Player Features and Ideas Discussion

My bad my bad, forget what I wrote. I like the 766.

Im very limited and cant understand , so stop posting. thx
ship presence in killmails are not directly related to performance??heh , better ships used more , more used means more killmails for them , what is not related there?
yes they stop using the nerfed ones when they can fly better ships , for some it takes time , for many they can already fly those ships it clearly doesnt take 1 year , maybe 2-3 months max

"The current issue is that no one wants to commit to clsoe range" that only means one thing that the blaster doest offer enough advantages over the longer ranged weapons , but hey i m blind so i cant see it
if ccp would increase blaster dps by 3times i would use them nearly all the time, see that way the blasters advantages would outshine their disadvantages,
the problem is not the tackling range is too large, the problem is that the longer ranged race is also the faster winmatar style :D

about sensor strenght , just look at the curret t1 battleships ideas , only matar battleships got their increased and the geddon which had realy low one, and ecm nerf support the race which is the weakest vs ecm , and that is matar

i dont have to diggest any information cause you didnt give any , you just blablad about something you think is right without any proof

oh yeah go back to the people who agree winmatar needs more boosts and 0 nerfs , matar fanboys stick togeather in these dark times , if you dont whine enough maybe you loose matar dominance :)

btw what discussions were here? that the tempest should keep its promised hp buff and also keep its mobility, oh no it should get even better mobility, so will it be combat (tanky) or attack (mobile, dps) bs ,or minmatar stlye both at the same time , oh checking it again it was you who think this is what ccp should do
or
that the thyphoon while slowly getting more launcer than the raven from 4 to 6 at is currently stands ,being already bc fast and small sign also should get better mobility and sneakily Rise just changed the signature to 330 from what was suggested last time 360? I cant remember .
isnt typhoon the same role (attack)as the raven , then why the raven 420m signature r? or just look at the scorp 480m , yeah it totally support superior sensor system

Well with 5 slots you can do prop, web, point, and a TC and E-war on a armor tank if you want or any number of other interesting combos.. a 6th slot.. seems over kill

I would love a 7/5/7, I won't lie but I think some people might feel that would put the ship in the realm of armor tanking too strongly. Even though there is the Maelstrom as the shield gunboat. I can understand why people that like to shield tank, wouldn't favor it due to it's speed and agility. I just don't want the shield tankers to push the tempest to much in to their realm.

The thing is the dual neuting will be almost irrelevant now. If you want a neut ship you will bring the geddon. 1 neut is enough to deal with frigates. That is why i Think would be a MINIMAL loss.

As all battleships tend to bit a bit sluggish and slow difference between combat and attack battleships seems to be quite small. Have you considered giving special role bonuses to attack BS to accentuate the difference between two classes?

I was thinking adding something like this to attack BC would make them more distinct:

Role bonus: -25% MWD capacitor consumption

or

Role bonus: -50% in overheat damage generated by overheated afterburners

This would not make them faster but would allow them to keep at maximum speed longer. Also you don’t have to give same role bonus to all attack BS, you can give different role bonus to each race, or to even to each ship, again to make them more distinct.

I think they should go with something like this for the Typhoon. If the DPS is still a bit low by removing the launcher hardpoint then you could always increase the rate of fire bonus to 7.5%

This way the Typhoon still can fully utilise all 3 weapon systems, including a decently sized drone bay, and does not simply become and armoured Raven.

Typhoon:

Minmatar Battleship Skill Bonuses:
5% bonus to Cruise and Torpedo launcher rate of fire
5% bonus to Cruise and Torpedo launcher explosion velocity

Slot layout: 7H, 5M, 7L; 5 turrets, 5 launchers (-1)
Fittings: 12500 PWG, 640 CPU
Defense (shields / armor / hull) : 6500 / 6000 / 6000
Capacitor (amount / recharge rate / cap per second) : 5400 / 1087s / 4.97
Mobility (max velocity / agility / mass / align time): 130 / .11 / 103600000 / 15.8
Drones (bandwidth / bay): 125 (+25) / 200 (+100)
Targeting (max targeting range / Scan Resolution / Max Locked targets): 65km / 115 / 7
Sensor strength: 19 Ladar Sensor Strength
Signature radius: 330[/quote]

If you go for an armour tank though then what are you going to do with 6 midslots? 1 prop mod for sure, but then you have 5 extra slots to fill when 4 is already plenty. Yeah sure having 6 mid slots is nice, but its a little overkill for an armour tanking ship.

It will be always better to simply fit a nice shield tank and then stack the low slots with damage mods if you for for a 7/6/6 layout.

Oo i can find very good uses. Sensor booster if I am camping. Track computer and track disruptor if I want to fight larger ships. Plus MWD, CAP Injector (neut is useles swithout it), Web, Scram.

Me too. It would be less powerful but it would retain the "spirit"

That is not a valid statement. ALL battleship use DC II. So ALL battleships loose 1 low :P