These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE Information Portal

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Dev Blog: Client modification, the EULA and you

First post First post
Author
Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
Vae. Victis.
#521 - 2013-04-19 03:45:36 UTC
Atum wrote:
Dutschetss Vilhelmena wrote:
I am a pretty solitary player, I tried playing two characters once and it was terrible trying to manage two accounts, I can not imagine how people can play more than one character without some sort of automated help.

I've been dual-accounting on a single machine without extra software for nine years now (ever since the Earth and Beyond sunset). Doing it in windowed mode on a single screen was tough, but doable. Having two screens, each set to full-window mode, isn't really a problem at all. Now granted, most of my time is spent in exploration and industrial type activities, so I can't say how well I'd do in a fleet fight (and I'm admittedly pretty fail at PVP), but managing two hasn't been an issue with my current setup.

I run two characters occasionally, and I'll freely admit I'm a complete Klutz at it without two monitors.

I used to fly with a very sweet older lady that everyone thought was a bit of an air head... until it became apparent she was flying multiple accounts in multiple locations in EvE with complete mastery... on a single screen. She seemed to always have the right ship in the right place at the right time, usually two flipping between two or three.

I still have no idea how she got that good at it. Smile

View the latest EVE Online developments and other game related news and gameplay by visiting Ranger 1 Presents: Virtual Realms.

Shefus
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#522 - 2013-04-19 04:20:53 UTC  |  Edited by: Shefus
Never mind CCP Peligro answered it
T RAYRAY
Echelon Research
Goonswarm Federation
#523 - 2013-04-19 04:22:45 UTC
i skipped ahead after page 3 or so.

I absolutely think CCP should take a look at the accounts of those players complaining so loudly and splitting hairs in the grey areas in the EULA and look hard into the tools they use to play the game. Seems like in this situation the most vocal are lkely the ones doing things to skirt right on the fine line of the EULA and the intent of the security team to find you if you're cheating.

what's the stupid old-english saying? "thou dost protest too much" or some garbage like that..

before you flame me for giving in to 'the man' and the grey areas of the EULA without a fight, let me explain that if we were IRL in the business world I live in, I'd say "bring on the grey areas" and let me find those places I can gain an advantage, however small, and however close to breaking the rules as I need to tread in order to make an extra buck.

However, this is a game. so **** off and stop cheating.
Roime
Mea Culpa.
Shadow Cartel
#524 - 2013-04-19 06:06:30 UTC
T RAYRAY wrote:
i skipped ahead after page 3 or so.

I absolutely think CCP should take a look at the accounts of those players complaining so loudly and splitting hairs in the grey areas in the EULA and look hard into the tools they use to play the game. Seems like in this situation the most vocal are lkely the ones doing things to skirt right on the fine line of the EULA and the intent of the security team to find you if you're cheating.

what's the stupid old-english saying? "thou dost protest too much" or some garbage like that..

before you flame me for giving in to 'the man' and the grey areas of the EULA without a fight, let me explain that if we were IRL in the business world I live in, I'd say "bring on the grey areas" and let me find those places I can gain an advantage, however small, and however close to breaking the rules as I need to tread in order to make an extra buck.

However, this is a game. so **** off and stop cheating.


This.

.

Lady Areola Fappington
#525 - 2013-04-19 06:26:43 UTC
It's really a very simple answer in the end.

If you are extremely concerned that CCP will adhere to the exact letter of the EULA and ToS, then you should stop using any form of cache scraping third-party software.

The rest of us understand that, as of right now, cache scraping is the EULA equivalent of jaywalking. By saying "all client modification is illegal", CCP closes lots of loopholes. The recent kerfluffle with EUNI comes to mind, with the whole "I wasn't botting I was just using cache scraping and my own custom web scripts to do market orders really fast."

7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY? No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided. --Eve New Player Guide

ORCACommander
Obsidian Firelance Technologies
#526 - 2013-04-19 06:44:21 UTC  |  Edited by: ORCACommander
CCP Peligro wrote:
ORCACommander wrote:
gone through a dozen pages about cache scraping. how about a different issue: customizing the overview: it is possible to use xml codes to add in colors and other information to brackets in space a good example: http://www.gamefront.com/files/?filepath=orcacommander/EVE/Sarah_Overview_Pack_0.2.3.rar


Hi there! I answered this one earlier.

CCP Peligro wrote:
Nope, no worries on that one. We are after the hackers, botters and the RMTers.


Oh i know what your explicitly after i just prefer to have specific things clarified for my own legal backside :) and damn it i shoulda caught that. i was specifically scrolling through dev posts Roll
feihcsiM
THE B0YS
#527 - 2013-04-19 07:38:46 UTC
"You may not use your own or any third-party software, macros or other stored rapid keystrokes"

I genuinely didn't know this. Does stuff like binding Ctrl-Click or S-Click to a mouse button count as a violation?

It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine.

Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#528 - 2013-04-19 07:44:04 UTC
T RAYRAY wrote:
i skipped ahead after page 3 or so.

I absolutely think CCP should take a look at the accounts of those players complaining so loudly and splitting hairs in the grey areas in the EULA and look hard into the tools they use to play the game. Seems like in this situation the most vocal are lkely the ones doing things to skirt right on the fine line of the EULA and the intent of the security team to find you if you're cheating.

what's the stupid old-english saying? "thou dost protest too much" or some garbage like that..

I was wondering when some muppet would bring this theory.

CCP can test me as much as they like for cheating, they're not going to find squat. Know why? Because there's nothing to find.

T RAYRAY wrote:
However, this is a game. so **** off and stop cheating.

Prove it.

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat

SJ Astralana
Syncore
#529 - 2013-04-19 07:46:31 UTC  |  Edited by: SJ Astralana
An interesting non-issue. There's no way to tell what happens client-side, it can only be inferred. So if a bot clicks on an item and updates market with appropriate random delays and reasonable hours of operation, it's basically passing a Turing test. Same thing with your tools, if you use the client interactively, you're also passing a Turing test.

I defy anyone to tell the difference between a bot clicking on Export and using imported data from one simply clicking on an item and doing the same.

For my own management tool, I made a design decision long ago that click click vs click when running market imports doesn't add enough time to my daily routine to even warrant wiring up an importer to an undocumented and unsupported side effect of running a client.

Hyperdrive your production business: Eve Production Manager

James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#530 - 2013-04-19 07:50:20 UTC  |  Edited by: James Amril-Kesh
Roime wrote:
T RAYRAY wrote:
i skipped ahead after page 3 or so.

I absolutely think CCP should take a look at the accounts of those players complaining so loudly and splitting hairs in the grey areas in the EULA and look hard into the tools they use to play the game. Seems like in this situation the most vocal are lkely the ones doing things to skirt right on the fine line of the EULA and the intent of the security team to find you if you're cheating.

what's the stupid old-english saying? "thou dost protest too much" or some garbage like that..

before you flame me for giving in to 'the man' and the grey areas of the EULA without a fight, let me explain that if we were IRL in the business world I live in, I'd say "bring on the grey areas" and let me find those places I can gain an advantage, however small, and however close to breaking the rules as I need to tread in order to make an extra buck.

However, this is a game. so **** off and stop cheating.


This.

Not this. Just because we're sick of CCP's doubletalk and redefining what they've previously said was fine doesn't mean we're guilty of using tools that reasonable people would consider unfair.
Unless you consider my use of EVEMon to be worthy of a ban. Not to mention other tools I use which I'm not sure even interact with EVE at all apart from either capturing the DirectX output and writing it to disk (FRAPS) or overlaying specific information from other programs into the DirectX output before displayed on the screen (Mumble and Teamspeak overlays). And I seriously doubt you would agree that any of these, apart from EVEMon, violate the EULA. I also doubt you would agree that EVEMon's cache scraping function should violate the EULA.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#531 - 2013-04-19 08:02:00 UTC
Sirane Elrek wrote:
Andski wrote:
I have MSVS 2010 on my PC, I guess I should get rid of it before CCP deems it a EULA violation because it can be used to not just design, but compile, debug and test botting software!

upgrade to 2012, its C++ intellisense is a lot better than 2010's


If only most 3rd party libraries would work on 2012 already...
Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#532 - 2013-04-19 08:05:49 UTC
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
I also doubt you would agree that EVEMon's cache scraping function should violate the EULA.

Personally, I'm still wondering what functions cache scraping provides which actually constitutes cheating, and what sort of cheating is being done which isn't caught by catchall phrases such as "illegal to modify the client" or "illegal to automate tasks towards the client", thus rendering the whole cache scraping point moot.

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat

James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#533 - 2013-04-19 08:19:59 UTC
Lord Zim wrote:
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
I also doubt you would agree that EVEMon's cache scraping function should violate the EULA.

Personally, I'm still wondering what functions cache scraping provides which actually constitutes cheating, and what sort of cheating is being done which isn't caught by catchall phrases such as "illegal to modify the client" or "illegal to automate tasks towards the client", thus rendering the whole cache scraping point moot.

If CCP says that simple cache scraping will not be enforced, then the answer is "none". So yes, the cache scraping point is moot, especially since CCP's left hand doesn't seem to talk much to its right hand about providing alternatives for its customers.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)

Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#534 - 2013-04-19 08:28:44 UTC  |  Edited by: Lord Zim
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Lord Zim wrote:
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
I also doubt you would agree that EVEMon's cache scraping function should violate the EULA.

Personally, I'm still wondering what functions cache scraping provides which actually constitutes cheating, and what sort of cheating is being done which isn't caught by catchall phrases such as "illegal to modify the client" or "illegal to automate tasks towards the client", thus rendering the whole cache scraping point moot.

If CCP says that simple cache scraping will not be enforced, then the answer is "none". So yes, the cache scraping point is moot, especially since CCP's left hand doesn't seem to talk much to its right hand about providing alternatives for its customers.

As I've said earlier in this thread, I don't trust that they won't have some "misunderstanding" against someone, especially given the fact that they're saying, yet again, that cache scraping isn't going to be punished under the EULA (yet), shortly after someone in the security group apparently has no problems saying that any cache scraping is illegal and has always been illegal. That's because of another left hand not talking to the right hand situation, and down that path lies tears.

After all, what are the chances that the customer support guy (or GM) is going to believe you when you say "I haven't cheated, why am I being punished as a cheater?"? I'm going to go with "pretty much none", since I'm sure even those who actually do bot will say "I don't bot, what gives?" when they get caught/punished.

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat

Anthar Thebess
#535 - 2013-04-19 08:39:23 UTC  |  Edited by: Anthar Thebess
A bit different question then.
Like most big alliances im thinking about creating unified Intel page.
How - by reading txt files created by EVE ( chat logs ) .
This will not connect to eve in any possible way - just read file that is created by it.
Will this be baned?

To be honest - right now i don't know if i can have :
- Neatbeans
- VS
- AHK
- VirtualBox
- (...)
...installed on my pc i use them for my work - so probably i will have to resign from eve - it will not feed my family - but my work does.

Hell, i could try to run it on my second PC - but i have linux there.
Wine should be enough ... will it be banable?
Because i simply don't know how you intend to monitor my Linux.
I have there more "strange" software than on my win PC.



Please someone from CCP respond - because i don't know - do i have to move to Linux or stop subscription.
virm pasuul
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#536 - 2013-04-19 08:45:55 UTC
This thread needs to be closed.
It's a clusterf*****k of self inflicted fear uncertainty doubt and what must be deliberate mis interpretation and wilful lack of understanding. It servers no purpose other than to increase tinfoil hat sales - I suspect the goons, don't they own the tinfoil moons?

CCP have made themselves clear.
If you are capable of understanding the CCP message then continue cache scraping for purposes not against the spirit of the ELUA.

If you are all in a woeful tizzy maelstorm of sky falling down, and quitting eve. Then just uninstall whatever 3dd party software you are using, and get yerself off down to see the nurse for some meds before a nice peaceful nap. Amd stop worrying.

I swear some people get off on worrying - and board lawyering mixed with a supersized dose of lack of comprehension .
seth Hendar
I love you miners
#537 - 2013-04-19 08:54:00 UTC
None ofthe Above wrote:
seth Hendar wrote:
Lallante wrote:
seth Hendar wrote:
as a RL lawyer, you should be aware that this is dependent of the countrys, and in france, if CCP ban someone with no reason, said person can fill a lawsuit and will win, because of customer protective laws (btw, EULA are of no value at all in France).


Incorrect. While a EULA might not be legally enforceable as a contract, that doesn't prevent CCP from refusing access to its services to whoever it likes for whatever reason it likes. At best consumer protection law might get you a refund of unused, pre-purchased subscription time (doesnt apply if you use ISK bought plexs), which will be vastly less than any legal fees incurred, so good luck with that.

enlighten me. EULA is of no value at all in france


Just reread his paragraph. How would France force an unban?

they wouldn't, but CCP will have to pay many RL money, and i mean big time
GreenSeed
#538 - 2013-04-19 08:54:03 UTC
why do people still insist that eve-mon is doing cache scrapes?

are you guys new on this game? years ago there was a huge ruckus with the cache and it was agreed that pulling market information was ok, they even made the client do market dumps in plain text as opposed to the old garbled cache format.

market dumps are even done in a separate folder, its not even used as cache by the game. they are just tab formatted market dumps.


so please, stop spreading misinformation. no market uploader touches the cache of the game, only market dumps.

and claiming they will ban people who upload market dumps that the game overtly does for no other purpose than to allow that specific use, is a silly as saying they will ban all miners because the mining lasers re-cycle automatically, even when a miner is on the next room reading a book.


cache scrapping is a bad thing, we all get it, and we all understood it for the last 5 or 6 years. because cache scrapping was used in the past to:

- know which ship just entered system without having it on grid, probed or even on dscan.
- create a dummy bookmark to warp to, without having that bookmark, or a warpin on those coordinates.

and has been recently used to:

- know what text is entered on which field in game. <- this is why they banned that E-Uni dude.

i am honestly surprised by the fact CCP employees don't seem to be aware that years ago they modified the client cache system in a way that made the client dump text information from the in-game market.

they don't seem to know that they even added code to the IGB to allow items to be loaded from it...

honestly im baffled... is it really that hard to pick up a phone and call someone who worked years ago in CCP and ask them "hey men, why is the client creating a text file every time an item is searched for in the market, and why is that file never, ever accessed again by the client? why is it plain text? why is it time coded? why is said file even created when the client does not use it as cache of the items information, and asks the server for updated information every time that item is searched for?


there's no need to make a half assed claim like " we will only ban cache scrapping if its used to bot or something against the TOS" all they need to say is "ehhh.... the market dumps are not cache."


cache is model information, textures, input fields, including even information in the region of the RAM the game has assigned. you cant access that information... in fact, if you live in the US that's actually illegal, as in "omg i need a lawyer" illegal, and you have your congressmen to thank for that.
Anthar Thebess
#539 - 2013-04-19 09:04:19 UTC
This is not about cache scratching - this is because CCP is going in the wrong way.
Ok i know bots are bad - and you have to brake this - but instead of making them unusable on game level - CCP is monitoring our PC.

To be honest - if you put some indexing software running on your PC - it could try to index also content of eve cache.

Will THIS get you banned?

I'm kind of programmer - i don't have education in this direction - every thing i know i learned by myself , mostly by mistakes - and hours spent on fixing them.

I know that most of software i use interacts one with other running aps - sometimes on level most of the people are not aware of.
For almost 2 years i was able to hold myself from "creating" something that will interact with a game - because i know - that this will kill all the pleasure of playing it.
( the reason i stopped playing Ultima Online )

And now someone could ban me because i have some strange software running on my PC?

OMG - I HAVE SOMETHING THAT interacts directly with EVE.
After running EVE clients i run my own app that rearranges/ resizes windows that they fit on my screen.
I use it for my all apps .....

Anthar Thebess
#540 - 2013-04-19 09:06:28 UTC
seth Hendar wrote:
None ofthe Above wrote:
seth Hendar wrote:
Lallante wrote:
seth Hendar wrote:
as a RL lawyer, you should be aware that this is dependent of the countrys, and in france, if CCP ban someone with no reason, said person can fill a lawsuit and will win, because of customer protective laws (btw, EULA are of no value at all in France).


Incorrect. While a EULA might not be legally enforceable as a contract, that doesn't prevent CCP from refusing access to its services to whoever it likes for whatever reason it likes. At best consumer protection law might get you a refund of unused, pre-purchased subscription time (doesnt apply if you use ISK bought plexs), which will be vastly less than any legal fees incurred, so good luck with that.

enlighten me. EULA is of no value at all in france


Just reread his paragraph. How would France force an unban?

they wouldn't, but CCP will have to pay many RL money, and i mean big time


In my country - you cannot monitor someone else PC - in the way CCP wants to.
This is forbidden by law.
( i know - no one cares :D, and no one forcing me to play eve )