These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next page
 

I challange you to a dual

Author
NickyYo
modro
The Initiative.
#1 - 2013-01-22 16:31:56 UTC  |  Edited by: NickyYo
Is there any more information on this implementation happening next month?

http://eve-ru.com/upload/userpics/january2013/duel_dialog_1.png
This is an awesome idea, i foresee multiple pvp tournaments setup from the community without any risk of intervention from anyone.

If someone could point me to a blog containing information about this it would greatly be appreciated cheers!

..

Piugattuk
Litla Sundlaugin
#2 - 2013-01-22 16:34:36 UTC
No, but this would be a great feature Big smileIm making my listTwisted
NickyYo
modro
The Initiative.
#3 - 2013-01-22 16:35:55 UTC  |  Edited by: NickyYo
Piugattuk wrote:
No, but this would be a great feature Big smileIm making my listTwisted


Yea it is, If this is so i think im gunna create a betting site for it :) or a new kind of killboard, if CCP can modify the killmail information so that we can tell the kill is from a dual BUT there will be a problem with remote reppers!!

You could just imagine the jita undock, a dual fest! much better than the jetcan way :)

..

Solstice Project
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#4 - 2013-01-22 16:42:04 UTC
"without interference"

lol really makes me think CCP lost its mind wording it that way,
because there will always be people misunderstanding it. ^_^
Seven Koskanaiken
Shadow Legions.
#5 - 2013-01-22 16:42:08 UTC
challenge from forum button needed
Tiberious Thessalonia
True Slave Foundations
#6 - 2013-01-22 16:42:22 UTC
NickyYo wrote:
without any risk of intervention from anyone.


Suicide ganking not included as intervention?
Ayuren Aakiwa
Anoikis Equilibrium
Honorable Third Party
#7 - 2013-01-22 16:43:05 UTC
"Enter an limited engagement"
Hrothgar Nilsson
#8 - 2013-01-22 16:48:11 UTC
This:
Quote:
...during which period CONCORD will permit us to settle our differences in single combat without interference.

Should be changed to this:
Quote:
...during which period we will be permitted to settle our differences in single combat without CONCORD intervention.
NickyYo
modro
The Initiative.
#9 - 2013-01-22 16:50:55 UTC
Hrothgar Nilsson wrote:
This:
Quote:
...during which period CONCORD will permit us to settle our differences in single combat without interference.

Should be changed to this:
Quote:
...during which period we will be permitted to settle our differences in single combat without CONCORD intervention.


Would remote reppers be allowed to rep someone in a dual? if so i think it should be made not so.

..

Mortimer Civeri
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#10 - 2013-01-22 16:53:10 UTC
You challenge me to a pair, of what?

Oh, I get it. You meant duel, as in prearranged combat between two persons, not dual as in composed or consisting of two people, items, parts, etc.

"I don't know which is worse, ...that everyone has his price, or that the price is always so low." Calvin

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#11 - 2013-01-22 16:59:16 UTC
NickyYo wrote:
Would remote reppers be allowed to rep someone in a dual? if so i think it should be made not so.
Of course it will, and of course it should be allowed. It's just the law looking the other way while two guys duke it out — you're still in the same universe as everyone else and subject to their whims.
John DaiSho
One Risky Click
Snuffed Out
#12 - 2013-01-22 17:04:30 UTC
NickyYo wrote:
Would remote reppers be allowed to rep someone in a dual? if so i think it should be made not so.


They would be as allowed as any other neutral logi, which means the repairer becomes a suspect. The new crimewatch rules are simple and will not stop having effect with prearranged duels.

And no, having a bounty on you does not make you more of a valid target as you already are.
Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
#13 - 2013-01-22 17:11:00 UTC
I insist on a graphic for a huge gauntlet smacking the ship of the challengee.


Bring back DEEEEP Space!

NickyYo
modro
The Initiative.
#14 - 2013-01-22 17:17:39 UTC
John DaiSho wrote:
NickyYo wrote:
Would remote reppers be allowed to rep someone in a dual? if so i think it should be made not so.


They would be as allowed as any other neutral logi, which means the repairer becomes a suspect. The new crimewatch rules are simple and will not stop having effect with prearranged duels.

And no, having a bounty on you does not make you more of a valid target as you already are.


In my honest opinion, neutral logis should not be allowed to rep ANYONE who is in a dual.
Logis are a win button for people who have been playing a while, logis need to be nerfed; meaning no rep from neutrals or concordoken!

..

Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#15 - 2013-01-22 17:18:59 UTC
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:
I insist on a graphic for a huge gauntlet smacking the ship of the challengee.




Damn it, you beat me to it.
Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
Vae. Victis.
#16 - 2013-01-22 17:19:29 UTC
John DaiSho wrote:
NickyYo wrote:
Would remote reppers be allowed to rep someone in a dual? if so i think it should be made not so.


They would be as allowed as any other neutral logi, which means the repairer becomes a suspect. The new crimewatch rules are simple and will not stop having effect with prearranged duels.

And no, having a bounty on you does not make you more of a valid target as you already are.

This.

If you bring in neutral reppers they will be shootable by everyone, which will end badly for them if it's done outside Jita 4-4. Smile

Off grid boosting is still an issue of course.

View the latest EVE Online developments and other game related news and gameplay by visiting Ranger 1 Presents: Virtual Realms.

Keno Skir
#17 - 2013-01-22 17:32:31 UTC
Stupid idea, not sandbox like.

If people want to duel in safety they should take space or otherwise learn how to do it in safety. Isn't that the whole point?
Turelus
Utassi Security
#18 - 2013-01-22 17:34:05 UTC
You can go test it all now on SISI :)

Turelus CEO Utassi Security

Bienator II
madmen of the skies
#19 - 2013-01-22 17:34:13 UTC
Seven Koskanaiken wrote:
challenge from forum button needed

to create private threads for smacktalk?

how to fix eve: 1) remove ECM 2) rename dampeners to ECM 3) add new anti-drone ewar for caldari 4) give offgrid boosters ongrid combat value

Arec Bardwin
#20 - 2013-01-22 17:36:31 UTC
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:
I insist on a graphic for a huge gauntlet smacking the ship of the challengee.
Make it so!
123Next page