These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE Information Portal

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Dev Blog: Client modification, the EULA and you

First post First post
Author
The Pooptani
State War Academy
Caldari State
#481 - 2013-04-18 23:05:33 UTC
If I couldn't use the cache I'd just write a better program but I guess that's just me because I'm a PhD programmer
Rebnok
Dependable Delinquents
Fraternity.
#482 - 2013-04-18 23:08:26 UTC
looking at all you folks who think ccp can't ban you for what ever reason they want or none at all, want to buy a bridge?
Pelea Ming
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#483 - 2013-04-18 23:20:46 UTC
CCP Peligro wrote:
Thanks, I appreciate it! It's 7pm here in Atlanta so I will sign off after this one, but I will be back tomorrow.

Does this mean i can stalk you? j/k :P I live about an hour south of you, around the Macon/Milledgville area.
Pelandusca
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#484 - 2013-04-18 23:33:21 UTC  |  Edited by: Pelandusca
I will post a short resume for the newcomers so they know what what CCP says:

"Cache scraping is ilegal, but we are not chasing the people using programs like EVEMon. Not until we decide otherwise. Then we will permaban your accounts without notice."

Perhaps CCP thinks that a 7 years old account is worth nothing for a player and after that player loses his/her account he/she will go hurry and buy another one with a ton of PLEX. GL beliving that CCP. If you permaban me for your shi**y made-unclear-on-purpose-EULA I am not going to spend a single dolar anymore on this game. And I'm not the only one who thinks like me. And you know that.
Scooter McCabe
Thunderwaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#485 - 2013-04-18 23:35:46 UTC
Ignoring for a moment the cache scrapping issue, there is a larger issue here that is much more worrisome as a potential sign of things to come. That's how this idea was introduced to the community at large. First the CSM was not consulted on this and this is being done during a transition phase when all major business should have been concluded.

This tells me one of two things:

1. CCP doesn't respect the CSM as stakeholder or even advisory body on behalf of the players. Doing an 11th hour rewrite of the EULA in which half the player base can now be banned is a rather huge step, one that with such broad implications to the player base you would think someone on the CSM would have gotten at least a Hallmark Card that this was coming. Though I don't know the Icelandic for "Hey sorry I stomped all over the player base and the purpose of the CSM for 12th, lets snuggle?" Instead in a major decision where CSM feedback on behalf of the player base was needed, and frankly the purpose of the CSM, people were left in the dark and as a result everyone should be mad.

2. CCP knew this was a bad idea, knew that they would not get the response they wanted from the CSM, and probably wanted to avoid giving anyone the chance to discuss this reasonably went ahead and pushed at the 11th hour with a CSM winding down. Its the kind of arrogance we have seen before in the past and gives us 60$ pants in space and no new ships.

I'm going to hope that CCP decides that in the future a hand in hand partnership with the CSM is not only good for player relations but good for business. So with that lets treat this like when we play soccer and the ball get intercepted by the neighbors Labrador Retriever, call for a do-over and let CCP and the next CSM work things out.

I mean if things go south there is always someone out there opening up a Kickstarter project for a sandbox internet spaceship game right?
Juris Philos Ernaga
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#486 - 2013-04-18 23:49:01 UTC  |  Edited by: Juris Philos Ernaga
Do these exceedingly important changes come before or after the much needed changes to POS management and the addition of 9/10 exploration sites?

Priorities CCP. Priorities.
Rosewalker
Khumaak Flying Circus
#487 - 2013-04-18 23:50:32 UTC
Boris Borison wrote:

If you want to make cache scrapping illegal, just encrypt it, or am I missing something here?


My understanding is that the cache files are encrypted, and the issue is the decryption of the files. CCP put the language in to take care of people using python injection and other code injection and the like and the decryption done by the cache-scrapers falls into his category.

The Nosy Gamer - CCP Random: "hehe, falls under the category: nice try, but no. ;)"

Sebastian Hoch
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#488 - 2013-04-18 23:57:14 UTC
Tonto Auri wrote:
Sebastian Hoch wrote:
This reminds me of the Obama administration stupidly dancing around the question if they can kill US citizens with Drones. "yes we can, but we won't".


You can kill people with bare hands. Should you be put in jail or have your hands cut?


I think you missed my point, but I have to admit I don't understand yours either. My point is they could easily end this by actually saying in the Eula here what they really say they mean rather than handing out a contradiction with a wink and a nod. My statement was not comparing killing with bottling drones, or banning or whatever.
LordeTank
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#489 - 2013-04-19 00:01:27 UTC
Because of the unclarity of the EULA and the Dev team, I think the best thing for me to do is.....uninstall and take my hard earned money and play another game. Why should i sit here and read yes its ok, no its not ok all the time and worry about my game being banned. Yes I run EVEMON and check eve central and will be the first to admit it.

What would be a great clarification is if it was said here is what you can run, here is what you cannot run. If there is something that is not listed, ask

Might be time to uninstall
Barakkus
#490 - 2013-04-19 00:04:32 UTC
So just out of curiosity, if I were to be working on something else while mining, and I happen to use a hex editor that has the capabilities to dumping the contents of ram on my system to disk, is that going to toss up flags? Every once in a while I work on various software projects while I do something like mining or some crap and occasionally use software that has that capability (ie. WinHex) or I might use something like Wireshark for something I might be working on...if that's the case I'll make sure I avoid that stuff while I have an eve client open... :P

http://youtu.be/yytbDZrw1jc

Atum
Eclipse Industrials
Quantum Forge
#491 - 2013-04-19 00:11:52 UTC
Scooter McCabe wrote:
Ignoring for a moment the cache scrapping issue, there is a larger issue here that is much more worrisome as a potential sign of things to come. That's how this idea was introduced to the community at large. First the CSM was not consulted on this and this is being done during a transition phase when all major business should have been concluded.

This tells me one of two things:

1. CCP doesn't respect the CSM as stakeholder or even advisory body on behalf of the players. Doing an 11th hour rewrite of the EULA in which half the player base can now be banned is a rather huge step, one that with such broad implications to the player base you would think someone on the CSM would have gotten at least a Hallmark Card that this was coming. Though I don't know the Icelandic for "Hey sorry I stomped all over the player base and the purpose of the CSM for 12th, lets snuggle?" Instead in a major decision where CSM feedback on behalf of the player base was needed, and frankly the purpose of the CSM, people were left in the dark and as a result everyone should be mad.

2. CCP knew this was a bad idea, knew that they would not get the response they wanted from the CSM, and probably wanted to avoid giving anyone the chance to discuss this reasonably went ahead and pushed at the 11th hour with a CSM winding down. Its the kind of arrogance we have seen before in the past and gives us 60$ pants in space and no new ships.

I'm going to hope that CCP decides that in the future a hand in hand partnership with the CSM is not only good for player relations but good for business. So with that lets treat this like when we play soccer and the ball get intercepted by the neighbors Labrador Retriever, call for a do-over and let CCP and the next CSM work things out.

I mean if things go south there is always someone out there opening up a Kickstarter project for a sandbox internet spaceship game right?


I hate agreeing with a Goon, just on principle, but.... ;)
1. I think you're mostly right... it seems as if the groups that have used the CSM, even as nothing more as a sounding board, have all indicated that their finished product has generally met with much better reviews than the groups that haven't. Not being CSM myself, I may be way off-mark here, but I rather doubt Team Security talks to them much, if at all, just by the nature of their work. What they do doesn't involve module rebalancing, ship tiericide, or UI improvements, is not seen by the player base (usually) as Team Gridlock's lag reduction/server latency work, and it's quite likely they're more paranoid about NDA violations screwing up their progress. If anything, they may do little more than a short "Yeah, here's what we've already done, now can we go back to our dark hacker caves?" type presentation at the summits. We also have to keep in mind that the CSM is a limited resource, with RL responsibilities as well. They simply can't be everywhere at once.

2. Probably partly right as well... pulling this off just before FanFest, when CSM7 is well into "lame duck" status, was incredibly bone-headed. It also tracks with CCP's past foot-in-mouth debacles (TriExporter, anyone?) However, I don't think their intent was ever to shut down useful tools like Eve-Central. Perhaps if the original blog post had read something like "Recent code improvements have allowed us to detect cache scraping, something that wasn't possible before. This telemetry has been integrated with our bot-detection routines, and offenders will meet the biomass chamber." The EULA is never brought into it (or if it must be, talk only about the section that says they're allowed to and ignore the gray-area scraping section), and it still gets the point across that as CCP Pel said, "Something HAS changed" without giving away just how they're doing it.
Entity
X-Factor Industries
Synthetic Existence
#492 - 2013-04-19 00:12:32 UTC
Rosewalker wrote:
Boris Borison wrote:

If you want to make cache scrapping illegal, just encrypt it, or am I missing something here?


My understanding is that the cache files are encrypted


You can stop there, your understanding is wrong.

╦......║...╔╗.║.║.╔╗.╦║.╔╗╔╦╗╔╗

║.╔╗╔╗╔╣.╔╗╠..╠ ╠╗╠╝.║╠ ╠╝║║║╚╗

╩═╚╝║.╚╝.╚╝║..╚╝║║╚╝.╩╚╝╚╝║.║╚╝

Got Item?

Ehcks Argentus
X LLC
#493 - 2013-04-19 00:49:23 UTC
Pelandusca wrote:
I will post a short resume for the newcomers so they know what what CCP says:

"Cache scraping is ilegal, but we are not chasing the people using programs like EVEMon. Not until we decide otherwise. Then we will permaban your accounts without notice."

Perhaps CCP thinks that a 7 years old account is worth nothing for a player and after that player loses his/her account he/she will go hurry and buy another one with a ton of PLEX. GL beliving that CCP. If you permaban me for your shi**y made-unclear-on-purpose-EULA I am not going to spend a single dolar anymore on this game. And I'm not the only one who thinks like me. And you know that.


If EVEMon gained the ability to alter your in-game skill queue without logging on, then you'd get banned for using it. Otherwise this is fear-mongering hyperbole.
Tasha Saisima
Doomheim
#494 - 2013-04-19 00:58:34 UTC
lol at all the conspiracy theorists here thinking CCP is coming after them
ORCACommander
Obsidian Firelance Technologies
#495 - 2013-04-19 01:08:15 UTC
gone through a dozen pages about cache scraping. how about a different issue: customizing the overview: it is possible to use xml codes to add in colors and other information to brackets in space a good example: http://www.gamefront.com/files/?filepath=orcacommander/EVE/Sarah_Overview_Pack_0.2.3.rar
Lors Dornick
Kallisti Industries
#496 - 2013-04-19 01:14:57 UTC
ORCACommander wrote:
gone through a dozen pages about cache scraping. how about a different issue: customizing the overview: it is possible to use xml codes to add in colors and other information to brackets in space a good example: http://www.gamefront.com/files/?filepath=orcacommander/EVE/Sarah_Overview_Pack_0.2.3.rar


But overview (and fitting) files are a different beast since we have import/export functions for them in the game.

CCP Greyscale: As to starbases, we agree it's pretty terrible, but we don't want to delay the entire release just for this one factor.

Loro Sordo
Drogas Sexo y PvP Inc.
#497 - 2013-04-19 01:16:20 UTC
all this mess for an autopilot at 0k ban?

but i disagree about ban without warning, even if user read EULA, same think will happen if another "eve third party software" is suddenly targeted as illegal then the same user will be perma banned.

autopilot at 0km works at least since 2010, why ban now without notice?.

im tired of all this s.h.i.t. (sry), i will dont invest more money (plex or credit card) and time (skills, time in game, etc) playing a game to be banned or perma banned cause CCP suddenly without notice for a technicism losing my chars, assets, etc.

dont count with my 60 bucks montlhy anymore.


Pelandusca
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#498 - 2013-04-19 01:18:52 UTC
Ehcks Argentus wrote:
Pelandusca wrote:
I will post a short resume for the newcomers so they know what what CCP says:

"Cache scraping is ilegal, but we are not chasing the people using programs like EVEMon. Not until we decide otherwise. Then we will permaban your accounts without notice."

Perhaps CCP thinks that a 7 years old account is worth nothing for a player and after that player loses his/her account he/she will go hurry and buy another one with a ton of PLEX. GL beliving that CCP. If you permaban me for your shi**y made-unclear-on-purpose-EULA I am not going to spend a single dolar anymore on this game. And I'm not the only one who thinks like me. And you know that.


If EVEMon gained the ability to alter your in-game skill queue without logging on, then you'd get banned for using it. Otherwise this is fear-mongering hyperbole.


Well, that's today, but thanks to the great EULA tomorrow CCP could change that without notice because they "will enforce it at their discretion".

Truth is that playing this game is like playing a poker round where rules change on the go (EULA changes, ship nerfs, etc). And not happy with that, the damn rules are NOT CLEAR. People is getting tired. This game is not free.
CCP Peligro
Doomheim
#499 - 2013-04-19 01:21:38 UTC
ORCACommander wrote:
gone through a dozen pages about cache scraping. how about a different issue: customizing the overview: it is possible to use xml codes to add in colors and other information to brackets in space a good example: http://www.gamefront.com/files/?filepath=orcacommander/EVE/Sarah_Overview_Pack_0.2.3.rar


Hi there! I answered this one earlier.

CCP Peligro wrote:
Nope, no worries on that one. We are after the hackers, botters and the RMTers.

CCP Peligro - Team Security

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
Vae. Victis.
#500 - 2013-04-19 01:31:59 UTC  |  Edited by: Ranger 1
Pelandusca wrote:
Ehcks Argentus wrote:
Pelandusca wrote:
I will post a short resume for the newcomers so they know what what CCP says:

"Cache scraping is ilegal, but we are not chasing the people using programs like EVEMon. Not until we decide otherwise. Then we will permaban your accounts without notice."

Perhaps CCP thinks that a 7 years old account is worth nothing for a player and after that player loses his/her account he/she will go hurry and buy another one with a ton of PLEX. GL beliving that CCP. If you permaban me for your shi**y made-unclear-on-purpose-EULA I am not going to spend a single dolar anymore on this game. And I'm not the only one who thinks like me. And you know that.


If EVEMon gained the ability to alter your in-game skill queue without logging on, then you'd get banned for using it. Otherwise this is fear-mongering hyperbole.


Well, that's today, but thanks to the great EULA tomorrow CCP could change that without notice because they "will enforce it at their discretion".

Truth is that playing this game is like playing a poker round where rules change on the go (EULA changes, ship nerfs, etc). And not happy with that, the damn rules are NOT CLEAR. People is getting tired. This game is not free.

... and this is no different from how it has always been, in EvE as well as other games.

They've gotten better at catching botters, RMT, hacks, and outright cheating... this is the only thing that has changed. They clarified their stance on the subject because of this.

In response the village idiots are theory crafting their imaginary worst what-if's, completely out of context with what they have been told, and are generally babbling in a hysterical panic.

Get a grip ladies.

View the latest EVE Online developments and other game related news and gameplay by visiting Ranger 1 Presents: Virtual Realms.