These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

BANNED ACCOUNT REMOVED Vs. TIME DATES ON TITANS-SUPERS!

First post
Author
Sergeant Acht Scultz
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#21 - 2013-01-14 19:13:34 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
[quote=masternerdguy]I support "Date of Construction" on ships.[/quote

I'd like date of construction and who made the ship (if they choose to "sign" their name so to speak). That we we could see which ship builder built the most ships that get blown up.

"Date of Construction" would also give us a way to measure the average life of a given type of ship.



Dynamic data is cool, useless dynamic data is not cool. Things already lag enough like they are, please stop trying to make them lag even more. My win 8-64 doesn't care that much but seems Eve does so, stop it !

removed inappropriate ASCII art signature - CCP Eterne

De'Veldrin
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#22 - 2013-01-15 13:32:13 UTC
silens vesica wrote:

Agreed on the 'final decision' bit. IRT 'gaming the system, I suspect the reference is to anticipated manipulation and social engineering to get someone to commit a bannable offense, motivated by desire to gain a highly desireable name.
Seems specious to me, but who knows what shenanigans the insiders have seen, that are not obvious to us?


Never underestimate the ability of duplicitous people to convince stupid people to do dumb things. People still pay Goons recruitment fees after all.

De'Veldrin's Corollary (to Malcanis' Law): Any idea that seeks to limit the ability of a large nullsec bloc to do something in the name of allowing more small groups into sov null will inevitably make it that much harder for small groups to enter sov null.

silens vesica
Corsair Cartel
#23 - 2013-01-15 14:32:02 UTC
De'Veldrin wrote:
silens vesica wrote:

Agreed on the 'final decision' bit. IRT 'gaming the system, I suspect the reference is to anticipated manipulation and social engineering to get someone to commit a bannable offense, motivated by desire to gain a highly desireable name.
Seems specious to me, but who knows what shenanigans the insiders have seen, that are not obvious to us?


Never underestimate the ability of duplicitous people to convince stupid people to do dumb things. People still pay Goons recruitment fees after all.

Fair point.

Tell someone you love them today, because life is short. But scream it at them in Esperanto, because life is also terrifying and confusing.

Didn't vote? Then you voted for NulBloc

Dominic karin
Versatility Production Corporation' LLC
#24 - 2013-01-15 16:28:45 UTC
I have no idea what you're getting at with the ban bit but I support the 'Date Manufactured' idea and would also go as far as to add that there should be a location manufactured as well if they add that.
BEPOHNKA
Ner Vod Fleet Systems
Goonswarm Federation
#25 - 2013-01-15 16:41:16 UTC
Thanks all for the feedback.

Far as the banned names, place time limit on it! 5 years? or over... point is game is growing and people would like to free up some names.... even if the name gets reused, the history is gone and player most likely who used it... 10 years in jail is very long time to keep something locked... Only thing I ask is deleting the toon name... Shocked
Previous page12