These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

PVE, Drones, The new AI and You

First post
Author
DeBingJos
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#341 - 2012-12-11 09:31:42 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:
DeBingJos wrote:
balblabla from me


I don't hate anyone, and I've got nothing against mission runners, or even miners. I dabble in both professions... I'm a bit of a dallier when it comes to this game. What I have a problem with, however, is people complaining about what they perceive to be a problem when the fact is everything is working as intended and people just don't like change.

I don't hate those people, either. But I laugh at their tears frequently.


Then tell me: is the risk vs reward for lv4's ok now? Why should a new player do them instead of mining? Give me some reasons..

I used to take some new players that needed isk into lv4's . That is not possible anymore.

What is the added value of the new system?

Ungi maðurinn þekkir reglurnar, en gamli maðurinn þekkir undantekningarnar. The young man knows the rules, but the old man knows the exceptions.

Morrigan LeSante
Perkone
Caldari State
#342 - 2012-12-11 09:46:33 UTC
DeBingJos wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
DeBingJos wrote:
balblabla from me


I don't hate anyone, and I've got nothing against mission runners, or even miners. I dabble in both professions... I'm a bit of a dallier when it comes to this game. What I have a problem with, however, is people complaining about what they perceive to be a problem when the fact is everything is working as intended and people just don't like change.

I don't hate those people, either. But I laugh at their tears frequently.


Then tell me: is the risk vs reward for lv4's ok now? Why should a new player do them instead of mining? Give me some reasons..

I used to take some new players that needed isk into lv4's . That is not possible anymore.

What is the added value of the new system?


Remember the full room DIE DIE DIE problem is a (confirmed) bug, not design.
DeBingJos
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#343 - 2012-12-11 09:50:58 UTC
Morrigan LeSante wrote:
DeBingJos wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
DeBingJos wrote:
balblabla from me


I don't hate anyone, and I've got nothing against mission runners, or even miners. I dabble in both professions... I'm a bit of a dallier when it comes to this game. What I have a problem with, however, is people complaining about what they perceive to be a problem when the fact is everything is working as intended and people just don't like change.

I don't hate those people, either. But I laugh at their tears frequently.


Then tell me: is the risk vs reward for lv4's ok now? Why should a new player do them instead of mining? Give me some reasons..

I used to take some new players that needed isk into lv4's . That is not possible anymore.

What is the added value of the new system?


Remember the full room DIE DIE DIE problem is a (confirmed) bug, not design.


I agree that solving this bug will solve most of the problems with lv4's. Lets hope it won't take months before the issue is addressed.

On a sidenote: I'm all for reducing the number of rats and make missions more pvp-like. (Keep the rewards the same)

Ungi maðurinn þekkir reglurnar, en gamli maðurinn þekkir undantekningarnar. The young man knows the rules, but the old man knows the exceptions.

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#344 - 2012-12-11 10:10:27 UTC
DeBingJos wrote:

Then tell me: is the risk vs reward for lv4's ok now? Why should a new player do them instead of mining? Give me some reasons..


Why should a player do anything in this game except for what they enjoy? If you're sole purpose is to make isk, then it shouldn't matter how you do it, if what you enjoy is making isk. However, if it's too much of a chore, then obviously you're not enjoying yourself, so you should find something else to do. Unsub if you have to and find another game, but a lot of people threatening to do so are failing to realise that they are in a minority and nobody really cares.

The isk/reward ration for level 4s is, imo, better balanced now, but still a little weighty on the reward side. You might not have noticed this, but the select few who are extraneously vocal about how "hard" level fours are now are also in a minority. For the majority, level 4 missions haven't changed. My old corp, as carebear as they are, do quite well running level 4s. I run them with a mate with a squad setup we find quite effective at encouraging the AI not to aggro the drones. In short, we've had no worries, and we're still making plenty of isk. But that's not why I run level 4s. I run them because I enjoy shooting stuff.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#345 - 2012-12-11 10:16:47 UTC  |  Edited by: Vaerah Vahrokha
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Additionally, this being a second feedback thread is a reason in itself to have it locked. Why do we need two? You said it yourself, there's a feedback thread in existence.


Apply for a GM position then, because someone who is appointeed for it (ISD) just confirmed that this thread is allright to exist.


Remiel Pollard wrote:


Lol. Yeah, nobody likes criticism, I get it. The difference between people who are willing to learn and those who aren't (like yourself) is that people who are willing to learn will consider criticism and check it for credibility before rejecting it outright.


1) I am willing to learn, I stated a simple scenario so you can show how it's done. No "BLAH BLAH look how I am though and good" but a simple, factual example.

2) Credibility is earned, not due. You'll get credibility once you put money where your mouth talks.
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#346 - 2012-12-11 10:26:21 UTC
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:


Credibility is earned, not due. You'll get credibility once you put money where your mouth talks.


And you expect me to take you as credible under the same conditions?

I've given you a heap of suggestions, and you've rejected them all outright. I'm pretty sure all you want is something to complain about. You're not interested in discussion whether it's credible or not, because my suggestions aren't the only ones you've outright rejected without even trying them out for yourself.

Don't talk to me about who's "credible" until you can prove your own credibility, as well. I have not once questioned your credibility, only you're willingness to learn. You keep claiming you are willing to learn? Prove it by trying out what's been suggested to you before outright rejecting the idea. I have a few other things we've tried and found very successful but been holding back for people who are actually willing to listen. You want me to share a fit? Why don't you at least pretend you're half interested in one first. Why don't you try one for yourself first, actually LOOK half competent instead of getting those that are competent to do it for you. No, you can't have my fits, and you can't have my better ideas until you actually come across as willing to try them. I won't waste my best material on ignorance.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#347 - 2012-12-11 10:40:36 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:


And you expect me to take you as credible under the same conditions?

I've given you a heap of suggestions, and you've rejected them all outright. I'm pretty sure all you want is something to complain about. You're not interested in discussion whether it's credible or not, because my suggestions aren't the only ones you've outright rejected without even trying them out for yourself.


Given *me* an heap of suggestions? I asked for *1* suggestion, that is how to implement YOUR suggestion of using SEBOs and EWAR (said in another post, for drones) in a 800mm Maelstrom.

I am all ears.
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#348 - 2012-12-11 10:44:43 UTC
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:


And you expect me to take you as credible under the same conditions?

I've given you a heap of suggestions, and you've rejected them all outright. I'm pretty sure all you want is something to complain about. You're not interested in discussion whether it's credible or not, because my suggestions aren't the only ones you've outright rejected without even trying them out for yourself.


Given *me* an heap of suggestions? I asked for *1* suggestion, that is how to implement YOUR suggestion of using SEBOs and EWAR (said in another post, for drones) in a 800mm Maelstrom.

I am all ears.


And yet you outright rejected a half dozen suggestions. To get to a half dozen, you first have to go through 1, and you rejected the first one, so you were given more.

Go figure it out yourself. I don't care about your little problems.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#349 - 2012-12-11 10:53:00 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:


And you expect me to take you as credible under the same conditions?

I've given you a heap of suggestions, and you've rejected them all outright. I'm pretty sure all you want is something to complain about. You're not interested in discussion whether it's credible or not, because my suggestions aren't the only ones you've outright rejected without even trying them out for yourself.


Given *me* an heap of suggestions? I asked for *1* suggestion, that is how to implement YOUR suggestion of using SEBOs and EWAR (said in another post, for drones) in a 800mm Maelstrom.

I am all ears.


And yet you outright rejected a half dozen suggestions. To get to a half dozen, you first have to go through 1, and you rejected the first one, so you were given more.

Go figure it out yourself. I don't care about your little problems.


Since I started asking for a precise, *one* thing 1 day ago, it's hard to believe you gave "half a dozen".

I take it, you have nothing of substance for a solo, 800mm AC Maelstrom pilot who wants to implement your own SEBO + EWAR suggestions.
Mara Rinn
Cosmic Goo Convertor
#350 - 2012-12-11 10:57:51 UTC
DeBingJos wrote:
Then tell me: is the risk vs reward for lv4's ok now? Why should a new player do them instead of mining? Give me some reasons..

I used to take some new players that needed isk into lv4's . That is not possible anymore.


I have been running missions with three pilots: Huginn, Oracle, Rattlesnake. The Oracle has about 960DPS, the Rattlesnake is at about 750DPS with T2 sentry drones, the Huginn is just painting and webbing. In this mix, the Rattlesnake gets the aggro. If the Rattler releases combat drones, they will get the aggro for a short while.

I wonder if there's a problem with the AI not prioritising sentry drones correctly?
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#351 - 2012-12-11 10:59:20 UTC
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:


And you expect me to take you as credible under the same conditions?

I've given you a heap of suggestions, and you've rejected them all outright. I'm pretty sure all you want is something to complain about. You're not interested in discussion whether it's credible or not, because my suggestions aren't the only ones you've outright rejected without even trying them out for yourself.


Given *me* an heap of suggestions? I asked for *1* suggestion, that is how to implement YOUR suggestion of using SEBOs and EWAR (said in another post, for drones) in a 800mm Maelstrom.

I am all ears.


And yet you outright rejected a half dozen suggestions. To get to a half dozen, you first have to go through 1, and you rejected the first one, so you were given more.

Go figure it out yourself. I don't care about your little problems.


Since I started asking for a precise, *one* thing 1 day ago, it's hard to believe you gave "half a dozen".

I take it, you have nothing of substance for a solo, 800mm AC Maelstrom pilot who wants to implement your own SEBO + EWAR suggestions.


I'm not the only one who offered you suggestions that you rejected, though, am I.

Why does it have to be a Maelstrom? Why bother, though? If you're not flexible enough to try a different ship then you're probably not flexible enough to even consider ideas other than you're own, and considering you haven't even tried to think of ONE yourself and found it necessary to ask (which I would have had no problem with had you not rejected it out of hand) I don't see why anyone should be helping you solve your problems when you won't even try to solve them yourself.

And as I've stated before, I'm giving you absolutely nothing more.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Mund Richard
#352 - 2012-12-11 11:07:37 UTC  |  Edited by: Mund Richard
ISD TYPE40 wrote:
I haven't deleted any posts in this thread, instead I would ask you all to remember that there are rules that should be followed when posting on these forums.

Forum Rules wrote:
...


I would ask you all to stay on topic and avoid personal attacks and troll posting. This is a good discussion thread and it would be beneficial to us all for it to stay within the rules - ISD Type40.

Fair enough, thank you.

Remiel Pollard wrote:
Why does it have to be a Maelstrom? Why bother, though?

It was a viable mission ship pre-patch, and in fact each race had at least one battleship, that with modest skills and barely any skills at V could do L4s.

While the fully fit ship costing less than 200 Mill, insurance paying out half of it at least.

I'd like it if that option would not be taken away.

The isk they make would be sub-par, a new player just told us the story of how he soloed blockade in two hours (I did it pre patch in 20mins?), so the reward wouldn't be off balance, but it's still an awesome feel to be able to clear such a hurdle in a T1 ship, which is pretty much only ideal for these as far as hisec goes.

Anyone not a new player is probably better off looking for isk elsewhere.

"We want PvE activities to require active participation and mirror PvP more closely." Stacking penalty for NPC EWAR then? Lock range under 9km from over 100 in a BS is not fun. Nor is two NPC web drones making me crawl 10m/s. PvP SW-900 x5: 75m/s.

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#353 - 2012-12-11 11:12:23 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:
I'm not the only one who offered you suggestions that you rejected, though, am I.


Citation needed.


Remiel Pollard wrote:

Why does it have to be a Maelstrom?


Because that's a widely used ship by new L4 pilots and it also happens to not rely a lot on drones, so it makes sense to use it.

I am quite interested into giving NEWBIES working solutions that are not about flaming them, telling them to "adapt or unsub" and the other irrelevant noise that characterized a number of your unasked replies.


Remiel Pollard wrote:

Why bother, though? If you're not flexible enough to try a different ship then you're probably not flexible enough to even consider ideas other than you're own, and considering you haven't even tried to think of ONE yourself and found it necessary to ask (which I would have had no problem with had you not rejected it out of hand) I don't see why anyone should be helping you solve your problems when you won't even try to solve them yourself.

And as I've stated before, I'm giving you absolutely nothing more.


I certainly don't need your "help", was just seeing if you were just about talking hot air or not.

I don't mission since 1+ years (and don't use a Mael any more) - don't even need to undock since that long. Have enough ISK to buy 2 titans if I wanted and I certainly did not need a GD though guy help about how to make wealth.

If you are not going to share a newbie maelstrom fit then you are wasting bandwidth.
Mund Richard
#354 - 2012-12-11 11:16:13 UTC  |  Edited by: Mund Richard
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
I'm not the only one who offered you suggestions that you rejected, though, am I.
Citation needed.
> Proteus

Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Why does it have to be a Maelstrom?
Because that's a widely used ship by new L4 pilots and it also happens to not rely a lot on drones, so it makes sense to use it.

I am quite interested into giving NEWBIES working solutions that are not about flaming them, telling them to "adapt or unsub"
Quite.

"We want PvE activities to require active participation and mirror PvP more closely." Stacking penalty for NPC EWAR then? Lock range under 9km from over 100 in a BS is not fun. Nor is two NPC web drones making me crawl 10m/s. PvP SW-900 x5: 75m/s.

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#355 - 2012-12-11 11:18:10 UTC  |  Edited by: Vaerah Vahrokha
Mund Richard wrote:
> Proteus


Someone replied me "Proteus" about what? As solution for a new L4 player with 1 account?
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#356 - 2012-12-11 11:20:09 UTC
There is no such thing as a "newbie fit" for level 4 missions.

Newbies start at level 1.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Mund Richard
#357 - 2012-12-11 11:22:30 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:
There is no such thing as a "newbie fit" for level 4 missions.

Newbies start at level 1.

Some consider 2-3+ million SP toons flying T2 (not guns) fit battleships as "newbie fit", which were prior to this patch able to do L4s.

This is what some of us don't want to see lost, even though it doesn't affect us (or L4s at all).

"We want PvE activities to require active participation and mirror PvP more closely." Stacking penalty for NPC EWAR then? Lock range under 9km from over 100 in a BS is not fun. Nor is two NPC web drones making me crawl 10m/s. PvP SW-900 x5: 75m/s.

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#358 - 2012-12-11 11:25:25 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:
There is no such thing as a "newbie fit" for level 4 missions.


Years of meta 4 fitted ravens / other ships beg to differ. The "Newbie" word has a context.
Hevymetal
POT Corp
#359 - 2012-12-11 11:27:43 UTC
18 Pages of posts, 12 threads on the first page of general with Dev responses. Still not a word here. How did this issue become such a "Typhoid Mary" that noone wants to respond to it? Was the ball dropped so bad thay are ashamed of the new AI release? Are they unsure of if/how they want to fix it now? Are they purposely nerf hammering the Newbs? We can only speculate since no official word has been given.

Still trying to formulate new strategy and tactics for soloing LVL 4s. Some are doable but there are a few mentioned here (WC) that seem near impossible to do solo, no matter what tactics/ships are used.
Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#360 - 2012-12-11 11:30:53 UTC
Hevymetal wrote:

Still trying to formulate new strategy and tactics for soloing LVL 4s. Some are doable but there are a few mentioned here (WC) that seem near impossible to do solo, no matter what tactics/ships are used.


The Gallente WC used to be partly bugged. You could get full stage aggro just for warping in the 2nd room and then the DPS was survivable only with deadspace mods and a relevant amount of SP. Now I would not suggest anyone doing it.