These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

Bring back my drone POO! 10% of systems with poo!

Author
BEPOHNKA
Ner Vod Fleet Systems
Goonswarm Federation
#1 - 2013-04-07 13:27:58 UTC
Hello,

I understand some of you hated drone poo, because you shot it instead of having to mine the stuff. But this is eve and we have so many options to gain from. So why can't we bring back drone poo too say 10% or 20% of the current drone regions. I didn't mind drone poo, you would learn how to gain from it!

I think CCP was on the right path of adding the "rare" systems in too the game were it was different from bounties which was great! We had something different other then bounties over the years, shooting for mining can still be a good thing! I for one would like too see it back in small mounts spawn over systems.

Drone alloys -- Effect? Would drop drone poo once again!
Bounties -- Effect? Could add highest level bounties in the belts! Common spawns would be set at 3m to 8m spawns!
Loot -- Effect? Loot would drop, No bounties!
Salvage -- Effect? ONly Salvage from NPC's.
Security Status -- Effect? -2.0 to -1.0 systems!
Ore System -- Effect? High level mounts of ORE!
Ring Mining -- Effect? System would be good mining moon goo in spawn sites!
Moon GOoo -- Effect? System would be good for Moon Mining! Ton of high ends...

The ideas could be endless..... again their would be so few that fighting for them would be in great.....
This could be added to low sec or even player control space!

Point of this we need more of a mixer of systems just like wormholes....
Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
#2 - 2013-04-07 13:36:04 UTC
I think that CCP just found it easier to remove the drone drops than actually fix the botting that was the real problem there.

Mr Epeen Cool
BEPOHNKA
Ner Vod Fleet Systems
Goonswarm Federation
#3 - 2013-04-07 13:44:17 UTC  |  Edited by: BEPOHNKA
Mr Epeen wrote:
I think that CCP just found it easier to remove the drone drops than actually fix the botting that was the real problem there.

Mr Epeen Cool



Don't get me wrong but I miss my drone poo, so adding it back with few systems having. Their would have too be a reason too have it back, and I pointed it would having the wonders of eve the option to pick from. risk vs wealth. and it's a option big sand box so having many options is what we need more of in player own space.
bufnitza calatoare
#4 - 2013-04-07 13:55:10 UTC
ccp should never added rogue drones to null sec.

I still think they shoulda made it EoM space.

now go away you cry baby Russian.
BEPOHNKA
Ner Vod Fleet Systems
Goonswarm Federation
#5 - 2013-04-07 14:10:42 UTC  |  Edited by: BEPOHNKA
Not a reason, please give a better one?
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#6 - 2013-04-07 14:16:08 UTC
No.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

BEPOHNKA
Ner Vod Fleet Systems
Goonswarm Federation
#7 - 2013-04-07 14:21:49 UTC  |  Edited by: BEPOHNKA
Malcanis with out giving a reason why, why should we talk about change in the future. I would love too CSM person stand up for common player in even and say why? this could be bad idea..


and i didn't for get to give you anyways Big smile
Ghazu
#8 - 2013-04-07 14:51:54 UTC
No, botters deserve what they got.

http://www.minerbumping.com/ lol what the christ https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2299984#post2299984

Vaju Enki
Secular Wisdom
#9 - 2013-04-07 14:55:51 UTC
If you want to mine, then go ahead and mine asteroid fields.

The Tears Must Flow

BEPOHNKA
Ner Vod Fleet Systems
Goonswarm Federation
#10 - 2013-04-07 15:07:54 UTC
Ahh topic!

I agree no one like botters, but anyone can bot any were at any time. Bounties on any NPC can cause a boter to happen, so can mining in the belt. So removing the drone poo because of a botter? Just as easy to bot belts andnot have to go back to pick up loot. You know you can't place all the blame on drone poo. As we can place blame on bounties and mining as well should we take this away ? you know.
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#11 - 2013-04-07 15:12:10 UTC
BEPOHNKA wrote:
Malcanis with out giving a reason why, why should we talk about change in the future. I would love too CSM person stand up for common player in even and say why? this could be bad idea..


and i didn't for get to give you anyways Big smile


I am standing up for "the common player". Why should a thousand miners starve so that you can spit out capitals in safety?

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

BEPOHNKA
Ner Vod Fleet Systems
Goonswarm Federation
#12 - 2013-04-07 15:13:00 UTC
Vaju Enki wrote:
If you want to mine, then go ahead and mine asteroid fields.




Just because you don't like wont mean other will like it! Trust me their many out their who would like too shoot mining. Again i'm point out a reason why, because it's different and would allow more options of what people like too do and not allow to do because you dislike something in the game! Trying to keep everyone happy can be done!
BEPOHNKA
Ner Vod Fleet Systems
Goonswarm Federation
#13 - 2013-04-07 15:15:14 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
BEPOHNKA wrote:
Malcanis with out giving a reason why, why should we talk about change in the future. I would love too CSM person stand up for common player in even and say why? this could be bad idea..


and i didn't for get to give you anyways Big smile


I am standing up for "the common player". Why should a thousand miners starve so that you can spit out capitals in safety?




With so little systems of the drone poo, you would be able to mine else were for it as well. So blame wont lay on drone poo as much as mining in other systems and build them up.

Just as easy to mine for capitals way in the back end systems :)) then build them.
Vaju Enki
Secular Wisdom
#14 - 2013-04-07 15:19:08 UTC
BEPOHNKA wrote:
Vaju Enki wrote:
If you want to mine, then go ahead and mine asteroid fields.




Just because you don't like wont mean other will like it! Trust me their many out their who would like too shoot mining. Again i'm point out a reason why, because it's different and would allow more options of what people like too do and not allow to do because you dislike something in the game! Trying to keep everyone happy can be done!


Following your amazing logic, since i enjoy chatting in ingame channels, i should get my Ore from doing that activity. Everyone is happy right?

The Tears Must Flow

BEPOHNKA
Ner Vod Fleet Systems
Goonswarm Federation
#15 - 2013-04-07 15:23:16 UTC
Sorry if my grammar or spelling not the best but why can't we just do both then one side. We all have options how capitals should be made, kill? over time you know.
Felicity Love
Doomheim
#16 - 2013-04-07 15:28:33 UTC
No... because asteroids are abundant and Trit is getting cheaper by the day.

Attention

"EVE is dying." -- The Four Forum Trolls of the Apocalypse.   ( Pick four, any four. They all smell.  )

BEPOHNKA
Ner Vod Fleet Systems
Goonswarm Federation
#17 - 2013-04-07 15:31:13 UTC  |  Edited by: BEPOHNKA
Thanks for reply! I hear you but with plan layout we would have so few systems! and so many more belts and sites you can upgrade this would have little effect on the player market! I'm asking they add 10% systems back into the game not what it use to be as I do see it could cause future people again...



Thanks for all the "good replies" I like them and gave you likes ! Big smile
Brooks Puuntai
Solar Nexus.
#18 - 2013-04-07 15:32:46 UTC
Alloys pretty much destroyed the mineral market as well as made a large chunk of 0.0 undesirable to many. With your idea it will still have a negative impact on mineral prices as well as make drone regions undesirable for most.

CCP's Motto: If it isn't broken, break it. If it is broken, ignore it. Improving NPE / Dynamic New Eden

BEPOHNKA
Ner Vod Fleet Systems
Goonswarm Federation
#19 - 2013-04-07 15:36:14 UTC
Brooks Puuntai wrote:
Alloys pretty much destroyed the mineral market as well as made a large chunk of 0.0 undesirable to many. With your idea it will still have a negative impact on mineral prices as well as make drone regions undesirable for most.



I see your point and good stand point of view! I wish we had some type of trial program we can do this with ! you know?
Abrazzar
Vardaugas Family
#20 - 2013-04-07 15:36:25 UTC  |  Edited by: Abrazzar
Or, once the amount of existing drone poo has been sufficiently drained, reintroduce it as the required building material for a set of drone specific modules and (modified) ships, which blueprints you can get from (faction) drones and complexes.

Edit: To make it clear, the new drone poo will not reprocess into minerals.
12Next page