These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Live Events Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

Yashunen: Sukuuvestaa convoy

First post
Author
Lucas Raholan
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
#21 - 2013-04-04 19:10:03 UTC
CCP Falcon wrote:
Dex Nederland wrote:
CCP Falcon wrote:


Initially when I undocked with a couple of the Peace & Order pilots prior to the rest of the event actors logging in, I thought that given the number of people who claim to be Patriots who were present, the Dragonaurs might hold the blockade.

When I realized just how many logistics were locking up the Peace & Order characters though, I was pretty convinced that they'd clear the docking ramps and the convoy would get out. I'll never underestimate the hate for Heth again Big smile



I am sorry, but what led you to think that the Patriots liked the Provist, especially the Dragonaurs?



Well, there's a few people who've been in support of Heth, and there were a fair few people in Luminaire who were defending the titan, even after it threatened to start shooting at the surface Blink




It's like you don't read the IGS at all Twisted

Shitposts so bad CONCORD gave me a 50 billion ISK bounty

Xindi Kraid
Itsukame-Zainou Hyperspatial Inquiries Ltd.
Arataka Research Consortium
#22 - 2013-04-05 12:49:40 UTC
CCP Falcon wrote:



Well, there's a few people who've been in support of Heth, and there were a fair few people in Luminaire who were defending the titan, even after it threatened to start shooting at the surface Blink


I think you have misunderstood the situation. Many of us do not support Heth, and I, in fact, would pod myself back to highsec if I thought I had the chance to kill him. We do, however stand with the Caldari State. That was a State owned titan in orbit of a State owned planet and the Federal forces were violating that sovereignty under what their own rhetoric demonstrated to be a somewhat thinly veiled excuse to attack Caldari naval assets.

In short we were defending our nation rather than just our leader.
Toluijin Chagangan
Doomheim
#23 - 2013-04-05 14:33:10 UTC
Simon Louvaki wrote:


My character is a liberal and he proudly stood in defense of Caldari Prime against the Federation assault. I find it kinda funny how people keep trying to use that card 'the Titan was gonna shoot at the planet!' to white wash the situation, especially given the Admirals broadcasts about moving in to support the troops who were engaged with Federal forces on the ground.


well... as falcon just said she was going to bombard the planet... and...

CCP Falcon wrote:

Yep, I was piloting the Leviathan, along with two of the Wyverns. All logging was turned on.

Hopefully we'll be able to piece something together out of all the crazy numbers Smile




i think it's a fair assessment that she was going to.
CCP Falcon
#24 - 2013-04-05 15:14:11 UTC
Toluijin Chagangan wrote:
Simon Louvaki wrote:


My character is a liberal and he proudly stood in defense of Caldari Prime against the Federation assault. I find it kinda funny how people keep trying to use that card 'the Titan was gonna shoot at the planet!' to white wash the situation, especially given the Admirals broadcasts about moving in to support the troops who were engaged with Federal forces on the ground.


well... as falcon just said she was going to bombard the planet... and...

CCP Falcon wrote:

Yep, I was piloting the Leviathan, along with two of the Wyverns. All logging was turned on.

Hopefully we'll be able to piece something together out of all the crazy numbers Smile




i think it's a fair assessment that she was going to.


Well, that's an assumption... but all will be revealed in good time. Big smile

CCP Falcon || EVE Universe Community Manager || @CCP_Falcon

Happy Birthday To FAWLTY7! <3

Simon Louvaki
Khaldari InnoTektoniks and Analytical Solutions
#25 - 2013-04-05 22:04:16 UTC
Toluijin Chagangan wrote:
Simon Louvaki wrote:


My character is a liberal and he proudly stood in defense of Caldari Prime against the Federation assault. I find it kinda funny how people keep trying to use that card 'the Titan was gonna shoot at the planet!' to white wash the situation, especially given the Admirals broadcasts about moving in to support the troops who were engaged with Federal forces on the ground.


well... as falcon just said she was going to bombard the planet... and...

CCP Falcon wrote:

Yep, I was piloting the Leviathan, along with two of the Wyverns. All logging was turned on.

Hopefully we'll be able to piece something together out of all the crazy numbers Smile




i think it's a fair assessment that she was going to.


Aye, luckily I was there and distinctly remember the broadcasts stating that she was indeed going to bomb the planet, but in a support capacity. That would, in my mind, strongly imply that she wasn't about to simply fry the planet.

-- "The weak of mind are quick to judge with slightest tempt; Thus fools go forth to spread false word." - The Scriptures, Book of Trials 2:13 - 2:21

--"At the narrow passage, there is no brother and no friend." - Hyasyoda Proverb

Unit XS365BT
Unit Commune
#26 - 2013-04-05 22:08:57 UTC
There was only one time she mentioned supporting the ground troops, and that was when she said the oblivion was spooling down because the ground forces had the upper hand.

the rest of the time she merely mentioned having target co-ordinates, or that she had lost communication with the planet and was going to bombard it anyway.

anyway, even if she fired in a 'support capacity' had she fired the oblivion at the planet she'd have made a big-ol supervolcano... consider that 2/3rds of the titan, without the most devastating parts left attached, caused a hole in the planet and major tectonic instability...

bad things would have happened.

Unit XS365BT. Designated Communications Officer. Unit Commune.

Simon Louvaki
Khaldari InnoTektoniks and Analytical Solutions
#27 - 2013-04-05 23:01:12 UTC
Which doesn't make sense that she'd be using the DD in the first place to support troops unless things had gotten entirely out of hand. I imagine it makes more sense that she was powering up all weapons in case they were needed, including the DD Weapon in which everyone simply assumes that means she was planning on using it right then and there.

Unless we're completely and totally wrong about the affect the DD would have on the planet it just seems really crazy to even contemplate using the weapon. As Falcon just said, that's one assumption, and its far too cartoon villain to be honest.

-- "The weak of mind are quick to judge with slightest tempt; Thus fools go forth to spread false word." - The Scriptures, Book of Trials 2:13 - 2:21

--"At the narrow passage, there is no brother and no friend." - Hyasyoda Proverb

Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
#28 - 2013-04-06 00:20:56 UTC  |  Edited by: Nevyn Auscent
It was only right at the end that they discussed actually firing the DD at the planet, the rest of the time the references were to conventional weapon fire on the planet. That said.... A Titans conventional weapons bombarding a planet are a significant threat, and had to be taken seriously given Heths claims that any attacks on the planet would result in the Titan killing the millions & millions of Gallente civilians.
Sitting back and going 'Oh maybe she's bluffing' when she had been moved there a week before specifically by Heth as the situation had started to heat up would have been criminal had she then carried through and bombarded the planet, and we have no real idea of what a titans conventional weapons do to a planet, since we don't have missile bombardment or titan sized bombardment available to capsuleers.

All reasonable indications were that the threats were serious regarding planetary bombardment and the use of the titan to commit ethnic cleansing when it came down to the wire, a form of scorched earth policy so to speak. So pilots had to regard them as such, and that it didn't happen due to the technical limitations of planetary bombardment.
Toluijin Chagangan
Doomheim
#29 - 2013-04-06 13:10:22 UTC
every time she mentioned firing on the planet, she also mentioned preparing the 'oblivion'
That is a threat regarding firing the doomsday.

Still.. she somehow managed to fire the thing at a CONCORD battleship... That still confuses me.
Simon Louvaki
Khaldari InnoTektoniks and Analytical Solutions
#30 - 2013-04-06 18:51:43 UTC
Its not unreasonable to assume that she was bringing all weapon systems online in preparation for a worst case scenario (not that I support nuking Caldari Prime into Oblivion) but it isn't a threat. Given her stated intentions to support the ground troops (which was the reason for moving into low orbit in the first place) its more like wishful thinking that she'd do something so unreasonable as to DD the planet to justify the Federations attack.

It appears to me most people had inferred her intention via what was spoken on the public comms, which doesn't even make sense that she'd be broadcasting on in the first place. Given our factional sides I doubt we're all gonna come to an agreement as to the intention one way or the other.

I'd be more interested in what wasn't broadcasted live rather than what was.

-- "The weak of mind are quick to judge with slightest tempt; Thus fools go forth to spread false word." - The Scriptures, Book of Trials 2:13 - 2:21

--"At the narrow passage, there is no brother and no friend." - Hyasyoda Proverb

Evi Polevhia
Phoenix Naval Operations
Phoenix Naval Systems
#31 - 2013-04-06 18:53:14 UTC
What confuses me is...isn't the Oblivion just Macross Missile Massacre? And wasn't it said before that the reason for there being no Missile version of the orbital bombardment weapons is that you'd either have a weapon that took -forever- for the missile to impact the ground due to being fired from orbit, or the missile would be going so fast (to get from orbit to ground nearly instantly) that the kinetic force due to the speed would wipe out the whole map in a massive blast?

I mean the Oblivion firing on the surface of Caldari Prime would either take a minute or two to impact, or it'd deal as much if not more damage due to .999c speed missiles as the impact of the titan itself did.
Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
#32 - 2013-04-07 00:01:23 UTC
The titans bombardment orbit was quoted as 325km. Difficult for tactical bombardment against individual troops like a dust map, but then again, any titans weapons would be overkill and wipe a dust map.
So if we assume something like 10km/s, achievable by some of the missile ships out there, as special OB ammo for missiles speeds, it's a 30sec flight time. Still reasonable.
Evi Polevhia
Phoenix Naval Operations
Phoenix Naval Systems
#33 - 2013-04-07 05:56:09 UTC
Nevyn Auscent wrote:
The titans bombardment orbit was quoted as 325km. Difficult for tactical bombardment against individual troops like a dust map, but then again, any titans weapons would be overkill and wipe a dust map.
So if we assume something like 10km/s, achievable by some of the missile ships out there, as special OB ammo for missiles speeds, it's a 30sec flight time. Still reasonable.


Still though. Either you do the massive targeting laser like is done in current orbital bombardments, and then the ground targets have 30 sec to escape. Or you don't target and you carpet bomb several square kilometers. Literally erase an entire DUST map from existence.
Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
#34 - 2013-04-07 08:38:48 UTC
Evi Polevhia wrote:
Nevyn Auscent wrote:
The titans bombardment orbit was quoted as 325km. Difficult for tactical bombardment against individual troops like a dust map, but then again, any titans weapons would be overkill and wipe a dust map.
So if we assume something like 10km/s, achievable by some of the missile ships out there, as special OB ammo for missiles speeds, it's a 30sec flight time. Still reasonable.


Still though. Either you do the massive targeting laser like is done in current orbital bombardments, and then the ground targets have 30 sec to escape. Or you don't target and you carpet bomb several square kilometers. Literally erase an entire DUST map from existence.


Yes, and the reasonable guess for a TITAN is that you erase a dust map. I would expect any Titans firepower to basically do that from orbit. Not just missiles. A titan isn't going to be fired to nuke a single tank, it's going to be fired to take out the entire army camp or city block.

Heth had threatened that the Titan was going to be fired at the Gallente city blocks.

We had no idea what the Titans 'co-ordinates' they were recieving from the ground troops were, nor if they had pre-recorded firing patterns for said city blocks.

There were significant indications that she intended to fire some kind of orbital bombardment at several points, but backed off again for various reasons.

She had destroyed a Concord battleship that had challenged her over the fact that bombarding the planet would break the Yulai convention, rather than simply advising the battleship they were not going to initiate any kind of bombardment.

So, to a logical perspective at the time, it seemed reasonable to assume she was going to not back down at some point soon, and begin firing the conventional weapons. At unknown and possibly civilian targets.
Simon Louvaki
Khaldari InnoTektoniks and Analytical Solutions
#35 - 2013-04-07 19:41:25 UTC
Nevyn Auscent wrote:

There were significant indications that she intended to fire some kind of orbital bombardment at several points, but backed off again for various reasons.

She had destroyed a Concord battleship that had challenged her over the fact that bombarding the planet would break the Yulai convention, rather than simply advising the battleship they were not going to initiate any kind of bombardment.

So, to a logical perspective at the time, it seemed reasonable to assume she was going to not back down at some point soon, and begin firing the conventional weapons. At unknown and possibly civilian targets.


Actually, she destroyed the CONCORD battleship because it refused to vacate the no-fly zone. She warned him multiple times at that in which he constantly refused.

-- "The weak of mind are quick to judge with slightest tempt; Thus fools go forth to spread false word." - The Scriptures, Book of Trials 2:13 - 2:21

--"At the narrow passage, there is no brother and no friend." - Hyasyoda Proverb

Nevyn Auscent
Broke Sauce
#36 - 2013-04-08 00:01:22 UTC
Simon Louvaki wrote:
Nevyn Auscent wrote:

There were significant indications that she intended to fire some kind of orbital bombardment at several points, but backed off again for various reasons.

She had destroyed a Concord battleship that had challenged her over the fact that bombarding the planet would break the Yulai convention, rather than simply advising the battleship they were not going to initiate any kind of bombardment.

So, to a logical perspective at the time, it seemed reasonable to assume she was going to not back down at some point soon, and begin firing the conventional weapons. At unknown and possibly civilian targets.


Actually, she destroyed the CONCORD battleship because it refused to vacate the no-fly zone. She warned him multiple times at that in which he constantly refused.


Except the only reason the CONCORD battleship was there was because CONCORD believed that she was about to break the Yulai convention by bombarding the planet. So if she had said 'We aren't going to bombard the planet'. Then the CONCORD battleship no longer had any need to be there. I also disagree that it was because of the no fly zone, as she was not engaging any of the hundred odd capsuleers present at that time in the 'No Fly zone' either. You don't get to selectivly apply no fly zones as a legit excuse to shoot someone. Especially shooting CONCORD being pretty serious.
Given the lack of engaging any of the other capsuleers present & the dialog at the time, the most likely apparant cause is that she intended to violate the bombardment clause in the Yulai convention, & didn't want CONCORD interference if she did. So took it out before it came up.

There are other possibilities, but it's the old Occams Razor deal (think I'm using the right principle....), simplest explanation. Hindsight provides us other possibilities, but at the time, the simplest explanation seemed like she intended to bombard the planet.
Simon Louvaki
Khaldari InnoTektoniks and Analytical Solutions
#37 - 2013-04-08 03:56:19 UTC  |  Edited by: Simon Louvaki
Nevyn Auscent wrote:

Except the only reason the CONCORD battleship was there was because CONCORD believed that she was about to break the Yulai convention by bombarding the planet. So if she had said 'We aren't going to bombard the planet'. Then the CONCORD battleship no longer had any need to be there.


To my knowledge, the DED doesn't hold jurisdiction over Caldari Naval vessels, and relaying that kind of information over a public channel while enemy forces are engaging your own soldiers on your own planet carries the faint scent of near-treason.
The DED requested Yanala give him the information, and she made it aptly clear that she was either not, or not in the position to relay that kind of information. My bet is both, given her orders come from the Caldari High Command and not CONCORD.

Nevyn Auscent wrote:

I also disagree that it was because of the no fly zone, as she was not engaging any of the hundred odd capsuleers present at that time in the 'No Fly zone' either. You don't get to selectivly apply no fly zones as a legit excuse to shoot someone. Especially shooting CONCORD being pretty serious.


This is curious, because even today no-fly zones are often met with deadly force when they are not heeded. She was within her right to destroy the ship, and she gave him ample time to vacate and even warned him. I also don't think it was 'selective' given he was the only one in 'violation'.

Nevyn Auscent wrote:
Given the lack of engaging any of the other capsuleers present & the dialog at the time, the most likely apparant cause is that she intended to violate the bombardment clause in the Yulai convention, & didn't want CONCORD interference if she did. So took it out before it came up.


You don't get to 'assume' one is going to break a treaty. If you can't prove it, you don't have room to act. CONCORD as stated many a time that its directive only allows for intervention if the Convention is breached, not if they think its going to be breached.

Nevyn Auscent wrote:

There are other possibilities, but it's the old Occams Razor deal (think I'm using the right principle....), simplest explanation. Hindsight provides us other possibilities, but at the time, the simplest explanation seemed like she intended to bombard the planet.


None of my observations were made in hindsight, we simply viewed

-- "The weak of mind are quick to judge with slightest tempt; Thus fools go forth to spread false word." - The Scriptures, Book of Trials 2:13 - 2:21

--"At the narrow passage, there is no brother and no friend." - Hyasyoda Proverb

Previous page12