that will be a topic at the december summit. That means it will most likely not appear in the winter patch, but shortly afterwards (hopefully with the AF 4th bonus).



Did anyone from csm indicate they had any position on what they would like in fw?


why would they - they are all null sec. . .
Bad Messenger
Rehabilitation Clinic
#469 - 2011-11-04 07:50:24 UTC  |  Edited by: Bad Messenger
Har Harrison wrote:
Bad Messenger wrote:
You do not still have any good ideas how to make fw better.

You are stuck on idea that nerfing missions solve something or forcing people to do something.

Ideas has to be so cool that everyone want to plex after those and without rewards. Then you have something.

Please stop posting and leave this thread... You are adding NOTHING of value. All you are doing is filling up the thread with noise which means you can go for 1-2 pages with noise from you and people responding to you without anything meaningful being discussed.

I have posted a number of things that are worth discussing, but the thread moves on 4-5 pages before people see them because of the dribble coming from people such as yourself. And of course, more will come since you will HAVE to respond to this post... Other people have also said similar things.

The majority of the calls about missions is the BALANCE them (as opposed to nerfing them). This could be done by making them all easier, or all harder or some easier and some harder to strike the balance... You also seem to believe that FW missions should be an entitlement for people in FW. I am arguing that they should be the reward for participating in FW activities (PvP and plexing etc...), rather then the ONLY form of FW activity that the farmers perform...


Yes i have to respond.

EVE has 4 different races players can choose, all those have different kind of playing experience, but if you choose some race you can train another race skills or even use another race agents and do missions for them. So if you feel that some other faction has easier to play you can always change to that side.

Now you want again that CCP should nerf or blance something because you have made choices that are not easiest one.

And if they balance FW mission npc next they should make all normal lvl4 missions having same npc too.

So your idea could be fair but still it breaks all fundamentals of EVE and makes it worse not better.

Edit: One of the goals why FW was made was that it will get more people to lowsec from highsec, and that has been happened.

FW is playground offering lot of options to do, only area that has major difficulties is the system occupancy war, there is some action on that front but not much, biggest problem is that people has no will to do it. How to add that will is not to remove or balance npc, it is not rewards because if rewards would be significant some people will come and farm those on way that general militia is not pleased at all.

So overall militia is good playground, only thing that misses is will to do occupancy war on bigger scale. So problem is in community thinking and this is something that CCP can not fix by patching.
Hirana Yoshida
Behavioral Affront
#470 - 2011-11-04 08:59:39 UTC
Read some of the old blogs that were release pre-/post Empyrean Age and you'll see that missions were intended to be the fuel for the mayhem in FW .. and not a bottomless wallet for anyone with an alt.

Example Blog: War is a full time job

The only way that will change is if we (read: everyone that is not me) give up the ridiculous notion that PvP and PvE must be kept completely separate at all costs. An example of how they can be tied together can be seen on page 20 (post #386).
Bomberlocks
Bombercorp
#471 - 2011-11-04 11:13:39 UTC
Cearain wrote:
Bomberlocks wrote:
Update on FW: I have contacted the CSM about the FW review and they say it is one of the subjects that will be a topic at the december summit. That means it will most likely not appear in the winter patch, but shortly afterwards (hopefully with the AF 4th bonus).



Did anyone from csm indicate they had any position on what they would like in fw?

Nope. I strongly suggest you post in the CSM thread on FHC that I started and get their positions, because it's entirely possible, seeing that the current CSM is mostly made up of nullsec people, that they will just gloss over whatever CCP comes up with and rubber stampt it.
Bad Messenger
Rehabilitation Clinic
#472 - 2011-11-04 11:14:03 UTC
Hirana Yoshida wrote:
Read some of the old blogs that were release pre-/post Empyrean Age and you'll see that missions were intended to be the fuel for the mayhem in FW .. and not a bottomless wallet for anyone with an alt.

Example Blog: War is a full time job

The only way that will change is if we (read: everyone that is not me) give up the ridiculous notion that PvP and PvE must be kept completely separate at all costs. An example of how they can be tied together can be seen on page 20 (post #386).


FW missions have been there from the beginning. but people started to do those after that buff, main reason why people did not do those before was that if you did not complete mission you will lose faction standing, so penalty was too high to take risk for most especially when you have only 12 hours to complete those missions.

Because Ankh cried that people should get good rewards being in FW , CCP removed standing penalty and boosted LP shop.
Still people are not willing to do boring plexing, even thou CCP made all changes they asked for to make good income on militia career. You got your paycheck but you do not still want to do your job.

You proposal could work but if it contains any possible exploitable elements some one will abuse those.

How i see you change will go is that some dedicated group will get all boost for lp and rest are just crying CCP to nerf them.
Karl Planck
Perkone
Caldari State
#473 - 2011-11-04 11:20:54 UTC  |  Edited by: Karl Planck
Bad Messenger wrote:
Hirana Yoshida wrote:
Read some of the old blogs that were release pre-/post Empyrean Age and you'll see that missions were intended to be the fuel for the mayhem in FW .. and not a bottomless wallet for anyone with an alt.

Example Blog: War is a full time job

The only way that will change is if we (read: everyone that is not me) give up the ridiculous notion that PvP and PvE must be kept completely separate at all costs. An example of how they can be tied together can be seen on page 20 (post #386).


FW missions have been there from the beginning. but people started to do those after that buff, main reason why people did not do those before was that if you did not complete mission you will lose faction standing, so penalty was too high to take risk for most especially when you have only 12 hours to complete those missions.

Because Ankh cried that people should get good rewards being in FW , CCP removed standing penalty and boosted LP shop.
Still people are not willing to do boring plexing, even thou CCP made all changes they asked for to make good income on militia career. You got your paycheck but you do not still want to do your job.

You proposal could work but if it contains any possible exploitable elements some one will abuse those.

How i see you change will go is that some dedicated group will get all boost for lp and rest are just crying CCP to nerf them.


Fair enough, how about this change then.

Give missions victory points (*Edit: and by VP i mean missions can flip sov). If this was done, make sure that if a system was occupied that no missions could be given by militia agents in the occupied systems. Give all missions the poison pill idea proposed by gallantus (name?) So that it was easy to shut missions down. How does that sound?

I has all the eve inactivity

Bad Messenger
Rehabilitation Clinic
#474 - 2011-11-04 11:32:12 UTC
Karl Planck wrote:

Fair enough, how about this change then.

Give missions victory points (*Edit: and by VP i mean missions can flip sov). If this was done, make sure that if a system was occupied that no missions could be given by militia agents in the occupied systems. Give all missions the poison pill idea proposed by gallantus (name?) So that it was easy to shut missions down. How does that sound?


One more reason to make mission alt for every militia Cool
Rodj Blake
PIE Inc.
Khimi Harar
#475 - 2011-11-04 11:43:42 UTC
Bad Messenger wrote:


Your ideas are not quite unique ones , these same kind of ideas has proposed last 3 years.

Hopefully someone will come out with new fresh ideas.


There's nothing wrong with a lot of the ideas that people have been suggesting for the last three years apart from the fact that it's taken CCP three years to consider looking at them.

Dolce et decorum est pro Imperium mori

Causalitii Eullon
Catalyst Consortium
#476 - 2011-11-04 13:14:55 UTC
Rodj Blake wrote:
Bad Messenger wrote:


Your ideas are not quite unique ones , these same kind of ideas has proposed last 3 years.

Hopefully someone will come out with new fresh ideas.


There's nothing wrong with a lot of the ideas that people have been suggesting for the last three years apart from the fact that it's taken CCP three years to consider looking at them.


This is what I was gonna say but instead of typing it myself I'm just gonna quote someone else. Buff FW ffs

Maybe if enough people ***** about not getting fixes to FW then maybe ccp will listen? Yea proby not lol
Cearain
Plus 10 NV
#477 - 2011-11-04 13:19:20 UTC
Ruah Piskonit wrote:
Cearain wrote:
Bomberlocks wrote:
Update on FW: I have contacted the CSM about the FW review and they say it is one of the subjects that will be a topic at the december summit. That means it will most likely not appear in the winter patch, but shortly afterwards (hopefully with the AF 4th bonus).



Did anyone from csm indicate they had any position on what they would like in fw?


why would they - they are all null sec. . .



Thats sort of the concern. Just like many wormhole players think it would be great if the rest of eve was like wormholes, I'm afraid these guys would think fw would be great if it was like null sec.

That said a Elise Randolf has expressed an interest. He indicated he had been in FW and had a great time. But on the whole I don't see what the point of the summit will be. People on the csm tend to be very hard core players. People in fw tend to be a bit more casual about the game yet still want lots of pvp.

Make faction war occupancy pvp instead of pve https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=53815&#post53815

Hwong Jian
Perkone
Caldari State
#478 - 2011-11-04 14:02:07 UTC  |  Edited by: Hwong Jian
It seems that quite a few of you are either misinformed or down-right ignorant. So, allow me to clean up the discussion about Faction Warfare just a little bit.

FW MISSIONS ARE NOT AN ISK FAUCET IN ANY WAY, SHAPE OR FORM.

I know many of you are preparing your arguments for that fact, but stop. Just stop it.

After running 16 FW missions (8 level 3s and 8 level 4s) my wallet increases by about 25-30 million isk. That is one hell of a faucet, right?

Again, your argument is in the process of forming, or you've already managed to blurt out the "but LP" portion of whatever malformed inane ramblings you are about to spew blindly into the aether in the hopes that it will make you sound like you're not a driveling imbecile. Again, stop.

Loyalty points are the reward you get for completing any mission. In Faction Warfare, you get a significant amount more than a non-FW mission. I know you think that might not be fair, but look at risk vs. reward: every FW mission is a shining beacon that anyone (friend, foe, pirate or neut) can warp to or camp until they get bored. The ability for any and every person in the system to harass an FW mission runner is there. It is bordering on pathological to expect CCP to punish FW mission runners because people aren't taking advantage of that mechanic.

Now, your reasoning is probably going to say the following: an FW mission runner can amass 150k LPs in under two hours, and then sell a tier 1 faction BC for 300mil isk. That is a huge faucet that CCP needs to limit! (I've heard that argument numerous times, and even the skeleton of it in this very thread.)

To that argument, I can merely say: No. Stop it. You are confusing lumping any method of making money into the category of "faucet". Stop it. The only thing that selling loot from the FW LP store does is move existing currency from one player to another. At most, the "faucet" would be the 20-30mil isk the player is given, spawned out of nowhere, for completing the mission.

Gathering 1.5 million LPs, enough to sell 10 faction tier 1 battleships, could earn a militiaman more than 2 billion isk, yes. That is true. But, 95% or more of that isk was already in the game.

So, let me sum this up. In my opinion, there is nothing wrong with the payouts of FW missions, and the risk vs. reward balances out. No significant amount of isk is added to the economy by running FW missions, and you can not hold it against FW mission runners that other players aren't harassing FW mission runners more often.

So, stop it. Stop bleating and neighing about nerfing FW missions. If you have a problem with their ease, CCP has provided you with the easiest method in the world of making it more difficult: by telling you that the mission is there and letting you swing by to say hello.
Hans Jagerblitzen
Ice Fire Warriors
#479 - 2011-11-04 17:34:32 UTC
I've written a letter to the CSM, providing them with links to these threads, and the Sov Wars blog where they can read up on the state of activities within the Faction Warfare scene. I encourage all of you to write them as well, the more voices they hear asking for a response on FW, the better. They may not see it as a signficant development issue, if no one is speaking up and asking for some love. Thanks for everyone's ongoing support! The FW has some of the classiest pilots around, I appreciate those on both sides of the war that have been advocates for improving the scene.

CPM0 Chairman / CSM7 Vice Secretary

Hans Jagerblitzen
Ice Fire Warriors
#480 - 2011-11-04 17:48:26 UTC  |  Edited by: Hans Jagerblitzen
Hwong Jian wrote:
A bunch of yappity stuff.


I don't think you've really been reading this thread at all. Allow me to clean up you're understanding of what the debate is about.

The argument is not that FW missions some how act as an isk faucet and affects the economy. The frustration over mission rewards is that they are easily farmable - meaning people join Faction Warfare only for the LP, and not for the PvP fights and fleet opportunities. The count of pilots who are actually active in PvP and the total number of alt toons enrolled in FW is very muddled.

Those farming LP to take elsewhere don't contribute anything to FW, except for providing bomber killmails.

I agree with your assessment that the challenge is making the mission public, and I don't oppose missions being either public (on the overview) or lucrative. The problem is that they are easily farmable in a bomber, instead of small gangs. The enemy AI sets up the mission reward system to be abused by a minimally skilled alt.

If you'd been following the thread, you'd realize that most are not asking for a flat out nerf, they're asking for the payouts to be moved to the completion of PvP objectives, or for the mission challenge to be stepped up so that they encourage gang work, not solo bomber work. Gangs of non-cloaky ships running missions means way more dynamic pew pew than the slicers chasing hounds you see every day.

Please take the time to read about what actually matters to the community, instead of acting arrogant like you know so much better than all of us.

This discussion is in no way about adding too much isk as a faucet. Its about FW being a farm for LP, instead of a framework to encourage fleet gang warfare. LP rewards and their sale are how we stay equipped and geared for our PvP battles, so when outsiders farm the items and water down the market, the people actually using the rewards for FW pew pew are hurt in the process.

Think of someone who wanted to live in nullsec alliance space and run sanctums all day, but always logged off the minute there was a call to arms - how welcome would such a pilot be after long?

CPM0 Chairman / CSM7 Vice Secretary