These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE Information Portal

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Dev Blog: Introducing The Free Developer License & CREST API Beta Test

First post First post
Author
shadygirl
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#81 - 2012-12-23 19:19:43 UTC
That was not a trolling attempt. I just expressed my opinion on hard steel's demand for profit.
Imho CCP is right to not allow outright profit. Though they allow donation which is fair.
If he (hard steel) is programmer and is looking in a way to make money he should find other project/job.

I will just stop here as I have no intention to drag this thread down as it serve other purpose. I just felt it needs to be said in contrast to what hard steel said.
Thats all.

Fly strange Smile
Synthmilk
The United Peoples of Synth
#82 - 2012-12-24 22:24:08 UTC
Sentient Blade wrote:
CCP stands to profit from the production of CREST (and the API) otherwise they simply would not have made it.


I am very glad I do not live in your world.

Because in my world, people tend towards making things for the benefit of a target group, if not everyone, and it is the desire to improve the experience of those people that drives development, with profits coming in as a reality check that limits what can be done with the available resources.

[economic rant]
Sure, many people, such as your self, put profits first, and the quality and capability of the product, and the well being of the customer, second. This is why we not only have the CoD and BF series of mindlessly entertaining titles, among others, but why there are so many horrible products out there in general, that only just barely meet the requirements they were intended to, not to mention it is why many economies are in ruins. In theory and practice, the "Profits First" mentality fails, horribly, being sustained simply by government subsidies and bail outs, with taxpayer money.
[/economic rant]


While CCP will benefit from creating tools that strengthen the community, if you think that is the ONLY reason they have done it, or even the primary reason, then I pity you for being so cynical.

If CCP was more concerned with making money than creating their product or providing services to the community, they would have removed the open, player driven economy, made it impossible to attack anyone else in Highsec at all, and done numerous other things to water EVE down into something that average casual couch jockey would pick up and play.

Instead they have stuck to maintaining a game that is still challenging to play, not to mention code, balance, and maintain, listened to, and implemented, player feedback, and generally been a hell of a lot better than most other developers of any genre of game when it comes to doing things for the players benefit, at the cost of an even larger bottom line that they could have gotten by doing something else.




So I want to thank you CCP for giving the community these tools, and for placing more value on improving your game and building the community than your profits.
Sentient Blade
Crisis Atmosphere
Coalition of the Unfortunate
#83 - 2012-12-24 22:31:58 UTC
There's so many things ignorant, contradictory and just plain wrong in the above post I don't even know where to start.
Hienz Doofenshmirtz
Outsourced Manufacturing
#84 - 2012-12-25 11:09:07 UTC
Question, do we know yet what kind of information Crest will provide for Dust514 players? I know this is probably not the best area to ask in, and that answering it might not be allowed. However, it'd be nice to know for a project I'm working on.

www.dust514stats.com do you know?

Dino Boff
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#85 - 2012-12-27 02:50:27 UTC
I am fine if CREST starts with limited features and restrictive terms of use. The sooner it get deployed, the better.

However, I hope we will soon get looser terms of use for internal corp/alliance/coalition application/wer site. A corp might have different people working on different apps that might need to share data with each other. It would be a shame if those apps had to stop sharing data or pass on using CREST/Single Sign On.
Karanar
DeathByDestruction
#86 - 2012-12-27 11:06:34 UTC
The fact that we cannot charge for access to anything we build with the API is very disappointing. I was intending to create a very large web application using the API that would total thousands of development hours with myself and another developer, but if we cannot even collect a small fee if necessary to cover our costs and development time then it is just not financially viable to spend so much development time on.

I hope CCP will reconsider letting thirdp arty developers charge for the hard work they put into making tools for the game.

Also for any Devs, the legal@ccpgames.com email address is not accepting mail.


Delivery has failed to these recipients or groups:

legal@ccpgames.com
Your message can't be delivered because delivery to this address is restricted

If you would like the full email headers please drop me a PM.
HARD STEEL
Caldari Capital Construction Company
#87 - 2012-12-28 15:00:05 UTC  |  Edited by: HARD STEEL
I didn't mean to troll and get people upset - my point was the rules of this ecosystem is win/lose/win (ccp/3rd party devs/the public). Lose being rules against us being able to bill for memberships and profit from our work - given enough time real-life will over-ride all ambition for us building things for EVE. Personally I'd LOVE to build an EVE app, build a team and put some hardware behind it.

Another variable I'd like to point out is, with the last posters comment about the legal email not being setup, the duration of time thats passed since this was announced at fanfest and my gut reaction after reading the API documentation - I'm getting the feeling not much effort is going into CREST - at least on the public side. I say this as someone who has read the API documentation for pretty much every major web service project from Amazon Webservices, Microsoft CRM, Salesforce.com and the wide range of Google APIs.

Perhaps the team is working on the internals right now but seriously, how many people are allocated to this and how important is the CREST project to CCP?

ONLY THE HARD.  ONLY THE STRONG.

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#88 - 2012-12-29 09:35:15 UTC  |  Edited by: Vaerah Vahrokha
I'd have some questions:

1) How can I deal with not accepting RMT, EULA breaking ads?

None of us small time developers have their own advertising network Attention so we have to rely on Google Ads and similar.

The RMT and EULA breaking ads spawn continuously and there's a limit on how many can be blacklisted. Even on prominent "legit and known good" sites like Chribba's EvE search those ads may appear.

If you want to help apps developers you should provide some CCP made ads wedge / filter with the ability to cut off the offending ads that don't suit CCP's standards.

2) Is there a provision to provide markets polling or pushing / queue subscribing? The current way is to (ab)use of the in game cache and upload data on third party sites for further processing and relay. This is quite intrusive, borderline gray area as for the EULA is concerned and many more other burdens.

3) CCP, out of everyone should know how life is a cold, harsh sandbox. If you want to get out the part time hobbyst 3rd party apps status you should create a revenue scheme for professional developers that makes it worth investing time in developing EvE apps. Make it something of a "opt in gold app membership" where, out of a possible same developer apps pool, the developer may choose some for gold membership, involving:

- for the developer the ability to charge
- for CCP the ability to claim a developer revenue percentage (CCP can monitor how many apps get bought or even create a mini-Steam) or a license fee.
Rob Crowley
State War Academy
#89 - 2012-12-29 10:14:20 UTC
Dino Boff wrote:
However, I hope we will soon get looser terms of use for internal corp/alliance/coalition application/wer site. A corp might have different people working on different apps that might need to share data with each other. It would be a shame if those apps had to stop sharing data or pass on using CREST/Single Sign On.

From a legal perspective, corp and alliance mates can't really be treated differently than any other players, so I wouldn't expect looser terms in that regard.

I agree it would be a shame to pass on data sharing or CREST, but maybe there's a workaround for that, especially if the different apps are made corp/alliance internal by people knowing each other to some extent: Just bring the apps under one roof and declare them one app (which isn't that far of a stretch if they share data anyway). Different people would still work on different parts of the new big app, so it's just a change in overall organization. Probably inconvenient compared to now but it should be legally sound.
Andre Vauban
Federal Defense Union
Gallente Federation
#90 - 2012-12-29 19:47:07 UTC
I cannot wait to get a hold of CREST. However, can you pretty please add the player's/corp factional warfare affiliation to one of the CREST resources? I'd really really like to update some websites to deny access once a corp leaves militia. It is currently a PITA to manually check the 10's of corps/alliances to make sure they didn't leave militia.

.

Myfanwy Heimdal
Heimdal Freight and Manufacture Inc
#91 - 2013-01-01 18:58:10 UTC

I've been on this planet for over fifty years and not needed nor wished to have an instrument which was designed to shackle one into debt. And I do not intend to start now.

So, does this mean that I am going to be excluded on the grounds of Clear and Prudent Thinking?

Pam:  I wonder what my name means in Welsh?Nessa: Why?

Myfanwy Heimdal
Heimdal Freight and Manufacture Inc
#92 - 2013-01-01 19:12:11 UTC
Marcel Devereux wrote:
gfldex wrote:
CCP FoxFour wrote:
I cannot wait to dig into this! :D Looking forward to seeing what you guys come up with using it.


Did you read and understood section 12.4? You might find yourself in a situation where your career is directly effected by this license agreement.


Just move to California. Section 12.4 can't be enforced there.


It can't be enforced in a lot of places; it will be classed as Restriction of Trade and that is heavily frowned upon.

I used to love such clauses in my past contracts; by having that in a contract it meant that I could have it terminated at any time on the grounds of it being a not-legal instrument. That's got me out of a few horrible contracts in the past.


I am looking forward to coding against this API for sure. I have a couple of applications in mind.

Pam:  I wonder what my name means in Welsh?Nessa: Why?

Tici Toc
Posique Corp
#93 - 2013-01-03 16:17:25 UTC
1) The developer cannot be responsible for filtering a 3rd party Ad network. CCP must approve an Ad network outright.
2) If CCP starts charging for CREST then the developer must be allowed to charge for the app
Khaim Khal
Perkone
Caldari State
#94 - 2013-01-03 18:20:23 UTC
Myfanwy Heimdal wrote:
Marcel Devereux wrote:
Just move to California. Section 12.4 can't be enforced there.


It can't be enforced in a lot of places; it will be classed as Restriction of Trade and that is heavily frowned upon.

I used to love such clauses in my past contracts; by having that in a contract it meant that I could have it terminated at any time on the grounds of it being a not-legal instrument. That's got me out of a few horrible contracts in the past.


Section 12.15 (Interpretation) has some language about severability. I'm guessing the contracts to which you are referring did not have such a clause?
Kelath Erebus
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#95 - 2013-01-06 18:43:54 UTC
I guess my views echo a few others...

First off, without a sizable traffic flow you're not going to be able to support your own private ad network in order to restrict certain types of ads. You're not going to be able to get that sizable traffic flow without a sizable income flow to cover the costs of your servers and support infrastructure. So either select a specific, widely used ad network that any site can easily utilize that will return a sizable profit to cover costs or the ad restrictions need to be removed.

Secondly. Some developers are interested in creating apps that can be run by individual players (EVE Mon, EVE Fitting Tool, etc.) or are based on a centralized website with a small traffic foot print, for these individuals this free license works great. They can build what they want and not worry about having to really cover any significant costs. However... Some developers are interested in creating large platforms which cost money to maintain (eve-kill.net, eve-commander.com, etc.), depending on their size these costs may cover not just servers, but additional support infrastructure, for these developers this free license is to restrictive. My only suggest would be to maintain the free license but also provide the original $99/year license so that developers can choose whether they want to have the ability to charge pilots (isk or real currency) for services or whether they're happy just l
Evanova Android
Traquenard Labs
#96 - 2013-01-10 02:16:17 UTC
CCP Zero Gravitas wrote:
Hooray! Looking forward to seeing what you all build with CREST!


How about commenting on all the suggestions and various comments on this forum?

Evanova - The Android App for Eve Online

CCP Seagull
C C P
C C P Alliance
#97 - 2013-01-10 18:06:07 UTC
Just a note to say that work is in progress to address many comments and issues from this thread - and also that DUST joining Tranquility today means CREST is now in full production - which is a big big technical step on the way to making it available to 3rd party developers. (CREST is how DUST clients communicates with Tranquility)

More soon!

/CCP Seagull

Senior Producer, EVE Online Development CCP Games Reykjavik

Sentient Blade
Crisis Atmosphere
Coalition of the Unfortunate
#98 - 2013-01-15 22:45:53 UTC
Seagull noted that source code will no longer be a requirement:

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2464800#post2464800
Magic Crisp
Amarrian Micro Devices
#99 - 2013-01-21 07:36:25 UTC
May I ask what kind of features can we expect in CREST in the future?

I'm concerned about a few things. Like if you allow market orders to be queried and bumped, then making marketing bots will become easier than ever, however it could still have a legal use case which is useful. There are similar areas which could have unwanted effect, when used improperly.

So, could we have some thoughts/plans shared on what features can we expect here?

Thanks
Artem Valiant
NecroRise Squadron
Galaxy Spiritus
#100 - 2013-01-22 06:38:51 UTC
Any news about beta test?